GBD 2019 Stroke Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Neurol2021; 20: 795–820.
2.
ThayabaranathanTKimJCadilhacDA, et al. Global stroke statistics 2022. Int J Stroke2022; 17: 946–956.
3.
FeiginVLBraininMNorrving, et al. World Stroke Organization (WSO): global stroke fact sheet 2022. Int J Stroke2022; 17: 18–29.
4.
ZhaoYHuaXRenX, et al. Increasing burden of stroke in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence, incidence, mortality, and case fatality. Int J Stroke2023; 18: 259–267.
5.
OkekunleAPJonesSAdenijiO, et al. Stroke in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence and case-fatality rates. Int J Stroke2023; 18: 634–644.
6.
JonesSPBaqaiKCleggA, et al. Stroke in India: a systematic review of the incidence, prevalence, and case fatality. Int J Stroke2022; 17: 132–140.
7.
DelfinoCNuñezMAsenjo-LobosC, et al. Stroke in Latin America: systematic review of incidence, prevalence, and case-fatality in 1997-2021. Int J Stroke2023; 18: 645–656.
8.
OwolabiMOThriftAGMartinsS, et al. Stroke Experts Collaboration Group. The state of stroke services across the globe: report of World Stroke Organization-World Health Organization surveys. Int J Stroke2021; 16: 889–901.
9.
RoushdyTArefHKesraouiS, et al. Stroke services in Africa: what is there and what is needed. Int J Stroke2022; 17: 972–982.
10.
LiJChenQWangC, et al. The quality disparity of stroke care over time: an analysis based on the national dataset from 2011 to 2017. Int J Stroke2023; 18: 304–311.
11.
KimJOlaiyaMTDe SilvaDA, et al. Global stroke statistics 2023: availability of reperfusion services around the world. Int J Stroke2024; 19: 253–270.
12.
NorrvingBBarrickJDavalosA, et al. Action plan for stroke in Europe 2018–2030. Eur Stroke J2018; 3: 309–336.
13.
MohamedAElsherifSLegereBFatimaNShuaibASaqqurM.Is telestroke more effective than conventional treatment for acute ischemic stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient outcomes and thrombolysis rates. Int J Stroke2023; 19: 280–292.
14.
NguyenTQTranMHPhungHN, et al. Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke beyond the 24-h time window: selection by target mismatch profile. Int J Stroke2023; 19: 305–313.
15.
KeevilHPhillipsBEEnglandTJ.Remote ischemic conditioning for stroke: a critical systematic review. Int J Stroke2023; 19: 271–279.
16.
ChenHSCuiYLiXQ, et al. Effect of remote ischemic conditioning vs usual care on neurologic function in patients with acute moderate ischemic stroke: the RICAMIS randomized clinical trial. JAMA2022; 328: 627–636.
17.
BlauenfeldtRAHjortNValentinJB, et al. Remote Ischemic Conditioning for Acute Stroke: The RESIST Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA2023; 330: 1236–1246.
18.
AbuduxukuerRGuoZNZhangPQuYYangY.Safety and efficacy of remote ischemic conditioning combined with intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: a multicenter, randomized, parallel-controlled clinical trial (SERIC-IVT) Study design and protocol. Int J Stroke2023; 18: 370–374.
19.
KozbergMGPerosaVGurolMEvan VeluwSJ.A practical approach to the management of cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Int J Stroke2021; 16: 356–369.
20.
PikijaSPretnar-OblakJFrolS, et al. Iatrogenic cerebral amyloid angiopathy: a multinational case series and individual patient data analysis of the literature. Int J Stroke2023; 19: 314–321.
21.
ZhaoJRostgaardKLauwersE, et al. Intracerebral hemorrhage among blood donors and their transfusion recipients. JAMA2023; 330: 941–950.
22.
Thanks to our reviewers, and editorial board changes. Int J Stroke2024; 19: 251–252.
