Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

No comprehensive study exists about mechanical thrombectomy accessibility for patients admitted to a primary stroke center without onsite interventional neuroradiology service.

Aims

To evaluate mechanical thrombectomy accessibility within 6 h after transfer from a primary stroke center to a distant (156 km apart; 1.5 h by car) comprehensive stroke center.

Methods

Analysis of data collected in a three-year prospective registry on patients admitted to a primary stroke center within 4.5 h after symptom onset and selected for transfer to a comprehensive stroke center for mechanical thrombectomy. Eligible patients had confirmed proximal arterial occlusion and no large cerebral infarction on MRI images (DWI-ASPECTS ≥ 5). The rate of transfer, transfer without mechanical thrombectomy, mechanical thrombectomy, reperfusion (TICI score ≥ 2b-3), and the main relevant time measures were determined.

Results

Among the 385 patients selected for intravenous thrombolysis and/or potential mechanical thrombectomy, 211 were considered as transferrable for mechanical thrombectomy. The rate of transfer was 56.4% (n = 119/211), transfer without mechanical thrombectomy 56.3% (n = 67/119), mechanical thrombectomy 24.6% (n = 52/211), and reperfusion by MT (TICI score 2b/3) 18% (n = 38/211). The relevant median times (interquartile range) were: 130 min (62) for intravenous thrombolysis start to comprehensive stroke center door, 95 minutes (39) for primary stroke center door-out to comprehensive stroke center door-in, 191 min (44) for intravenous thrombolysis start to mechanical thrombectomy puncture, 354 min (107) for symptom onset to mechanical thrombectomy puncture and 417 min (124) for symptom onset to recanalization.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that transfer to a distant comprehensive stroke center is associated with reduced access to early mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke and large artery occlusion. These results could be translated to other high volume distant primary stroke center.

Keywords

Acute stroke therapy ischemic stroke reperfusion stroke facilities stroke units treatment thrombectomy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Goyal

Menon

van Zwam

. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet 2016; 387: 1723–1731.

Mazighi

Chaudhry

Ribo

. Impact of onset-to-reperfusion time on stroke mortality: a collaborative pooled analysis. Circulation 2013; 127: 1980–1985.

Sablot D, Gaillard N, Colas C, et al. Results of a one-year quality improvement process to reduce door-to-needle time for acute ischemic stroke with MRI screening. Rev Neurol 2017; 173: 47–54.

Prabhakaran

Ward

John

. Transfer delay is a major factor limiting the use of intra-arterial treatment in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2011; 42: 1626–1630.

Fuentes

Alonso de Leciñana

Ximénez-Carrillo

. Futile interhospital transfer for endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke. The Madrid Stroke Network Experience. Stroke 2015; 46: 2156–2161.

Ribo

Molina

Cobo

. Association between time to reperfusion and outcome is primarily driven by the time from imaging to reperfusion. Stroke 2016; 47: 999–1004.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.74 MB

Thrombectomy accessibility after transfer from a primary stroke center: Analysis of a three-year prospective registry