Mental representations guide action planning and body execution. While hand representations have been extensively studied, not much is known about differences between hands, feet, and whole-body representations. Previous studies tell us about functional and sensory differences between body parts and between parts and whole body; however, hands and feet studies also tell us that it matters if we are aware of using motor strategies when we activate body representations, and this has not been compared yet between body parts and between parts and whole body. Sixty participants (M = 26.68, SD = 8.22) took part in an online experiment, including Implicit Association Tests (IAT) where participants are not fully aware of using a motor strategy, and a Mental Motor Chronometry (MMC), a more explicit task requiring awareness of imagining actions. The influence of visual imagery was controlled by administering a Vividness of Visual Imagery (VVI) questionnaire to exclude non-motor-related effects. Results show that when the task requires less awareness to be solved, there are no differences between hands, feet, and whole body. Differences are found when more awareness of body representation and related processes is required, with a more pronounced and finer representation of hands than the whole body. No differences between hands versus feet and whole body versus feet were found. These results highlight the importance of awareness in the representation of body parts and suggest that motor strategies contribute to the differentiation between hand and whole-body representations, a distinction not accounted for by visual imagery differences.
ArmitageJ.EerolaT. (2020). Reaction time data in music cognition: Comparison of pilot data from lab, crowdsourced, and convenience web samples. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2883. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02883
2.
AspellJ. E.LenggenhagerB.BlankeO. (2012). Multisensory perception and bodily self-consciousness: From out-of-body to inside-body experience. In MurrayM. M. (Ed.), The neural bases of multisensory processes. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis.
3.
BakkerM.OvereemS.SnijdersA. H.BormG.van ElswijkG.ToniI.BloemB. R. (2008). Motor imagery of foot dorsiflexion and gait: Effects on corticospinal excitability. Clinical Neurophysiology, 119(11), 2519–2527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2008.07.282
4.
BartoloA.CarlierM.HassainiS.MartinY.CoelloY. (2014). The perception of peripersonal space in right and left brain damage hemiplegic patients. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00003
5.
BekJ.HumphriesS.PoliakoffE.BradyN. (2022). Mental rotation of hands and objects in ageing and Parkinson’s disease: Differentiating motor imagery and visuospatial ability. Experimental Brain Research, 240(7-8), 1991–2004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-022-06389-5
BradyN.MaguinnessC.Ní ChoisdealbhaA. (2011). My hand or yours? Markedly different sensitivity to egocentric and allocentric views in the hand laterality task. PLOS ONE, 6(8), Article e23316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023316
8.
BraunN.KrancziochC.LiepertJ.DettmersC.ZichC.BüschingI.DebenerS. (2017). Motor imagery impairment in postacute stroke patients. Neural Plasticity, 2017, 4653256. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4653256
9.
BrusaF.KretzschmarL.MagnaniF. G.TurnerG.GarraffaM.SeddaA. (2021). Talking with hands: Body representation in British Sign Language users. Experimental Brain Research, 239(3), 731–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-020-06013-4
10.
BrusaF.Suphi ErdenM.SeddaA. (2024). Exploring the role of disgust in hands and feet laterality judgement tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77,1418–1429. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218231207336
11.
CaggianoP.CocchiniG. (2020). The functional body: Does body representation reflect functional properties?Experimental Brain Research, 238(1), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05705-w
12.
CameronJ. J.StinsonD. A. (2019). Gender (mis)measurement: Guidelines for respecting gender diversity in psychological research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13(11). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12506
13.
CanepaP.SbragiA.SainoF.BiggioM.BoveM.BisioA. (2020). Thinking before doing: A pilot study on the application of motor imagery as a learning method during physical education lesson in high school. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 2, 550744. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2020.550744
14.
CareyM.PrestonC. (2019). Investigating the components of body image disturbance within eating disorders. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10(September), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00635
15.
CoelloY.CartaudA. (2021). The interrelation between peripersonal action space and interpersonal social space: Psychophysiological evidence and clinical implications. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15, 636124. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.636124
16.
CohenJ. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev. ed.). Academic Press.
17.
ColletC.HajjM. E.ChakerR.Bui-XuanB.LehotJ. J.HoyekN. (2021). Effect of motor imagery and actual practice on learning professional medical skills. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02424-7
18.
CorenS. (1993). The lateral preference inventory for measurement of handedness, footedness, eyedness, and earedness: Norms for young adults. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334122
19.
Corradi-Dell’AcquaC.TomasinoB.FinkG. R. (2009). What is the position of an arm relative to the body? Neural correlates of body schema and body structural description. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 29(13), 4162–4171. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4861-08.2009
20.
CramerS. C.OrrE. L. R.CohenM. J.LacourseM. G. (2007). Effects of motor imagery training after chronic, complete spinal cord injury. Experimental Brain Research, 177(2), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0662-9
21.
CummingJ.EavesD. L. (2018). The nature, measurement, and development of imagery ability. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 37(4), 375–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276236617752439
22.
CurtzeC.OttenB.PostemaK. (2010). Effects of lower limb amputation on the mental rotation of feet. Experimental Brain Research, 201(3), 527–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-2067-z
23.
DeanG. M.MorrisP. E. (2003). The relationship between self-reports of imagery and spatial ability. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 245–273. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712603321661912
24.
de LangeF. P.RoelofsK.ToniI. (2008). Motor imagery: A window into the mechanisms and alterations of the motor system. Cortex, 44(5), 494–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2007.09.002
DevlinA. L.WilsonP. H. (2010). Adult age differences in the ability to mentally transform object and body stimuli. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 17, 709–729.
27.
DiedenhofenB.MuschJ. (2015). Cocor: A comprehensive solution for the statistical comparison of correlations. PLOS ONE, 10(4), e0121945.
28.
Di VitaA.BocciaM.PalermoL.GuarigliaC. (2016). To move or not to move, that is the question! Body schema and non-action oriented body representations: An fMRI meta-analytic study. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 68, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.05.005
29.
EdwardsL. M.CausbyR. S.StewartH.StantonT. R. (2019). Differential influence of habitual third-person vision of a body part on mental rotation of images of hands and feet. Experimental Brain Research, 237(5), 1325–1337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05512-3
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
32.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
33.
FieldA. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Sage.
34.
FioriF.SeddaA.FerrèE. R.ToraldoA.QuerzolaM.PasottiF.OvadiaD.PiroddiC.Dell’AquilaR.LunettaC.CorboM.BottiniG. (2013). Exploring motor and visual imagery in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Experimental Brain Research, 226(4), 537–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3465-9
35.
FiorioM.TinazziM.IontaS.FiaschiA.MorettoG.EdwardsM. J.BhatiaK. P.AgliotiS. M. (2007). Mental rotation of body parts and non-corporeal objects in patients with idiopathic cervical dystonia. Neuropsychologia, 45(10), 2346–2354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.02.005
36.
FrassinettiF.FerriF.MainiM.BenassiM. G.GalleseV. (2011). Bodily self: An implicit knowledge of what is explicitly unknown. Experimental Brain Research, 212(1), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2708-x
GherriE.XuA.AmbronE.SeddaA. (2022). Peripersonal space around the upper and the lower limbs. Experimental Brain Research, 240(7–8), 2039–2050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-022-06387-7
39.
GiurgolaS.BologniniN.NavaE. (2020). Perceptual representation of own hand size in early childhood and adulthood. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 5378. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62206-5
40.
GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD. E.SchwartzJ. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test.
41.
GreenwaldA. G.NosekB. A.BanajiM. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197
42.
GumbleA.CarelsR. (2012). The harmful and beneficial impacts of weight bias on well-being: The moderating influence of weight status. Body Image, 9(1), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2011.07.005
43.
GustinS. M.WrigleyP. J.GandeviaS. C.MiddletonJ. W.HendersonL. A.SiddallP. J. (2008). Movement imagery increases pain in people with neuropathic pain following complete thoracic spinal cord injury. Pain, 137(2), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2007.08.032
44.
HajnalA.FonsecaS.HarrisonS.Kinsella-ShawJ.CarelloC. (2007). Comparison of dynamic (effortful) touch by hand and foot. Journal of Motor Behavior, 39(2), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.39.2.82-88
Hotz-BoendermakerS.FunkM.SummersP.BruggerP.Hepp-ReymondM.-C.CurtA.KolliasS. S. (2008). Preservation of motor programs in paraplegics as demonstrated by attempted and imagined foot movements. NeuroImage, 39(1), 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.065
48.
IontaS.BlankeO. (2009). Differential influence of hands posture on mental rotation of hands and feet in left and right handers. Experimental Brain Research, 195(2), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1770-0
49.
IontaS.FourkasA. D.FiorioM.AgliotiS. M. (2007). The influence of hands posture on mental rotation of hands and feet. Experimental Brain Research, 183(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1020-2
50.
IontaS.VilligerM.JutzelerC. R.FreundP.CurtA.GassertR. (2016). Spinal cord injury affects the interplay between visual and sensorimotor representations of the body. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 20144. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20144
51.
IsaacA.MarksD. F.RussellD. G. (1986). An instrument for assessing imagery of movement: The Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire (VMIQ). Journal of Mental Imagery, 10(4), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/t07980-000
52.
JacksonP. L.DoyonJ.RichardsC. L.MalouinF. (2004). The efficacy of combined physical and mental practice in the learning of a foot-sequence task after stroke: A case report. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 18(2), 106–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888439004265249
53.
JacksonP. L.LafleurM. F.MalouinF.RichardsC. L.DoyonJ. (2003). Functional cerebral reorganization following motor sequence learning through mental practice with motor imagery. NeuroImage, 20(2), 1171–1180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00369-0
54.
JeannerodM. (1994). The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00034026
55.
JordanM.RichardsonE. J. (2016). Effects of virtual walking treatment on spinal cord injury-related neuropathic pain: Pilot results and trends related to location of pain and at-level neuronal hypersensitivity. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 95(5), 390–396. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000417
56.
KimJ.GabrielU.GygaxP. (2019). Testing the effectiveness of the Internet-based instrument PsyToolkit: A comparison between web-based (PsyToolkit) and lab-based (E-Prime 3.0) measurements of response choice and response time in a complex psycholinguistic task. PLOS ONE, 14(9), e0221802. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221802
LenggenhagerB.BuschC.BruggerP. (2016). Minding gaps on the skin: Opposite bisection biases on forehead and back of one’s head. Consciousness and Cognition, 42, 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.03.001
62.
LiepertJ.GreinerJ.NedelkoV.DettmersC. (2012). Reduced upper limb sensation impairs mental chronometry for motor imagery after stroke: Clinical and electrophysiological findings. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 26(5), 470–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968311425924
63.
LongoM. R. (2016). Types of body representation. In CoelloY.FischerM. H. (Eds.), Foundations of embodied cognition: Perceptual and emotional embodiment (pp. 117–134). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
LuoZ.JoseP. E.HuntsingerC. S.PigottT. D. (2007). Fine motor skills and mathematics achievement in East Asian American and European American kindergartners and first graders. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151007X185329
66.
MalouinF.RichardsC. L.JacksonP. L.LafleurM. F.DurandA.DoyonJ. (2007). The Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ) for assessing motor imagery in persons with physical disabilities: A reliability and construct validity study. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy: JNPT, 31(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.npt.0000260567.24122.64
67.
MalouinF.RichardsC. L.JacksonP. L.LafleurM. F.DurandA.DoyonJ. (2009). The Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ) for assessing motor imagery in persons with physical disabilities: A reliability and construct validity study. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy, 31(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.npt.0000260567.24122.64
68.
ManciniF.BauleoA.ColeJ.LuiF.PorroC. A.HaggardP.IannettiG. D. (2014). Whole-body mapping of spatial acuity for pain and touch. Annals of Neurology, 75(6), 917–924. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24179
69.
Manser-SmithK.TamèL.LongoM. R. (2018). Tactile confusions of the fingers and toes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(11), 1727–1738. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000566
MarchesottiS.BassolinoM.SerinoA.BleulerH.BlankeO. (2016). Quantifying the role of motor imagery in brain-machine interfaces. Scientific Reports, 6, 24076. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24076
72.
MibuA.KanS.NishigamiT.FujinoY.ShibataM. (2020). Performing the hand laterality judgement task does not necessarily require motor imagery. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 5155. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61937-9
73.
MichaelG. A.DupuyM. A.DeleuzeA.HumblotM.SimonB.NaveteurJ. (2012). Interacting effects of vision and attention in perceiving spontaneous sensations arising on the hands. Experimental Brain Research, 216(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2901-y
74.
MilnerA. D.GoodaleM. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford University Press.
MoraL.SeddaA.EstebanT.CocchiniG. (2021). The signing body: Extensive sign language practice shapes the size of hands and face. Experimental Brain Research, 239(7), 2233–2249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-021-06121-9
77.
MoseleyG. L.GallaceA.SpenceC. (2012). Bodily illusions in health and disease: Physiological and clinical perspectives and the concept of a cortical “body matrix.”Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(1), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.03.013
78.
MoseleyG. L.OlthofN.VenemaA.DonS.WijersM.GallaceA.SpenceC. (2008). Psychologically induced cooling of a specific body part caused by the illusory ownership of an artificial counterpart. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(35), 13169–13173. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803768105
79.
NosekB. A.GreenwaldA. G.BanajiM. R. (2005). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(2), 166–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271418
80.
PaillardJ. (1999). Body schema and body image: A double dissociation in deafferented patients. In GantchevG. N.MoriS.MassionJ. (Eds.), Motor control, today and tomorrow (pp. 197–214).
PenfieldW.RasmussenT. (1950). The Cerebral cortex of man: A clinical study of localization of function. Macmillan.
84.
PerruchoudD.MichelsL.PiccirelliM.GassertR.IontaS. (2016). Differential neural encoding of sensorimotor and visual body representations. Scientific Reports, 6, 37259. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37259
85.
PrestonC.EhrssonH. H. (2018). Implicit and explicit changes in body satisfaction evoked by body size illusions: Implications for eating disorder vulnerability in women. PLOS ONE, 13(6), Article e0199426. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199426
RobertsR.CallowN.HardyL.MarklandD.BringerJ. (2008). Movement imagery ability: Development and assessment of a revised version of the Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30(2), 200–221. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.30.2.200
88.
RoosinkM.RobitailleN.JacksonP. L.BouyerL. J.MercierC. (2016). Interactive virtual feedback improves gait motor imagery after spinal cord injury: An exploratory study. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 34(2), 227–235. https://doi.org/10.3233/RNN-150563
89.
ScarpinaF.BastoniI.VillaV.MendolicchioL.CastelnuovoG.MauroA.SeddaA. (2022b). Self perception in anorexia nervosa: When the body becomes the objects. Neuropsychologia, 166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108158
90.
ScarpinaF.MagnaniF. G.TaginiS.PrianoL.MauroA.SeddaA. (2019). Mental representation of the body in action in Parkinson’s disease. Experimental Brain Research, 237(10), 2505–2521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05608-w
91.
ScarpinaF.PaschinoC.ScacchiM.MauroA.SeddaA. (2022a). Does physical weight alter the mental representation of the body? Evidence from motor imagery in obesity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218221075038
92.
SchwoebelJ.CoslettH. B. (2005). Evidence for multiple, distinct representations of the human body. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929053467587
93.
SharmaN.BaronJ.-C.RoweJ. B. (2009). Motor imagery after stroke: Relating outcome to motor network connectivity. Annals of Neurology, 66(5), 604–616. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.21810
94.
SimhiN.YovelG. (2021). Independent contributions of the face, body, and gait to the representation of the whole person. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 83(1), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02110-2
95.
SiriguA.GrafmanJ.BresslerK.SunderlandT. (1991). Multiple representations contribute to body knowledge processing: Evidence from a case of autotopagnosia. Brain, 114(1), 629–642.
96.
StantonT. R.SpenceC. (2020). The influence of auditory cues on bodily and movement perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 3001. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03001
StoetG. (2010). PsyToolkit: A software package for programming psychological experiments using Linux. Behavior Research Methods, 42(4), 1096–1104. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.4.1096
99.
StoetG. (2017). PsyToolkit: A novel web-based method for running online questionnaires and reaction-time experiments. Teaching of Psychology, 44(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628316677643
100.
StraussS.BarbyS.HärtnerJ.PfannmöllerJ. P.NeumannN.MoseleyG. L.LotzeM. (2021). Graded motor imagery modifies movement pain, cortical excitability and sensorimotor function in complex regional pain syndrome. Brain Communications, 3(4), fcab216. https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcab216
101.
TacchinoA.SaioteC.BrichettoG.BommaritoG.RoccatagliataL.CordanoC.BattagliaM. A.MancardiG. L.IngleseM. (2018). Motor imagery as a function of disease severity in multiple sclerosis: An fMRI study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 628. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00628
102.
TamèL.DransfieldE.QuettierT.LongoM. R. (2017). Finger posture modulates structural body representations. Scientific Reports, 7, 43019. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43019
TocheriM. W.OrrC. M.JacofskyM. C.MarzkeM. W. (2008). The evolutionary history of the hominin hand since the last common ancestor of Pan and Homo. Journal of Anatomy, 212(4), 544–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00865.x
105.
VannuscorpsG.PillonA.AndresM. (2012). Effect of biomechanical constraints in the hand laterality judgment task: Where does it come from?Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00299
106.
VelkoffE. A.SmithA. R. (2020). Preliminary development of an implicit association test to measure body dissatisfaction and predict disordered eating behaviors. Body Image, 34, 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.05.005
107.
WilliamsS. E.GuillotA.Di RienzoF.CummingJ. (2015). Comparing self-report and mental chronometry measures of motor imagery ability. European Journal of Sport Science, 15(8), 703–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2015.1051133
108.
World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
109.
ZacksJ.MiresJ.TverskyB.HazeltineE. (2002). Mental spatial transformation of objects and perspective. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 2, 315–332.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
