The purpose of this study was to explore the match and technical indicators between winning and losing teams in the Olympics and World Championships (2016–2021) depending on the final score of the matches. A total of 273 volleyball match reports were analyzed from the Men's Olympics (2016 and 2021) and World Championships (2014–2018). Discriminant function analysis determined which skill(s) contributed significantly to winning in matches with various score types. This study showed that for 3- and 4-set matches attack was the best predictor for team's success, while block and serve had also meaningful contribution. In 5-set matches serve and block points were the main predictors of a team's success. The results on the importance of scoring skills highlight the necessity of sustained trainability of all match actions, not favoring one, such as attack, too much. The essential for this balance is confirmed by the fact that teams do not increase their probability of winning a match by success only in attack, but also in the other terminal actions such as serve and block.
CarlingCReillyTWilliamsAM. Performance assessment for field sports. New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 2008, pp.240.
2.
Fernandez-EcheverriaCMesquitaIMRGonzález-SilvaJ,et al.Match analysis within the coaching process: a critical tool to improve coach efficacy. Int J Perform Anal Sport2017; 17: 149–163.
3.
PalaoJMHernández-HernándezE. Match statistical system and criteria used by spanish volleyball coaches. Int J Perform Anal Sport2017; 14: 564–573.
4.
MackenzieRCushionC. Performance analysis in football: a critical review and implications for future research. J Sport Sci2013; 31: 639–676.
5.
OliveiraAOGFValladaresNVazLMT,et al.Evaluation of scoring skills and non scoring skills in the Brazilian SuperLeague Women's Volleyball. Montenegrin J Sport Sci Med2016; 5: 25–31.
6.
PenaJRodriguez-GuerraJBuscaB,et al.Which skill and factors better predict winning and losing in high-level men's Volleyball?J Strength Cond Res2013; 27: 487–493.
7.
KountourisPDrikosSAggelonidisI,et al.Evidence for differences in men’s and women’s volleyball matches based on skills effectiveness in four consecutive Olympic tournaments. Compr Psychol2015; 4: 1–7.
8.
DrikosSSotiropoulosKBarzoukaK,et al.The contribution of skills in the interpretation of a volleyball set result with minimum score difference across genders. Int J Sports Sci Coach2020; 15: 542–551.
9.
García-de-AlcarazAMarcelinoR. Influence of match quality on men’s volleyball performance at different competition levels. Int J Perform Anal Sport2017; 17: 394–405.
10.
LaportaLAfonsoJMesquitaIMRInteraction network analysis of the six match complexes in high-level volleyball through the use of eigenvector centrality. PLoS One2018; 13: e0203348.
11.
StutzigNZimmermannBBüschD,et al.Analysis of match variables to predict scoring and performance levels in elite men’s volleyball. Int J Perform Anal Sport2015; 15: 816–829.
12.
DrikosSBarzoukaKNikolaidouME,et al.Match variables that predict success and performance level in elite men’s volleyball. Int J Perform Anal Sport2021; 21: 767–779.
13.
PalaoJMSantosJAUreñaA. Effect of team level on skill performance in volleyball. Int J Perform Anal Sport2004; 4: 50–60.
14.
PřidalVPriklerováS. Analysis of relation between team placing in tournament and selected indicators of playing performance in top-level volleyball. J Phys Educ Sport2018; 18: 1501–1505.
15.
DrikosSSotiropoulosKPapadopoulouSD,et al.Multivariate analysis of the success factors in high-level male volleyball: a longitudinal study. Trends Sport Sci2019; 177: 177–185.
16.
PalaoJMManzanaresPValadésD. Way of scoring of spanish first division volleyball teams in relation to winning/losing, home/away, final classification, and type of confrontation. J Hum Sport Exerc2015; 10: 36–46.
17.
ValladaresNGarcía-TormoJVJoãoPV. Analysis of variables affecting performance in senior female volleyball world championship 2014. Int J Perform Anal Sport2016; 16: 401–410.
18.
ZetouETsigilisNMoustakidisA,et al.Playing characteristics of men’s Olympic volleyball teams in complex II. Int J Perform Anal Sport2006; 6: 172–177.
19.
ZetouEMoustakidisATsigilisN,et al.Does effectiveness of skill in Complex I predict Win in men’s Olympic volleyball matches?J Quant Anal Sport2007; 3: 1–11.
20.
F.I.V.B. VIS (Volleyball information system), STAFF guidelines- evaluation criteria 2000. Laussane: F.I.V.B., 2000.
21.
F.I.V.B. Official volleyball rules. Anaheim, CA, USA: FIVB, 2012.
22.
HughesMBartlettRM. The use of performance indicators in performance analysis.J Sports Sci 2002; 20: 739–754.
23.
TabachnickBGFidellLS. Using multivariate statistics.5th ed. Organization. Boston: Pearson, Allyn and Bacon, 2007. pp. 980
24.
PedhazurEJ. Multiple regression in behavioral research - explanation & prediction. 3rd ed. Wadsworth, UK: Tomson Learning, 1997.
25.
ComreyALLeeHB. A first course in factor analysis.2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1992.
26.
CohenJ. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hilsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
27.
RochaACRPedrosaGFFreireAB, et al.Analysis of the setting and predictive factors of the effect of attack according to match ecology: the case of female volleyball. Kinesiology2020; 52: 217–223.
28.
PeñaJCasalsM. Match-Related performance factors in four European men’s professional volleyball championships. J Hum Kinet2016; 53: 223–230.
29.
DrikosSTsoukosA. Data benchmarking through a longitudinal study in high-level men’s volleyball. Int J Perform Anal Sport2018; 18: 1–11.
30.
SotiropoulosKDrikosSPapadopoulouSD,et al.Characterizing adaptations of serve indicators in top-level male volleyball among seasons. Int J Sport Sci Coach2021; 16: 784–792.
31.
MarcelinoRMesquitaISampaioJ,et al.Estudo dos indicadores de rendimento em voleibol em função do resultado do set. Rev Bras Educ Física e Esporte2010; 24: 69–78.
32.
DrikosSBarzoukaKBalasasDG,et al.Effect of quality of opposition on match performance indicators in elite male volleyball. Int J Sports Sci Coach 2022; 17: 169–177.
33.
DrikosSNtzoufrasIApostolidisN. Bayesian analysis of skills importance in world champions men’s volleyball across ages. Int J Comput Sci Sport2019; 18: 24–44.
34.
MarcelinoRMesquitaIMRAfonsoJ. The weight of terminal actions in volleyball. Contributions of the spike, serve and block for the teams’ rankings in the World League 2005. Int J Perform Anal Sport2008; 8: 1–7.
35.
LimaRFPalaoJMMoreiraM,et al.Variations of technical actions and efficacy of national teams’ volleyball attackers according to their sex and playing positions. Int J Perform Anal Sport2019; 19: 491–502.
36.
YuYGarcía-de-AlcarazAJiX,et al.Effects of home advantage on set outcome and match actions performance in the Chinese women’s volleyball association league. Int J Perform Anal Sport2021; 21: 1–11.
