Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A series of imidazolium and pyridinium-based bridged dicationic ionic liquids have been analysed using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The different electronic environments of the dications have been investigated and a robust fitting model for the carbon C1s region has also been developed. The relative positions of different C1s components and N1s of dications have been determined and their complex C1s photoemission spectra produced from both aromatic and aliphatic carbon states giving photoemission peaks in the binding energy range of 289.0–283.9 eV. A contemporary fitting approach has been applied to a different set of environments which allowing comparison of the binding energies of cationic components of imidazolium and pyridinium-based dicationic ionic liquids. The experimental stoichiometry of all the carbons and nitrogens have also been calculated from XP spectra of the dicationic ionic liquids.

Keywords

dicationic ionic liquids carbon C1s photoemissions X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

Introduction

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) is a leading technique for the surface analysis of organic and inorganic compounds that provides information regarding surface composition and chemistry.^1–3 Not only different electronic environments and chemical states can be identified,⁴ but elemental composition can also be quantified, apart from helium and hydrogen.⁵ There is characteristic binding energy associated with each element and a small variation in the binding energy occurs due to change in the chemical and electronic environment which corresponds to a slight change in the binding energy of the peak in the XPS spectrum.^6,7

As it is an ultra-high vacuum (UHV) based technique, many small-molecule samples cannot be analysed as they would evaporate quickly due to their high volatility under the XPS experimental conditions.⁸ Therefore, the most prominent fields where XPS can be exploited include nanomaterials,⁹ solid-state chemistry,¹⁰ metal alloys,^11,12 polymers,¹³ fuel cells¹⁴ and viscous oils.¹⁵ One apparent exception to the restriction on small molecular analysis is ionic liquids (ILs), which are composed entirely of molecular ions.¹⁶ The inherent wide liquid range of ILs and their extremely low vapour pressure have enabled them to be investigated under UHV conditions of XPS.¹⁷ A variety of information about liquid–gas interface¹⁸ and surface enrichment¹⁹ of solutes can also be obtained by investigating ILs using XPS.²⁰ Significantly, many ILs experience little or no detectable beam damage in laboratory-based XPS instruments, this is due to the dynamic nature of the liquid surface, and spectra from ILs are typically characterized by intense, sharp and reproducible core line signals.²¹ Substantial differential charging is also prevented owing to the electrically conducting nature of many ILs, although more viscous ILs can suffer from charging.

XPS core line signals appear complex when an element exists in several chemical states within a sample. An important objective of much XPS analysis is to successfully deconvolute complex core line spectra and accurately identify and quantify the different chemical environments present. Due to the difficulty in measuring small molecules, and challenges of surface contamination seen in many XPS measurements, the development of models of C1s spectra for organic molecules is less developed compared with many inorganic non-molecular materials, or for other core lines apart from C1s.²² For chemical environments commonly seen in organic molecules, binding energy (BE) chemical shifts are typically smaller than the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of core photoemission lines.²³ To overcome this problem of overlapping peaks in XPS, peak fitting models are used.^24,25 There are multiple chemical states of carbon in ILs; for example, aromatic environments will appear at different binding energies to aliphatic environments.²⁶ Considering commonly used aromatic IL cations, the complexity in XP spectra is due to the covalent bonding and delocalization of charge having alkyl chain lengths and different functional groups and in more viscous ILs, the photoelectron flux has also been noted to cause surface charging.²⁷ Therefore, an accurate, reliable and robust fitting model for ILs is required to get precise information from the complex XP spectrum. Such models have been introduced for standard monocationic ILs.^18,28 Here, we adapt and assess these models for use with dicationic ionic liquids (DcILs).

The chemical properties can be tuned by the chemical variation of ILs to expand their applications and for this reason, they are referred to as neoteric designer solvents.^29,30 DcILs are an interesting class of ILs that not only have extended the chemical space but also offer more opportunities to improve their functions by giving many options for chemical modifications with tuneable properties.³¹ The incorporation of two charges in DcILs allows more tailoring of the IL with two different anions and more tailoring of the IL with two different anions and they exhibit even higher thermal stability properties.³² Further studies are also required to exploit the designer feature of ILs as well as the opportunity to expand XPS as an analytical tool.

The aim of this study is to exploit the tuneable nature of DcILs to effect electronic changes specifically in the cations to facilitate the XPS peak fitting. The DcILs presented in this work are based on both symmetric as well as asymmetric imidazolium and pyridinium cations. Their complex C1s photoemission spectra produce from both aromatic and aliphatic carbon states giving photoemission peaks in the BE range 289.0–283.9 eV. So, the goal of this work is to build on the foundations laid before us by modifying existing fitting models and applying them to this previously unexplored class of ILs.

Results and discussion

A series of DcILs based on imidazoles and pyridines have been synthesized and investigated (Table 1). The cations are composed of methyl imidazole, butyl imidazole, pyridine and methyl pyridine with varying alkyl bridges of 2, 5 and 10 carbons long. The X-ray photoelectron spectra of C1s in ILs are usually characterized by the two discrete photoemission envelopes, which correspond to cationic and anionic carbon. In these synthesized DcILs, the anion contains no carbon, so the only contribution to the C1s region should be from the cation. Survey spectra from all samples are shown in the supporting information. Apart from the expected elements, some samples showed low levels of Si. ¹H NMR confirmed the purity of all samples. The N1s XPS peak is shown in the Supporting Information for all samples. In each case, this N1s peak appeared as a narrow, symmetric peak, expected for a single nitrogen environment, with peak energies tabulated in Table 2. The amount of N seen is lightly lower in all samples than expected. This may be due to orientation effects of the cations at the surface of the IL droplet, at the vacuum–liquid interface.

Table 1.

Names and structures of DcILs under investigation here.

DcILs	Names	Abbreviations
1	1,1,-(ethane-1,2-diyl)-bis(3-methylimidazolium) bis(bromotrichloroferrate)	[C₂(C₁Im)₂][Fe₂Cl₆Br₂]
2	1,1,-(pentane-1,5-diyl)-bis(3-methylimidazolium) bis(bromotrichloroferrate)	[C₅(C₁Im)₂][Fe₂Cl₆Br₂]
3	1,1,-(decane-1,10-diyl)-bis(3-methylimidazolium) bis(bromotrichloroferrate)	[C₁₀(C₁Im)₂][Fe₂Cl₆Br₂]
4	1,1,-(ethane-1,2-diyl)-bis(3-butylimidazolium) bis(bromotrichloroferrate)	[C₂(C₄Im)₂][Fe₂Cl₆Br₂]
5	1,1,-(pentane-1,5-diyl)-bis(3-butylimidazolium) bis(bromotrichloroferrate)	[C₅(C₄Im)₂][Fe₂Cl₆Br₂]
6	1,1,-(decane-1,10-diyl)-bis(3-butylimidazolium) bis(bromotrichloroferrate)	[C₁₀(C₄Im)₂][Fe₂Cl₆Br₂]
7	1-(3-methylimidazolium-yl-ethyl)-3-butylimidazolium bis(bromotrichloroferrate)	[C₂(C₁Im)(C₄Im)][Fe₂Cl₆Br₂]
8	1-(3-methylimidazolium-yl-pentyl)-3=butylimidazolium bis(bromotrichloroferrate)	[C₅(C₁Im)(C₄Im)][Fe₂Cl₆Br₂]
9	1-(3-methylimidazolium-yl-decyl)-3-butylimidazolium bis(bromotrichloroferrate)	[C₁₀(C₁Im)(C₄Im)][Fe₂Cl₆Br₂]
10	1,1,-(ethane-1,2-diyl)-bis(3-methylpyridinium) dibromide	[C₂(C₁Py)₂][Br₂]
11	1,1,-(pentane-1,5-diyl)-bis(3-methylpyridinium) dibromide	[C₅(C₁Py)₂][Br₂]
12	1,1,-(decane-1,10-diyl)-bis(3-methylpyridinium) dibromide	[C₁₀(C₁Py)₂][Br₂]
13	1,1,-(ethane-1,2-diyl)-bis(pyridinium) dibromide	[C₂(Py)₂][Br₂]
14	1,1,-(pentane-1,5-diyl)-bis(pyridinium) dibromide	[C₅(Py)₂][Br₂]
15	1,1,-(decane-1,10-diyl)-bis(pyridinium) dibromide	[C₁₀(Py)₂][Br₂]

Table 2.

Binding energies of imidazolium and pyridinium-based DcILs presented in this work.

DcILs	BE/eV
DcILs	C_A1s	Δ_BE (C_B–C_A)	Δ_BE (C_C–C_A)	Δ_BE (C_D–C_A)	Δ_BE (N1s–C_A)
[C₂(C₁Im)₂]²⁺	286.2	−1.6	–2.2	–	115.1
[C₅(C₁Im)₂]²⁺	286.5	−0.8	–2	–2.2	114.8
[C₁₀(C₁Im)₂]²⁺	286.5	−0.5	−1.6	–2.3	114.8
[C₂(C₄Im)₂]²⁺	286.5	−0.8	−1.4	–2.7	114.5
[C₅(C₄Im)₂]²⁺	288.7	−0.7	−1.1	–2.4	114.5
[C₁₀(C₄Im)₂]²⁺	289.0	−0.8	−1.1	–2.5	114.2
[C₂(C₁Im) (C₄Im)]²⁺	288.1	−0.6	−1.4	–2.6	114.5
[C₅(C₁Im) (C₄Im)]²⁺	287.7	−0.8	−1.2	–2.4	114.4
[C₁₀(C₁Im) (C₄Im)]²⁺	287.6	−0.8	−1.2	–2.6	114.4
Average for Im compounds	287.5	−0.8	−1.5	−2.5	114.6
Average for Im compounds from Villar-Garcia et al.	285.1 ^a	−0.7	−1.1	−2.4	114.4
[C₂(C₁Py)₂]²⁺	287.8	–1	–2.5	–	115.4
[C₅(C₁ Py)₂]²⁺	287.0	–0.8	–1.4	–	115.4
[C₁₀(C₁ Py)₂]²⁺	286.0	–0.9	–1.7	–	115.4
[C₂(Py)₂]²⁺	285.7	–1	–1.1	–	115.6
[C₅(Py)₂]²⁺	285.4	–1.1	–1.3	–	115.6
[C₁₀(Py)₂]²⁺	285.8	–0.7	–1.6	–	115.5
Average for Py compounds	286.3	–0.9	–1.6	–	115.5

BE: binding energy.

Note that Villar-Garcia et al.²⁸ used a charge correction procedure in their work, so the absolute BE is not directly comparable, although the binding energy differences are.

The C1s spectrum was asymmetric in all samples studied here and appears to be comprised of different components which we attempt to model as contributions from carbon environments within the cation. Definition of the BE scale, often described as charge correction, using C1s is typically carried out in the literature; however, this procedure is difficult when the material under analysis itself contains carbon, and so in this work, we have focused on understanding spectral shape in terms of molecular structure, and not absolute binding energies.²⁸ While charge compensation was used to reduce charging we have not adjusted the as-recorded binding energies and so the absolute binding energies here should not be used alone to characterize carbon environments. In contrast, relative binding energies of each component are a valid tool for understanding chemical environments.

Imidazolium DcILs

The C1s fitting model for these DcILs follows the trend already set in the literature and applies according to the work previously completed in this area of interest.^18,22,33 In the case of bis-imidazoles, the first component C_A is the ring carbon between the two nitrogen atoms, the second component corresponds to the remaining two carbons within the imidazolium ring labelled as C_B and the alkyl carbons bonded directly to nitrogen outside of the aromatic ring are the third component C_C. As the cation gets bigger, an increase in substitution on aromatic ring or carbon bridge length introduces a new carbon environment, C_D, which corresponds to the sp³ hybridized carbon that is bonded to the carbon and hydrogen only. We model the C1s region by constraining the relative areas of components A–D according to the molecular formula of the cation. For example, in compound 1, we constrain the area ratio of the components A: B: C: D as 2: 4: 4: 0. The model is also constrained such that the BE order of the components is A ⩾ B ⩾ C ⩾ D. This reflects the expected electron density, or partial positive charge, on the different carbon environments. Figure 1 shows the C1s spectra from compounds 1–3, as well as the fitted models.

Figure 1.

C1s XP spectra of compounds 1–3, with fitting according to the model described in the text. The molecular structures are labelled with the carbon environments A–D.

As depicted in Figure 1, the spectra of compounds 1–3 consist of two distinct maxima, which change in relative intensity with increasing bridge chain length. As the bridge length increased, the low BE portion of the spectrum increases in relative intensity. Compound 1 has no C_D component in the model, as the chain length is only two, and both carbons are classified as C_C, being bound directly to nitrogen. As the C_D component increases from 5 to 10 carbons long, it shows a BE that decreases relatively to the other components showing more typical aliphatic characteristics. This in turn makes the C_C component increasingly different from the aliphatic bridge resulting in an increase in BE. This is a trend similar in the previous studies from Men et al.³⁴ where dimethyl imidazolium cations were explored and it was found that the overall BE of the aliphatic region also shifts to a lower BE with the increasing of the alkyl chain length.

Similarly, butyl imidazolium-based symmetric DcILs are also modelled with the same alkyl bridges of 2, 5 and 10, respectively. The same fitting procedure is applied as before, with the C_C component being aliphatic carbons bonded to nitrogen. The difference with these DcILs is that the butyl part of the cation plays a key role in the modelling of the environments too. It is elected that the C_D component should also include three atoms on the aliphatic alkyl chain introduced with the butyl group. The DcILs are illustrated in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

C1s XP spectra of compounds 4–6, with fitting according to the model described in the text. The molecular structures are labelled with the carbon environments A–D.

In the series of bis-butyl imidazolium-based DcILs, a parallel trend can be seen. As the bridge length is increased the low BE region of the spectrum also increases in intensity, following the patterns seen in compounds 1–3. In all cases, a good fit is obtained using the constraints described to model the spectra.

After modelling symmetric DcILs, asymmetric DcILs are now presented. This is completed to assess the robustness of the fitting model applied, staying in the same spirit of the simplest most efficient model. The DcILs are a mix of methyl and butyl imidazolium cations which are shown below in Figure 3 along with their spectra.

Figure 3.

C1s XP spectra of compounds 7–9, with fitting according to the model described in the text. The molecular structures are labelled with the carbon environments A–D.

The same rules apply as previously stated, with a four-component model, with the same constraints. As before, as the bridge length is increased, the C_D component shifts to a lower BE relative to the other components, typical of aliphatic carbons. In these spectra, the C_B and C_C components are also displaying subtle changes whereby the binding energies appear to be getting closer together (a smaller difference between the two), this can also be seen for the bis-methyl imidazolium DcILs discussed though the phenomena are difficult to explain based chemically. An early hypothesis could be that the signals are becoming increasingly similar due to the larger influence of the alkyl component in C_D. A similar phenomena is found in ¹H NMR when alkylating butyl imidazole with a haloalkane longer than four carbons, for example, 10; here focussing on the resulting imidazolium cation, it will appear symmetrical if only considering up to the 4th carbon in the alkyl chain resulting in an aromatic region with only two peaks in a ratio 1:2, whereas in actual fact, one alkyl chain has 10 carbons so the molecule is not symmetrical and the standard 3 aromatic peaks should be present in a 1:1:1 ratio, a similar argument could perhaps be made for these components.

Pyridinium DcILs

Pyridinium (Py) DcILs have been shown in previous work³⁵ to display better thermal stabilities,³⁶ lubricative properties³⁷ as well as higher viscosities³⁸ and have slightly lower densities,³⁹ compared with imidazolium-based ILs. A wide variety of Py ILs has been analysed using XPS in the literature and a three-component model was deduced for pyridinium-based ILs by Men et al.⁴⁰ We attempted to fit the same four-component model described for the Imidazolium compounds for the pyridinium compounds. In doing this, after fitting the carbon 1s components C_C and C_D were always found to appear at almost exactly the same BE. Thus, components C_D were combined with C_C to give a three-component model for the pyridinium compounds. C1s spectra from compounds 10–12 are shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4.

C1s XP spectra of compounds 10–12, with fitting according to the model described in the text. The molecular structures are labelled with the carbon environments A–C.

In previous studies, one of the three components consists of carbons attached directly to N; this represents three carbons for each Py ring.^25,40 This provides a good fit for their data; however, we have chosen different approach to our C1s model. To keep consistency with the imidazolium model discussed above, we designate the two carbons in the aromatic ring that are bound to N as carbon environment C_A. The other carbon attached to the N, in the alkyl chain, is part of C_C, as is the carbon of the methyl group. The remainder of the carbons in the Py ring belong to environment C_B. We find this model satisfactorily models the observed spectra shape and for that reason find it adequate for our purposes.

From the spectra set out in Figure 4, it can be clearly seen that as the alkyl chain bridge is increased, the BE for the C component shifts to a lower value relative to the other components. The final set of data is the same pyridinium-based DcILs, without the methyl group present, the models and spectra are shown in Figure 5.

Figure 5.

C1s XP spectra of compounds 13–15, with fitting according to the model described in the text. The molecular structures are labelled with the carbon environments A–C.

As can be seen in Figure 5, the same fitting model has been applied as previously and the same trend can also be inferred, increasing the length of the alkyl bridge causing a decrease in BE to that typical of aliphatic carbons. The difference in the last two sets of data is the presence of a methyl group bonded on the pyridinium cation, from the data presented it appears to have been correctly appointed to a C_C component.

Table 2 shows the relative positions of the C1s components and the N1s signal for each compound listed here. The C1s components C_B–C_D are shown relative to the C_A component, which is present in each sample. The absolute BE values for the C_A component are given but note that these are not corrected to any internal standard, as described in the experimental section, given the difficulty in doing this for carbon containing materials. Instead, we focus on BE differences which we consider a more reliable indicator of chemical environment. For the imidazolium compounds, the N1s BE is on average 114.6 eV above the C_A component of the C1s spectrum. Villar-Garcia et al. studied monocationic imidazolium ILs and found an average of 114.8 eV difference between their component C_A and the N1s core line, very similar to our result. However, for the pyridinium compounds, the N1s BE is on average 115.5 eV above the C_A component of the C1s spectrum. This 0.9 eV difference may represent a greater difference in electron density between the N and C_A in the pyridinium versus the imidazolium cation, or it may be due to final state effects which are difficult to interpret without calculation of electronic structure. The separation of each of the components from C_A is relatively constant across the series of compounds studied here, except for the cation in compound 1 [C₂(C₁Im)₂]²⁺. This compound has significantly different component separations compared with the monocationic imidazolium ions studied previously, suggesting that in this compound the very short bridge length causes the two imidazolium rings to interact, affecting the measured BE of the components. At longer chain lengths, the two Im rings appear to show no electronic interaction detectable by XPS.

There are different types of Carbon C1s environment are and visibly seen in the figures above. The C1s and N1s ratio are given below in the table and it has been seen that the ratio of these investigated DcILs has very close experimental values to the nominal ones and could be improved further by considering the shake-up effect of the aromatic ring.⁴¹

Conclusion

The XP spectra of a wide array of DcILs based on imidazoles and pyridines, varying the bridged alkyl chain length of cation, have successfully been analysed. The different electronic environments of these DcILs are identified. A fitting model for the C1s region of imidazolium and pyridinium-based DcILs has been fashioned. The binding energies of different components of the C Is region are determined with high confidence. This research is based on work previously set out by other researchers and applied the models to a different set of circumstances which reveals the comparison of the binding energies of cationic components of imidazolium and pyridinium-based DcILs. This study also favours the fact that the carbon in between two nitrogens (C_A) of imidazole is more electropositive than any of the carbon components of pyridinium-based cations. For the pyridinium-based DcILs, it is an early alternative suggested way of modelling that is backed up by our XPS spectra where we intend to apply this model to even more varied structures to prove its worth.

Experimental

XP spectra were recorded using a K-alpha spectrometer equipped with a monochromated, micro-focused, Al K-Alpha X-ray source (1486.6 eV), a quartz crystal monochromator set in a 250-mm Rowland circle, hybrid optics, multichannel plate, hemispherical analyzer and 128-channel sensitive detector. The incident and collection angle were 30° and 0°, respectively, comparative to the surface normal. The base pressure was 10⁻⁹ mbar and 180° double-focusing hemispherical analyzer having mean radius 125 mm which was run in constant analyzer energy mode. The pass energies were set to 20 eV for high resolution and 80 eV for survey scans.

Three-point (Au, Ag and Cu) scale was used to regularly calibrate the BE scale of the instrument. Samples were prepared and placed onto a stainless-steel plate. For the liquid samples, a very small drop (≈15–20 mg) was directly placed on stainless-steel plate and for solid a thin film (≈ 0.5–1 mm) was used. After the sample preparation, these were placed immediately into a load-lock to avoid the absorption of volatile impurities and consequently pumping down by reducing the pressure up to 10⁻⁷ mbar. The time for the process of pumping down varies and depends on the factors such a volume, viscosity and volatile impurities of the sample. There were no significant bubbling and outgassing observed in this process. After gaining the required pressure, the samples were transported to the main analytic vacuum chamber for analysis. For liquid samples, etching was carried out as they are electrically conducting and not able to experience considerable differential charging. So, 500 eV Ar⁺ ion dual bean flood gun was used to achieve the charge compensation.

Data analysis

The data for all the samples were converted into VAMAS (.vms) format and imported to Casa XPS for peak fitting and quantitative analysis. A Shirley background subtraction was used for the interpretation of data and GL(30) lineshapes, a combination of a Gaussian (70%) and Lorentzian (30%) was used for the peak fitting.⁴² This lineshape was used throughout to match the experimental lineshapes for the IL systems. The C1s region was modelled using components assigned to different carbon chemical environments, following the work of Villar-Garcia et al.²⁸ These components are labelled A–D, using the priority rule which was already set in the literature.⁴⁰ The full width half maximum (FWHM) for every component was kept constant within each model but could vary between models. The relative areas of A–D were initially constrained to the expected ratios according to the molecular structure and were allowed to vary from this starting point. To calculate the atomic percentages, relative sensitivity factor (RSF) was used.⁴³ In this study, the experimental stoichiometries calculated form XP spectra for all ILs were well in agreement with the experimental error of nominal stoichiometries attained from their empirical formulae (Table 3).

Table 3.

Quantitative analysis of XP spectra imidazolium and pyridinium-based DcILs presented in this work.

DcILs	RSF	Cation
DcILs	RSF	C_A1s	C_B1s	C_C1s	C_D1s	N1s
[C₂(C₁Im)₂]²⁺	Nominal	2	4	4	0	4
[C₂(C₁Im)₂]²⁺	Experimental	1.44	4.9	4.9		1.8
[C₅(C₁Im)₂]²⁺	Nominal	2	4	4	3	4
[C₅(C₁Im)₂]²⁺	Experimental	2.3	4.6	4.6	3.4	2.1
[C₁₀(C₁Im)₂]²⁺	Nominal	2	4	4	8	4
[C₁₀(C₁Im)₂]²⁺	Experimental	2.1	4.3	4.3	8.6	2.5
[C₂(C₄Im)₂]²⁺	Nominal	2	4	4	6	4
[C₂(C₄Im)₂]²⁺	Experimental	2.1	4.2	4.2	6.2	3.3
[C₅(C₄Im)₂]²⁺	Nominal	2	4	4	9	4
[C₅(C₄Im)₂]²⁺	Experimental	2.1	4.1	4.1	9.2	3.5
[C₁₀(C₄Im)₂]²⁺	Nominal	2	4	4	14	4
[C₁₀(C₄Im)₂]²⁺	Experimental	2.0	4.1	4.1	14.3	3.4
[C₂(C₁Im) (C₄Im)]²⁺	Nominal	2	4	4	3	4
	Experimental	2.0	4.1	4.1	3.4	3.3
[C₅(C₁Im) (C₄Im)]²⁺	Nominal	2	4	4	6	4
	Experimental	2.1	4.1	4.1	6.1	3.5
[C₁₀(C₁Im) (C₄Im)]²⁺	Nominal	2	4	4	11	4
	Experimental	2.1	4.1	4.1	11.3	3.3
[C₂(C₁Py)₂]²⁺	Nominal	4	6	2	0	2
	Experimental	4.1	6.2	2.1		1.5
[C₅(C₁Py)₂]²⁺	Nominal	4	6	5	0	2
	Experimental	4.0	6.1	5.1		1.73
[C₁₀(C₁Py)₂]²⁺	Nominal	4	6	10	0	2
	Experimental	4.1	6.1	10.3		1.38
[C₂(Py)₂]²⁺	Nominal	4	6	4	0	2
	Experimental	4.3	6.5	4.3		1.1
[C₅(Py)₂]²⁺	Nominal	4	6	7	0	2
	Experimental	4.2	6.2	7.4		1.2
[C₁₀(Py)₂]²⁺	Nominal	4	6	12	0	2
	Experimental	4.1	6.2	12.4		1.1

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The authors acknowledge the Commonwealth Scholarship and the Franz Sondheimer Bursary received form University College London.

ORCID iDs

Anham Zafar

Robert G Palgrave

References

Fadley

. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: progress and perspectives. J Electron Spectros Relat Phenomena 2010; 178–179: 2–32.

Roberts

Moffitt

. Trends in XPS instrumentation for industrial surface analysis and materials characterisation. J Electron Spectros Relat Phenomena 2019; 231: 68–74.

Seah

. Universal equation for argon gas cluster sputtering yields. J Phys Chem C 2013; 117: 12622–12632.

Gerber

Erasmus

. Electronic effects of metal hexacyanoferrates: an XPS and FTIR study. Mater Chem Phys 2018; 203: 73–81.

Penn

. Quantitative chemical analysis by ESCA. J Electron Spectros Relat Phenomena 1976; 9: 29–40.

Crist

. XPS in industry – problems with binding energies in journals and binding energy databases. J Electron Spectros Relat Phenomena 2019; 231: 75–87.

Karim

MMS

Ganose

Pieters

, et al. Anion distribution, structural distortion, and symmetry-driven optical band gap bowing in mixed halide Cs2SnX6 vacancy ordered double perovskites. Chem Mater 2019; 31: 9430–9444.

Siegbahn

. Electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis of liquids and solutions. Proc Soc Anal Chem 1985; 89: 897–909.

Korin

Froumin

Cohen

. Surface analysis of nanocomplexes by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2017; 3: 882–889.

10.

Liu

Van den Berghe

Konstantinović

. XPS spectra of the U5 + compounds KUO3, NaUO3 and Ba2 U2 O7. J Solid State Chem 2009; 182: 1105–1108.

11.

Payne

Biesinger

McIntyre

. Use of oxygen/nickel ratios in the XPS characterisation of oxide phases on nickel metal and nickel alloy surfaces. J Electron Spectros Relat Phenomena 2012; 185: 159–166.

12.

Cocco

Elsener

Fantauzzi

, et al. Nanosized surface films on brass alloys by XPS and XAES. RSC Adv 2016; 6: 31277–31289.

13.

Pijpers

Meier

. Core level photoelectron spectroscopy for polymer and catalyst characterisation. Chem Soc Rev 1999; 28: 233–238.

14.

Corcoran

Tavassol

Rigsby

, et al. Application of XPS to study electrocatalysts for fuel cells. J Power Sources 2010; 195: 7856–7879.

15.

Scharmann

Cherkashinin

Breternitz

, et al. Viscosity effect on GaInSn studied by XPS. Surf Interface Anal 2004; 36: 981–985.

16.

Men

Licence

Do-Thanh

, et al. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of piperidinium ionic liquids: a comparison to the charge delocalised pyridinium analogues. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2020; 22: 11976–11983.

17.

Calisi

Martinuzzi

Giaccherini

, et al. Temperature and angle resolved XPS study of BMIm Cl and BMIm FeCl4. J Electron Spectros Relat Phenomena 2021; 247: 147034.

18.

Lovelock

KRJ

Villar-Garcia

Maier

, et al. Photoelectron spectroscopy of ionic liquid-based interfaces. Chem Rev 2010; 110: 5158–5190.

19.

Lockett

Sedev

Harmer

, et al. Orientation and mutual location of ions at the surface of ionic liquids. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2010; 12: 13816–13827.

20.

Kolbeck

Niedermaier

Deyko

, et al. Influence of substituents and functional groups on the surface composition of ionic liquids. Chem – A Eur J 2014; 20: 3954–3965.

21.

Kolbeck

Cremer

Lovelock

KRJ

, et al. Influence of different anions on the surface composition of ionic liquids studied using ARXPS. J Phys Chem B 2009; 113: 8682–8688.

22.

Lockett

Sedev

Bassell

, et al. Angle-resolved X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of the surface of imidazolium ionic liquids. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2008; 10: 1330–1335.

23.

Santos

Blundell

Licence

. XPS of guanidinium ionic liquids: a comparison of charge distribution in nitrogenous cations. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2015; 17: 11839–11847.

24.

Cousens

NEA

Taylor Kearney

Clough

, et al. Preparation and characterisation of high-density ionic liquids incorporating halobismuthate anions. Dalt Trans 2014; 43: 10910–10919.

25.

Clarke

Maxwell-Hogg

Smith

, et al. Resolving X-ray photoelectron spectra of ionic liquids with difference spectroscopy. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2019; 21: 114–123.

26.

Hurisso

Lovelock

KRJ

Licence

. Amino acid-based ionic liquids: using XPS to probe the electronic environment via binding energies. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2011; 13: 17737–17748.

27.

Taylor

Licence

. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of ferrocenyl- and ferrocenium-based ionic liquids. ChemPhysChem 2012; 13: 1917–1926.

28.

Villar-Garcia

Smith

Taylor

, et al. Charging of ionic liquid surfaces under X-ray irradiation: the measurement of absolute binding energies by XPS. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2011; 13: 2797–2808.

29.

Zafar

Imtiaz-Ud-Din, Ahmed

, et al. Synthesis, structural analysis, electrochemical and magnetic properties of tetrachloroferrate ionic liquids. New J Chem 2021; 45: 13429–13440.

30.

Olivier-Bourbigou

Magna

. Ionic liquids: perspectives for organic and catalytic reactions. J Mol Catal A Chem 2002; 182–183: 419–437.

31.

Talebi

Patil

Armstrong

. Physicochemical properties of branched-chain dicationic ionic liquids. J Mol Liq 2018; 256: 247–255.

32.

Zhang

Liu

, et al. Thermophysical properties of dicationic imidazolium-based ionic compounds for thermal storage. J Mol Liq 2019; 282: 474–483.

33.

Hammer

Reichelt

Morgner

. Influence of the aliphatic chain length of imidazolium based ionic liquids on the surface structure. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2010; 12: 11070–11080.

34.

Men

Jiang

Licence

. Spectroscopic analysis of 1-butyl-2,3-dimethylimidazolium ionic liquids: cation–anion interactions. Chem Phys Lett 2017; 674: 86–89.

35.

Galán Sánchez

Espel

Onink

, et al. Density, viscosity, and surface tension of synthesis grade imidazolium, pyridinium, and pyrrolidinium based room temperature ionic liquids. J Chem Eng Data 2009; 54: 2803–2812.

36.

Cadena

Zhao

Snurr

, et al. Molecular modeling and experimental studies of the thermodynamic and transport properties of pyridinium-based ionic liquids. J Phys Chem B 2006; 110: 2821–2832.

37.

Mahrova

Pagano

Pejakovic

, et al. Pyridinium based dicationic ionic liquids as base lubricants or lubricant additives. Tribol Int 2015; 82: 245–254.

38.

Bittner

Wrobel

Milchert

. Physical properties of pyridinium ionic liquids. J Chem Thermodyn 2012; 55: 159–165.

39.

Crosthwaite

Muldoon

Dixon

, et al. Phase transition and decomposition temperatures, heat capacities and viscosities of pyridinium ionic liquids. J Chem Thermodyn 2005; 37: 559–568.

40.

Men

Mitchell

Lovelock

KRJ

, et al. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of pyridinium-based ionic liquids: comparison to imidazolium- and pyrrolidinium-based analogues. ChemPhysChem 2015; 16: 2211–2218.

41.

Smith

Rutten

FJM

Villar-Garcia

, et al. Ionic liquids in vacuo: analysis of liquid surfaces using ultra-high-vacuum techniques. Langmuir 2006; 22: 9386–9392.

42.

Matthew

. Surface analysis by Auger and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Surf Interface Anal 2004; 36: 1647–1647.

43.

Wagner

Davis

Zeller

, et al. Empirical atomic sensitivity factors for quantitative analysis by electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis. Surf Interface Anal 1981; 3: 211–225.

An X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy study of ionic liquids based on a bridged dicationic moiety

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Results and discussion

Imidazolium DcILs

Pyridinium DcILs

Conclusion

Experimental

Data analysis

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

ORCID iDs

References