The purpose of this study was to explore the association between coach leadership and the coach-athlete relationship. Eighty-one elite athletes (M = 20.4 years; SD = 3.8; 58% female and 42% male) responded to questionnaires pertaining to their coaches’ leadership behaviours and the quality of their relationship. The overall model for predicting the quality of the coach-athlete relationship according to perceived coach leadership behaviours explained 61% of the variance. Three transformational leadership behaviours were positively associated with the quality of the coach-athlete relationship: individualized consideration, appropriate role-modelling, and fostering acceptance of group goals and teamwork. Based on a gender comparison, men perceived higher levels of leadership pertaining to role-modelling and intellectual stimulation, in addition to higher levels of quality for the coach-athlete relationship. This research emphasizes the importance of engaging in transformational leadership behaviours with regards to associations with perceptions of the coach-athlete relationship in elite sport contexts.
JowettSWyllemanP.Interpersonal relationships in sport and exercise settings: crossing the chasm. Psychol Sport Exerc2006;
7: 119–123.
2.
CôtéJGilbertW.An integrative definition of coaching effectiveness and expertise. Int J Sports Sci Coach2009;
4: 307–323.
3.
ArthurCABastardozNEklundR.Transformational leadership in sport: current status and future directions. Curr Opin Psychol2017;
16: 78–83.
4.
Turnnidge J and Côté J. The theoretical underpinnings of transformational coaching in sport. In R. Thelwell & M. Dicks (Eds.) Professional Advances in Sports Coaching-Research and Practice (pp. 22–44). Routledge; 2019.
5.
Chelladurai P. Leadership in Sport. In G. Tenenbaum & R.C. Eklund (Eds) Handbook of sport psychology (pp. 113–135). John Wiley and sons Inc; 2007.
6.
ArthurCAWoodmanTOngCW, et al.
The role of athlete narcissism in moderating the relationship between coaches' transformational leader behaviors and athlete motivation. J Sport Exerc Psychol2011;
33: 3–19.
7.
CallowNSmithMJHardyL, et al.
Measurement of transformational leadership and its relationship with team cohesion and performance level. J Appl Sport Psychol2009;
21: 395–412.
8.
SmithMJArthurCAHardyJ, et al.
Transformational leadership and task cohesion in sport: the mediating role of intrateam communication. Psychol Sport Exerc2013;
14: 249–257.
9.
BassBMRiggioRE.Transformational leadership. 2nd ed.
New York.
Psychology Press, 2006.
10.
BassBM.Does the transactional-transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries?Am Psychol1997;
52: 130–139.
11.
GomesARAlmeidaAResendeR.Athletes' perception of leadership according to their perceptions of goal achievement and sport results. Percept Mot Skills2020;
127: 415–431.
12.
ZhangSBeattieSPitkethlyA, et al.
Lead me to train better: transformational leadership's moderation of the negative relationship between athlete personality and training behaviors. Sport Psychol2019;
33: 119–128.
13.
StenlingATafvelinS.Transformational leadership and well-being in sports: the mediating role of need satisfaction. J Appl Sport Psychol2014;
26: 182–196.
14.
VellaSAOadesLGCroweTP.The relationship between coach leadership, the coach-athlete relationship, team success, and the positive developmental experiences of adolescent soccer players. Phys Educ Sport Pedagogy2013;
18: 549–561.
15.
KaoS-FTsaiC-YSchinkeR.Investigation of the interaction between coach transformational leadership and coaching competency change over time. Int J Sports Sci Coach2021;
16: 44–53.
16.
RowoldJ.Transformational and transactional leadership in martial arts. J Appl Sport Psychol2006;
18: 312–325.
17.
JowettSNtoumanisN.The coach-athlete relationship questionnaire (CART-Q): development and initial validation. Scand J Med Sci Sports2004;
14: 245–257.
18.
JowettSNezlekJ.Relationship interdependence and satisfaction with important outcomes in coach-athlete dyads. J Soc Personal Relationships2012;
29: 287–301.
19.
AdieJWJowettS.Meta-perceptions of the coach-athlete relationship, achievement goals, and intrinsic motivation among sport participants. J Appl Soc Psychol2010;
40: 2750–2773.
20.
JowettS.Moderators and mediators of the association between the quality of the coach-athlete relationship and athletes’ physical self concept. Int J Coach Sci2008;
2: 43–62.
21.
FeltonLJowettS.Attachment and well-being: the mediating effects of psychological needs satisfaction within the coach-athlete and parent-athlete relational contexts. Psychol Sport Exerc2013;
14: 57–65.
22.
DavisLApplebyRDavisP, et al.
The role of coach-athlete relationship quality in team sport athletes' psychophysiological exhaustion: implications for physical and cognitive performance. J Sports Sci2018;
36: 1985–1992.
23.
HampsonRJowettS.Effects of coach leadership and coach-athlete relationship on collective efficacy. Scand J Med Sci Sports2014;
24: 454–460.
24.
Isoard-GautheurSTrouilloudDGustafssonH, et al.
Associations between the perceived quality of the coach-athlete relationship and athlete burnout: an examination of the mediating role of achievement goals. Psychol Sport Exerc2016;
22: 210–217.
25.
JowettSShanmugamV.Relational coaching in sport: its psychological underpinnings and practical effectiveness. In: ShinkeRMcGannonKRSmithB (eds) Routledge international handbook of sport psychology.
Abingdon:
Routledge, 2016, pp.471–484.
26.
KorabikKAymanR.Gender and leadership in the corporate world: a multiperspective model. In: ChinJLLottBRiceJK, et al. (eds) Women and leadership: transforming visions and diverse voices.
Oxford:
Blackwell, 2007, pp.106–124.
27.
CroninLDArthurCAHardyJ, et al.
Transformational leadership and task cohesion in sport: the mediating role of inside sacrifice. J Sport Exerc Psychol2015;
37: 23–36.
28.
WellsJEPeacheyJWWalkerN.The relationship between transformational leadership, leader effectiveness, and turnover intentions: do subordinate gender differences exist?J Intercollegiate Sport2014;
7: 64–79.
29.
JowettSDon CarolisG.The coach–athlete relationship and perceived satisfaction in team sports. In: StelterR (ed.) XIth European congress of sport psychology proceedings.
Copenhagen, Denmark:
Det Samfundsvidenskabelige Fakultets, 2003, pp.83–84.
30.
López de Subijana C, Martin L, Tejón O and Côté J. Adolescent Athletes' Perceptions of Both Their Coachs' Leadership and Their Personal Motivation. Perceptual and Motor Skills 2021; 128: 813–830. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512520985760.
31.
Lopez-JimenezARubioVJSanchez-IglesiasI, et al.
Validating the TDRT-Q to assess the quality of the teacher-dancer relationship. Revista De Psicologia Del Deporte2017;
26: 71–79.
32.
YangSXJowettS.Psychometric properties of the coach-athlete relationship questionnaire (CART-Q) in seven countries. Psychol Sport Exerc2012;
13: 36–43.
33.
CohenJ.Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed.
Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, 1988.
34.
IBM Corp. IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 26.0.
Armonk, NY:
IBM Corp, 2019.
35.
OsborneJW.Best practices in data cleaning: a complete guide to everything you need to do before and after collecting your data.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage, 2013.
36.
HairJFBlackWCBabinBJ, et al. Multivariate data analysis: Pearson new international edition.
Essex:
Pearson Education Limited, 2014.
37.
RhindDJAJowettS.Development of the coach-athlete relationship maintenance questionnaire (CARM-Q). Int J Sports Sci Coach2012;
7: 121–137.
38.
JowettSChaundyV.An investigation into the impact of coach leadership and coach-athlete relationship on group cohesion. Group Dyn – Theory Res Pract2004;
8: 302–311.
39.
CôtéJAllanVTurnnidgeJ, et al. Youth talent development. In: HornTSmithA (eds) Advances in sport and exercise psychology. 4th ed.Champaign,
IL: Human Kinetics, 2019, pp.467–482.
40.
AdieJWDudaJLNtoumanisN.Autonomy support, basic need satisfaction and the optimal functioning of adult male and female sport participants: a test of basic needs theory. Motiv Emot2008;
32: 189–199.
41.
AdieJWDudaJLNtoumanisN.Perceived coach-autonomy support, basic need satisfaction and the well- and ill-being of elite youth soccer players: a longitudinal investigation. Psychol Sport Exerc2012;
13: 51–59.
42.
CarronAVEysME.Group dynamics in sport. 4th ed.
Morgantown, WV:
Fitness Information Technology, 2012.
43.
SmithSLSmollFL.Social-cognitive approach to coaching behaviors. In: JowettSLavalleeD (eds) Social psychology in sport.
Champaign, IL:
Human Kinetics, 2007, pp.75–90.
44.
JowettS.Coaching effectiveness: the coach–athlete relationship at its heart. Curr Opin Psychol2017;
16: 154–158.
45.
VellaSAOadesLGCroweTP.Validation of the differentiated transformational leadership inventory as a measure of coach leadership in youth soccer. Sport Psychol2012;
26: 207–223.
46.
TurnnidgeJCôtéJ.Observing coaches' leadership behaviours: the development of the coach leadership assessment system (CLAS). Measure Phys Educ Exerc Sci2019;
23: 214–226.
47.
LefebvreJSEvansMBTurnnidgeJ, et al.
Describing and classifying coach development programmes: a synthesis of empirical research and applied practice. Int J Sports Sci Coach2016;
11: 887–899.
