The facial processing characteristics of developmental prosopagnosia (DP) have long been a focus of research. In this study, we used behavioral and eye movement techniques to explore the facial fixation characteristics of DP by comparing the fixation patterns during facial recognition between people with DP and control individuals. A mixed 2 (group: control, DP) × 3 (area of interest [AOI]: eyes, nose, mouth) experimental design was adopted, dividing faces into 3 AOIs: eyes, nose, and mouth. The behavioral results showed that facial recognition scores were lower in the DP group than in the control group. The eye movement results showed that the duration and number of eye and nose fixations were greater than those on the mouth in the control group; however, the duration and number of fixations on the eyes, nose, and mouth did not differ in the DP group. These results confirmed that the control group focused more on the eyes and nose when recognizing faces, whereas the DP group adopted a more even browsing pattern to focus on various facial features. Overall, the differences between the fixation patterns of the control group and the DP group were explored with the help of eye-tracking technology, which revealed that the fixation patterns of the DP group were more evenly spread across multiple facial features than those of the control group were, providing a new perspective for researchers to further explore the causes of DP and formulate effective intervention programs.
BartonJ. J.RadcliffeN.CherkasovaM. V.EdelmanJ. A. (2007). Scan patterns during the processing of facial identity in prosopagnosia. Experimental Brain Research, 181, 199–211.
4.
BateS.BennettsR.MoleJ. A.AingeJ. A.GregoryN. J.BobakA. K.BussuntA. (2015). Rehabilitation of face-processing skills in an adolescent with prosopagnosia: Evaluation of an online perceptual training programme. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 25(5), 733–762.
5.
BateS.HaslamC.JansariA.HodgsonT. L. (2009). Covert face recognition relies on affective valence in congenital prosopagnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 26(4), 391–411.
6.
BateS.HaslamC.TreeJ. J.HodgsonT. L. (2008). Evidence of an eye movement-based memory effect in congenital prosopagnosia. Cortex, 44(7), 806–819.
7.
BehrmannM.AvidanG.MarottaJ. J.KimchiR. (2005). Detailed exploration of face-related processing in congenital prosopagnosia: 1. Behavioral findings. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(7), 1130–1149.
8.
BellL.DuchaineB.SusiloT. (2023). Dissociations between face identity and face expression processing in developmental prosopagnosia. Cognition, 238, 105469.
9.
BlaisC.JackR. E.ScheepersC.FisetD.CaldaraR. (2008). Culture shapes how we look at faces. PLoS One, 3(8), e3022.
10.
BobakA. K.ParrisB. A.GregoryN. J.BennettsR. J.BateS. (2017). Eye-movement strategies in developmental prosopagnosia and “super” face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(2), 201–217.
11.
BombariD.SchmidP. C.Schmid MastM.BirriS.MastF. W.LobmaierJ. S. (2013). Emotion recognition: The role of featural and configural face information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(12), 2426–2442.
12.
BrielmannA. A.BülthoffI.ArmannR. (2014). Looking at faces from different angles: Europeans fixate different features in Asian and Caucasian faces. Vision Research, 100, 105–112.
13.
BrunsdonR.ColtheartM.NickelsL.JoyP. (2006). Developmental prosopagnosia: A case analysis and treatment study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23(6), 822–840.
14.
BukachC. M.Le GrandR.KaiserM. D.BubD. N.TanakaJ. W. (2008). Preservation of mouth region processing in two cases of prosopagnosia. Journal of Neuropsychology, 2(1), 227–244.
15.
BurnsE. J.GauntE.KidaneB.HunterL.PulfordJ. (2023). A new approach to diagnosing and researching developmental prosopagnosia: Excluded cases are impaired too. Behavior Research Methods, 55(8), 4291–4314.
16.
BurnsE. J.TreeJ. J.WeidemannC. T. (2014). Recognition memory in developmental prosopagnosia: electrophysiological evidence for abnormal routes to face recognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 622.
17.
DeGutisJ.CohanS.MercadoR. J.WilmerJ.NakayamaK. (2012). Holistic processing of the mouth but not the eyes in developmental prosopagnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 29(5–6), 419–446.
18.
DuchaineB.NakayamaK. (2006). The Cambridge Face Memory Test: Results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants. Neuropsychologia, 44(4), 576–585.
19.
DuchaineB.GermineL.NakayamaK. (2007). Family resemblance: Ten family members with prosopagnosia and within-class object agnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24(4), 419–430.
20.
GerlachC.StarrfeltR. (2021). Patterns of perceptual performance in developmental prosopagnosia: An in-depth case series. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 38(1), 27–49.
21.
GoffauxV. (2019). Fixed or fexible? Orientation preference in identity and gaze processing in humans. PLOS ONE, 14(1), e0210503.
22.
GoffauxV.DakinS. (2010). Horizontal information drives the behavioral signatures of face processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 1721.
23.
HillsP. J.RossD. A.LewisM. B. (2011). Attention misplaced: The role of diagnostic features in the face-inversion effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(5), 1396.
24.
ItzM. L.SchweinbergerS. R.KaufmannJ. M. (2018). Familiar face priming: The role of second-order configuration and individual face recognition abilities. Perception, 47(2), 185–196.
25.
KellyD. J.MielletS.CaldaraR. (2010). Culture shapes eye movements for visually homogeneous objects. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 1360
26.
KennerknechtI.PluempeN.WellingB. (2008). Congenital prosopagnosia–a common hereditary cognitive dysfunction in humans. Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark, 13(8), 3150–3158.
27.
LewisM. B.EdmondsA. J. (2003). Face detection: Mapping human performance. Perception, 32(8), 903–920.
28.
LittleZ.SusiloT. (2022). Preference for horizontal information in faces predicts typical variations in face recognition but is not impaired in developmental prosopagnosia. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 30, 1–8.
29.
MaJ. L.HuangJ. Y. (2024). The other-ethnicity effect in face recognition of Tibetan and Han individuals: Evidence from behavioral and eye-movement data. International Journal of Psychology, 59, 762–771.
30.
MaJ. L.ZhangR.LiY. X. (2023). Age Weakens the Other-Race Effect among Han Subjects in Recognizing Own-and Other-Ethnicity Faces. Behavioral Sciences, 13(8), 675.
31.
MaJ.YangB.LuoR.DingX. (2020). Development of a facial expression database of Chinese Han, Hui and Tibetan people. International Journal of Psychology, 55(3), 456–464.
32.
MielletS.VizioliL.HeL.ZhouX.CaldaraR. (2013). Mapping face recognition information use across cultures. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 34.
33.
PachaiM. V.SekulerA. B.BennettP. J. (2013). Masking of individual facial features reveals the use of horizontal structure in the eyes. Journal of Vision, 13(9), 411-411.
34.
PetersonM. F.EcksteinM. P. (2012). Looking just below the eyes is optimal across face recognition tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109 (48), E3314–E3323.
35.
PetersonM. F.ZaunI.HokeH.JiahuiG.DuchaineB.KanwisherN. (2019). Eye movements and retinotopic tuning in developmental prosopagnosia. Journal of Vision, 19(9), 7.
36.
PizzamiglioM. R.LucaM. D.VitaA. D.PalermoL.TanzilliA.DacquinoC.PiccardiL. (2017). Congenital prosopagnosia in a child: Neuropsychological assessment, eye movement recordings and training. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 27(3), 369–408
37.
RoyerJ.BlaisC.CharbonneauI.DéryK.TardifJ.DuchaineB.GosselinF.FisetD. (2018). Greater reliance on the eye region predicts better face recognition ability. Cognition, 181, 12–20.
38.
SchmalzlL.PalermoR.GreenM.BrunsdonR.ColtheartM. (2008). Training of familiar face recognition and visual scan paths for faces in a child with congenital prosopagnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25(5), 704–729.
39.
SchynsP. G.BonnarL.GosselinF. (2002). Show me the features! Understanding recognition from the use of visual information. Psychological Science, 13(5), 402–409.
40.
ShahP.GauleA.SowdenS.BirdG.CookR. (2015). The 20-item prosopagnosia index (PI20): A self-report instrument for identifying developmental prosopagnosia. Royal Society Open Science, 2(6), 140343. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.140343
41.
StantićM.PounderZ.BateS.SusiloT.CatmurC.BirdG. (2022). Individuals with developmental prosopagnosia show independent impairments in face perception, face memory and face matching. Cortex, 157, 266–273.
42.
SunW.WangY.WangJ.LuoF. (2021). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the 20-item Prosopagnosia Index (PI20). In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 271, p. 01036). EDP Sciences.
43.
TanakaJ. W.FarahM. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46(2), 225–245.
44.
TardifJ.Morin DuchesneX.CohanS.RoyerJ.BlaisC.FisetD.DuchaineB.GosselinF. (2019). Use of face information varies systematically from developmental prosopagnosics to super-recognizers. Psychological Science, 30(2), 300–308.
45.
TowlerJ.FisherK.EimerM. (2018). Holistic face perception is impaired in developmental prosopagnosia. Cortex, 108, 112–126.
46.
TsantaniM.GrayK. L.CookR. (2022). New evidence of impaired expression recognition in developmental prosopagnosia. Cortex, 154, 15–26
47.
VerfaillieK.HuysegemsS.De GraefP.Van BelleG. (2014). Impaired holistic and analytic face processing in congenital prosopagnosia: Evidence from the eye-contingent mask/window paradigm. Visual Cognition, 22(3–4), 503–521.
48.
VinetteC.GosselinF.SchynsP. G. (2004). Spatio-temporal dynamics of face recognition in a flash: It’s in the eyes. Cognitive Science, 28(2), 289–301.
49.
WangQ.XiaoN. G.QuinnP. C.HuC. S.QianM.FuG.LeeK. (2015). Visual scanning and recognition of Chinese, Caucasian, and racially ambiguous faces: Contributions from bottom-up facial physiognomic information and top-down knowledge of racial categories. Vision Research, 107, 67–75.
50.
WangY. T.MaJ. L.ZhangJ. Y.LiY. T.DingX. B. (2020). Differences in looking at own-race and other-race facial expression: Evidence from eye movements. Studie of Psychology and Behavior, 18(6), 749–754.
51.
WilcocksonT. D.BurnsE. J.XiaB.TreeJ.CrawfordT. J. (2020). Atypically heterogeneous vertical first fixations to faces in a case series of people with developmental prosopagnosia. Visual Cognition, 28(4), 311–323.
