BarbaletJPragmatism and symbolic interactionism. In: TurnerB (ed). The new Blackwell companion to social theory, Chichester, UK: Blackwell Publishing, 2009, pp. 199–217.
DelantyGThe foundations of social theory. In: TurnerB (ed). The new Blackwell companion to social theory, Chichester, UK: Blackwell Publishing, 2009, pp. 19–37.
4.
JoasH. Pragmatism and social theory, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.
5.
GorardSTaylorC. Combining methods in educational and social research, Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press, 2004.
6.
GreenJC. Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology?J Mixed Meth Res2008; 7: 7–22.
JohnsonRBOnwuegbuzieAJ. Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Edu Res2004; 33: 14–26.
9.
MorganDL. Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. J Mixed Meth Res2007; 1: 48–76.
BiestaGPragmatism and the philosophical foundations of mixed methods research. In: TashakkoriATeddlieC (eds). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioural research, London: Sage, 2010, pp. 95–118.
12.
Vries GH de (1990). De ontwikkeling van wetenschap. Cited in Biesta G (2010). Pragmatism and the philosophical foundations of mixed methods research. In: Tashakkori A and Teddlie C (eds) Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioural research. London: Sage, 2010, pp.95–118.
13.
AvnerZJones L and Denison J. Poststructuralism. In: NelsonLGroomRPotracP (eds). Research methods in sports coaching, London: Routledge, 2014, pp. 42–51.
14.
Nelson L, Groom R and Potrac P (eds) Research methods in sports coaching. London: Routledge, 2014.
15.
PotracPJonesRNelsonLInterpretivism. In: NelsonLGroomRPotracP (eds). Research methods in sports coaching, London: Routledge, 2014, pp. 31–41.
16.
SmithRESmollFLLogical positivism. In: NelsonLGroomRPotracP (eds). Research methods in sports coaching, London: Routledge, 2014, pp. 18–30.
17.
MallettCTinningRPhilosophy of knowledge. In: NelsonLGroomRPotracP (eds). Research methods in sports coaching, London: Routledge, 2014, pp. 9–17.
18.
DenzinNK. Moments, mixed methods, and paradigm dialogs. Qual Inq2010; 16: 419–427.
19.
LincolnY. ‘What a long strange trip it’s been …’: twenty-five years of qualitative and new paradigm research. Qual Inq2010; 16: 3–9.
20.
SparkesAC. Developing mixed methods research in sport and exercise psychology: critical reflections on five points of controversy. Psychol Sport Exer2015; 16: 49–59.
21.
SmithBSparkesACPhoenixC. Qualitative research in physical therapy: a critical discussion on mixed-methods research. Phys Ther Rev2012; 17: 374–381.