Abstract
Background and aim
Pyrexia-dependent clinical algorithms may under or overdiagnose stroke-associated pneumonia. This study investigates whether inclusion of elevated C-reactive protein as a criterion improves diagnosis.
Methods
The contribution of C-reactive protein ≥30 mg/l as an additional criterion to a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-based algorithm incorporating pyrexia with chest signs and leukocytosis and/or chest infiltrates to diagnose stroke-associated pneumonia was assessed in 1088 acute stroke patients from 37 UK stroke units. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of different approaches were assessed using adjudicated stroke-associated pneumonia as the reference standard.
Results
Adding elevated C-reactive protein to all algorithm criteria did not increase diagnostic accuracy compared with the algorithm alone against adjudicated stroke-associated pneumonia (sensitivity 0.74 (95% CI 0.65–0.81) versus 0.72 (95% CI 0.64–0.80), specificity 0.97 (95% CI 0.96–0.98) for both; kappa 0.70 (95% CI 0.63–0.77) for both). In afebrile patients (n = 965), elevated C-reactive protein with chest and laboratory findings had sensitivity of 0.84 (95% CI 0.67–0.93), specificity of 0.99 (95% CI 0.98–1.00), and kappa 0.80 (95% CI 0.70–0.90). The modified algorithm of pyrexia or elevated C-reactive protein and chest signs with infiltrates or leukocytosis had sensitivity of 0.94 (95% CI 0.87–0.97), specificity of 0.96 (95% CI 0.94–0.97), and kappa of 0.88 (95% CI 0.84–0.93) against adjudicated stroke-associated pneumonia.
Conclusions
An algorithm consisting of pyrexia or C-reactive protein ≥30 mg/l, positive chest signs, leukocytosis, and/or chest infiltrates has high accuracy and can be used to standardize stroke-associated pneumonia diagnosis in clinical or research settings.
Trial Registration
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
