Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2016-12
Testing the moderating effect of the perceived importance of the coach on the relationship between perceived coaching feedback and athletes’ perceptions of competence
The purpose of this study was to explore whether the importance athletes place on behaviors of their coach moderates the relationship between athletes’ perceptions of their coach’s feedback and their own perceptions of competence. Adult female softball players participating in a competitive league completed questionnaires assessing (a) their perceptions of competence, (b) their perceptions of feedback they typically receive from their coach, and (c) the importance they place on what their coach says and does. Overall, results of various regression analyses provided general support for the hypothesis that a stronger effect of coach feedback on athletes’ perceptions of competence would emerge for those athletes placing greater importance on their coach. This effect was primarily a function of variations in the interpretation of positive and informational feedback. Results are discussed relative to theory and research on coaching behavior and self-perceptions.
AmoroseAJCoaching effectiveness: exploring the relationship between coaching behavior and motivation from a self-determination theory perspective. In: ChatzisarantisNHaggerMS (eds). Self-determination in sport and exercise, Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2007, pp. 209–227.
2.
HornTSCoaching effectiveness in the sport domain. In: HornTS (ed). Advances in sport psychology, Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2008, pp. 240–267.
3.
WeissMRAmoroseAJKippLEYouth motivation and participation in sport and physical activity. In: RyanR (ed). The Oxford Handbook of motivation, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 520–553.
4.
HarterSA model of intrinsic mastery motivation in children: individual differences and developmental change. In: CollinsWA (ed). Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology1981; Vol 14, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 215–255.
5.
RyanRMDeciELAn overview of self-determination theory: an organismic-dialectical perspective. In: DeciELRyanRM (eds). Handbook of self-determination research, Rochester, NY: The University of Rochester Press, 2002, pp. 3–33.
6.
MageauGAVallerandRJ. The coach–athlete relationship: a motivational model. J Sports Sci2003; 21: 883–904.
7.
SmollFLSmithRE. Leadership behavior in sport: a theoretical model and research paradigm. J Appl Soc Psychol1989; 19: 1522–1551.
8.
AllenJBHoweB. Player ability, coach feedback, and female adolescent athletes’ perceived competence and satisfaction. J Sport Exercise Psychol1998; 20: 280–299.
9.
Amorose AJ and Horn TS. Intrinsic motivation: Relationships with collegiate athletes’ gender, scholarship status, and perceptions of their coaches’ behavior. J Sport Exercise Psychol 2000; 22: 63–84.
10.
BlackSJWeissMR. The relationship among perceived coaching behaviors, perceptions of ability, and motivation in competitive age-group swimmers. J Sport Exercise Psychol1992; 14: 309–325.
11.
WeissMRAmoroseAJWilkoAM. Coaching behavior, motivational climate, and psychosocial outcomes among female adolescent athletes. Pediatr Exercise Sci2009; 21: 475–492.
12.
SmollFLSmithREBarnettNP. Enhancement of children’s self-esteem through social support training for youth sport coaches. J Appl Psychol1993; 78: 602–610.
13.
CoatsworthJDConroyDE. Enhancing self-esteem of youth swimmers through coach training: gender and age effects. Psychol Sport Exercise2006; 7: 173–192.
14.
KenowLMWilliamsJM. Relationship between anxiety, self-confidence, and evaluation of coaching behaviors. Sport Psychol1992; 6: 344–357.
15.
WilliamsJMJeromeGIKenowLJ. Factor structure of the Coaching Behavior Questionnaire and its relationship to athlete variables. Sport Psychol2003; 17: 16–34.
16.
HornTSDevelopmental perspectives on self-perceptions in children and adolescents. In: WeissMR (ed). Developmental sport and exercise psychology: a lifespan perspective, Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology, 2004, pp. 101–143.
17.
McAuleyEDuncanTTammenV. Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: a confirmatory factor analysis. Res Quart Exer Sport1989; 60: 48–58.
18.
SmithRSmollFHuntE. A system for the behavioral assessment of athletic coaches. Res Quart1977; 48: 401–407.
CohenJCohenP. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1983.
24.
PreacherKJCurranPJBauerDJ. Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. J Ed Behav Stat2006; 31: 437–448.
25.
BurtonDRaedekeTD. Sport psychology for coaches, Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2008.
26.
MartensR. Successful coaching, Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1997.
27.
SmithREA positive approach to coaching effectiveness and performance enhancement. In: WilliamsJM (ed). Applied sport psychology: Personal growth to peak performance, Boston, MA: McGraw Hill, 2010, pp. 42–58.
28.
HornTS. Coaches’ feedback and changes in children’s perceptions of their physical competence. J Ed Psychol1985; 77: 174–186.
29.
SmithREShodaYCummingSP. Behavioral signatures at the ballpark: intraindividual consistency of adults’ situation–behavior patterns and their interpersonal consequences. J Res Personality2009; 43: 187–195.
30.
HenderlongJLepperMR. The effect of praise on children’s intrinsic motivation: a review and synthesis. Psychol Bull2002; 128: 774–795.
31.
CarpentierJMageauGA. When change-oriented feedback enhances motivation, well-being and performance: a look at autonomy-supportive feedback in sport. Psychol Sport Exercise2013; 14: 423–435.
32.
MouratidisALensWVansteenkisteM. How you provide feedback makes a difference: the motivating role of communicating in an autonomy-supportive way. J Sport Exercise Psychol2010; 32: 619–637.
33.
SmollFLSmithRECoaching behavior research and intervention in youth sport. In: SmollFLSmithRE (eds). Children and youth in sport, Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt, 2002, pp. 211–231.
34.
BeckerAJ. It’s not what they do, it’s how they do it: athlete experiences of great coaching. Int J Sport Sci Coach2009; 4: 93–119.
