Coaches and scientists share a preoccupation with understanding athletic performance. The aim of this study was to investigate coaches’ practical knowledge about forward ice hockey skating with reference to the biomechanical research findings in order to improve understanding of the skating task and encourage the design of more representative research. For this purpose, 10 expert ice hockey coaches were interviewed. Semistructured interviews were transcribed and meanings units were selected and grouped to build the main categories after verbatim analysis. The qualitative analysis revealed that the coaches detailed forward skating based on three categories: posture, lower limb kinematics, and arm movements. They used performance indicators to specify their practical knowledge. These indicators were generally consistent with recent biomechanical research and when the coaches held different opinions, they expressed intuitive ideas that often suggested new research perspectives. This study illustrates how the interaction of scientists and coaches, via their respective knowledge, can supply new research perspectives.
CôtéJSalmelaJTrudelPet al.The coaching model: a grounded assessment of expert gymnastic coaches’ knowledge. J Sport Exerc Psychol1995; 17: 1–17.
2.
GilbertWDTrudelP. Analysis of coaching science research published from 1970–2001. Res Q Exerc Sport2004; 75: 388–399.
3.
SauryJDurandM. Practical knowledge in expert coaches: on-site study of coaching in sailing. Res Q Exerc Sport1998; 69: 254–266.
4.
OliverEJHardyJMarklandD. Identifying important practice behaviors for the development of high-level youth athletes: exploring the perspectives of elite coaches. Psychol Sport Exerc2010; 11: 433–443.
5.
RollandCCizeronM. Comprendre et intervenir: les connaissances des entraîneurs experts en gymnastique [Understand and act: gymnastics coaches’ expert knowledge]. Activités2011; 8: 53–76.
6.
ShermanCASparrowWAJolleyDet al.Coaches’ perceptions of golf swing kinematics. Int J Sport Psychol2001; 32: 257–270.
7.
GreenwoodDDavidsKRenshawI. Experiential knowledge of expert coaches can help identify informational constraints on performance of dynamic interceptive actions. J Sports Sci2013; 32: 328–35.
8.
ThompsonABezodisINJonesRL. An in-depth assessment of expert sprint coaches’ technical knowledge. J Sports Sci2009; 27: 855–61.
9.
AraújoDDavidsKPassosP. Ecological validity, representative design, and correspondence between experimental task constraints and behavioral setting: comment on Rogers, Kadar, and Costall (2005). Ecol Psychol2007; 19: 69–78.
10.
BrackoMR. Biomechanics powers ice hockey performance. BioMechanics2004; 11: 1–7.
11.
PearsallDJTurcotteRAMurphySDBiomechanics of ice hockey. In: GarretWEKirkendallDT (ed). Exercise and sport science, Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000, pp. 675–692.
12.
MontgomeryDNobesKPearsallDet al.Task analysis (hitting, shooting, passing, and skating) of professional hockey players. In: PearsallDAshareA (eds). Safety in ice hockey: fourth volume, ASTM STP 1446, West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2004, pp. 288–296.
13.
CôtéJ. The influence of the family in the development of talent in sport. Sport Psychol1999; 13: 395–417.
14.
SmithMCushionCJ. An investigation of the in-game behaviours of professional, top-level youth soccer coaches. J Sports Sci2006; 24: 355–366.
TeschR. Qualitative research analysis types and software tools, New York: Farmer Press, 1990.
17.
CorbinJStraussA. Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual Sociol1990; 13: 3–21.
18.
PhillipsEDavidsKRenshawIet al.Expert performance in sport and the dynamics of talent development. Sport Med2010; 40: 271–283.
19.
HoltNTamminenK. Improving grounded theory research in sport and exercise psychology: further reflections as a response to Mike Weed. Psychol Sport Exerc2010; 11: 405–413.
20.
WeedM. Research quality considerations for grounded theory research in sport & exercise psychology. Psychol Sport Exerc2009; 10: 502–510.
21.
GreenwoodDDavidsKRenshawI. How elite coaches’ experiential knowledge might enhance empirical research on sport Performance. Int J Sport Sci Coach2012; 7: 427–429.
22.
FalzonPLes activités verbales dans le travail [verbal activitie at work]. In: AmalbertiRDe MontmollinMTheureauJ (eds). Modèles en analyse du travail, Bruxelles : Mardaga, 1991, pp. 229–252.
23.
UpjohnTTurcotteRAPearsallDJet al.Three-dimensional kinematics of the lower limbs during forward ice hockey skating. Sport Biomech2008; 7: 206–221.
24.
MarinoGW. Selected mechanical factors associated with acceleration in ice skating. Res Q Exerc Sport1983; 54: 234–238.
25.
PearsallDJTurcotteRALevangieMCet al.Biomechanical adaptation in ice hockey skating. In: HongY (ed). Routledge handbook of ergonomics in sport and exercise, London and New York: Routledge, 2014, pp. 37–45.
26.
McPhersonMNWrigleyAMontelpareWJThe biomechanical characteristics of development-age hockey players: determining the effects of body size on the assessment of skating technique. In: PearsallDAshareA (eds). Safety in ice hockey: fourth volume, ASTM STP 1446, West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2004, pp. 272–287.
27.
LafontaineD. Three-dimensional kinematics of the knee and ankle joints for three consecutive push-offs during ice hockey skating starts. Sports Biomech2007; 6: 391–406.
28.
PearsallDJTurcotteRALefebvreRet al.Kinematics of the foot and ankle in forward ice hockey skating. In: BlackwellJRSandersRH (eds). Nineteenth international symposium on biomechanics in sports, San Francisco, CA: ISBS, 2001, pp. 78–81.
29.
BartlettR. Introduction to sports Biomechanics: analysing human movement patterns, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2007.
