This paper presents a cognitive ethnography on the variability of interpersonal coordination in defense against direct screens during basketball games. We collected data through observation of ten games of Estudiantes U18 Team during the 2014/2015 season in Madrid. We filmed the game and showed clips of specific direct screens to players while conducting semi-structured interviews. We analyzed the video and the discourse qualitatively following grounded theory principles. We identified three categories expressing variability: failure, partial repair, and functional variation. Even though communication was quoted by the interviewed players as a key element in their decision-making, other contextual elements – related to framing and joint attention- affected the degree of variation and success. Based on these findings, the paper offers some recommendations for coaching the tactical behaviour of defense against direct screens.
MenautA.Contribution a une approche theorique des jeux sportifs collectifs: Theorisation et recherche d'un modèle opérationnel.
These pour le Doctorat,
Universite de Bordeaux, France, 1982.
2.
De JaegherHDi PaoloEGallagherS.Can social interaction constitute social cognition?Trends Cogn Sci2010;
14: 441–447.
3.
BourboussonJPoizatGSauryJ, et al.
Team coordination in basketball: description of the cognitive connections among teammates. J Appl Sport Psychol2010;
22: 150–166.
4.
RichardsonMJShockleyKFajenBR, et al. Ecological psychology: six principles for an embodied-embedded approach to behavior. In: Calvo P and Gomilla T (eds) Handbook of cognitive science: an embodied approach. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2008, pp.161–187.
5.
LeCouteurAFeoR.Real-time communication during play: analysis of team-mates’ talk and interaction. Psychol Sport Exerc2011;
12: 124–134.
6.
AraújoDBourboussonJ. Theoretical perspectives on interpersonal coordination for team behaviour. In: Passos P, Chow JY and Davids K (eds) Interpersonal coordination and performance in social systems. London: Routledge, 2016, pp.126–139.
7.
BourboussonJPoizatGSauryJ, et al.
Temporal aspects of team cognition: a case study on concerns sharing within basketball. J Appl Sport Psychol2012;
24: 224–241.
8.
AraújoDEstevesP. The irreducible variability of decisión making in basketball. In: Lorenzo A, Ibáñez SJ and Ortega E (Coords.) Aportaciones teóricas y prácticas Para el baloncesto del futuro. Madrid: Wanceulen, 2009, pp.171–181.
9.
BalaguéNTorrentsCHristovskiR, et al.
Overview of complex systems in sport. J Syst Sci Complex2013;
26: 4–13.
10.
SoláJ.Inteligencia táctica deportiva: entenderla y entrenarla.
Barcelona:
Inde, 2010.
11.
Cannon-BowersJABowersC.Applying work team results to sports teams: opportunities and cautions. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol2006;
4: 447–369.
EcclesDWTenenbaumG.Why an expert team is more than a team of experts: a social-cognitive conceptualization of team coordination and communication in sport. J Sport Exerc Psychol2004;
26: 542–560.
14.
GoodwinC.Multimodality in human interaction. Calidoscópio2010;
8: 85–98.
15.
HutchinsE. The distributed cognition perspective on human interaction. In: Levinson SC and Enfield NJ (eds) Roots of human sociality: culture, cognition and interaction. London: Routledge, 2006, pp.375–398.
16.
PremackD.Is language the key to human intelligence. Science2004;
303: 318–320.
17.
KendonA. The negotiation of context in face-to-face interaction. In. Duranti A and Goodwin C (eds.) Rethinking context: language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp.323–334.
18.
SchützA. Making music together – a study in social relationship. In: Schütz A (ed.) Collected papers II: studies in social theory. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1971, pp.159–178.
19.
GoffmanE.Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience.
Cambridge:
Harvard University Press, 1974.
20.
LibermanK.Objectivation practices. Soc Interact Video Based Stud Hum Sociality2018;
1. DOI: 10.7146/si.v1i2.110037
21.
SchützA.The phenomenology of the social world.
Chicago:
Northwestern University Press, 1967.
22.
GalleseVKeysersCRizzolattiG.A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends Cogn Sci2004;
8: 396–403.
23.
ClarkeE. Empirical methods in the study of performance. In E. Clarke (Ed.), Empirical musicology: Aims, methods, prospects. (pp. 77–102). Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004.
24.
Muntanyola-Saura D. Partnering in dance rehearsals. The place of listening and rhythm. Etnografia e ricerca qualitativa. 2015;8(3):429–52. Si2018;
1. DOI: 10.7146/si.v1i2.110039
25.
Goodwin C. Why multimodality? Why co-operative action? Social interaction. Si 2018;1. DOI: 10.7146/si.vli2.110039.
26.
AraújoDDavidsK.What exactly is acquired during skill acquisition?Journal of Consciousness Studies2011;
18: 7–23.
27.
Muntanyola, D. and Kirsh, D. “Marking as Physical Thinking: A cognitive ethnography of dance.” In: Proceedings of the IWCogSc-10 ILCLI International Workshop on Cognitive Science, pp. 339–355. 2010.
28.
Muntanyola-Saura D, Kirsh D. Marking as Physical Thinking: A cognitive ethnography of dance. In: IWCogSc-10 ILCLI International Workshop on Cognitive Science 2010 (pp. 339–355).
29.
GlaserBGStraussA.The discovery of ground theory.
Alpine,
New York, 1967.
30.
HoltNL.Doing grounded theory in sport and exercise. In: Brett Smith, and Andrew C. Sparkes (Eds.) Routledge handbook of qualitative research in sport and exercise. (pp. 24–36). London: Routeldge,
2016.
31.
AraújoDDavidsKWChowJY, et al. 2009. The development of decision making skill in sport: an ecological dynamics perspective. In D. Araújo and H. Ripoll (Eds) Perspectives on cognition and action in sport. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc., pp. 157–169.
32.
DavidsKWButtonCBennettSJ.Dynamics of skill acquisition: a constraints-led approach.
Il:
Human Kinetics, 2008.
33.
Hutto DD, Sánchez-García R. Choking RECtified: embodied expertise beyond Dreyfus. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. 2015 Jun 1;14(2):309–31.
34.
RocaJ.Psicología: una introducción teórica.
Girona:
Documenta Universitaria, 2006.
35.
FeleG.Sociology of action: some ethnomethodological remarks on football. In Paolo De Nardis, Antonio Mussino, Nicola Porro (eds.) Sport: Social problems, social movements. (pp. 224–231.
Roma:
SEAM, 1997.
