A range of cognitive skills that support the development of sport potential have been suggested to be important for athletes and coaches. This study explored performers’ psychological characteristics within orienteers. The psychological skills of World Elite orienteers and athletes in the National Junior Squads of both Great Britain and Switzerland were assessed using the six-factor Psychological Characteristics of Excellence Questionnaire. Data suggested that, as juniors, elite orienteers reported less support for long-term success than the Swiss juniors, perhaps because of the earlier adoption of self-coaching, but were not significantly different from either junior group on all other factors. British juniors were not significantly different from the other two groups on any factor. Follow-up qualitative approaches explored possible reasons for the World Elites’ early reliance on “self” rather than “other”, the role of the coach and the self-coaching phenomenon. The role of orienteering in developing these skills is also discussed along with unique psychological challenges faced by high performing orienteers.
Durand–BushNSalmelaJH. The development and maintenance of expert athletic performance: Perceptions of world and Olympic champions. J Appl Sport Psychol2002; 14: 154–171.
2.
OrlickTPartingtonJ. Mental links to excellence. Sport Psychol1988; 2: 105–130.
3.
MacNamaraÁButtonACollinsD. The role of psychological characteristics in facilitating the pathway to elite performance part 1: Identifying mental skills and behaviours. Sport Psychol2010; 24: 52–73.
4.
BloomBS. Developing talent in young people, New York: Ballantine Books, 1985.
5.
CôtéJ. The influence of the family in the development of talent in sport. Sport Psychol1999; 13: 395–417.
6.
FeldmanDHGoldsmithL. Nature’s gambit: Child prodigies and the development of human potential, New York: Teachers College Press, 1986.
7.
FreemanJFamilies, the essential context for gifts and talents. In: HellerKAMonksFJSternbergRSubotnikR (eds). International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent, Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press, 2000, pp. 573–585.
8.
KayT. Sporting excellence: A family affair?Eur Phys Educ Rev2000; 6: 151–169.
9.
CeciSJBarnettSMKanayaTDeveloping childhood proclivities into adult competencies: The overlooked multiplier effect. In: SternbergRJGrigorenkoEL (eds). The psychology of abilities, competencies and expertise, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 126–158.
10.
MacNamaraÁButtonACollinsD. The role of psychological characteristics in facilitating the pathway to elite performance. Part 2: Examining environmental and stage related differences in skills and behaviours. Sport Psychol2010; 24: 74–96.
11.
MacNamaraÁHolmesPCollinsD. Negotiating transitions in musical development: The role of psychological characteristics of developing excellence. Psychol Music2008; 36: 335–352.
12.
MacNamaraÁPsychological characteristics of developing excellence. In: CollinsDRichardsHButtonA (eds). Performance psychology, Kidlington, UK: Elsevier, 2011, pp. 47–64.
13.
SarkarMDF. Psychological resilience in sport performers: A review of stressors and protective factors. J Sports Sci2014; 32: 1419–1434.
14.
SimontonDK. Talent development as a multidimensional, multiplicative, and dynamic process. Curr Direct Psychol Sci2001; 10: 39–43.
15.
PattonMQ. Qualitative evaluation methods, New York: SAGE, 1990.
MacNamaraÁCollinsD. Development and initial validation of the Psychological Characteristics of Developing Excellence Questionnaire. J Sports Sci2011; 29: 1273–1286.
18.
ChangL. A psychometric evaluation of 4-point and 6-point Likert-type scales in relation to reliability and validity. Appl Psychol Meas1994; 18: 205–216.
19.
MacNamaraÁCollinsD. Do mental skills make champions? Examining the discriminant function of the Psychological Characteristics of Developing Excellence Questionnaire. J Sports Sci2013; 31: 736–744.
20.
PankhurstACollinsDMacNamaraÁ. Talent development: Linking the stakeholders to the process. J Sports Sci2013; 31: 370–380.
21.
CollierJL. Louis Armstrong: An American genius, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1983.
22.
EricssonKASmithJ. Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
23.
EcclesDWArsalG. How do they make it look so easy? The expert orienteer’s cognitive advantage. J Sports Sci2015; 33: 609–615.
24.
SeilerR. Cognitive processes in orienteering: A review. Scient J Orient1996; 122: 50–65.
25.
EcclesDWWalshSEIngledewDK. A grounded theory of expert cognition in orienteering. J Sport Exerc Psychol2002; 24: 68–88.
26.
EcclesDWWalshSEIngledewDK. The use of heuristics during route planning by expert and novice orienteers. J Sports Sci2002; 20: 327–337.
27.
EcclesDW. Thinking outside the box: The role of environmental adaptation in the acquisition of skilled and expert performance. J Sports Sci2006; 24: 1103–1114.
28.
MacquetACEcclesDWBarrauxE. What makes an orienteer an expert? A case study of a highly elite orienteer’s concerns in the course of competition. J Sports Sci2012; 30: 91–99.
29.
HaninYLEmotions in sport: Current issues and perspectives. In: TenenbaumGEklundRC (eds). Handbook of sport psychology, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2007, pp. 31–58.
30.
SquiresA. Methodological challenges in cross-language qualitative research: A research review. Int J Nurs Stud2009; 46: 277–287.
31.
CôtéJEricssonKALawMP. Tracing the development of athletes using retrospective interview methods: A proposed interview and validation procedure for reported information. J Appl Sport Psychol2005; 17: 1–19.
