The current study investigated how romantic relationships affected socially shared memory in heterosexual couples. Experiment 1 explored the influence of material sharing and intimacy on shared memory. Both romantic pairs and strangers showed memory effects from retrieval practice, but socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting occurred only in romantic pairs. Experiment 2 examined differences in neural activities during dyadic retrieval practice processes between romantic and stranger pairs. Results suggested that romantic pairs exhibited distinct memory effects compared to strangers, with higher brain activation in the prefrontal cortex and greater neural synchronization. This study sheds light on social memory in romantic relationships, highlighting implications for shared memory and knowledge organization.
AbramsD.AndoK.HinkleS. (1998). Psychological attachment to the group: Cross-cultural differences in organizational identification and subjective norms as predictors of workers’ turnover intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(10), 1027–1039. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672982410001
2.
AcevedoB. P.AronA.FisherH. E.BrownL. L. (2012). Neural correlates of long-term intense romantic love. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq092
3.
AnS.MaoW.XuL.RazaH. (2023). The effect of others’ repeated retrieval on the illusion of truth for emotional information. Current Psychology, 42(23), 19894–19902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03105-y
4.
AndersenS. M.ChenS. (2002). The relational self: An interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psychological Review, 109(4), 619–645. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.4.619
5.
AndersonM. C.BjorkR. A.BjorkE. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(5), 1063–1087. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.5.1063
6.
AronA.McLaughlin-VolpeT.MashekD.LewandowskiG.WrightS. C.AronE. N. (2004). Including others in the self. European Review of Social Psychology, 15(1), 101–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280440000008
7.
ArtioliF.CicognaP. C.OcchioneroM.ReeseE. (2012). “The people I grew up with”: The role of sociodemographic factors in early memories in an Italian sample. Memory, 20(2), 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2011.651090
8.
BarberS. J.MatherM. (2012). Forgetting in context: The effects of age, emotion, and social factors on retrieval-induced forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 40(6), 874–888. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0202-8
9.
BarnierA. J.HarrisC. B.MorrisT.SavageG. (2018). Collaborative facilitation in older couples: Successful joint remembering across memory tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2385. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02385
10.
BarnierA. J.HungL.ConwayM. (2004). Retrieval–induced forgetting of emotional and unemotional autobiographical memories. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 457–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/0269993034000392
BoothbyE. J.SmithL. K.ClarkM. S.BarghJ. A. (2017). The world looks better together: How close others enhance our visual experiences. Personal Relationships, 24(3), 694–714. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12201
13.
BucchioniG.LelardT.AhmaidiS.GodefroyO.KrystkowiakP.MourasH. (2015). Do we feel the same empathy for loved and hated peers?PLoS One, 10(5), e0125871. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125871
ChengX.LiX.HuY. (2015). Synchronous brain activity during cooperative exchange depends on gender of partner: A fNIRS-based hyperscanning study. Human Brain Mapping, 36(6), 2039–2048. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22754
16.
ComanA.BerryJ. N. (2015). Infectious cognition: Risk perception affects socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting of medical information. Psychological Science, 26(12), 1965–1971. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615609438
17.
ComanA.ManierD.HirstW. (2009). Forgetting the unforgettable through conversation: Socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting of September 11 memories. Psychological Science, 20(5), 627–633. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02343.x
18.
ComanA.MomennejadI.DrachR. D.GeanaA. (2016). Mnemonic convergence in social networks: The emergent properties of cognition at a collective level. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(29), 8171–8176.
19.
CucA.KoppelJ.HirstW. (2007). Silence is not golden: A case for socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Science, 18(8), 727–733. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01967.x
20.
CuiX.BakerJ. M.LiuN.ReissA. L. (2015). Sensitivity of fNIRS measurement to head motion: An applied use of smartphones in the lab. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 245, 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.02.006
21.
CuiX.BryantD. M.ReissA. L. (2012). NIRS-based hyperscanning reveals increased interpersonal coherence in superior frontal cortex during cooperation. NeuroImage, 59(3), 2430–2437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.003
22.
De WildeA.KootH. M.Van LierP. A. C. (2016). Developmental links between children’s working memory and their social relations with teachers and peers in the early school years. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 44(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-015-0053-4
23.
DeHartT.PelhamB.MurrayS. (2004). Implicit dependency regulation: Self-esteem, relationship closeness, and implicit evaluations of close others. Social Cognition, 22(1), 126–146. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.22.1.126.30986
24.
EchterhoffG.HigginsE. T.LevineJ. M. (2009). Shared reality: Experiencing commonality with others’ inner states about the world. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(5), 496–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01161.x
25.
FörsterJ.LibermanN.HigginsE. T. (2005). Accessibility from active and fulfilled goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(3), 220–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.06.009
26.
GrinstedA.MooreJ. C.JevrejevaS. (2004). Application of the cross wavelet transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 11(5/6), 561–566. https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-11-561-2004
27.
GrysmanA. (2020). Narrative characteristics of autobiographical memory predict expectations of narrator gender. Memory, 28(8), 968–983. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2020.1795200
28.
HardinC. D.HigginsE. T. (1996). Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. In SorrentinoR. M.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition, Vol. 3: The interpersonal context (pp. 28–84). The Guilford Press.
29.
HarrisC. B.BarnierA. J.SuttonJ.KeilP. G.DixonR. A. (2017). “Going episodic”: Collaborative inhibition and facilitation when long-married couples remember together. Memory, 25(8), 1148–1159. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2016.1274405
30.
HarrisC. B.KeilP. G.SuttonJ.BarnierA. J.McIlwainD. J. F. (2011). We remember, we forget: Collaborative remembering in older couples. Discourse Processes, 48(4), 267–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2010.541854
31.
HirstW.EchterhoffG. (2012). Remembering in conversations: The social sharing and reshaping of memories. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 55–79.
32.
HoshiY. (2007). Functional near-infrared spectroscopy: Current status and future prospects. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 12(6), 062106. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2804911
33.
JangK. E.TakS.JungJ.JangJ.JeongY.YeJ. C. (2009). Wavelet minimum description length detrending for near-infrared spectroscopy. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 14(3), 034004.
34.
JiangJ.DaiB.PengD.ZhuC.LiuL.LuC. (2012). Neural synchronization during face-to-face communication. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(45), 16064–16069. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2926-12.2012
KoppelJ.WohlD.MeksinR.HirstW. (2014). The effect of listening to others remember on subsequent memory: The roles of expertise and trust in socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting and social contagion. Social Cognition, 32(2), 148–180. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2014.32.2.148
37.
KuhlB. A.DudukovicN. M.KahnI.WagnerA. D. (2007). Decreased demands on cognitive control reveal the neural processing benefits of forgetting. Nature Neuroscience, 10(7), 908–914. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1918
38.
LindenbergerU.LiS.-C.GruberW.MüllerV. (2009). Brains swinging in concert: Cortical phase synchronization while playing guitar. BMC Neuroscience, 10(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-10-22
LongY.ZhengL.ZhaoH.ZhouS.ZhaiY.LuC. (2021). Interpersonal neural synchronization during interpersonal touch underlies affiliative pair bonding between romantic couples. Cerebral Cortex, 31(3), 1647–1659. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaa316
41.
LuC.-M.ZhangY.-J.BiswalB. B.ZangY.-F.PengD.-L.ZhuC.-Z. (2010). Use of fNIRS to assess resting state functional connectivity. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 186(2), 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.11.010
42.
MaoW.AnS.JiF.LiZ. (2021). Who will influence memories of listeners: Evidence from socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 10(3), 458–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.01.005
43.
MikulincerM.GillathO.ShaverP. R. (2002). Activation of the attachment system in adulthood: Threat-related primes increase the accessibility of mental representations of attachment figures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 881–895. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.881
44.
MillerJ. G.VrtičkaP.CuiX.ShresthaS.HosseiniS. M. H.BakerJ. M.ReissA. L. (2019). Inter-brain synchrony in mother-child dyads during cooperation: An fNIRS hyperscanning study. Neuropsychologia, 124, 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.12.021
45.
MolaviB.DumontG. A. (2012). Wavelet-based motion artifact removal for functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Physiological Measurement, 33(2), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/33/2/259
46.
MurrayS. L.DerrickJ. L.LederS.HolmesJ. G. (2008). Balancing connectedness and self-protection goals in close relationships: A levels-of-processing perspective on risk regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(3), 429–459. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.429
47.
OkamotoM.DanH.SakamotoK.TakeoK.ShimizuK.KohnoS.OdaI.IsobeS.SuzukiT.KohyamaK.DanI. (2004). Three-dimensional probabilistic anatomical cranio-cerebral correlation via the international 10–20 system oriented for transcranial functional brain mapping. NeuroImage, 21(1), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.08.026
48.
PanY.ChengX.ZhangZ.LiX.HuY. (2017). Cooperation in lovers: An fNIRS-based hyperscanning study. Human Brain Mapping, 38(2), 831–841. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23421
PuX. (2009). The relationship between self-deception, self-esteem, and emotional autobiographical memory. Journal of Capital Normal University: Social Sciences Edition, (S4), 56–62.
52.
RossM.SpencerS. J.LinardatosL.LamK. C. H.PerunovicM. (2004). Going shopping and identifying landmarks: Does collaboration improve older people’s memory?Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(6), 683–696. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1023
53.
ScholkmannF.KleiserS.MetzA. J.ZimmermannR.Mata PaviaJ.WolfU.WolfM. (2014). A review on continuous wave functional near-infrared spectroscopy and imaging instru-mentation and methodology. NeuroImage, 85, 6–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.004
54.
SongH.ZouZ.KouJ.LiuY.YangL.ZilverstandA.d’Oleire UquillasF.ZhangX. (2015). Love-related changes in the brain: A resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 71. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00071.
55.
SongX.DongM.FengK.LiJ.HuX.LiuT. (2024). Influence of interpersonal distance on collaborative performance in the joint Simon task—An fNIRS-based hyperscanning study. NeuroImage, 285, 120473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120473
56.
SprecherS.TregerS.WondraJ. D.HilaireN.WallpeK. (2013). Taking turns: Reciprocal self-disclosure promotes liking in initial interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(5), 860–866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.017
57.
StoneC. B.BarnierA. J.SuttonJ.HirstW. (2013). Forgetting our personal past: Socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting of autobiographical memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(4), 1084–1099. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030739
58.
TakahashiK.MizunoK.SasakiA. T.WadaY.TanakaM.IshiiA.TajimaK.TsuyuguchiN.WatanabeK.ZekiS.WatanabeY. (2015). Imaging the passionate stage of romantic love by dopamine dynamics. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 191. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00191.
59.
TangY.LiuX.WangC.CaoM.DengS.DuX.DaiY.GengS.FanY.CuiL.LiF. (2020). Different strategies, distinguished cooperation efficiency, and brain synchronization for couples: An fNIRS-based hyperscanning study. Brain and Behavior, 10(9), e01768. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1768
60.
TongY.LindseyK. P.deB FrederickB. (2011). Partitioning of physiological noise signals in the brain with concurrent near-infrared spectroscopy and fMRI. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 31(12), 2352–2362. https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2011.100
61.
TorrenceC.CompoG. P. (1998). A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 79(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<0061:APGTWA>2.0.CO;2
62.
VirtanenJ.NoponenT.MeriläinenP. (2009). Comparison of principal and independent comp-onent analysis in removing extracerebral interference from near-infrared spectroscopy signals. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 14(5), 054032. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3253323
63.
VitorioR.StuartS.RochesterL.AlcockL.PantallA. (2017). fNIRS response during walking—Artefact or cortical activity? A systematic review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 83, 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.10.002
64.
WimberM.BäumlK.-H.BergströmZ.MarkopoulosG.HeinzeH.-J.Richardson-KlavehnA. (2008a). Neural markers of inhibition in human memory retrieval. The Journal of Neuroscience, 28(50), 13419–13427. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1916-08.2008
YamashiroJ. K.HirstW. (2020). Convergence on collective memories: Central speakers and distributed remembering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(3), 461–481. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000656
ZhangH.LiuY.WangX.CuiZ.WangH.LiuX.WagnerU.EchterhoffG. (2023). Benefits of collaborative remembering in older and younger couples: the role of conversation dynamics and gender. Memory, 31(3), 406–420.
ZhangY.BrooksD. H.FranceschiniM. A.BoasD. A. (2005). Eigenvector-based spatial filtering for reduction of physiological interference in diffuse optical imaging. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 10(1), 011014. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1852552
72.
ZhengL.ChenC.LiuW.LongY.ZhaoH.BaiX.ZhangZ.HanZ.LiuL.GuoT.ChenB.DingG.LuC. (2018). Enhancement of teaching outcome through neural prediction of the students’ knowledge state. Human Brain Mapping, 39(7), 3046–3057. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24059
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
