This review is intended to help physicians guide patients to optimal management of post-stroke aphasia. We review literature on post-stroke aphasia treatment, focusing on: (1) when and for whom language therapy is most effective, (2) the variety of approaches that can be effective for different individuals, and (3) the extent to which behavioral therapy might be augmented by non-invasive brain stimulation and/or medications.
FlowersHLSkoretzSASilverFL, et al.Poststroke aphasia frequency, recovery, and outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2016; 97: 2188–2201.
2.
BerubeSHillisAE. Advances and innovations in aphasia treatment trials. Stroke2019; 50: 2977–2984.
3.
Fridriksson J and Smith K. Neuroplasticity associated with treated aphasia recovery. In: Small S & Hickok G (eds) Neurobiology of Language. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2016, pp.1007–1013.
4.
EdmondsLAMamminoKOjedaJ. Effect of verb network strengthening treatment (VNeST) in persons with aphasia: Extension and replication of previous findings. Am J Speech-Language Pathol2014; 23: S312–S329.
5.
HillisAE. The handbook of adult language disorders, UK: Psychology Press, 2015.
6.
MartinNThompsonCKWorrallL. Aphasia rehabilitation: the impairment and its consequences, San Diego: Plural Publishing, 2007.
7.
Hillis AE. For a theory of rehabilitation: progress in the decade of the brain. In: Halligan PW & Wade DT (eds) The Effectiveness of Rehabilitation for Cognitive Deficits. Oxord: Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 271–280.
8.
Hillis AE. The role of models of language processing in rehabilitation of language impairments. Aphasiology 1993; 7: 2–26.
9.
Brady MC, Kelly H, Godwin J, Enderby P and Campbell P. Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane database Syst Rev 2016; 9. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000425.pub4.
10.
SpellLARichardsonJDBasilakosA, et al.Developing, implementing, and improving assessment and treatment fidelity in clinical aphasia research. Am J Speech-Language Pathol2020; 29: 286–298.
11.
BreitensteinCGreweTFlöelA, et al.Intensive speech and language therapy in patients with chronic aphasia after stroke: a randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint, controlled trial in a health-care setting. Lancet2017; 389: 1528–1538.
12.
de Courten-MyersGMKleinholzMWagnerKRXiGMyersRE. Efficacious experimental stroke treatment with high-dose methylprednisolone. Stroke1994; 25: 487–492.
13.
WarrenRLGabrielCJohnstonAGaddieA. Efficacy during acute rehabilitation. Clin aphasiology1987; 17: 1–11.
14.
Godecke E, Armstrong E, Rai T, et al. A randomized control trial of intensive aphasia therapy after acute stroke: The Very Early Rehabilitation for SpEech (VERSE) study. Int J Stroke. Epub ahead of print 2020. DOI:1747493020961926.
JohnsonLBasilakosAYourganovG, et al.Progression of aphasia severity in the chronic stages of stroke. Am J Speech-Language Pathol2019; 28: 639–649.
17.
HollandAFrommDForbesMMacWhinneyB. Long-term recovery in stroke accompanied by aphasia: a reconsideration. Aphasiology2017; 31: 152–165.
18.
Harvey S, Carragher M, Dickey MW, Pierce JE and Rose ML. Dose effects in behavioural treatment of post-stroke aphasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Disabil Rehabil 2020: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1843079.
19.
CarpenterJCherneyLR. Increasing aphasia treatment intensity in an acute inpatient rehabilitation programme: a feasibility study. Aphasiology2016; 30: 542–565.
20.
RichardCKatzBHallowellC, et al.A multinational comparison of aphasia management practices. Int J Lang Commun Disord2000; 35: 303–314.
21.
HooverELCaplanDNWatersGSCarneyA. Communication and quality of life outcomes from an interprofessional intensive, comprehensive, aphasia program (ICAP). Top Stroke Rehabil2017; 24: 82–90.
22.
PittRTheodorosDHillAJRussellT. The impact of the telerehabilitation group aphasia intervention and networking programme on communication, participation, and quality of life in people with aphasia. Int J Speech Lang Pathol2019; 21: 513–523.
23.
PalmerRDimairoMCooperC, et al.Self-managed, computerised speech and language therapy for patients with chronic aphasia post-stroke compared with usual care or attention control (Big CACTUS): a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol2019; 18: 821–833.
24.
Fleming V, Brownsett S, Krason A, et al. Efficacy of spoken word comprehension therapy in patients with chronic aphasia: a cross-over randomised controlled trial with structural imaging. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2021; 92: 418–424.
25.
FridrikssonJHubbardHIHudspethSG, et al.Speech entrainment enables patients with Broca’s aphasia to produce fluent speech. Brain2012; 135: 3815–3829.
26.
Cherney LR and Carpenter J. Handbook of clinical neurology. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
27.
FridrikssonJBakerJMWhitesideJ, et al.Treating visual speech perception to improve speech production in nonfluent aphasia. Stroke2009; 40: 853–858.
28.
ThompsonCShapiroL. Treating agrammatic aphasia within a linguistic framework: treatment of underlying forms. Aphasiology2005; 19: 1021–1036.
29.
ZhangJYuJBaoY, et al.Constraint-induced aphasia therapy in post-stroke aphasia rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One2017; 12: e0183349.
30.
PulvermüllerFNeiningerBElbertT, et al.Constraint-induced therapy of chronic aphasia after stroke. Stroke2001; 32: 1621–1626.
31.
SickertAAndersL-CMünteTFSailerM. Constraint-induced aphasia therapy following sub-acute stroke: a single-blind, randomised clinical trial of a modified therapy schedule. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2014; 85: 51–55.
32.
CicconeNWestDCreamA, et al.Constraint-induced aphasia therapy (CIAT): a randomised controlled trial in very early stroke rehabilitation. Aphasiology2016; 30: 566–584.
33.
DavisGA. PACE revisited. Aphasiology2005; 19: 21–38.
34.
KaganASimmons-MackieNVictorJC. The impact of exposure with no training: implications for future partner training research. J Speech Lang Hear Res2018; 61: 2347–2352.
35.
ElmanRJ. The importance of aphasia group treatment for rebuilding community and health. Top Lang Disord2007; 27: 300–308.
36.
Simmons-Mackie N and Holland AL. Aphasia centers in North America: a survey. In: Helm-Estabrooks N, Bernstein-Ratner N (eds) Seminars in speech and language. vol 32. New York: Thieme, 2011, pp.203–215.
37.
ElmanRJ. Aphasia centers and the life participation approach to aphasia. Top Lang Disord2016; 36: 154–167.
38.
NouwensFde LauLMLVisch-BrinkEG, et al.Efficacy of early cognitive-linguistic treatment for aphasia due to stroke: a randomised controlled trial (Rotterdam Aphasia Therapy Study-3). Eur Stroke J2017; 2: 126–136.
39.
HollandAL. Pragmatic aspects of intervention in aphasia. J Neurolinguistics1991; 6: 197–211.
40.
PurdieHBaldwinS. Music therapy: challenging low self-esteem in people with a stroke. J Br Music Ther1994; 8: 19–24.
41.
Nicholas M and Elliott S. C-speak aphasia: a communication system for adults with aphasia. Solana Beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson Co.
42.
NINDS TPA (The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke RT-PA Stroke Study Group). Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med1995; 333: 1581–1587.
43.
CampbellBCVMitchellPJKleinigTJ, et al.Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med2015; 372: 1009–1018.
44.
CrijnenYSNouwensFde LauLML, et al.Early effect of intra-arterial treatment in ischemic stroke on aphasia recovery in MR CLEAN. Neurology2016; 86: 2049–2055.
45.
HillisAE. Pharmacological, surgical, and neurovascular interventions to augment acute aphasia recovery. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2007; 86: 426–434.
46.
Hillis AE, Ulatowski JA, Barker PB, et al. A pilot randomized trial of induced blood pressure elevation: effects on function and focal perfusion in acute and subacute stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 2003; 16: 236–246.
47.
Berthier ML. Ten key reasons for continuing research on pharmacotherapy for post-stroke aphasia. Aphasiology 2020. Epub ahead of print https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2020.1769987.
48.
CrossonBRodriguezADCoplandD, et al.Neuroplasticity and aphasia treatments: new approaches for an old problem. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2019; 90: 1147–1155.
49.
BrzoskoZMierauSBPaulsenO. Neuromodulation of spike-timing-dependent plasticity: past, present, and future. Neuron2019; 103: 563–581.
Llano DA and Small SL. Pharmacotherapy for Aphasia. Small S & Hickok G (eds) Neurobiology of Language. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2015, pp.1067–1083.
52.
Walker-BatsonDCurtisSNatarajanR, et al.A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the use of amphetamine in the treatment of aphasia. Stroke2001; 32: 2093–2096.
53.
SeniówJLitwinMLitwinTLeśniakMCzłonkowskaA. New approach to the rehabilitation of post-stroke focal cognitive syndrome: effect of levodopa combined with speech and language therapy on functional recovery from aphasia. J Neurol Sci2009; 283: 214–218.
54.
BreitensteinCKorsukewitzCBaumgaertnerA, et al.L-dopa does not add to the success of high-intensity language training in aphasia. Restor Neurol Neurosci2015; 33: 115–120.
55.
BerthierMLGreenCHiguerasCFernandezIHinojosaJMartínMC. A randomized, placebo-controlled study of donepezil in poststroke aphasia. Neurology2006; 67: 1687–1689.
56.
HaixiaYEShilinLI. A clinical randomized case-control study of donepezil in the treatment of aphasia after stroke. Chinese J Behav Med Brain Sci2014; 23: 225–227.
57.
LiptonSA. Paradigm shift in neuroprotection by NMDA receptor blockade: memantine and beyond. Nat Rev Drug Discov2006; 5: 160–170.
58.
BerthierMLGreenCLaraJP, et al.Memantine and constraint-induced aphasia therapy in chronic poststroke aphasia. Ann Neurol Off J Am Neurol Assoc Child Neurol Soc2009; 65: 577–585.
59.
BarbanchoMABerthierMLNavas-SánchezP, et al.Bilateral brain reorganization with memantine and constraint-induced aphasia therapy in chronic post-stroke aphasia: an ERP study. Brain Lang2015; 145: 1–10.
60.
CholletFTardyJAlbucherJ-F, et al.Fluoxetine for motor recovery after acute ischaemic stroke (FLAME): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol2011; 10: 123–130.
61.
JorgeREAcionLMoserDAdamsHPRobinsonRG. Escitalopram and enhancement of cognitive recovery following stroke. Arch Gen Psychiatry2010; 67: 187–196.
62.
DennisMMeadGForbesJ, et al.Effects of fluoxetine on functional outcomes after acute stroke (FOCUS): a pragmatic, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet2019; 393: 265–274.
63.
Crinion J. Transcranial direct current stimulation and aphasia therapy post stroke. Epub ahead of print 2015.
64.
BindmanLJLippoldOCJRedfearnJWT. The action of brief polarizing currents on the cerebral cortex of the rat (1) during current flow and (2) in the production of long-lasting after-effects. J Physiol1964; 172: 369.
65.
FritschBReisJMartinowichK, et al.Direct current stimulation promotes BDNF-dependent synaptic plasticity: potential implications for motor learning. Neuron2010; 66: 198–204.
66.
HollandRLeffAPJosephsO, et al.Speech facilitation by left inferior frontal cortex stimulation. Curr Biol2011; 21: 1403–1407.
67.
BiouECassoudesalleHCognéM, et al.Transcranial direct current stimulation in post-stroke aphasia rehabilitation: a systematic review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med2019; 62: 104–121.
68.
FridrikssonJRordenCElmJSenSGeorgeMSBonilhaL. Transcranial direct current stimulation vs sham stimulation to treat aphasia after stroke: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol2018; 75: 1470–1476.
69.
Sebastian R, Kim JH, Brenowitz R, et al. Cerebellar neuromodulation improves naming in post-stroke aphasia. Brain Commun. Epub ahead of print 2020.
70.
SpielmannKvan de Sandt-KoendermanWMEHeijenbrok-KalMHRibbersGM. Transcranial direct current stimulation does not improve language outcome in subacute poststroke aphasia. Stroke2018; 49: 1018–1020.
71.
Rubi-FessenIHartmannAHuberW, et al.Add-on effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on subacute aphasia therapy: enhanced improvement of functional communication and basic linguistic skills. a randomized controlled study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2015; 96: 1935–1944.
72.
KhedrEMAbo El-FetohNAliAM, et al.Dual-hemisphere repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for rehabilitation of poststroke aphasia: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2014; 28: 740–750.
73.
TsaiP-YWangC-PKoJSChungY-MChangY-WWangJ-X. The persistent and broadly modulating effect of inhibitory rTMS in nonfluent aphasic patients: a sham-controlled, double-blind study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2014; 28: 779–787.
74.
RenC-LZhangG-FXiaN, et al.Effect of low-frequency rTMS on aphasia in stroke patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One2014; 9: e102557.
75.
Lam JMC and Wodchis WP. The relationship of 60 disease diagnoses and 15 conditions to preference-based health-related quality of life in Ontario hospital-based long-term care residents. Med Care 2010; 48: 380–387.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
