The magnitude of loading artistic gymnasts experience during training is currently unknown. Inertial measurement units (IMUs) could assess loading, although the reliability of these devices must be established prior to implementation into the training environment. This study aimed to determine inter-trial reliability of using IMeasureU Blue Thunder IMUs to assess upper and lower limb loading when performing foundation gymnastics skills. A secondary aim investigated the effect of raw and filtered acceleration signals on reliability results. Sixteen competitive level artistic gymnasts (male, n = 8; female, n = 8) performed seven gymnastics skills while wearing four IMUs (upper back, lower back, forearm and tibia). The peak resultant acceleration (PRA) during ground contact for all skills was exported from raw and filtered acceleration data (fourth-order zero-lag Butterworth filter with 85 Hz cut-off). Descriptive statistics (median and inter-quartile range), Friedman’s ANOVA, intra-class correlations, coefficient of variation, mean difference and Cohen’s effect sizes were calculated. Overall, the IMU PRA measures showed very good inter-trial reliability, however filtered signals improved reliability statistics for five variables compared to raw. The forearm- and tibia-mounted IMUs demonstrated improved reliability (very good reliability) compared to back positions (good reliability). IMUs are considered reliable devices to measure upper and lower limb loading in gymnastics.
DalyRBassSFinchC.Balancing the risk of injury to gymnasts: how effective are the counter measures?Br J Sports Med2001;
35: 8–20.
2.
BurtLANaughtonGAHighamDG, et al.
Training load in pre-pubertal female artistic gymnastics. Sci Gymn J2010;
2: 5–14.
3.
FaranaRJandackaDUchytilJ, et al.
The influence of hand positions on biomechanical injury risk factors at the wrist joint during the round-off skills in female gymnastics. J Sports Sci2017;
35: 124–129.
4.
FaranaRJandackaDUchytilJ, et al.
Technique selection ‘the coaches challenge’ influencing injury risk during the first contact hand of the round off skill in female gymnastics. J Hum Kinet2017;
56: 51–59.
5.
MarkolfKLShapiroMSMandelbaumBR, et al.
Wrist loading patterns during pommel horse exercises. J Biomech1990;
23: 1001–1011.
6.
PenitenteGSandsWA.Exploratory investigation of impact loads during the forward handspring vault. J Hum2015;
46: 59–68.
7.
McNitt-GrayJHesterDMathiyakomW, et al.
Mechanical demand and multijoint control during landing depend on orientation of the body segments relative to the reaction force. J Biomech2001;
34: 1471–1482.
8.
PanzerVWoodGBatesB, et al. Lower extremity loads in landings of elite gymnasts. In: ISBS-conference proceedings archive,
Amsterdam,
Netherlands, 1987.
9.
YoungWBHepnerJRobbinsDW.Movement demands in Australian Rules Football as indicators of muscle damage. J Strength Cond Res2012;
26: 492–496.
10.
WundersitzDWTNettoKJAisbettB, et al.
Validity of an upper-body-mounted accelerometer to measure peak vertical and resultant force during running and change-of-direction tasks. Sports Biomech2013;
12: 403–412.
11.
SimonsCBradshawEJ.Do accelerometers mounted on the back provide a good estimate of impact loads in jumping and landing tasks?Sports Biomech2016;
15: 76–88.
12.
NiggBMHerzogW.Biomechanics of the musclo-skeletal system. 2nd ed.
New York:
John Wiley, 1999.
13.
BeattyKTMcIntoshASFrechedeBO.Measurement of impact during gymnastics skills. Br J Sports Med2005;
39: 374.
14.
BeattyKTMcIntoshASFrechedeBO. Method for analysing the risk of overuse injury in gymnastics. In: ISBS-conference proceedings archive, Ouro Preto, Brazil, 2007.
15.
BradshawE. Pilot tests of inertial measurement units during artistic gymnastics training on pommel horse and vault. In: Research to practice. Melbourne, 2016.
16.
BradshawEJGrechKHumePA, et al. How safe are the code of points landing technical requirements in artistic gymnastics? Preliminary results. In: ISBS-conference proceedings archive, Tsukuba, Japan, 2016.
17.
BurtLANaughtonGALandeoR. Quantifying impacts during beam and floor training in preadolescent girls from two streams of artistic gymnastics. In: ISBS-conference proceedings archive, Ouro Preto, Brazil, 2007.
18.
AtkinsonGNevillAM.Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med1998;
26: 217–238.
19.
JosephCWBradshawEJKempJ, et al.
The interday reliability of ankle, knee, leg, and vertical musculoskeletal stiffness during hopping and overground running. J Appl Biomech2013;
29: 386–394.
20.
WundersitzDWGastinPBRichterC, et al.
Validity of a trunk-mounted accelerometer to assess peak accelerations during walking, jogging and running. Eur J Sport Sci2015;
15: 382–390.
21.
WinterDA.Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. 4th ed.New Jersey:
John Wiley, 1990.
22.
YuBGabrielDNobleL, et al.
Estimate of the optimum cut off frequency for the Butterworth low-pass digital filter. J Appl Biomech1999;
15: 318–329.
23.
SheerinKBesierTReidD, et al. The reliability and variability of three-dimensional tibial acceleration during running. In: ISBS-conference proceedings archive, Tsukuba, Japan, 2016.
24.
MoresiMO’MearaDGrahamK. Quantifying mechanical loading during training in track athletes. In: ISBS-conference proceedings archive, Taipei, Taiwan, 2013.
25.
ParringtonLPhillipsEWongA, et al. Validation of inertial measurement units tracking 100m sprint data. In: ISBS-conference proceedings archive, Tsukuba, Japan, 2016.
26.
CampbellRABradshawEJBallN, et al. Effects of digital filtering on peak acceleration and force measurements for artistic gymnastics. J Sports Sci2020; 38(16): 1859–1868.
27.
TiroshOSparrowW.Identifying heel contact and toe-off using forceplate thresholds with a range of digital-filter cutoff frequencies. J Appl Biomech2003;
19: 178–184.
28.
BeckGRRabinovitchPBrownAC.Acceleration forces at eye level experienced with rotation on the horizontal bar. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol1979;
46: 1119–1121.
29.
CampbellRAPeaseDCossensP. Quantifying landing impacts during a leg strength circuit in male artistic gymnasts: a pilot study. In: ISBS proceedings archive, Auckland, New Zealand, 2018.
30.
CampbellRABradshawEJBallN, et al. Do gymnasts experience symmetrical limb loading when performing foundation gymnastics skills? In: ISBS proceedings archive, Oxford, USA. 2019.
31.
RowlandsAStilesV.Accelerometer counts and raw acceleration output in relation to mechanical loading. J Biomech2012;
45: 448–454.
32.
BeattyKTMcIntoshASFrechedeBO. Method for the detection of fatigue during gymnastics training. In: ISBS-conference proceedings archive, Ouro Preto, Brazil. 2007.
33.
PeatJBartonB.Continuous data analyses: correlation and regression.
Massachusetts, USA:
Blackwell Publishing, 2005.
34.
HopkinsW.A new view of statistics: a scale of magnitudes for effect sizes.
Internet Society for Sport Science, 2006.
35.
HornerFERaysonMBilzonJL.Reliability and validity of the 3DNX accelerometer during mechanical and human treadmill exercise testing. Int J Obes2011;
35: S88–S97.
36.
SheerinKRBesierTFReidD, et al.
The one-week and six-month reliability and variability of three-dimensional tibial acceleration in runners. Sports Biomech2018;
17: 531–540.
37.
KellySJMurphyAJWatsfordML, et al.
Reliability and validity of sports accelerometers during static and dynamic testing. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2015;
10: 106–111.
38.
de ManMVanderploegEAimersN, et al.
Validity and inter-device reliability of dominant and non-dominant wrist worn activity trackers in suburban walking. Sensoria J Mind Brain Culture2016;
12: 40–46.
39.
MarinšekM.Basic landing characteristics and their application in artistic gymnastics. Sci Gymn J2010;
2: 59–67.
40.
UzunovV.Teaching a great Yurchenko layout vault. Gym Coach2011;
5: 12–21.
41.
CampbellRABradshawEJBallNB, et al.
Injury epidemiology and risk factors in competitive artistic gymnasts: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med2019;
53: 1056–1069.
