Towards a process for advancing women in coaching through mentorship

Abstract

Female coaches continue to be underrepresented in the coaching domain despite remarkable strides made in female athlete participation. To develop, support, and advance female coaches, mentorship initiatives have been widely recommended. Positive outcomes have been reported in nonsport literature for the professional advancement of women through mentorship, but far less attention has been paid to the advancement of female coaches through mentorship in sport. This study used a multi-methods methodology to explore female coaches’ experiences in, and outcomes of, a female coach mentorship program. Survey data and individual in-depth semi-structured interviews with participating mentor (n = 7) and mentee coaches (n = 8) from the program were conducted. Survey data were analyzed descriptively and the interview data were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis. Findings revealed two primary forms of mentoring support provided through the mentorship program that facilitated personal and professional outcomes for participating mentor and mentee coaches, as well as various quality attributes of the mentorship process. Based upon these findings, a mentorship model for advancing women in coaching is proposed.

Keywords

Careers gender personal development psychosocial support

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kidd

Where are all the female coaches?

Can J Women Coach 2013; 13: 1–8.

Government of Canada. Actively engaged: a policy on sport for women and girls, http://canada.pch.gc.ca/eng/1414511367652/1414602693839 (2018, accessed 20 July 2018).

Norman

Donnelly

Kidd

Gender equity in canadian interuniversity sport: a biennial report (No. 3; 2014-15). University of Toronto Centre for Sport Policy Studies, Toronto, 2017.

Sport Canada. Female coach inventory. Toronto, 2016. Unpublished data.

LaVoi

NM.

Head coaches of women’s collegiate teams: a report on seven select NCAA Division-I conferences, 2017-18. The Tucker Center for Research on Girls & Women in Sport, Minneapolis, MN, February 2017.

Sport Australia. Australian Sports Commission identifies need for more female coaches, www.ausport.gov.au/news/asc_news/story_659364_australian_sports_commission_identifies_need_for_more_female_coaches (2017, accessed 7 August 2018).

Coaching Insights. Coaching statistics and analysis 2015/16, www.bucs.org.uk/core/core_picker/download.asp?id=28588 (2016, accessed 7 August 2018).

Kram

KE.

Mentoring at work: developmental relationships in organizational life. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company, 1985.

Law

Bottenberg

Brozick

, et al. A checklist for the development of faculty mentorship programs. Am J Pharmaceut Ed 2014; 78: 1–10.

10.

Kjeldsen

A proficient mentor is a must when starting up with research.

Exp Clin Cardiol 2006; 11: 243–245.

11.

Hewlett

Peraino

Sherbin

, et al. The sponsor effect: breaking through the last glass ceiling. Harvard Business Review, Center for Work-Life Policy, December 2010.

12.

Kay

Wallace

JE.

Is more truly merrier? Mentoring and the practice of law.

Can Rev Sociol 2010; 47: 1–26.

13.

Soklaridis

Lopez

Charach

, et al. Developing a mentorship program for psychiatry residents. Acad Psych 2014; 39: 10–15.

14.

Pai

Vaidya

Glass ceiling: role of women in the corporate world.

Int Business J 2009; 19: 106–113.

15.

Marshall

Demers

Sharp

DM.

Developing the next generation of female coaches. In: Robertson

(ed.) Taking the lead: strategies and solutions from female coaches. Edmonton, Alberta: University of Alberta Press, 2010, pp. 181–201.

16.

Alliance of Women Coaches. Mentor Program, http://gocoaches.org/programs-events/mentor-program/ (2018, accessed 14 July 2018).

17.

Canadian Collegiate Athletic Association (CCAA). CCAA Female Apprentice Coach Program Pacific Western Athletic Association, www.pacwestbc.ca/sports/wsoc/2017-18/releases/20171207-FemaleApprenticeCoachProgram (2017, accessed 10 May 2018).

18.

Coaching Association of Canada. Women in coaching, www.coach.ca/-p157336 (2018, accessed 5 March 2018).

19.

Zachary

LJ.

The mentee’s guide: making mentoring work for you. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2009.

20.

Zachary

LJ.

The mentor’s guide: facilitating effective learning relationships. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, 2012.

21.

Kram

KE.

Phases of the mentoring relationship.

Acad Manage J 1983; 26: 608–625.

22.

University of Toronto. Mentorship and peer programs, www.studentlife.utoronto.ca/mpp/four-phases (2019, accessed 23 July 2019).

23.

Morse

JM.

Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design. In: Tashakkori

Teddlie

(eds) Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2003, pp. 189–208.

24.

Sparkes

Smith

Qualitative research methods in sport, exercise, and health. New York: Routledge, 2014.

25.

Braun

Clarke

Using thematic analysis in psychology.

Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3: 77–101.

26.

Bower

Hums

MA.

Mentoring young women for success in international Physical Education.

ICHPER-SD J Res 2008; 3: 70–75.

27.

Brown

TM.

Mentorship and the female college president.

Sex Roles 2005; 52: 659–666.

28.

Higgins

MC.

The more, the merrier. Multiple developmental relationships and work satisfaction.

J Manage Dev 2000; 19: 277–296.

29.

Ramaswami

Dreher

GF.

The benefits associated with workplace mentoring relationships. In: Allen

Eby

(eds) Blackwell handbook of mentoring: a multiple perspectives approach. London: Blackwell, 2007, pp. 211–231.

30.

Ibarra

Carter

Silva

Why men still get more promotions than women: you high-potential females need more than just well-meaning mentors. Harvard Business Review, September 2010.

31.

O’Rourke

Are you mentee material? http://articles.bplans.com/are-you-mentee-material/ (n.d., accessed 5 March 2018).

32.

Eswara

Questions to ask before choosing a mentor, www.insidehighered.com/advice/2017/03/13/questions-ask-when-selecting-mentor-and-trying-nurture-mentoring-relationship (2017, accessed 4 March 2018).

33.

Kayes

Kolb

DA.

Experiential learning in teams.

Simul Gaming 2005; 36: 330–354.

34.

Liang

Tracy

Taylor

, et al. Mentoring college-age women: a relational approach. Am J Commun Psychol 2002; 30: 271–288.

35.

Scandura

TA.

Dysfunctional mentoring relationships and outcomes.

J Manage 1998; 24: 449–467.

36.

Ash

Clayton

PH.

Generating, deepening, and documenting learning: the power of critical reflection in applied learning.

J Appl Learn Higher Educ 2009; 1: 25–48.

37.

Rogers

Reflection in higher education: a concept analysis.

Innov Higher Educ 2001; 26: 37–57.

38.

Ploeg

de Witt

Hutchison

, et al. Evaluation of a research mentorship program in community care. J Eval Program Plan 2008; 31: 22–33.

39.

Foust-Cummings

Dinolfo

Kohler

Sponsoring women to success. Catalyst, New York, August 2011.

40.

Brun

Dugas

An analysis of employee recognition: perspectives on human resources practices.

Int Human Resource Manage 2008; 19: 716–730.

41.

Angelo

TA.

Ten easy pieces: assessing higher learning in four dimensions.

New Direct Teach Learn 1991; 46: 17–31.

42.

Kilty

Women in coaching.

Sport Psychol 2006; 20: 222–234.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.08 MB