Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The original version of this consensus statement on mechanical thrombectomy was approved at the European Stroke Organisation (ESO)-Karolinska Stroke Update conference in Stockholm, 16–18 November 2014. The statement has later, during 2015, been updated with new clinical trials data in accordance with a decision made at the conference. Revisions have been made at a face-to-face meeting during the ESO Winter School in Berne in February, through email exchanges and the final version has then been approved by each society. The recommendations are identical to the original version with evidence level upgraded by 20 February 2015 and confirmed by 15 May 2015. The purpose of the ESO-Karolinska Stroke Update meetings is to provide updates on recent stroke therapy research and to discuss how the results may be implemented into clinical routine. Selected topics are discussed at consensus sessions, for which a consensus statement is prepared and discussed by the participants at the meeting. The statements are advisory to the ESO guidelines committee. This consensus statement includes recommendations on mechanical thrombectomy after acute stroke. The statement is supported by ESO, European Society of Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT), European Society of Neuroradiology (ESNR), and European Academy of Neurology (EAN).

Keywords

Recommendations Consensus statement acute stroke therapy mechanical thrombectomy endovascular

Methods

The Karolinska Stroke Update (KSU) consensus conferences take place every second year since 1996. From 2014, this is an official European Stroke Organisation meeting (ESO-KSU). The ESO-KSU program committee approves the final program. The core of the program is formed by consensus sessions, each dedicated to a topic within clinical stroke research with recent study results.

The participants in the consensus session prepare a draft consensus statement, coordinated by the session chairpersons and secretary. For the thrombectomy consensus session 2014, the secretary performed a Pubmed search for “mechanical thrombectomy and stroke”, “endovascular treatment of stroke”, “neurointervention” and others, as a basis for the draft statement. The draft circulated between the participants providing additional information on literature reviews and new publications. The draft was finally confirmed at a face-to-face session the afternoon before the start of the meeting and then discussed and modified at the meeting.

Since the participants at the Karolinska Stroke Update conference 2014 were aware of that several randomized studies on mechanical thrombectomy were about to be published within the next few months, it was decided that the session participants and the conference secretariat should revise the statement when relevant, based on the new reports. Since representatives of several professional organizations participated at the conference, the statement was also reviewed and agreed upon by these organizations.

New evidence since Karolinska stroke update 2012

Since the previous Karolinska stroke update consensus statement on mechanical thrombectomy 2012 results from randomized clinical trials and other retrospective cohort studies were made available as follows:

Large meta-analysis from randomized clinical trials of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT)

A recently published meta-analysis of individual patient data from 6756 patients in nine randomized trials comparing intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with alteplase versus placebo or open control showed that alteplase significantly improves functional outcomes when delivered within 4–5 h of stroke onset, with earlier treatment associated with bigger proportional benefits (OR 1·75, 95% CI 1·35–2·27), thus emphasizing the need for preventing delays in acute stroke treatment.¹

Clinical trials on mechanical thrombectomy

Older generation devices and first use of stent retrievers

Three trials evaluating endovascular therapy, published in 2013, IMS III, MR RESCUE and SYNTHESIS, reported neutral results on clinical outcome. Possible explanations for failure to demonstrate superiority of endovascular therapy were long delay between symptom onset and treatment, inadequate patient selection, less than desired recanalization rates and use of older generation devices. IMS III showed no difference in safety and clinical outcomes compared to IVT but used six different procedural techniques with only four patients being treated with the new generation stent retrievers.² A subgroup analysis of IMS III showed that 48.2% of the patients were functionally independent at follow-up, corresponding to a modified Rankin score (mRS) 0–2 when recanalization to modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) score 2b/3 was achieved (for internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusions 37–42% and proximal middle cerebral artery (MCA) (M1) occlusions 44%),³ emphasizing the importance of recanalization of proximal occlusion. Importantly, IMS III demonstrated that a delay in time to reperfusion was associated with lower likelihood of good clinical outcome.⁴ MR RESCUE allowed procedures up to 8 h based on penumbral imaging but used previous generation MERCI or Penumbra devices achieving mTICI 2b/3 recanalization rates of 67%.⁵ The SYNTHESIS EXPANSION trial also used very few stent retrievers.⁶ However, regarding safety, these trials showed similar rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) compared to IVT and even equivalence/superiority of IVT for minor stroke and stroke without large vessel occlusion on imaging.⁷

In the meantime, evidence for the efficacy and safety of stent retrievers in mechanical thrombectomy continued to grow from non-randomized studies. The solitaire flow restoration thrombectomy for acute revascularization (STAR) study was an international, multicentre, prospective, single-arm study of the Solitaire™ device in 202 patients with large vessel occlusion of the anterior circulation within 8 h of onset. It reported a 79% rate of successful revascularization, 57.9% of mRS 0-2, 1.5% SICH and 6.9% mortality. Support for stent retrievers was further gathered in a 2013 pooled analysis of 19 studies using the Trevo™ (n = 221) or Solitaire™ (n = 355) devices, showing mTICI 2b-3 scores in 83 and 82%, hemorrhage in 8 and 6%, device complications in 5 and 6%, good functional outcomes in 51 and 47% of the patients with similar times to recanalization and with a mortality of 31 and 14%, respectively.⁸

Stent retrievers in recent randomized controlled trials

Two smaller phase IIb randomized controlled studies compared stent retrievers with the original MERCI™ device (see also thrombectomy consensus statement from the 2012 KSU meeting):

The SWIFT study (Solitaire™ With the Intention For Thrombectomy) compared thrombectomy with the Solitaire™ and with the MERCI™ devices and was prematurely stopped after 113 patients because of efficacy. The primary outcome, recanalisation defined as Thrombolysis In Myocardial Ischemia (TIMI) scale 2 or 3, was more frequent with the Solitaire ™ device with an odds ratio (OR) of 4.9 (95% CI 2.1–11.1). Also, three months mRS ≤2 was more frequent with the Solitaire™ with an OR of 2.8 (1.2–6.2).⁹

The TREVO-2 trial (Trevo versus Merci retrievers for thrombectomy REvascularisation of large Vessel Occlusions) compared thrombectomy with the TREVO Retriever™ and with the MERCI™ device in 178 patients. Reperfusion measured by thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) scores of ≥2 was more frequent with the TREVO retriever™ with an OR of 4.2 (95% CI 1.9–9.7). Three months mRS ≤2 was more frequent with Trevo™: 40.0% vs. 21.8%, but there was a trend towards higher mortality.¹⁰

Five randomized controlled published trials compared endovascular therapy with usual therapy only (Table 1):

Table 1.

Recent randomized controlled trials of endovascular therapy vs. standard treatment (trials published 2015)

a) Main inclusion criteria and baseline characteristics
Study	Age	Time	Imaging	Inclusion NIHSS	Pat (n)	Median NIHSS T/C	IVT (%)
MR CLEAN (The Netherlands)	≥18	6 h	CT/CTA MR/MRA	≥ 2	500	17/18	89
ESCAPE (US, Canada, UK, South Korea)	≥18	12 h	CT/CTA/ multiphase CTA	> 5	316	17/16	72.7
EXTEND-IA (Australia, New Zealand)	≥18	6 h	CT/MR CTA/CTP	0–42	70	17/13	100
SWIFT PRIME (USA/EU)	18–85	6 h	CT MR DWI/PWI (Rapid) CTA/MRA	8–29	196	17/17	100
REVASCAT (Catalonia)	18–80	8 h	CT/MR DWI CTA/MRA	6	206	17/17	72.8
b) Main results and outcomes
Study	Onset-to-groin	TICI 2b/3	sICH T/C (%)	mRS 0-2 3 months TBY + IVT when indicated	mRS 0-2 3 months IVT or standard	Difference in mRS 0-2 at 3 months	Mortality T/C (%)
MR CLEAN (The Netherlands)	4 h 20 m	58.7%	7.7/6.4	33%	19%	+14%	21/22
ESCAPE (US, Canada, UK, South Korea)	4 h 01 m^a	72.4%	3.6/2.7	53%	29%	+24%	10/19
EXTEND-IA (Australia, New Zealand)	3 h 30 m	89%	0/2.9	71%	40%	+31%	9/20
SWIFT PRIME (USA/EU)	4 h 12 m	83%	0/3	60%	35%	+25%	9/12
REVASCAT (Catalonia)	4 h 29 m	66%	1.9/1.9	44%	28%	+16%	18/16

T: treatment arm, C: control arm, TBY: thrombectomy, IVT: intravenous thrombolysis.

Onset-to-recanalisation.

The MR CLEAN trial (Multicenter Randomized Clinical trial of Endovascular Treatment in the Netherlands),¹¹ using stent retrievers in 97% of the cases, showed benefit of endovascular therapy up to 6 h after stroke onset in the proximal anterior circulation in addition to best medical therapy (IVT up to 4.5 h in most patients). Onset to IVT was 85–87 min in both intervention and control groups, and onset time to arterial puncture was 260 min. The endovascular procedure was associated with a shift to improved function at 90 days, as reflected in more patients in the lower mRS categories, with an adjusted common odds ratio (acOR) of 1.67 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21–2.30).

Secondary outcome parameters (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at 24 h and 1 week, recanalization at 24 h and final infarct at 1 week) were all indicating statistically significant favoring of the intervention group. Treatment effect was consistent in all pre-defined subgroups.

The ESCAPE trial (Endovascular treatment for Small Core and Anterior circulation Proximal occlusion with Emphasis on minimizing CT to recanalization times) was prematurely halted after randomization of 316 patients due to a positive interim analysis. To be randomized, patients needed to have an NIHSS > 5, a computer tomography angiography (CTA) confirmed occlusion of the terminal carotid or MCA(M1 or large M2 segment), good collaterals on multiphase CTA, a computer tomography (CT) Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) > 5, and had to be enrolled <12 h. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) before randomization was given if patients were eligible. Results: The adjusted risk ratio for an mRS shift with thrombectomy at 90 days was 3.1 (CI: 2.0–4.7). A favorable mRS of 0–2 at 90 days was seen in 53.0% in thrombectomy vs. 29.3% in controls (numbers needed to treat (NNT) = 4), and reduction of mortality was significant. All subgroups of patients had similar benefit, including the elderly and patients treatable after 6 h from onset time. About 75% of patients received IVT and stent retrievers were used in 86.1%.¹²

The SWIFT PRIME trial (Solitaire™ With the Intention For Thrombectomy as PRIMary treatment for acute ischemic strokE) was prematurely stopped after a positive interim analysis of the first 196 patients. To be randomized, all patients needed to have received IVT < 4.5 h, an NIHSS score between 8 and 29, a CTA or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) showing an occlusion of the intracranial carotid or M1 segment of the MCA without extracranial carotid occlusion, an ASPECTS > 6 and CT hypodensity (or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) hyperintensity) <1/3 of the MCA territory, and treatable <6 h. Results (two co-primary endpoints): The OR for an mRS shift at 90 days with thrombectomy using the Solitaire™ FR stent retriever was highly significant (p < 0.001), and mRS 0-2 at 90 days was 60.2% in thrombectomy patients vs. 35.5% in controls (p < 0.001, NNT = 4). There was a trend for reduced mortality. The onset-to-arterial-puncture delay was 252 min. All subgroups of patients had similar benefit.¹³

The EXTEND-IA trial (EXtending the time for Thrombolysis in Emergency Neurological Deficits with Intra-Arterial therapy), a phase II trial looking at early reperfusion and neurological improvement on day 3, was prematurely stopped because of a positive interim analysis of the first 70 randomized patients. To be randomized, all patients needed to have received IVT < 4.5 h, a CTA or MRA showing an occlusion of the intracranial carotid, M1 or M2 segment of the MCA, significant mismatch and limited core on MR- or CT perfusion (using the RAPID® software), and had to be treatable <6 h. Results (two co-primary endpoints): Early reperfusion of the ischemic tissue at 24 h with thrombectomy with the Solitaire™ FR stent retriever was seen in 100% vs. 37% in the control group (p < 0.001), an NIHSS reduction ≥8 points or NIHSS 0-1 at three days was 80% with thrombectomy vs. 37% in the control group (p < 0.001). At 90 days, mRS 0-2 was 71% in thrombectomy patients and 40% in controls (p < 0.01, NNT = 3). There was a trend towards reduction of mortality. The onset-to-arterial-puncture delay was 210 min.¹⁴

The REVASCAT trial (Randomized Trial of Revascularization with Solitaire FR Device versus Best Medical Therapy in the Treatment of Acute Stroke Due to Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion Presenting within Eight Hours of Symptom Onset) was originally planned for 690 patients, but recruitment was halted early because of loss of equipoise after positive results published from other trials. Primary outcome was the severity of global disability at 90 days, as measured on the mRS. All patients had confirmed proximal anterior circulation occlusion and absence of a large infarct on neuroimaging. Intravenous thrombolysis was given in 68% of patients allocated to thrombectomy and 78% of the controls. Thrombectomy reduced disability over the range of the mRS with an adjusted OR for improvement of one point of 1.7 (95% CI 1.05–2.8). An independent functional outcome (mRS 0-2) was 43.7% for thrombectomy and 28.2% for control (adjusted odds ratio 2.1 (95% CI 1.1–4.0).¹⁵

Two further randomized controlled trials compared endovascular therapy with usual therapy only; results to be published

In the THRACE trial (Trial and Cost Effectiveness Evaluation of Intra-arterial Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke), patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis within 4 h were randomized to mechanical thrombectomy within 6 h with any approved device in France vs. no further treatment. The trial was halted after the second intermediate analysis of 395 patients. The results presented recently showed a reduction of disability in 12.1% with an independent functional outcome (mRS 0-2) in 42.1% after IV thrombolysis alone and 54.2% after IV thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy and lend further strong support for adding mechanical thrombectomy in selected patients.¹⁶

The THERAPY-trial (THE Randomized, concurrent controlled trial to Assess the Penumbra sYstem’s safety and effectiveness in the treatment of acute stroke) compared IV thrombolysis alone with added thrombus aspiration with the Penumbra™ system within 6 h. Because of the positive mechanical thrombectomy trials, THERAPY was halted after 108 randomized patients. Preliminary results were presented recently and the intention to treat analysis showed a strong trend for benefit with this intervention.¹⁷

In summary, there is very good evidence for early thrombectomy with stent retrievers. There is good evidence to favor stent retrievers over the MERCI™ device. At this moment, only limited data on other types of recanalization devices such as the Penumbra™ system are available.¹⁸ Given the variable success rates and clinical outcomes with different recanalization devices in randomized trials, generalizability of all transvascular approaches cannot be assumed.

Meta-analysis of thrombectomy vs. standard treatment

A meta-analysis of recent large trials comparing acute thrombectomy with no further treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke and (suspected or documented) large intracranial artery occlusions was also performed by one of the authors (TS). Large randomized controlled trials with results published in peer-reviewed journals over the last three years were included. In a first analysis, all trials where included, and in a second, only the recent ones (published in 2015) were used where stent retrievers were the predominant thrombectomy method. Analysed outcomes were favourable outcome defined as an mRS 0-2 at 90 days, mortality at 90 days and symptomatic hemorrhage as defined by each study group. ORs and 95% CIs of the intention-to-treat analyses were calculated for each outcome using the Mantel-Haenszel method with random effects. Heterogeneity between trials was assessed by several methods. All analyses were performed with Review Manager (Version 5.2.6). Results are shown in Figures 1 to 3. Adding thrombectomy did not change the examined outcomes, except that favorable three months outcome was significantly better (OR 2.29, CI 1.82–3.18) in recent thrombectomy trials.

Figure 1.

Endovascular vs. standard treatment or/and IVT outcome: mortality (day 90) (a) Only 2015 trials; (b) all trials.

Figure 3.

Endovascular vs. standard treatment or/and IVT outcome: symptomatic ICH; (a) Only 2015 trials; (b) all trials.

Aspects to be considered in mechanical thrombectomy

Mechanical thrombectomy in single centre cohorts: Outcomes and risk factors

A recently published single-centre series of 240 patients treated from 2005 to 2011 with mechanical thrombectomy alone or in addition to IVT (40%) (initially using MERCI™ and later on stent retrievers) achieved 50% mRS 0-2 at three months and reported 4.6% of SICH.¹⁹

In a retrospective single-centre cohort of 176 consecutive patients focusing on complications of mechanical thrombectomy, it was shown that prolonged endovascular procedure beyond 1 h was associated with higher complication rates (such as SICH, embolism to new territories, dissection, vasospasm, stent dislocation/occlusion, cumulative 11% rate), but that the overall rate of SICH (5%) was comparable to IVT.²⁰ Post interventional subarachnoid hyperdensities were not shown to influence outcomes.²¹

Mechanical thrombectomy in elderly patients

In MR CLEAN, 16% of the patients were 80 years or older; there was a positive treatment effect in this subgroup. This effect was significant and its size not different from the main effect size (OR 3.24, 95% CI 1.21–8.62).¹⁰ Similarly, both randomized trials ESCAPE and SWIFT PRIME (in the latter with upper age limit of 80 years old) showed benefit for all subgroups including the elderly, who should thus be considered for thrombectomy.^11,12 Previously, mortality in patients undergoing thrombectomy over 80 years of age was reported to be double that for younger patients in a large multicentre retrospective analysis in the US (9300 patients, of which 18% were above 80). However, the analysis period was restricted to 2008–2010, the type of device used was not mentioned and treatment effect could not be assessed.²² Almekhlafi et al.²³ used the SPAN-100 index (i.e. positive index if age + NIHSS score = 100 or more) and found lower proportions of favorable outcome in the patients with positive (61%) compared to negative SPAN index (27%, OR 0.3; 95% CI 0.1-0.9), with 60% of positive SPAN index being 80 years of age and older. For the vertebrobasilar circulation, a retrospective analysis from a US nationwide database from 2006 to 2010 showed that age had an impact on in-hospital mortality of patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (n = 631) but not IVT (n = 1554), in particular those 65 years of age or older (43 vs. 23%). However, the types of devices used during that period were not reported.²⁴

Time to treatment and reperfusion

The positive effect in the MR CLEAN trial was time dependent, with acOR decreasing from 3.0 (95% CI: 1.6–5.6) at 3.5 h onset to reperfusion time, to 1.5 (95% CI: 1.1–2.2) at 6 h.²⁵ Treatment effect was not statistically significant anymore when reperfusion was achieved after 6 h 19 m. The benefit of thrombectomy was also shown to be time dependent in IMS III, where increased time to reperfusion was associated with a decreased probability of good functional outcome (adjusted relative risk for every 30-min delay 0·88, 95% CI 0·80–0·98).⁴ Based on IMS III results and literature review, a cutoff of 347 min (5 h 47 m) for superiority of endovascular procedure over IVT alone was recently suggested,²⁶ and a first statistical review of published randomized controlled trials suggested a lower rate of good functional outcome (mRS 0-2) if stroke onset to reperfusion time exceeds 5–6 h.²⁷ These findings underline the necessity to treat as early as possible, and justify the time window of treatment within 6 h from symptom onset.

In the ESCAPE trial, however, 49 (15.5%) patients were included beyond 6 h, and treatment effect was not different but more advanced imaging (multiphase CTA) for inclusion in the trial was used. Also REVASCAT allowed inclusion up to 8 h.¹⁴ This leaves room to investigate the possibilities of expanding the treatment time window for a selected group based on advanced imaging.

Tandem pathology

In the MR CLEAN trial, 146 (29%) patients had an additional extracranial ICA occlusion (tandem pathology), with treatment effect in favor of thrombectomy (OR 1.43, 95% CI 0.78–2.64).¹⁰

In a systematic review of 32 studies including 1107 patients with intra and/or extracranial ICA occlusions, intra-arterial thrombolysis was compared with any kind of mechanical treatment and/or stent placement. Only studies with clinical outcomes reported beyond 30 days were included, ICA occlusions caused by dissection were excluded. Acute stenting of occlusions of the extracranial ICA resulted in a higher recanalization rate (87% vs. 48%, p = 0.001) and favorable outcomes (68% vs. 15%, p < 0.001) as well as lower mortality (18% vs. 41%, p = 0.048) when compared to intra-arterial thrombolysis.²⁸

Recently published cohort studies indicate that tandem stenosis/occlusions of the ICA/MCA can be treated with acute stenting of the extracranial internal carotid and stent retriever mechanical thrombectomy in the MCA with a reasonable risk profile.^29–33 However, further evaluation of this treatment strategy is warranted.

Basilar artery occlusion

Despite high mortality and morbidity rates associated with basilar artery occlusion,³⁴ evidence from RCT’s on the effect of endovascular treatment is lacking. A recent meta-analysis of 45 observational studies (n = 2056) of reperfusion vs. no reperfusion of acute basilar occlusion showed NNT of 3 and 2.5 to decrease death or dependency and death alone, respectively.³⁵

Single-centre studies with samples less than 100 patients have shown good functional outcomes following thrombectomy of the basilar artery, ranging from 30%^36,37 to 48%.^38–40 Experience at the Karolinska Hospital showed a 57% rate of good functional outcome (95% CI 37% to 75%), and of 73% (95% CI 50% to 89%) when there were no signs of acute infarction prior to treatment, with about 21% mortality.⁴¹

Recanalization rates over 75% were reported with new generation devices^37,42 as well as with older generation devices in the MERCI and multi-MERCI trials but with lower benefit.⁴³

A previous prospective registry, the Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study (BASICS) could not demonstrate superiority of endovascular therapy against IVT; however, it employed mostly older-generation devices.⁴⁴ The same investigators are now undertaking the BASICS treatment randomized trial, comparing thrombectomy <6 h in addition to IVT with IVT alone.

Anesthesia in mechanical thrombectomy

Conscious sedation has gained support from a retrospective analysis of patients receiving either general anesthesia or conscious sedation (n = 507 in both groups, 1:1 matching). Patients receiving general anesthesia had significantly more in-hospital mortality (25%) and pneumonia (17%) compared to patients receiving conscious sedation (12% and 9.3%, OR 2.37 and 2.0, respectively) but similar rates of SICH.⁴⁵ A recent mini review from Takahashi et al.⁴⁶ also supports conscious sedation. Previous single-centre cohort studies^47,48 and a review of five such studies⁴⁹ have reported similar findings. The post-hoc analysis of the thrombectomy patients in MR CLEAN showed better functional three months outcome in the absence of general anesthesia, but patients were not randomized to the type of anesthesia.⁵⁰ The issue of general anesthesia vs. sedation is currently studied in four randomized trials (ANSTROKE, COMET, GOLIATH and SIESTA).^51–54

An expert consensus statement of the Society of Neurointerventional Surgery and the Neurocritical Care Society recommends the use of general anesthesia for patients with severe agitation, low level of consciousness (GCS < 8), loss of airway protective reflexes, respiratory compromise and in selected posterior circulation stroke presenting with these features.⁵⁵

Prehospital patient selection for immediate transfer to centers with multimodal imaging and availability of thrombectomy

A recently published SITS registry study found NIHSS scores of 11 and 12 points as predictors of baseline vessel occlusion and functional independence at three months in a cohort of 11,632 patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis with available baseline imaging data and three month functional outcome.⁵⁶ Moreover, if imaging was performed 3 h after stroke onset, NIHSS scores thresholds decreased to 9 and 10 points in predicting baseline vessel occlusion and functional independency at three months, respectively. Higher NIHSS scores predicted large vessel occlusion and functional dependence after three months if treated with intravenous thrombolysis. These results are in line with an initial single-centre retrospective study of 162 patients showing that an NIHSS score of 10 or more points up to 6 h after stroke onset increased by 16.9-fold the odds of unfavorable outcome or death (p = 0.013), and by 7.13-fold the odds of proximal vessel occlusion (p = 0.013 and p < 0.038, respectively; sensitivity, 83%; specificity, 78%).⁵⁷

Imaging-guided patient selection

Acute non-invasive arterial imaging: All recent RCT trials of thrombectomy used non-invasive arterial imaging (CT-angiography or MR-angiography of cerebral and neck arteries) to select patients with an intracranial occlusion of the distal carotid and/or MCA or M2 main stem. This may be a reason why such trials were positive, in contrast to the previous thrombectomy trials. If non-invasive arterial imaging cannot be performed, an elevated NIHSS ≥ 9 points within the first 3 h, and ≥ 7 between 3 and 6 h strongly suggests an occlusion of a major intracranial artery.^56,58 Still, acute non-invasive imaging of cervical and intracranial arteries is clearly superior to identify the appropriate patients for acute mechanical thrombectomy.

ASPECTS (Alberta Score Program Early CT Score) on plain CT: The MR CLEAN trial subgroup analysis showed benefit of thrombectomy for patients with ASPECTS scores of 5 or more points (5–7 points, OR 1.97 and 8–10 points, OR 1.61, respectively) but probably not with ASPECTS scores 0–4 (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.14–8.46). A higher ASPECTS score indicates less ischemic signs. Higher baseline ASPECTS also predicted favorable outcome in a cohort of 202 patients treated with Solitaire FR²¹ and in a cohort 149 patients treated with Solitaire and Penumbra aspiration system⁵⁹ The MR RESCUE study, in which the penumbra was identified with multimodal CT or MRI for patient randomization, showed neutral results for mechanical thrombectomy. In the ESCAPE and SWIFT-PRIME trials, a lower ASPECTS threshold of 5 and 6 were applied, respectively. Above these values, thrombectomy showed similar efficacy for different ASPECTS scores.^11,12

MRI-based imaging: DWI, PWI, mismatch: The single-centre RECOST study using MRI diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-derived ASPECTS score on 165 patients showed benefit of thrombectomy when using this imaging technique for patient selection where the elderly could benefit from stent retriever thrombectomy if the ischemic core volume was low (with a clear cut-off at 70 years old) whereas all patients below 70 years of age could benefit.⁶⁰ A smaller study from the same centre on 31 consecutive patients, focusing on basilar artery occlusion treated with Solitaire FR device, found a good correlation between brainstem DWI score <3 and favorable clinical outcome.⁴⁰ The prospective, single-arm multicentre DEFUSE-2 trial showed favorable clinical outcomes in patients selected for endovascular treatment with MRI perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) mismatch in MCA or ICA occlusions (n = 98, about half pre-treated with IVT).⁶¹

Perfusion-CT-based imaging: A multicentre analysis of 165 patients, the vast majority of whom underwent endovascular or intravenous recanalization treatment, showed independent prognostic value of core and penumbra volumes on clinical outcome.⁶² The importance of recanalization was particularly striking in patients with large penumbra volumes.⁶³ In the positive EXTEND-IA trial, patients were selected based on a CT perfusion examination (CTP) showing a mismatch ratio >1.2, and absolute mismatch volume >10 ml, and an ischemic core lesion volume <70 ml, using RAPID™ software.¹³

Discussion regarding ongoing and future studies on mechanical thrombectomy

The recent results from several randomized controlled studies could potentially influence patient recruitment in ongoing RCT’s such as PISTE⁶⁴ or BASICS.⁶⁵ Until steering committees of the respective trials have halted the trial, randomization should be continued to help answer uncertainties of benefit and risk from thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke.

Studies comparing active centres (IVT + possibility for thrombectomy) with control centres that do not yet have access to thrombectomy (IVT treatment alone), e.g. SITS-OPEN,⁶⁶ should continue its recruitment to strengthen the level of evidence. There are many reasons to recommend this approach such as the need for confirmatory studies, the desirability of narrowing the confidence interval to get a tighter estimate of the effect size for health economic reasons and the necessity for a wide range of data allowing subgroup analysis with adequate power. This type of design will also test thrombectomy in standard clinical practice in experienced centres.

In addition, it is desirable that all patients undergoing some form of acute revascularization therapy (IVT, mechanical thrombectomy, etc.) are prospectively included in registries (e.g. SITS-ISTR⁶⁷ or SITS-TBY⁶⁸) to ensure further evidence from routine clinical practice data.

Consensus statements of the ESO-Karolinska Stroke Update 2014/2015, Supported by ESO, ESMINT, ESNR and EAN

Prepared in November 2014, updated and released on 20 February 2015, after the International Stroke Conference, reconfirmed 15 May 2015

(Sources: Karolinska Stroke Update level of evidence for treatment recommendation: Appendix 1; Oxford Evidence-based level of evidence: Appendix 2)

Treatment recommendations

Mechanical thrombectomy, in addition to intravenous thrombolysis within 4.5 h when eligible, is recommended to treat acute stroke patients with large artery occlusions in the anterior circulation up to 6 h after symptom onset (Grade A, Level 1a, KSU Grade A). – new

Mechanical thrombectomy should not prevent the initiation of intravenous thrombolysis where this is indicated, and intravenous thrombolysis should not delay mechanical thrombectomy (Grade A, Level 1a, KSU Grade A). – changed

Mechanical thrombectomy should be performed as soon as possible after its indication (Grade A, Level 1a, KSU Grade A).

For mechanical thrombectomy, stent retrievers approved by local health authorities should primarily be considered (Grade A, Level 1a, KSU Grade A). – new

Other thrombectomy or aspiration devices approved by local health authorities may be used upon the neurointerventionists discretion if rapid, complete and safe revascularisation of the target vessel can be achieved (Grade C, Level 2a, KSU Grade C) – new

If intravenous thrombolysis is contraindicated (e.g. Warfarin-treated with therapeutic INR) mechanical thrombectomy is recommended as first-line treatment in large vessel occlusions (Grade A, Level 1a, KSU Grade A) – changed and updated level of evidence.

Patients with acute basilar artery occlusion should be evaluated in centres with multimodal imaging and treated with mechanical thrombectomy in addition to intravenous thrombolysis when indicated (Grade C, Level 4, KSU Grade C); alternatively they may be treated within a randomized controlled trial for thrombectomy approved by the local ethical committee – new

The decision to undertake mechanical thrombectomy should be made jointly by a multidisciplinary team comprising at least a stroke physician and a neurointerventionist and performed in experienced centres providing comprehensive stroke care and expertise in neuroanaesthesiology (Grade C, Level 5, GCP, KSU Grade C).

Mechanical thrombectomy should be performed by a trained and experienced neurointerventionist who meets national and/or international requirements (Grade B, Level 2b, KSU Grade B) – changed in level of evidence.

The choice of anaesthesia depends on the individual situation; independently of the method chosen, all efforts should be made to avoid thrombectomy delays (Grade C, Level 2b, KSU Grade C) – changed.

Patient selection

Intracranial vessel occlusion must be diagnosed with non-invasive imaging whenever possible before considering treatment with mechanical thrombectomy (Grade A, Level 1a, KSU Grade A) – new.

If vessel imaging is not available at baseline, a NIHSS score of ≥ 9 within three, and ≥ 7 points within 6 h may indicate the presence of large vessel occlusion (Grade B, Level 2a, KSU Grade B) – new.

Patients with radiological signs of large infarcts (for ex. using the ASPECTS score) may be unsuitable for thrombectomy (Grade B, Level 2a, KSU Grade B) – new

Imaging techniques for determining infarct and penumbra sizes can be used for patient selection and correlate with functional outcome after mechanical thrombectomy (Grade B, Level 1b, KSU Grade B) – new.

High age alone is not a reason to withhold mechanical thrombectomy as an adjunctive treatment (Grade A, Level 1a, KSU Grade A) – new.

Recommendation for implementation, registries and further trials

Health authorities are strongly encouraged to implement access to thrombectomy within a reasonable time range in a network including stroke centres. Access to thrombectomy should be organised in a way that time between symptoms onset and to thrombectomy is minimised and that adequate competence within neurointervention, neurology, neuroradiology, neurosurgery and neuroanaesthesiology is provided. – new.

It is encouraged to perform and include patients in RCT addressing unresolved thrombectomy questions such as thrombectomy for basilar artery occlusion, treatment in a late und unknown time windows, treating patients with imaging findings not sufficiently covered in recent trials, comparing new devices with widely-used stent retrievers, thrombectomy with or without intravenous thrombolysis, and different types of anaesthesia. – new.

Non-randomized trials comparing centres not yet having access to mechanical thrombectomy with others should continue (such as SITS OPEN) – new.

Ischemic stroke patients undergoing any type of acute revascularization treatment should be included systematically in national or international registries (such as SITS or SITS-TBY) – new.

Organisations represented by the authors

Nils Wahlgren, Tiago Moreira, Patrik Michel, Thorsten Steiner, Olav Jansen, Christophe Cognard, Heinrich P Mattle, Wim van Zwam, Staffan Holmin, Turgut Tatlisumak, Jesper Petersson, Valeria Caso, Werner Hacke: European Stroke Organisation-Karolinska Stroke Update (ESO-KSU) consensus conference Nils Wahlgren, Tiago Moreira, Patrik Michel, Thorsten Steiner, Christophe Cognard, Heinrich P Mattle, Turgut Tatlisumak, Valeria Caso, Werner Hacke, Mikael Mazighi, Marcel Arnold, Urs Fischer, Jens Fiehler, Jan Gralla, Kennedy R Lees: European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Christophe Cognard, Istvan Szikora, Laurent Pierot, Jens Fiehler, Jan Gralla, Olav Jansen: European Society of Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) Jens Fiehler, Jan Gralla, Olav Jansen: European Society of Neuroradiology (ESNR) Franz Fazekas: European Academy of Neurology (EAN)

Figure 2.

Endovascular vs. standard treatment or/and IVT outcome: mRS 0-2 (day 90) (a) Only 2015 trials; (b) all trials.

Footnotes

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Individual Funding

Jens Fiehler has received funding from the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF).

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Marcel Arnold had speaker engagements and advisory boards for Covidien, and Boehringer-Ingelheim, BMS, Pfizer and Bayer and declared co-authorship for some literature.49,50 Christoph Cognard was a co-author of SWIFT Prime. Valeria Caso declares speaker’s bureau for Boehringer Ingelheim and Pfizer and advisory board for Boehringer-Ingelheim. Franz Fazekas has no conflicts of interest. Jens Fiehler has received fees as consultant or lecturer from Acandis, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Codman, Covidien, MicroVention, Penumbra, Philips, Sequent, Siemens and Stryker. Related: Consultant for Codman, MicroVention. Lectures for Boehringer-Ingelheim, Covidien, and Penumbra. Funding to institution: MicroVention. Unrelated: Consultant for Acandis, Sequent, Stryker. Lectures for Bayer, Philips, Siemens. Funding to Institution: DFG, BMBF, BMWi. Olav Jansen was a co-author of SWIFT-Prime, and is a steering committee member of SITS Open. Urs Fischer has speaker’s honorarium with Covidien. Jan Gralla is global PI of the STAR study, consultant for Covidien. Werner Hacke declares membership in the SWIFT Prime Steering Committee, and modest reimbursement for time spent. Staffan Holmin co-authored some literature^19,41 and is a steering committee member of SITS Open and the SITS thrombectomy registry. Kennedy Lees was co-author of Emberson et al.¹ Heinrich Mattle was an advisor in the design of MR CLEAN, co-author of SWIFT Prime, and was involved in planning, conduction and writing the studies quoted in some literature.^44,57,58 Mikael Mazighi has co-authored the IMS 3 trial Patrik Michel is co-investigator in SWIFT Prime, BASICS registry and BASICS trials Tiago Moreira is co-investigator in SITS Open. Jesper Peterson’s centre is participating in SITS Open. Laurent Pierot has no conflicts of interest. Thorsten Steiner had consulting from Covidien. Istvan Szikora has consulting agreements with Covidien, Stryker and Codman. Turgut Tatlisumak has no conflicts of interest. Wim van Zwam was one of the principal investigators of MR CLEAN. Nils Wahlgren is coordinator of SITS Open and chairman of SITS International. Co-authored some literature.^1,19,41,56

Appendix 1

Appendix 2

References

Emberson

Lees

Lyden

. Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet 2014; 384: 1929–1935.

Broderick

Palesch

Demchuk

. Endovascular therapy after intravenous t-pa versus t-pa alone for stroke. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 893–903.

Tomsick

Yeatts

Liebeskind

. Endovascular revascularization results in IMS III: intracranial ICA and M1 occlusions. J Neurointerv Surg 2015; 7: 795–802.

Khatri

Yeatts

Mazighi

. Time to angiographic reperfusion and clinical outcome after acute ischaemic stroke: An analysis of data from the interventional management of stroke (IMS III) phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol 2014; 13: 567–574.

Kidwell

Jahan

Saver

. Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 2434–2435.

Ciccone

Valvassori

Nichelatti

. Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 904–913.

Qureshi

Abd-Allah

Aleu

. Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke patients: implications and interpretation of IMS III, MR rescue, and synthesis expansion trials: a report from the working group of international congress of interventional neurology. J Vasc Interv Neurol 2014; 7: 56–75.

Pereira

Gralla

Davalos

. Prospective, multicenter, single-arm study of mechanical thrombectomy using solitaire flow restoration in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2013; 44: 2802–2807.

Saver

Jahan

Levy

. Solitaire flow restoration device versus the merci retriever in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (swift): a randomised, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2012; 380: 1241–1249.

10.

Nogueira

Lutsep

Gupta

. Trevo versus merci retrievers for thrombectomy revascularisation of large vessel occlusions in acute ischaemic stroke (TREVO 2): a randomised trial. Lancet 2012; 380: 1231–1240.

11.

Berkhemer

Fransen

Beumer

. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 11–20.

12.

Goyal

Demchuk

Menon

. Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 1019–1030.

13.

Saver

Goyal

Bonafé

. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 2285–2295.

14.

Campbell

Mitchell

Kleinig

. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 1009–1018.

15.

Jovin

Chamorro

Cobo

. Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 2296–2306.

16.

Bracard S on behalf of the THRACE trialists; Oral presentation, ESO Conference 2015, Glasgow, UK.

17.

Mocco JD on behalf of the THERAPY trialists, Oral presentation, ESO Conference 2015, Glasgow, UK.

18.

Hussain

Zaidat

Fitzsimmons

. The penumbra system for mechanical thrombectomy in endovascular acute ischemic stroke therapy. Neurology 2012; 79: S135–S141.

19.

Soderqvist

Kaijser

Soderman

. Mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke-experience from 6 years of practice. Neuroradiology 2014; 56: 477–486.

20.

Behme

Gondecki

Fiethen

. Complications of mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke – a retrospective single-center study of 176 consecutive cases. Neuroradiology 2014; 56: 467–476.

21.

Nikoubashman

Reich

Pjontek

. Postinterventional subarachnoid haemorrhage after endovascular stroke treatment with stent retrievers. Neuroradiology 2014; 56: 1087–1096.

22.

Villwock

Singla

Padalino

. Acute ischaemic stroke outcomes following mechanical thrombectomy in the elderly versus their younger counterpart: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2014; 4: e004480.

23.

Almekhlafi

Davalos

Bonafe

. Impact of age and baseline NIHSS scores on clinical outcomes in the mechanical thrombectomy using solitaire FR in acute ischemic stroke study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014; 35: 1337–1340.

24.

Brinjikji

Rabinstein

Cloft

. Outcomes of endovascular mechanical thrombectomy and intravenous tissue plasminogen activator for the treatment of vertebrobasilar stroke. J Clin Neurol 2014; 10: 17–23.

25.

Fransen

. Time to reperfusion and effect of intra-arterial treatment in the MR CLEAN trial. Int Stroke Conf, Nashville, TN, USA, 12 February 2015.

26.

Vagal

Khatri

Broderick

. Time to angiographic reperfusion in acute ischemic stroke: decision analysis. Stroke 2014; 45: 3625–3630.

27.

Prabhakaran

Ruff

Bernstein

. Acute stroke intervention. A systematic review. JAMA 2015; 313: 1451–1462.

28.

Kappelhof

Marquering

Berkhemer

. Intra-arterial treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke and internal carotid artery occlusion: A literature review. J Neurointerv Surg 2015; 7: 8–15.

29.

Cohen

Gomori

Rajz

. Extracranial carotid artery stenting followed by intracranial stent-based thrombectomy for acute tandem occlusive disease. J Neurointerv Surgery 2014; 7: 412–417.

30.

Maurer

Joachimski

Berlis

. Two in one: endovascular treatment of acute tandem occlusions in the anterior circulation. Clin Neuroradiol 2014; Epub, PMID 24988990.

31.

Lescher

Czeppan

Porto

. Acute stroke and obstruction of the extracranial carotid artery combined with intracranial tandem occlusion: results of interventional revascularization. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 2014; 38: 304–314.

32.

Dababneh

Bashir

Hussain

. Endovascular treatment of tandem internal carotid and middle cerebral artery occlusions. J Vasc Interv Neurol 2014; 7: 26–31.

33.

Stampfl

Ringleb

Mohlenbruch

. Emergency cervical internal carotid artery stenting in combination with intracranial thrombectomy in acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014; 35: 741–746.

34.

Lindsberg

Soinne

Tatlisumak

. Long-term outcome after intravenous thrombolysis of basilar artery occlusion. JAMA 2004; 292: 1862–1866.

35.

Kumar

Shahripour

Alexandrov

. Recanalization of acute basilar artery occlusion improves outcomes: a meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 2014; Epub, doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011418.

36.

Nagel

Kellert

Mohlenbruch

. Improved clinical outcome after acute basilar artery occlusion since the introduction of endovascular thrombectomy devices. Cerebrovasc Dis 2013; 36: 394–400.

37.

Mohlenbruch

Stampfl

Behrens

. Mechanical thrombectomy with stent retrievers in acute basilar artery occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014; 35: 959–964.

38.

Baek

Yoon

Kim

. Acute basilar artery occlusion: Outcome of mechanical thrombectomy with solitaire stent within 8 hours of stroke onset. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014; 35: 989–993.

39.

Broussalis

Hitzl

McCoy

. Comparison of endovascular treatment versus conservative medical treatment in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion. Vasc Endovasc Surg 2013; 47: 429–437.

40.

Mourand

Machi

Nogue

. Diffusion-weighted imaging score of the brain stem: a predictor of outcome in acute basilar artery occlusion treated with the solitaire FR device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014; 35: 1117–1123.

41.

Andersson

Kuntze Soderqvist

Soderman

. Mechanical thrombectomy as the primary treatment for acute basilar artery occlusion: experience from 5 years of practice. J Neurointerv Surg 2013; 5: 221–225.

42.

Fesl

Holtmannspoetter

Patzig

. Mechanical thrombectomy in basilar artery thrombosis: technical advances and safety in a 10-year experience. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 2014; 37: 355–361.

43.

Lutsep

Rymer

Nesbit

. Vertebrobasilar revascularization rates and outcomes in the merci and multi-merci trials. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2008; 17: 55–57.

44.

Schonewille

Wijman

Michel

. Treatment and outcomes of acute basilar artery occlusion in the basilar artery international cooperation study (basics): a prospective registry study. Lancet Neurol 2009; 8: 724–730.

45.

McDonald

Brinjikji

Rabinstein

. Conscious sedation versus general anaesthesia during mechanical thrombectomy for stroke: a propensity score analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 2015; 7: 789–794.

46.

Takahashi

Liang

Liebeskind

. To tube or not to tube? The role of intubation during stroke thrombectomy. Front Neurol 2014; 5: 170.

47.

Davis

Menon

Baghirzada

. Anesthetic management and outcome in patients during endovascular therapy for acute stroke. Anesthesiology 2012; 116: 396–405.

48.

Abou-Chebl

Lin

Hussain

. Conscious sedation versus general anesthesia during endovascular therapy for acute anterior circulation stroke: preliminary results from a retrospective, multicenter study. Stroke 2010; 41: 1175–1179.

49.

John

Mitchell

Dowling

. Is general anaesthesia preferable to conscious sedation in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke with intra-arterial mechanical thrombectomy? A review of the literature. Neuroradiology 2013; 55: 93–100.

50.

van der Berg

Koelman

Berkhemer

. Type of anesthesia and differences in clinical outcome after intra-arterial treatment for ischemic stroke. Stroke 2015; 46: 1257–1262.

51.

Sedation versus general anesthesia for endovascular therapy in acute stroke – impact on neurological outcome (ANSTROKE), Study record, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01872884 (accessed 6 October 2015).

52.

Conscious sedation vs. general anesthesia for Mechanical Thrombectomy (COMET). Personal information L. Pierot.

53.

General or local anaesthesia in intraarterial therapy (GOLIATH). Study record, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02317237 (accessed 6 October 2015).

54.

Schönenberger

Möhlenbruch

Pfaff

. Sedation vs. intubation for endovascular stroke treatment (SIESTA) – a randomized monocentric trial. Int J Stroke 2015; 10: 969–978.

55.

Talke

Sharma

Heyer

. Republished: Society for neuroscience in anesthesiology and critical care expert consensus statement: anesthetic management of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2014; 45: e138–e150.

56.

Cooray

Fekete

Mikulik

. Threshold for NIH stroke scale in predicting vessel occlusion and functional outcome after stroke thrombolysis. Int J Stroke 2015; 10: 822–829.

57.

Nedeltchev

Schwegler

Haefeli

. Outcome of stroke with mild or rapidly improving symptoms. Stroke 2007; 38: 2531–2535.

58.

Heldner

Zubler

Mattle

. National institutes of health stroke scale score and vessel occlusion in 2152 patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2013; 44: 1153–1157.

59.

Spiotta

Vargas

Hawk

. Impact of the aspect scores and distribution on outcome among patients undergoing thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg 2014; 7: 551–558.

60.

Daniere

Lobotesis

Machi

. Patient selection for stroke endovascular therapy – DWI-aspects thresholds should vary among age groups: insights from the recost study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015; 36: 32–39.

61.

Lemmens

Mlynash

Straka

. Comparison of the response to endovascular reperfusion in relation to site of arterial occlusion. Neurology 2013; 81: 614–618.

62.

Zhu

Michel

Aghaebrahim

. Computed tomography workup of patients suspected of acute ischemic stroke: perfusion computed tomography adds value compared with clinical evaluation, noncontrast computed tomography, and computed tomography angiogram in terms of predicting outcome. Stroke 2013; 44: 1049–1055.

63.

Zhu

Michel

Aghaebrahim

. Prediction of recanalization trumps prediction of tissue fate: the penumbra: a dual-edged sword. Stroke 2013; 44: 1014–1019.

64.

Pragmatic Ischaemic Stroke Thrombectomy Evaluation (PISTE). Study record, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01745692 (accessed 6 October 2015).

65.

van der Hoeven

Schonewille

Vos

. The Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study (BASCIS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2013; 14: 200.

66.

SITS open arteries in acute stroke study (SITS Open). Study record, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02326428 (accessed 6 October 2015).

67.

SITS international stroke thrombolysis registry (SITS-ISTR), https://sitsinternational.org/news/sits-scientifc-report-2014 (accessed 6 October 2015).

68.

SITS thrombectomy registry (SITS TBY), https://sitsinternational.org/news/sits-thrombectomy-registry (accessed 6 October 2015).

Mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: Consensus statement by ESO-Karolinska Stroke Update 2014/2015,supported by ESO,ESMINT,ESNR and EAN

Abstract

Keywords

Methods

New evidence since Karolinska stroke update 2012

Large meta-analysis from randomized clinical trials of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT)

Clinical trials on mechanical thrombectomy

Older generation devices and first use of stent retrievers

Stent retrievers in recent randomized controlled trials

Two further randomized controlled trials compared endovascular therapy with usual therapy only; results to be published

Meta-analysis of thrombectomy vs. standard treatment

Aspects to be considered in mechanical thrombectomy

Mechanical thrombectomy in single centre cohorts: Outcomes and risk factors

Mechanical thrombectomy in elderly patients

Time to treatment and reperfusion

Tandem pathology

Basilar artery occlusion

Anesthesia in mechanical thrombectomy

Prehospital patient selection for immediate transfer to centers with multimodal imaging and availability of thrombectomy

Imaging-guided patient selection

Discussion regarding ongoing and future studies on mechanical thrombectomy

Consensus statements of the ESO-Karolinska Stroke Update 2014/2015, Supported by ESO, ESMINT, ESNR and EAN

Treatment recommendations

Patient selection

Recommendation for implementation, registries and further trials

Organisations represented by the authors

Footnotes

Funding

Individual Funding

Declaration of conflicting interests

Appendix 1

Appendix 2

References