Understanding the factors that influence player retention within elite youth football can be used to enhance current practices. This study investigated an English Category 1 academy to determine if birth quartile, somatic maturity, anthropometric and physical performance characteristics are associated with player retention across the developmental pathway. Birth dates of 355 elite players from Under 11 (U11) to U21 groups were categorised into birth quartiles, and logistic regression (odds ratio) analysis was used to determine the differences in retention. Multilevel modelling compared somatic maturity, anthropometry, countermovement jump, sprint time (10 and 30 m), agility T-test and Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Level 1 or 2 performance between retained and dropout players. Logistic regression (odds ratio) analysis revealed no significant differences between birth quartiles for the likelihood of being retained across age groups. Multilevel modelling revealed that retained players were typically older, advanced in maturity and superior in body size and physical performances compared to dropouts, with small to medium effect sizes typically observed. This study indicates that within a highly selective cohort of young football players, somatic maturity, anthropometric and physical performance characteristics, but not birth quartile, distinguish individuals that are subsequently retained or dropout in an age group-dependent manner. Youth football organisations should seek to implement multidisciplinary and dynamic talent selection and retention strategies to prevent inappropriate discrimination and loss of talented young players.
Premier League.Elite player performance plan.
Gloucester Place, London, England:
Premier League, 2011.
2.
WilliamsAMReillyT.Talent identification and development in soccer.J Sports Sci2000;
18: 657–667.
3.
FigueiredoAJGonçalvesCECoelho e SilvaMJ, et al.
Characteristics of youth soccer players who drop out, persist or move up.J Sports Sci2009;
27: 883–891.
4.
HuijgenBCHElferink-GemserMTLemminkKAPM, et al.
Multidimensional performance characteristics in selected and deselected talented soccer players.Eur J Sport Sci2014;
14: 2–10.
5.
VaeyensRMalinaRMJanssensM, et al.
A multidisciplinary selection model for youth soccer: the Ghent Youth Soccer Project.Br J Sports Med2006;
40: 928–934.
6.
ToeringTElferink-GemserMTJordetG, et al.
Self-regulation of learning and performance level of elite youth soccer players. Int J Sport Psychol2012;
43: 312–325.
7.
ReillyTWilliamsAMNevillA, et al.
A multidisciplinary approach to talent identification in soccer.J Sports Sci2000;
18: 695–702.
8.
CoelhoESMJFigueiredoAJSimoesF, et al.
Discrimination of u-14 soccer players by level and position.Int J Sports Med2010;
31: 790–796.
9.
SarmentoHAngueraMTPereiraA, et al.
Talent identification and development in male football: a systematic review.Sports Med2018;
48: 907–931.
10.
MujikaIVaeyensRMatthysSPJ, et al.
The relative age effect in a professional football club setting.J Sports Sci2009;
27: 1153–1158.
11.
MuschJGrondinS.Unequal competition as an impediment to personal development: a review of the relative age effect in sport. Dev Rev2001;
21: 147–167.
12.
CarlingCLe GallFMalinaRM.Body size, skeletal maturity, and functional characteristics of elite academy soccer players on entry between 1992 and 2003.J Sports Sci2012;
30: 1683–1693.
13.
MalinaRMChamorroMSerratosaL, et al.
TW3 and Fels skeletal ages in elite youth soccer players.Ann Hum Biol2007;
34: 265–272.
14.
DeprezDCouttsAJFransenJ, et al.
Relative age, biological maturation and anaerobic characteristics in elite youth soccer players.Int J Sports Med2013;
34: 897–903.
15.
LovellRTowlsonCParkinG, et al.
Soccer player characteristics in English lower-league development programmes: the relationships between relative age, maturation, anthropometry and physical fitness.PLoS One2015;
10: e0137238.
16.
CobleySBakerJWattieN, et al.
Annual age-grouping and athlete development. Sports Med2009;
39: 235–256.
17.
FigueiredoAJCoelho e SilvaMJMalinaRM.Predictors of functional capacity and skill in youth soccer players.Scand J Med Sci Sports2011;
21: 446–454.
18.
DelormeNBoicheJRaspaudM.Relative age and dropout in French male soccer.J Sports Sci2010;
28: 717–722.
19.
MalinaRMPena ReyesMEEisenmannJC, et al.
Height, mass and skeletal maturity of elite Portuguese soccer players aged 11–16 years.J Sports Sci2000;
18: 685–693.
20.
SkorskiSSkorskiSFaudeO, et al.
The relative age effect in German elite youth soccer: implications for a successful career.Int J Sports Physiol Perform2016;
11: 370–376.
21.
OstojicSMCastagnaCCalleja-GonzalezJ, et al.
The biological age of 14-year-old boys and success in adult soccer: do early maturers predominate in the top-level game?Res Sports Med2014;
22: 398–407.
22.
GibbsBGJarvisJADufurMJ.The rise of the underdog? The relative age effect reversal among Canadian-born NHL hockey players: A reply to Nolan and Howell. Int Rev Sociol Sport2012;
47: 644–649.
23.
le GallFCarlingCWilliamsM, et al.
Anthropometric and fitness characteristics of international, professional and amateur male graduate soccer players from an elite youth academy.J Sci Med Sport2010;
13: 90–95.
24.
FranksAWilliamsAMReillyT, et al.
Talent identification in elite youth soccer players: physical and physiological characteristics. Communication to the 4th World Congress on Science and Football, Sydney. J Sports Sci1999;
17: 812.
25.
DeprezDNFransenJLenoirM, et al.
A retrospective study on anthropometrical, physical fitness, and motor coordination characteristics that influence dropout, contract status, and first-team playing time in high-level soccer players aged eight to eighteen years.J Strength Cond Res2015;
29: 1692–1704.
26.
StewartAMarfell-JonesMOldsT, et al. International standards for anthropometric assessment ISAK: The International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry.
Lower Hutt, New Zealand:
ISAK, 2011.
27.
SemenickD.Tests and measurements: the T-test. Strength Condition J1990;
12: 36–37.
28.
KrustrupPMohrMAmstrupT, et al.
The yo-yo intermittent recovery test: physiological response, reliability, and validity.Med Sci Sports Exerc2003;
35: 697–705.
29.
KrustrupPMohrMNyboL, et al.
The Yo-Yo IR2 test: physiological response, reliability, and application to elite soccer.Med Sci Sports Exerc2006;
38: 1666–1673.
30.
MirwaldRLBaxter-JonesADBaileyDA, et al.
An assessment of maturity from anthropometric measurements. Med Sci Sports Exerc2002;
34: 689–694.
31.
Goldstein H. Multilevel statistical models. 2nd ed. London, Edward Arnold; New York: Halstead Press, 1995.
32.
CharltonCRasbashJBrowneWJ, et al. MLwiN version 3.03.
Bristol:
Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol, 2019.
33.
CohenJ.Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.
Hillsdale, N.J.:
L. Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
34.
Sierra-DiazMJGonzalez-VilloraSPastor-VicedoJC, et al.
Soccer and relative age effect: a walk among elite players and young players. Sports (Basel, Switzerland)2017;
5: pii: E5.
35.
CastilloDPerez-GonzalezBRaya-GonzalezJ, et al.
Selection and promotion processes are not associated by the relative age effect in an elite Spanish soccer academy.PLoS One2019;
14: e0219945.
36.
LemezSBakerJHortonS, et al.
Examining the relationship between relative age, competition level, and dropout rates in male youth ice-hockey players.Scand J Med Sci Sports2014;
24: 935–942.
37.
FigueiredoAJCoelhoESMJCummingSP, et al.
Relative age effect: characteristics of youth soccer players by birth quarter and subsequent playing status.J Sports Sci2018;
37: 677–684.
38.
CraneJTempleV.A systematic review of dropout from organized sport among children and youth. Eur Phys Educ Rev2015;
21: 114–131.
39.
HelsenWFStarkesJLVan WinckelJ.The influence of relative age on success and dropout in male soccer players.Am J Hum Biol1998;
10: 791–798.
40.
HillMScottSMalinaRM, et al.
Relative age and maturation selection biases in academy football. J Sports Sci. Epub ahead of print 31 July 2019. DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1649524.
41.
Patel R, Nevill A, Cloak R, et al. Relative age, maturation, anthropometry and physical performance characteristics of players within an Elite Youth Football Academy. Int J Sports Sci Coach 2019; 14: 714–725.
42.
SimmonsCPaullGC.Season-of-birth bias in association football.J Sports Sci2001;
19: 677–686.
43.
Bidaurrazaga-LetonaILekueJAAmadoM, et al.
Progression in youth soccer: selection and identification in youth soccer players aged 13-15 years.J Strength Cond Res2019;
33: 2548–2558.
44.
WrigleyRDDrustBStrattonG, et al.
Long-term soccer-specific training enhances the rate of physical development of academy soccer players independent of maturation status.Int J Sports Med2014;
35: 1090–1094.
45.
Valente-dos-SantosJCoelho-e-SilvaMJSimoesF, et al.
Modeling developmental changes in functional capacities and soccer-specific skills in male players aged 11-17 years.Pediatr Exerc Sci2012;
24: 603–621.
46.
GrossmannBLamesM.Relative age effect (RAE) in football talents – the role of youth academies in transition to professional status in Germany. Int J Perform Anal Sport2013;
13: 120–134.
47.
McCarthyNCollinsD.Initial identification & selection bias versus the eventual confirmation of talent: evidence for the benefits of a rocky road?J Sports Sci2014;
32: 1604–1610.
48.
HiroseN.Relationships among birth-month distribution, skeletal age and anthropometric characteristics in adolescent elite soccer players.J Sports Sci2009;
27: 1159–1166.
49.
ZuberCZibungMConzelmannA.Holistic patterns as an instrument for predicting the performance of promising young soccer players – a 3-years longitudinal study. Front Psychol2016;
7: 1088.
50.
TriboletRWatsfordMLCouttsAJ, et al.
From entry to elite: the relative age effect in the Australian football talent pathway.J Sci Med Sport2019;
22: 741–745.
51.
GüllichA.Selection, de-selection and progression in German football talent promotion.Eur J Sport Sci2014;
14: 530–537.
52.
FlemingJFlemingS.Relative age effect amongst footballers in the English Premier League and English Football League, 2010–2011. Int J Perform Anal Sport2012;
12: 361–372.
53.
RadaAPaduloJJelaskaI, et al.
Relative age effect and second-tiers: no second chance for later-born players.PLoS One2018;
13: e0201795.
54.
SchroepfBLamesM.Career patterns in German football youth national teams – a longitudinal study. Int J Sports Sci Coach2018;
13: 405–414.
55.
TriboletRBennettKJMWatsfordML, et al.
A multidimensional approach to talent identification and selection in high-level youth Australian Football players.J Sports Sci2018;
36: 2537–2543.
56.
BuchheitMMendez-VillanuevaASimpsonBM, et al.
Match running performance and fitness in youth soccer.Int J Sports Med2010;
31: 818–825.
57.
GotoHMorrisJGNevillME.Motion analysis of U11 to U16 elite English Premier League Academy players.J Sports Sci2015;
33: 1248–1258.
58.
PhilippaertsRMVaeyensRJanssensM, et al.
The relationship between peak height velocity and physical performance in youth soccer players.J Sports Sci2006;
24: 221–230.
FurleyPMemmertD.Coaches’ implicit associations between size and giftedness: implications for the relative age effect. J Sports Sci2016;
34: 459–466.
61.
EmmondsSTillKJonesB, et al.
Anthropometric, speed and endurance characteristics of English academy soccer players: do they influence obtaining a professional contract at 18 years of age?Int J Sports Sci Coach2016;
11: 212–218.
62.
SawardCMorrisJGNevillME, et al.
Longitudinal development of match-running performance in elite male youth soccer players.Scand J Med Sci Sports2016;
26: 933–942.
63.
FaudeOKochTMeyerT.Straight sprinting is the most frequent action in goal situations in professional football.J Sports Sci2012;
30: 625–631.
64.
LarkinPO’ConnorD.Talent identification and recruitment in youth soccer: recruiter’s perceptions of the key attributes for player recruitment.PLoS One2017;
12: e0175716.
65.
HillBSotiriadouP.Coach decision-making and the relative age effect on talent selection in football. Eur Sport Manage Q2016;
16: 292–315.
66.
GonausCMullerE.Using physiological data to predict future career progression in 14- to 17-year-old Austrian soccer academy players.J Sports Sci2012;
30: 1673–1682.
67.
BuchheitMMendez-VillanuevaA.Reliability and stability of anthropometric and performance measures in highly-trained young soccer players: effect of age and maturation.J Sports Sci2013;
31: 1332–1343.
68.
FransenJBennettKJMWoodsCT, et al.
Modelling age-related changes in motor competence and physical fitness in high-level youth soccer players: implications for talent identification and development. Sci Med Football2017;
1: 203–208.
69.
TowlsonCCobleySParkinG, et al.
When does the influence of maturation on anthropometric and physical fitness characteristics increase and subside?Scand J Med Sci Sports2018;
28: 1946–1955.
70.
LloydRSOliverJLFaigenbaumAD, et al.
Chronological age vs. biological maturation: implications for exercise programming in youth.J Strength Cond Res2014;
28: 1454–1564.
71.
MillsKBakerDPaceyV, et al.
What is the most accurate and reliable methodological approach for predicting peak height velocity in adolescents? A systematic review.J Sci Med Sport2017;
20: 572–577.
72.
VandendriesscheJBVaeyensRVandorpeB, et al.
Biological maturation, morphology, fitness, and motor coordination as part of a selection strategy in the search for international youth soccer players (age 15–16 years).J Sports Sci2012;
30: 1695–1703.
73.
CummingSPLloydRSOliverJL, et al.
Bio-banding in sport: applications to competition, talent identification, and strength and conditioning of youth athletes. Strength Condition J2017;
39: 34–47.
74.
CummingSPBrownDJMitchellS, et al.
Premier League academy soccer players’ experiences of competing in a tournament bio-banded for biological maturation.J Sports Sci2018;
36: 757–765.
75.
CollinsDMacNamaraA.The rocky road to the top: why talent needs trauma.Sports Med2012;
42: 907–914.
76.
ForsmanHBlomqvistMDavidsK, et al.
Identifying technical, physiological, tactical and psychological characteristics that contribute to career progression in soccer. Int J Sports Sci Coach2016;
11: 505–513.
