Intracranial atherosclerotic disease is one of the leading causes of ischemic strokes and poses a moderate risk of recurrence. Diagnosis is currently limited to stenosis on luminal imaging, which likely underestimates the true prevalence of the disease. Detection of non-stenosing intracranial atherosclerosis is important in order to optimize secondary stroke prevention strategies. This review collates findings from the early seminal trials and the latest studies in advanced radiological techniques that characterize symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease across various imaging modalities. While computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) comprise diagnostic mainstays in identifying stenotic changes secondary to atherosclerosis, emerging techniques such as high-resolution MRA, quantitative MRA, and computational fluid dynamics may reveal a myriad of other underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.
ChimowitzMILynnMJDerdeynCP, et alStenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med2011; 365: 993–1003.
4.
KasnerSEChimowitzMILynnMJ, et alPredictors of ischemic stroke in the territory of a symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. Circulation2006; 113: 555–563.
5.
ChungJWBangOYLeeMJ, et alEchoing plaque activity of the coronary and intracranial arteries in patients with stroke. Stroke2016; 47: 1527–1533.
6.
RitzKDenswilNPStamOCG, et alCause and mechanism of intracranial atherosclerosis. Circulation2014; 130: 1407–1414.
7.
LibbyPPasterkampGCreaFJangIK. Reassessing the mechanisms of acute coronary syndromes. The “vulnerable plaque” and superficial erosion. Circ Res2019; 124: 150–160.
8.
BentzonJFOtsukaFVirmaniRFalkE. Mechanisms of plaque formation and rupture. Circ Res2014; 114: 1852–1866.
9.
KamelHGialdiniGBaradaranH, et alCryptogenic stroke and nonstenosing intracranial calcified atherosclerosis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis2017; 26: 863–870.
10.
TaoLLiX-QHouX-W, et alIntracranial atherosclerotic plaque as a potential cause of embolic stroke of undetermined source. J Am Coll Cardiol2021; 77: 680–691.
11.
HurfordRRothwellPM. Prevalence, prognosis, and treatment of atherosclerotic intracranial stenosis in Caucasians. Int J Stroke2020; 16: 248–264.
12.
SongJWPavlouAXiaoJKasnerSEFanZMesséSR. Vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis: a meta-analysis. Stroke2021; 52: 193–202.
13.
DegnanAJGallagherGTengZLuJLiuQGillardJH. MR angiography and imaging for the evaluation of middle cerebral artery atherosclerotic disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2012; 33: 1427–1435.
14.
Pavlin-PremrlDBoopathySRNemesA, et alComputational fluid dynamics in intracranial atherosclerosis—lessons from cardiology: a review of CFD in intracranial atherosclerosis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis2021; 30: 106009.
15.
SamuelsOBJosephGJLynnMJSmithHAChimowitzMI. A standardized method for measuring intracranial arterial stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2000; 21: 643–646.
16.
GaoSWongKSHansbergTLamWWMDrosteDWRingelsteinEB. Microembolic signal predicts recurrent cerebral ischemic events in acute stroke patients with middle cerebral artery stenosis. Stroke2004; 35: 2832–2836.
17.
WongKSChenCFuJ, et alClopidogrel plus aspirin versus aspirin alone for reducing embolisation in patients with acute symptomatic cerebral or carotid artery stenosis (CLAIR study): a randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial. Lancet Neurol2010; 9: 489–497.
18.
WabnitzAMDerdeynCPFiorellaDJ, et alHemodynamic markers in the anterior circulation as predictors of recurrent stroke in patients with intracranial stenosis. Stroke2018; 50: 134–137.
19.
ZhouPLuZGaoP, et alEfficacy and safety of intensive statin therapy in Chinese patients with atherosclerotic intracranial arterial stenosis: a single-center, randomized, single-blind, parallel-group study with one-year follow-up. Clin Neurol Neurosurg2014; 120: 6–13.
20.
LiebeskindDSKosinskiASLynnMJ, et alNoninvasive fractional flow on MRA predicts stroke risk of intracranial stenosis. J Neuroimaging2015; 25: 87–91.
21.
Amin-HanjaniSPandeyDKRose-FinnellL, et alEffect of hemodynamics on stroke risk in symptomatic atherosclerotic vertebrobasilar occlusive disease. JAMA Neurol2016; 73: 178–185.
22.
LengXLanLIpHL, et alHemodynamics and stroke risk in intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Ann Neurol2019; 85: 752–764.
23.
SongXZhaoXLiebeskindDS, et alIncremental value of plaque enhancement in predicting stroke recurrence in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis. Neuroradiology2020; 62: 1123–1131.
24.
RomanoJGPrabhakaranSNizamA, et alInfarct recurrence in intracranial atherosclerosis: results from the MyRIAD study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis2021; 30: 105504.
25.
LiebeskindDSCotsonisGASaverJL, et alCollaterals dramatically alter stroke risk in intracranial atherosclerosis. Ann Neurol2011; 69: 963–974.
26.
FeldmannEWilterdinkJLKosinskiA, et alThe stroke outcomes and neuroimaging of intracranial atherosclerosis (SONIA) trial. Neurology2007; 68: 2099–2106.
27.
ZhaoLBarlinnKSharmaVK, et alVelocity criteria for intracranial stenosis revisited: an international multicenter study of transcranial Doppler and digital subtraction angiography. Stroke2011; 42: 3429–3434.
28.
TsivgoulisGVadikoliasKHeliopoulosI, et alPrevalence of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis in Caucasians: a prospective, multicenter, transcranial Doppler study. J Neuroimaging2014; 24: 11–17.
29.
BaracchiniCAnzolaGPCenciarelliS, et alItalian symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis study (ISIDE): a multicenter transcranial ultrasound evaluation. Neurol Sci2016; 37: 1645–1651.
30.
TsivgoulisGSharmaVKHooverSL, et alApplications and advantages of power motion-mode Doppler in acute posterior circulation cerebral ischemia. Stroke2008; 39: 1197–1204.
31.
HwangJKimSJHongJM, et alMicroembolic signals in acute posterior circulation cerebral ischemia: sources and consequences. Stroke2012; 43: 747–752.
32.
WuXZhangHLiuHXingYLiuK. Microembolic signals detected with transcranial Doppler sonography differ between symptomatic and asymptomatic middle cerebral artery stenoses in Northeast China. PLoS One2014; 9: e88986.
33.
SilvestriniMVernieriFPasqualettiP, et alImpaired cerebral vasoreactivity and risk of stroke in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA2000; 283: 2122–2127.
KorogiYTakahashiMNakagawaT, et alIntracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: MR angiographic findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol1997; 18: 135–143.
36.
HiraiTKorogiYOnoK, et alProspective evaluation of suspected stenoocclusive disease of the intracranial artery: combined MR angiography and CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2002; 23: 93–101.
37.
BashSVillablancaJPJahanR, et alIntracranial vascular stenosis and occlusive disease: evaluation with CT angiography, MR angiography, and digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2005; 26: 1012–1021.
38.
VillablancaJPNaelKHabibiRNaelALaubGFinnJP. 3 T contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of the intracranial arteries: comparison with time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and multislice computed tomography angiography. Invest Radiol2006; 41: 799–805.
39.
ChoiJLimSMKimYK. Comparison of 3D TOF MRA with contrast enhanced MRA in intracranial atherosclerotic occlusive disease. J Korean Soc Radiol2011; 64: 203–211.
40.
ChoiCGLeeDHLeeJH, et alDetection of intracranial atherosclerotic steno-occlusive disease with 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography with sensitivity encoding at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2007; 28: 439–446.
41.
ZhaoMAmin-HanjaniSRulandSCurcioAPOstergrenLCharbelFT. Regional cerebral blood flow using quantitative MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2007; 28: 1470–1473.
42.
PrabhakaranSWarriorLWellsKRJhaveriMDChenMLopesDK. The utility of quantitative magnetic resonance angiography in the assessment of intracranial in-stent stenosis. Stroke2009; 40: 991–993.
43.
GrossbergJAHaussenDCCardosoFB, et alCervical carotid pseudo-occlusions and false dissections: intracranial occlusions masquerading as extracranial occlusions. Stroke2017; 48: 774–777.
44.
Nguyen-HuynhMNWintermarkMEnglishJ, et alHow accurate is CT angiography in evaluating intracranial atherosclerotic disease?Stroke2008; 39: 1184–1188.
45.
DuffisEJJethwaPGuptaGBonelloKGandhiCDPrestigiacomoCJ. Accuracy of computed tomographic angiography compared to digital subtraction angiography in the diagnosis of intracranial stenosis and its impact on clinical decision-making. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis2013; 22: 1013–1017.
46.
WuXHChenXYWangLJWongKS. Intracranial artery calcification and its clinical significance. J Clin Neuro2016; 12: 253–261.
47.
BosDPortegiesMLVan der LugtA, et alIntracranial carotid artery atherosclerosis and the risk of stroke in whites: the Rotterdam Study. JAMA Neurol2014; 71: 405–411.
48.
Van DijkACFonvilleSZadiT, et alAssociation between arterial calcifications and nonlacunar and lacunar ischemic strokes. Stroke2014; 45: 728–733.
49.
HaussenDCBouslamaMDehkharghaniS, et alAutomated CT perfusion prediction of large vessel acute stroke from intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Interv Neurol2018; 7: 334–340.
50.
DemeestereJWoutersAChristensenSLemmensRLansbergMG. Review of perfusion imaging in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke2020; 51: 1017–1024.
51.
De HavenonAKhatriPPrabhakaranS, et alHypoperfusion distal to anterior circulation intracranial atherosclerosis is associated with recurrent stroke. J Neuroimaging2020; 30: 468–470.
52.
YaghiSKhatriPPrabhakaranS, et alWhat threshold defines penumbral brain tissue in patients with symptomatic anterior circulation intracranial stenosis: an exploratory analysis. J Neuroimaging2019; 29: 203–205.
53.
SacchettiDCCuttingSMMcTaggartRA, et alPerfusion imaging and recurrent cerebrovascular events in intracranial atherosclerotic disease or carotid occlusion. Int J Stroke2019; 13: 592–599.
54.
LyuJMaNLiebeskindDS, et alArterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging estimation of antegrade and collateral flow in unilateral middle cerebral artery stenosis. Stroke2016; 47: 428–433.
55.
LouXMaXLiebeskindDS, et alCollateral perfusion using arterial spin labeling in symptomatic versus asymptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab2019; 39: 108–117.
56.
LiebeskindDSFeldmannE. Fractional flow in cerebrovascular disorders. Interv Neurol2012; 1: 87–99.
57.
LiebeskindDSFongAScalzoF, et alSAMMPRIS angiography discloses hemodynamic effects of intracranial stenosis: computational fluid dynamics of fractional flow. Stroke2013; 44: A156.
58.
LengXScalzoFIpHL, et alComputational fluid dynamics modeling of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis may predict risk of stroke recurrence. PLoS One2014; 9: e97531.
59.
LindenholzAvan der KolkAGZwanenburgJJMHendrikseJ. The use and pitfalls of intracranial vessel wall imaging: how we do it. Radiology2017; 286: 12–28.
60.
MandellDMMossa-BashaMQiaoY, et al; On behalf of the Vessel Wall Imaging Study Group of the American Society of Neuroradiology. Intracranial vessel wall MRI: principles and expert consensus recommendations of the American Society of Neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2017; 38: 218–229.
61.
GaoPWangDZhaoZ, et alMulticenter prospective trial of stent placement in patients with symptomatic high-grade intracranial stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2016; 37: 1275–1280.
62.
AlexanderMJZaunerAChaloupkaJC, et alWEAVE trial: final results in 152 on-label patients. Stroke2019; 50: 889–894.
