The aim of this study was to explore the match and technical indicators between winning and losing women's teams in the Olympics and World Championships (2016–2021) depending on the final score of the matches and to compare the winners’ technical indicators in 3-set matches to those of men in the respective competitions. A total of 281 volleyball matches were analyzed from the Women's Olympics (2016 and 2021) and World Championships (2014 and 2018). Discriminant function analysis determined which skill(s) contributed significantly to winning matches in every type of score. This study showed that the teams that won 3-0 and 3-1 matches had better performance in all scoring skills (serve, attack, block, and opponent errors) compared to their opponents, while the opponents’ errors did not affect the result. In 5-set matches, block points were the main predictor of a team's success. In conclusion, the results of the women's teams at the highest level of volleyball matches, show that different performance indicators determine the match outcome. The attack is not the only skill that increases the probability of winning a match, since block and serve to contribute equally significantly. Furthermore, in 5-set matches, blocking is the technical skill that differentiates the winning from the losing teams. Finally, in 3-set matches, it seems that the performance indicators differ between women and men in attack efficiency, block, and opponent error points.
CarlingCReillyTWilliamsAM. Performance assessment for field sports. New York, NY: Routledge, 2008, pp. 240.
3.
Data Project. Data volley (Release 3.8.6). 2017.
4.
MackenzieRCushionC. Performance analysis in football: a critical review and implications for future research. J Sport Sci2013; 31: 639–676.
5.
Fernandez-EcheverriaCMesquitaIMRGonzález-SilvaJ,et al.Match analysis within the coaching process: a critical tool to improve coach efficacy. Int J Perform Anal Sport2017; 17: 149–163.
6.
OliveiraAOGFValladaresNVazLMT,et al.Evaluation of scoring skills and non scoring skills in the Brazilian SuperLeague women’s volleyball. Montenegrin J Sport Sci Med2016; 5: 25–31.
7.
PalaoJMHernández-HernándezE. Match statistical system and criteria used by Spanish volleyball coaches. Int J Perform Anal Sport2017; 14: 564–573.
8.
DrikosSSotiropoulosKBarzoukaK,et al.The contribution of skills in the interpretation of a volleyball set result with minimum score difference across genders. Int J Sports Sci Coach2020; 15: 542–551.
9.
García-de-AlcarazAMarcelinoR. Influence of match quality on men’s volleyball performance at different competition levels. Int J Perform Anal Sport2017; 17: 394–405.
10.
LaportaLAfonsoJMesquitaIMR. Interaction network analysis of the six match complexes in high-level volleyball through the use of Eigenvector centrality. PLoS One2018; 13: e0203348.
11.
StutzigNZimmermannBBüschD,et al.Analysis of match variables to predict scoring and performance levels in elite men’s volleyball. Int J Perform Anal Sport2015; 15: 816–829.
12.
DrikosSBarzoukaKNikolaidouME,et al.Match variables that predict success and performance level in elite men’s volleyball. Int J Perform Anal Sport2021; 21: 767–779.
13.
PalaoJMSantosJAUreñaA. Effect of team level on skill performance in volleyball. Int J Perform Anal Sport2004; 4: 50–60.
14.
PřidalVPriklerováS. Analysis of relation between team placing in tournament and selected indicators of playing performance in top-level volleyball. J Phys Educ Sport2018; 18: 1501–1505.
15.
PenaJRodriguez-GuerraJBuscaB,et al.Which skill and factors better predict winning and losing in high-level men’s volleyball?J Strength Cond Res2013; 27: 2487–2493.
16.
KountourisPDrikosSAggelonidisI,et al.Evidence for differences in men’s and women’s volleyball matches based on skills effectiveness in four consecutive Olympic tournaments. Compr Psychol2015; 4: 1–7.
17.
ValladaresNGarcía-TormoJVJoãoPV. Analysis of variables affecting performance in senior female volleyball world championship 2014. Int J Perform Anal Sport2016; 16: 401–410.
18.
ZetouETsigilisNMoustakidisA,et al.Playing characteristics of men’s Olympic volleyball teams in complex II. Int J Perform Anal Sport2006; 6: 172–177.
19.
ZetouEMoustakidisATsigilisN,et al.Does effectiveness of skill in complex I predict win in men’s Olympic volleyball matches?J Quant Anal Sport2007; 3: 1–11.
20.
DrikosSSotiropoulosKPapadopoulouSD,et al.Multivariate analysis of the success factors in high-level male volleyball: a longitudinal study. Trends Sport Sci2019; 177: 177–185.
21.
PalaoJMManzanaresPValadésD. Way of scoring of Spanish first division volleyball teams in relation to winning/losing, home/away, final classification, and type of confrontation. J Hum Sport Exerc2015; 10: 36–46.
22.
GiatsisGDrikosSLolaA. Analysis of match report indicators in men’s Volleyball Olympics and World Championships (2014-2021) depending on the type of final score. Int J Sports Sci Coach2022(March).
23.
SotiropoulosKDrikosSBarzoukaK. Variations in attack patterns between female and male opposite players in top-level volleyball. Int J Sports Sci Coach2021; 17: 400–411.
24.
KountourisPDrikosSAggelonidisI,et al.Evidence for differences in men’s and women’s volleyball games based on skills effectiveness in four consecutive Olympic tournaments. Compr Psychol2015; 4: 1–7.
25.
BishopPCuretonKCollinsM. Sex difference in muscular strength in equally-trained men and women. Ergonomics1987; 30: 675–687.
26.
PalaoJMManzanaresPOrtegaE. Techniques used and efficacy of volleyball skills in relation to gender. Int J Perform Anal Sport2009; 9: 281–293.
27.
CostaGDCTCaetanoRCJFerreiraNN, et al.Determinants of attack tactics in youth male elite volleyball. Int J Perform Anal Sport2011; 11: 96–104.
28.
FuchsPMenzelHJGuidottiF,et al.Spike jump biomechanics in male versus female elite volleyball players. J Sports Sci2019; 37: 2411–2419.
29.
CostaGDCTAfonsoJBrantE, et al.Differences in game patterns between male and female youth volleyball. Kinesiology2012; 44: 60–66.
30.
JoãoPVLeiteNMesquitaIMR, et al.Sex differences in discriminative power of volleyball game-related statistics. Percept Mot Skills2010; 111: 893–900.
31.
LimaRFPalaoJMMoreiraM, et al.Variations of technical actions and efficacy of national teams’ volleyball attackers according to their sex and playing positions. Int J Perform Anal Sport2019; 19: 491–502.
32.
SeminatiEMarzariAVacondioO,et al.Shoulder 3D range of motion and humerus rotation in two volleyball spike techniques: injury prevention and performance. Sport Biomech2015; 14: 216–231.
33.
ForthommeBCroisierJ-LCiccaroneG, et al.Factors correlated with volleyball spike velocity. Am J Sports Med2005; 33: 1513–1519.
34.
ValadesDPalaoJM. Monitoring ball speed of the volleyball spike throughout the season for elite women’s volleyball players. J Sport Hum Perform2015; 3: 1–11.
35.
F.I.V.B. VIS (Volleyball information system), STAFF guidelines – evaluation criteria 2000. Lausanne: F.I.V.B., 2000.
36.
F.I.V.B. Official volleyball rules. Anaheim, CA: FIVB, 2012.
37.
HughesMBartlettRM. The use of performance indicators in performance analysis. J Sports Sci2002; 20: 739–754.
38.
TabachnickBGFidellLS. Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson, Allyn and Bacon, 2007, pp. 980.
39.
CohenJ. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hilsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
40.
PedhazurEJ. Multiple regression in behavioral research – explanation & prediction. 3rd ed. UK: Wadsworth: Tomson Learning, 1997.
41.
ComreyALLeeHB. A first course in factor analysis. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1992.
42.
DrikosSAngelonidisYSobonisG. The role of skills in winning in different types of set in women’s volleyball. Int J Perform Anal Sport2018; 18: 950–960.
43.
RochaACRPedrosaGFFreireAB, et al.Analysis of the setting and predictive factors of the effect of attack according to match ecology: the case of female volleyball. Kinesiology2020; 52: 217–223.
44.
BarzoukaKSotiropoulosKDrikosS,et al.Current trends of the serve skill in relation to the in-game roles of the elite volleyball players: comparison between genders. J Hun Sport Exerc2021; 16: 317–331.
45.
DrikosSBarzoukaKBalasasDG,et al.Effect of quality of opposition on match performance indicators in elite male volleyball. Int J Sports Sci Coach2022; 17: 169–177.
46.
DrikosSNtzoufrasIApostolidisN. Bayesian analysis of skills importance in world champions men’s volleyball across ages. Int J Comput Sci Sport2019; 18: 24–44.
47.
MarcelinoRMesquitaIMRAfonsoJ. The weight of terminal actions in volleyball. Contributions of the spike, serve and block for the teams’ rankings in the world league 2005. Int J Perform Anal Sport2008; 8: 1–7.
48.
YuYGarcía-de-AlcarazAJiX,et al.Effects of home advantage on set outcome and match actions performance in the Chinese Women’s Volleyball Association League. Int J Perform Anal Sport2021; 21: 1–11.
49.
StammRStammMToriloD, et al.Comparative analysis of the elements of attack and defence in men’s and women’s games in the Estonian volleyball highest league. Pap Anthropol2016; 25: 37.
50.
DurkovicTMarelicNResetarT. Influence of the position of players in rotation on differences between winning and loosing teams in volleyball. Int J Perform Anal Sport2008; 8: 8–15.
51.
LaportaLNikolaidisPThomasL,et al.The importance of loosely systematized game phasis in sports: the case of attack coverage systems in women’s volleyball. Montenegrin J Sport Sci Med2015; 1: 19–24.
52.
LimaRSilvaAClementeF. Temporal effects of final action on the performance of the Portuguese men’s volleyball teams. Biomed Hum Kinet2019; 11: 121–130.
53.
LaportaLAfonsoJValongoB,et al.Using social network analysis to assess play efficacy according to game patterns: a game-centred approach in high-level men’s volleyball. Int J Perform Anal Sport2019; 19: 866–877.
