The aim of the study was to examine the evolution of players' perception of group variables (leadership, motivational climate, cohesion, and collective efficacy) and to determine whether the intercept and growth trajectory differed as a function of whether expectations have or have not been met in a sample of semi-professional Spanish football players. The results show that the levels of the variables (except for autocratic leadership and coach-created ego climate) decrease over the season. Furthermore, the mean scores of the “fully meets expectations” group were significantly higher in positive leader characteristics, coach-created task climate, cohesion and collective efficacy. Also, rates of decline were significantly greater in the “does not meet expectations” group. The results indicate the importance of establishing reachable expectations by coaches and players because to achieve or to miss the expected goals can affect psychological group dynamics.
EysMBrunerMWMartinLJ.The dynamic group environment in sport and exercise. Psychol Sport Exerc2019;
42: 40–47.
2.
CarronAVColmanMMWheelerJ, et al.
Cohesion and performance in sport: a meta analysis. J Sport Exerc Psychol2002;
24: 168–188.
3.
HeuzéJPSarrazinPMasieroM, et al.
The relationships of perceived motivational climate to cohesion and collective efficacy in elite female teams. J Appl Sport Psychol2006;
18: 201–218.
4.
LeoFMSánchez-MiguelPASánchez-OlivaD, et al.
Coach leadership and motivational climates as antecedents of cohesion and perceived roles in semi-professional football players. Rev Psicol Del Deport2013;
22: 361–370.
5.
MyersNDPaymentCAFeltzDL.Reciprocal relationships between collective efficacy and team performance in women’s ice hockey. Gr Dyn Theory, Res Pract2004;
8: 182–195.
6.
HeuzéJPBosselutGThomasJP.Should the coaches of elite female handball teams focus on collective efficacy or group cohesion?Sport Psychol2007;
21: 383–399.
7.
LeoFMSánchez-MiguelPASánchez-OlivaD, et al.
Evolution of perceived cohesion and efficacy over the season and their relation to success expectations in soccer teams. J Hum Kinet2012;
34: 129–138.
8.
BeauchampMR.Efficacy beliefs within relational and group contexts in sport. In: JowetteSLavalleeD (eds) Social psychology in sport.
Champaign:
Human Kinetics, 2007, pp.181–193.
9.
BanduraA.Self-efficacy: the exercise of control.
San Francisco, CA:
Freeman, 1997.
10.
Carron & Eys.Group dynamics in sport. 4th ed.Morgantown, WV:
Fitness Information Technology, 2012.
11.
FilhoETenenbaumGYangY.Cohesion, team mental models, and collective efficacy: towards an integrated framework of team dynamics in sport. J Sports Sci2015;
33: 641–653.
12.
LeoFMGonzález-PonceISánchez-MiguelPA, et al.
Role ambiguity, role conflict, team conflict, cohesion and collective efficacy in sport teams: a multilevel analysis. Psychol Sport Exerc2015;
20: 60–66.
13.
BairdNMartinLJBensonAJ.A dynamic view of coach transformational leadership: how leadership perceptions relate to task cohesion and team potency. Psychol Sport Exerc2020;
51: 101789.
14.
HeuzéJPRaimbaultNFontayneP.Relationships between cohesion, collective efficacy and performance in professional basketball teams: an examination of mediating effects. J Sports Sci2006;
24: 59–68.
15.
CarronAVBraySREysMA.Team cohesion and team success in sport. J Sports Sci2002;
20: 119–126.
16.
FransenKDecroosSVanbeselaereN, et al.
Is team confidence the key to success? The reciprocal relation between collective efficacy, team outcome confidence, and perceptions of team performance during soccer games. J Sports Sci2015;
33: 219–231.
17.
ArthurCABastardozN.Leadership in sport. In: TenenbaumGEklundRC (eds) Handbook of sport psychology.
Hoboken:
John Wiley & Sons, 2020, pp.344–371.
18.
ChelladuraiP.Leadership. In: SingerRNMurpheyMKeith TennantL (eds) Handbook of research on sport psychology.
New York, NY:
Macmillan, 1993, pp. 647–671.
19.
NichollsJG.The competitive ethos and democratic education.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press; 1989.
20.
DudaJLBalaguerI.The coach-created motivational climate. In: LavaleeDJowettS (eds) Social psychology of sport.
Champaing, IL:
Human Kinetics, 2007, pp. 117–130.
21.
NtoumanisNTaylorIMThøgersen-NtoumaniC.A longitudinal examination of coach and peer motivational climates in youth sport: implications for moral attitudes, well-being, and behavioral investment. Dev Psychol2012;
48: 213–223.
22.
CarronAVBrawleyLRWidmeyerWN.The measurement of cohesiveness in sport groups. In: DudaJL (ed.) Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement.
Morgantown, WV:
Fitness Inc., 1998, pp.213–226.
23.
ZaccaroSJBlairVPetersonC, et al. Collective efficacy, self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment.
New York, NY:
Springer, 1995.
24.
MacleanDSullivanP.A season long case study investigation of collective efficacy in male intercollegiate basketball. Athl Insight2003;
5: 1–9.
25.
CarronAVEysM.Group dynamics in sport. 4th ed.
Morgantown, WV:
Fitness information Technology, 2012.
26.
ReinbothMDudaJL.Perceived motivational climate, need satisfaction and indices of well-being in team sports: a longitudinal perspective. Psychol Sport Exerc2006;
7: 269–286.
27.
FeltzDShortSSullivanP.Self-efficacy in sport.
Champaign, IL:
Human Kinetics, 2008.
28.
JohnsonDDFowlerJH.The evolution of overconfidence. Nature2011;
477: 317–320.
29.
FransenKVanbeselaereNDe CuyperB, et al.
Perceived sources of team confidence in soccer and basketball. Med Sci Sports Exerc2015;
47: 1470–1484.
30.
EndersCKTofighiD.Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: a new look at an old issue. Psychol Methods2007;
12: 121–138.
31.
CrespoMBalaguerIAtienzaFL.Psychometric analysis of the Spanish version of the leadership scale in sport by Chelladurai and Saleh in the coaches’ version. Rev Psicol Soc Apl1994;
4: 5–28.
32.
BalaguerIGuivernauMDudaJL, et al.
Analysis of the construct and predictive validity of the perceived motivational climate in sport questionnaire with Spanish competitor tennis players. Rev Psicol Del Deport1997;
11: 41–58.
33.
LeoFMGonzález-PonceISánchez-OlivaD, et al.
Adaptation and validation in Spanish of the group environment questionnaire (GEQ) with professional football players. Psicothema2015;
27: 261–268.
34.
NashCMartindaleRCollinsD, et al.
Parameterising expertise in coaching: aast, present and future. J Sports Sci2012;
30: 985–994.
35.
LoewenthalKM.An introduction to psychological tests and scales. 2nd ed.Hove, UK:
Psychology Press, 2001.
36.
SingerJDWillettJB.Applied longitudinal data analysis: modeling change and event occurrence.
New York, NY:
Oxford University Press, 2003.
37.
LeoFMSánchez-MiguelPASánchez-OlivaD, et al.
Analysis of motivational climate as the background to collective efficacy in semi-professional football players. Rev Psicol Del Deport2012;
21: 159–162.
38.
McEwanDBeauchampMR.Teamwork training in sport: a pilot intervention study. J Appl Sport Psychol2020;
32: 220–236.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
