Meeting unknown people is inevitably linked with evaluating them, and many factors can influence this evaluation. The aim of our two experiments was to study the relationships between emotional (arousal, subjective significance) and social cognition (warmth, competence) dimensions. Participants saw emotional words differing in arousal and subjective significance and then evaluated neutral stimuli on warmth and competence. It was observed that words with higher levels of subjective significance intensified the ratings, as did words of moderate arousal; however, words of lower and higher arousal decreased the ratings. Higher subjective significance increased the ratings of competence (but not warmth). The results confirm the influence of emotions on social cognition and the relationship between subjective significance and competence.
AbeleA. E.UchronskiM.SuitnerC.WojciszkeB. (2008). Towards an operationalization of the fundamental dimensions of agency and communion: Trait content ratings in five countries considering valence and frequency of word occurrence. European Journal of Personality, 38(7), 1139–1147. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.549
2.
AquinoJ. M.ArnellK. M. (2007). Attention and the processing of emotional words: Dissociating effects of arousal. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 430–435. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194084
3.
AueT.BuhrerS.MayerB.DricuM. (2021). Empathic responses to social targets: The influence of warmth and competence perceptions, situational valence, and social identification. PLOS ONE, 16(3), Article e0248562. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0248562
BiancardiB.PelachaudC.CafaroA. (2017). Analyzing first impressions of warmth and competence from observable nonverbal cues in expert-novice interactions. https://doi.org/10.1145/3136755.3136779
7.
BlaisonC.ImhoffR.HühnelI.HessU.BanseR. (2012). The affect misattribution procedure: Hot or not?Emotion, 12(2), 403–412. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026907
8.
CelikP.StormeM.MyszkowskiN. (2016). Anger and sadness as adaptive emotion expression strategies in response to negative competence and warmth evaluations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55(4), 792–810. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJSO.12149
9.
CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.BeningerA. (2011). The dynamics of warmth and competence judgments, and their outcomes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 31, 73–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2011.10.004
10.
DamasioA. (2010). Self comes to mind: Constructing the conscious mind. Pantheon.
11.
DeCosterJ.ClaypoolH. M. (2004). A meta-analysis of priming effects on impression formation supporting a general model of informational biases. Personality and social psychology review, 8(1), 2–27. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0801_1
12.
Delaney-BuschN.WilkieG.KuperbergG. (2016). Vivid: How valence and arousal influence word processing under different task demands. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 16(3), 415–432. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-016-0402-y
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
15.
FerriJ.WeinbergA.HajcakG. (2012). Social neuroscience I see people: The presence of human faces impacts the processing of complex emotional stimuli. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2012.680492
16.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
17.
ForgasJ. P. (2011). Can negative affect eliminate the power of first impressions? Affective influences on primacy and recency effects in impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(2), 425-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.11.005
18.
FrijdaN. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge University Press.
19.
GlöcknerA.WittemanC. (2010). Beyond dual-process models: A categorisation of processes underlying intuitive judgement and decision making. Thinking and Reasoning, 16(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546780903395748
20.
GrgicM.DelacK.GrgicS. (2011). SCface—Surveillance cameras face database. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 51(3), 863–879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-009-0417-2
21.
HareliS.DavidS.HessU. (2013). Competent and warm but unemotional: The influence of occupational stereotypes on the attribution of emotions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 37(4), 307–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10919-013-0157-X
22.
HaririA. R.TessitoreA.MattayV. S.FeraF.WeinbergerD. R. (2002). The amygdala response to emotional stimuli: A comparison of faces and scenes. NeuroImage, 17(1), 317–323. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1179
23.
HeflickN. A.GoldenbergJ. L.CooperD. P.PuviaE. (2011). From women to objects: Appearance focus, target gender, and perceptions of warmth, morality and competence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(3), 572–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.020
24.
HinojosaJ. A.Méndez-BértoloC.PozoM. A. (2012). High arousal words influence subsequent processing of neutral information: Evidence from event-related potentials. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 86(2), 143–151. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.06.001
25.
ImbirK. K. (2016a). Affective Norms for 4900 Polish Words Reload (ANPW_R): Assessments for valence, arousal, dominance, origin, significance, concreteness, imageability and, age of acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1081. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01081
26.
ImbirK. K. (2016b). Affective Norms for 718 Polish Short Texts (ANPST): Dataset with affective ratings for valence, arousal, dominance, origin, subjective significance and source dimensions. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(JUL), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01030
27.
ImbirK. K. (2017a). Does reading words differing in arousal load influence interference control in flanker task?Current Psychology, 36(1), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9396-9
28.
ImbirK. K. (2017b). Words’ origin of an affective state, but not valence, shape the reaction latencies in a word-sign choosing ambiguous task. Current Psychology, 38, 1235–1244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9669-6
29.
ImbirK. K. (2018). Arousal and subjective significance sShapes stimuli interpretation across warmth vs. competence dimensions. Current Psychology, 37(4), 716–725. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12144-016-9553-9/FIGURES/4
30.
ImbirK. K.PastwaM. (2021). Can valence and origin of emotional words influence the assessments of ambiguous stimuli in terms of warmth or competence?PeerJ, 9, Article e10488. https://doi.org/10.7717/PEERJ.10488/SUPP-1
31.
ImbirK. K.SpustekT.BernatowiczG.Duda-GoławskaJ.ŻygierewiczJ. (2017). Two aspects of activation: Arousal and subjective significance—Behavioral and event-related potential correlates investigated by means of a modified emotional stroop task. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11(December), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00608
32.
JarymowiczM. T.ImbirK. K. (2015). Toward a human emotions taxonomy (based on their automatic vs. reflective origin). Emotion Review, 7(2), 183–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914555923
33.
KahnemanD. K. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
34.
KupermanV.EstesZ.BrysbaertM.WarrinerA. B. (2014). Emotion and language: Valence and arousal affect word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1065–1081.
35.
LarsenR.MercerK.BalotaD.StrubeM. (2008). Not all negative words slow down lexical decision and naming speed: Importance of word arousal. Emotion, 8(4), 445–452. https://psycnet.apa.org/journals/emo/8/4/445/
36.
MaN.WangS.YangQ.FengT.Van OverwalleF. (2016). The neural representation of competence traits: An fMRI study. Scientific Reports, 6, 39609. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39609
37.
MaddockR. J.GarrettA. S.BuonocoreM. H. (2003). Posterior cingulate cortex activation by emotional words: fMRI evidence from a valence decision task. Human Brain Mapping, 18(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.10075
38.
ManoH. (1992). Judgments under distress: Assessing the role of unpleasantness and arousal in judgment formation. Organ-izational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52(2), 216–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(92)90036-7
MehrabianA. (1996). Pleasure-arousal-dominance: A general framework for describing and measuring individual differences in temperament. Current Psychology, 14(4), 261–292.
41.
MurphyS. T.ZajoncR. B.EllsworthP.KitayamaS.MarkusH.NiedenthalP.SchwarzN.PettyR.WinkielmanP. (1993). Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 723–739.
OsgoodC. E.SuciG. J.TannenbaumP. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. University of Illinois Press.
44.
PayneB. K.HallD. L.CameronC. D.BisharaA. J. (2010). A process model of affect misattribution. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(10), 1397–1408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210383440
45.
PetersK.KashimaY. (2015). A multimodal theory of affect diffusion emotion sharing view project the economy and environmental attitudes: A review of the current literature view project. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000020
PonsiG.PanasitiM. S.ScandolaM.AgliotiS. M. (2016). Influence of warmth and competence on the promotion of safe in-group selection: Stereotype content model and social categorization of faces. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(8), 1464–1479. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1084339
48.
RogersK.SchröderT.von ScheveC. (2014). Dissecting the sociality of emotion: A multilevel approach. Emotion Review, 6(2), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073913503383
49.
RussellJ. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077714
50.
RussellJ. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110(1), 145. 10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.145
51.
RussellJ. A.BarrettL. F. (1999). Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: Dissecting the elephant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(5), 805–819.
SevillanoV.FiskeS. T. (2016). Fantasia: Being emotionally involved with a stereotyped target changes stereotype warmth. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 54, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJINTREL.2016.06.001
56.
StrackF.DeutschR. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(3), 220–247.
57.
ThayerR. E. (1986). Activation-deactivation adjective check list: Current overview and structural analysis. Psychological Reports, 58(2), 607–614. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1986.58.2.607
58.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (2018). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Experiments in Environmental Economics, 1, 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2391-4_2
59.
van HooffJ. C.DietzK. C.SharmaD.BowmanH. (2008). Neural correlates of intrusion of emotion words in a modified stroop task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 67(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.09.002
60.
VergallitoA.PetilliM. A.CattaneoL. (2019). Somatic and visceral effects of word valence, arousal and concreteness in a continuum lexical space. Scientific Reports, 9, 20254. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56382-2
61.
VieitezL.HaroJ.FerréP.PadrónI.FragaI. (2021). Unraveling the mystery about the negative valence bias: Does arousal account for processing differences in unpleasant words?Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 748726. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.748726
62.
WangZ.MaoH.LiY. J.LiuF. (2017). Smile big or not? Effects of smile intensity on perceptions of warmth and competence. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(5), 787–805. https://doi.org/10.1093/JCR/UCW062
63.
WatsonD.WieseD.VaidyaJ.TellegenA.WatsonD.TellegenA.DavidW. (1999). The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence the affect circumplex historical overview. Journal Ol’ Personality and Social Psychology, 76(5), 820–858.
64.
WielgopolanA.ImbirK. K. (2023). Affective norms for emotional ambiguity in valence, origin, and activation spaces. Behavior Research Methods, 55, 1141–1156. https://doi.org/10.3758/S13428-022-01865-W
65.
WojciszkeB. (2005). Morality and competence in person- and self-perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 16(1), 155–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280500229619
66.
YaoQ.WanQ.LiS.ZhouW.YangZ. (2022). Perceived power and smile intensity in service encounters. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 40(3), 372–387. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-07-2021-0216/FULL/XML
67.
YihJ.UusbergA.QianW.GrossJ. J. (2019). Author reply: An appraisal perspective on neutral affective states. Emotion Review, 12(1), 41–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073919868295
68.
ZajoncR. B. (1984). The interaction of affect and cognition. In SchererK REkmanP. (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 239–246). Psychology Press.
69.
ZsidóA. N. (2024). The effect of emotional arousal on visual attentional performance: A systematic review. Psychological Research, 88, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-023-01852-6
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
