This study investigated whether adding a maximal voluntary isometric contraction to developing snowboard and ski cross athletes’ warm-up could reduce start time. A secondary aim was to assess the appropriateness of start performance as a talent identification tool for junior athletes by determining whether differences in time could be explained by participant age and anthropometry. Twenty sub-elite athletes (male: n = 11, female: n = 9, age: 15.0 ± 1.4 years) participated. No differences were found for start time (7.5 m) between maximal voluntary isometric contraction and standardised (no-maximal voluntary isometric contraction) warm-up or gender (maximal voluntary isometric contraction; males: 1.36 ± 0.07 s, females: 1.41 ± 0.03 s, no-maximal voluntary isometric contraction; males: 1.35 ± 0.01 s, females: 1.38 ± 0.10 s, P > 0.05). A strong relationship between body mass and start time to 7.5 m (r = −0.78, r2 = 0.61, P < 0.05) was observed. Use of maximal voluntary isometric contraction-based warm-ups with developing snowboard cross and ski cross athletes may not be beneficial to improving performance.
Argüelles J, de la Fuente B, Tarnas J, et al. First section of the course performance as a critical aspect in skicross competition: 2010 Olympic Games & World Cup analysis. In: ISBS-Conference Proceedings Archive (eds JP Vilas-Boas, L Machado, W Kim, et al.), Porto, Portugal, 27 June–1 July 2011, paper no. 11 (Suppl. 2), pp.969–972. Germany: ISBS.
RaschnerCMüllerLPattersonC. Current performance testing trends in junior and elite Austrian alpine ski, snowboard and ski cross racers. Sport Orthop Traumat2013; 29: 193–202.
4.
RaschnerCPlatzerHPattersonCOptimizing snowboard cross and ski cross starts: a new laboratory testing and training tool. In: MüllerELindingerSStögglT (eds). Science and skiing IV, Maidenhead: Meyer & Meyer Sport, 2009, pp. 698–707.
5.
PlatzerH-PRaschnerCPattersonC. Comparison of physical characteristics and performance among elite snowboarders. J Strength Cond Res2009; 23: 1427–1432.
6.
Ebenbichler C and Raschner C. The influence of direct pre-activation on the starting performance of elite ski cross athletes. In: 8th international conference on strength training abstract book, 2012, pp.197–198. Oslo, Norway: Norwegian School of Sport Science.
7.
SporerBCCoteASleivertG. Warm-up practices in elite snowboard athletes. Int J Sport Physiol Perform2012; 7: 295–297.
8.
BishopD. Warm up I: potential mechanisms and the effects of passive warm up on exercise performance. Sports Med2003; 33: 439–454.
9.
FrenchDNKraemerWJCookeCB. Changes in dynamic exercise performance following a sequence of preconditioning isometric muscle actions. J Strength Cond Res2003; 17: 678–685.
10.
GüllichASchmidtbleicherD. MVC-induced short-term potentiation of explosive force. New StudAthlet1996; 11: 67–84.
11.
SaleDG. Postactivation potentiation: role in human performance. Exercise Sport Sci R2002; 30: 138–143.
12.
TillinNABishopD. Factors modulating post-activation potentiation and its effect on performance of subsequent explosive activities. Sports Med2009; 39: 147–166.
13.
ErelineJGapeyevaHPääsukeM. Comparison of twitch contractile properties of plantarflexor muscles in nordic combined athletes, cross-country skiers, and sedentary men. Eur J Sport Sci2011; 11: 61–67.
14.
GirardOLattierGMicallefJP. Changes in exercise characteristics, maximal voluntary contraction, and explosive strength during prolonged tennis playing. Brit J Sport Med2006; 40: 521–526.
15.
SecherNH. Isometric rowing strength of experienced and inexperienced oarsmen. Med Sci Sport1974; 7: 280–283.
16.
GorskiTRosserTHoppelerH. An anthropometric and physical profile of young Swiss alpine skiers between 2004 and 2011. Int J Sports Physiol Perform2014; 9: 108–116.
17.
AmonetteWEBrownLEDe WittJK. Peak vertical jump power estimations in youths and young adults. J Strength Cond Res2012; 26: 1749–1755.
18.
GirardOMilletGP. Physical determinants of tennis performance in competitive teenage players. J Strength Cond Res2009; 23: 1867–1872.
19.
CarvalhoHMCoelho e SilvaMJVaz RonqueER. Assessment of reliability in isokinetic testing among adolescent basketball players. Medicina2011; 47: 446–452.
20.
McMillianDJMooreJHHatlerBS. Dynamic vs. static-stretching warm up: the effect on power and agility performance. J Strength Cond Res2006; 20: 492–429.
21.
HaffGGStoneMO'BryantHS. Force-time dependent characteristics of dynamic and isometric muscle actions. J Strength Cond Res1997; 11: 269–272.
22.
KawamoriNRossiSJJusticeBD. Peak force and rate of force development during isometric and dynamic mid-thigh clean pulls performed at various intensities. J Strength Cond Res2006; 20: 483–491.
23.
WestDJOwenNJJonesMR. Relationships between force-time characteristics of the isometric midthigh pull and dynamic performance in professional rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res2011; 25: 3070–3075.
24.
AlwaySEHughsonRLGreenHJ. Twitch potentiation after fatiguing exercise in man. Eur J Appl Physiol O1987; 56: 461–466.
25.
ChiuLZFryACWeissLW. Postactivation potentiation response in athletic and recreationally trained individuals. J Strength Cond Res2003; 17: 671–677.
26.
LloydRSOliverJLFaigenbaumAD. Chronological age vs. biological maturation: implications for exercise programming in youth. J Strength Cond Res2014; 28: 1454–1464.
27.
RumpfMCCroninJBOliverJL. Vertical and leg stiffness and stretch-shortening cycle changes across maturation during maximal sprint running. Hum Mov Sci2013; 32: 668–676.
28.
MoeschKElbeAMHaugeML. Late specialization: the key to success in centimeters, grams, or seconds (cgs) sports. Scand J Med Sci Sports2011; 21: e282–e290.
29.
MalinaRMSławinskaTIgnasiakZ. Sex differences in growth and performance of track and field athletes 11–15 years. J Hum Kinet2010; 24: 79–85.
30.
MeylanCMCroninJBOliverJL. Sex-related differences in explosive actions during late childhood. J Strength Cond Res2014; 28: 2097–2104.
31.
AerenhoutsDClijsenRFässlerREvent-specific somatotype and physical characteristics of male and female elite alpine skiers. In: MüllerELindingerSStögglT (eds). Science and skiing IV, Maidenhead: Meyer & Meyer Sport, 2012, pp. 51–58.
32.
GastinPBBennettGCookJ. Biological maturity influences running performance in junior Australian football. J Sci Med Sport2013; 16: 140–145.
33.
NuzzoJLMcBrideJMCormieP. Relationship between countermovement jump performance and multijoint isometric and dynamic tests of strength. J Strength Cond Res2008; 22: 699–707.
34.
ReidRJohnsonSKippRAlbertR. Validity of sport-specific field tests for elite and developing alpine ski racers, London: Chapman & Hall, 1997.
35.
FergusonRA. Limitations to performance during alpine skiing. Exp Physiol2010; 95: 404–410.
36.
WuQSunQ. A comprehensive skiing mechanics theory with implications to snowboard optimization. Med Sci Sports Exerc2011; 43: 1955–1963.
37.
TurnbullJKeoghJWKildingAE. Strength and conditioning considerations for elite snowboard half pipe. Open Sport Med J2011; 5: 1–11.
38.
GabbettTJAbernethyB. Dual-task assessment of a sporting skill: influence of task complexity and relationship with competitive performances. J Sport Sci2012; 30: 1735–1745.
39.
HuangHJMercerVS. Dual-task methodology: applications in studies of cognitive and motor performance in adults and children. Pediatr Phy Ther2001; 13: 133–140.
40.
RandjelovicSHeirSNordslettenL. Injury situations in Freestyle Ski Cross (SX): a video analysis of 33 cases. Br J Sports Med2014; 48: 29–35.
41.
PlatzerH-PRaschnerCPattersonCInfluence of physical fitness parameters on performance in elite snowboarding. In: MüllerELindingerSStögglT (eds). Science and skiing IV, Maidenhead: Meyer & Meyer Sport, 2009, pp. 690–67.
