Intentional inhibition, the ability to voluntarily inhibit or suspend an action preparation, is closely related to self-control. It is widely believed that subliminal stimuli can also activate action preparation, but whether intentional inhibition is enhanced or disrupted with greater subliminal action preparation remains unclear. In this study, participants voluntarily decided whether or not to perform the action in the scenario with subliminal action preparation, and the strength of the action preparation was manipulated by a precueing procedure. The results, based on behavioural measures and drift-diffusion models, showed that intentional inhibition enhanced with increasing subliminal action preparation, suggesting that as subliminal action preparation increases, people are more inclined to make inhibitory decisions. This study provides evidence for a framework in which strong subliminal action preparation induces enhanced cognitive monitoring.
BrassM.LynnM. T.DemanetJ.RigoniD. (2013). Imaging volition: What the brain can tell us about the will. Experimental Brain Research, 229, 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3472-x
Dall’AcquaT.BegliominiC.MottaR.MiottoD.CastielloU. (2018). Effects of intentionality and subliminal information in free-choices to inhibit. Neuropsychologia, 109, 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.11.035
6.
EimerM.SchlagheckenF. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1737–1747. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.6.1737
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
9.
FilevichE.KühnS.HaggardP. (2012). Intentional inhibition in human action: The power of “no.”Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(4), 1107–1118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.01.006
HaggardP. (2008). Human volition: Towards a neuroscience of will. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(12), 934–946. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2497
12.
KlappS. T. (2015). One version of direct response priming requires automatization of the relevant associations but not awareness of the prime. Consciousness and Cognition, 34, 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.08.004
13.
LeutholdH.KoppB. (1998). Mechanisms of priming by masked stimuli: Inferences from event-related brain potentials. Psychological Science, 9, 263–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00053
14.
LingnauA.VorbergD. (2005). The time course of response inhibition in masked priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 67(3), 545–557. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193330
15.
LlerasA.EnnsJ. T. (2004). Negative compatibility or object updating? A cautionary tale of mask-dependent priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 133, 475–493. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.4.475
16.
LynnM. T.Muhle-KarbeP. S.BrassM. (2014). Controlling the self: The role of the dorsal frontomedian cortex in intentional inhibition. Neuropsychologia, 65, 247–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.09.009
17.
MeyerK. N.DavidowJ. Y.Van DijkK. R. A.SantillanaR. M.SnyderJ.BustamanteC. M. V.. . .SheridanM. A. (2021). History of conditioned reward association disrupts inhibitory control: An examination of neural correlates. NeuroImage, 227, 117629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117629
18.
NewellB. R.ShanksD. R. (2014). Unconscious influences on decision making: A critical review. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12003214
19.
ParkinsonJ.GarfinkelS.CritchleyH.DienesZ.SethA. K. (2017). Don’t make me angry, you wouldn’t like me when I’m angry: Volitional choices to act or inhibit are modulated by subliminal perception of emotional faces. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 17, 252–268. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-016-0477-5
ParkinsonJ.HaggardP. (2015). Choosing to stop: Responses evoked by externally triggered and internally generated inhibition identify a neural mechanism of will. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(10), 1948–1956. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00830
22.
RatcliffR.Huang-PollockC.McKoonG. (2018). Modeling individual differences in the go/no-go task with a diffusion model. Decision, 5(1), 42–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000065
23.
RatcliffR.McKoonG. (2008). The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Computation, 20(4), 873–922. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.2008.12-06-420
24.
RatcliffR.Van DongenH. P. A. (2011). Diffusion model for one-choice reaction-time tasks and the cognitive effects of sleep deprivation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(27), 11285–11290. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1100483108
25.
SchlagheckenF.EimerM. (2002). Motor activation with and without inhibition: Evidence for a threshold mechanism in motor control. Perception & Psychophysics, 64(1), 148–162. https://doi.org/0.3758/BF03194564
26.
SchlagheckenF.EimerM. (2006). Active masks and active inhibition: A comment on Lleras and Enns (2004) and on Verleger, Jaskowski, Aydemir, van der Lubbe, and Groen (2004). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(3), 484–494. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135.3.484
27.
SpiegelhalterD. J.BestN. G.Van Der LindeC. A. (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 64(4), 583–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00353
28.
SumnerP.BrandwoodT. (2008). Oscillations in Motor Priming Positive Rebound Follows the inhibitory phase in the masked prime paradigm. Journal of Motor Behavior, 240(6), 484–489. https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.40.6.484-490
29.
SumnerP.TsaiP. C.YuK.NachevP. (2006). Attentional modulation of sensorimotor processes in the absence of perceptual awareness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(27), 10520–10525. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0601974103
30.
van den BrinkR. L.MurphyP. R.DesenderK.De RuN.NieuwenhuisS. (2021). Temporal expectation hastens decision onset but does not affect evidence quality. Journal of Neuroscience, 41(1), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1103-20.2020
31.
van GaalS. V.RidderinkhofK. R.ScholteH. S.LammeV. A. F. (2010). Unconscious activation of the prefrontal no-go network. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(11), 4143–4150. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2992-09.2010
32.
VlassovaA.DonkinC.PearsonJ. (2014). Unconscious information changes decision accuracy but not confidence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(45), 16214–16218. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1403619111
33.
VorbergD.MattlerU.HeineckeA.SchmidtT.SchwarzbachJ. (2003). Different time courses for visual perception and action priming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 6275–6280. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0931489100
34.
WagenmakersE. J. (2009). Methodological and empirical developments for the Ratcliff diffusion model of response times and accuracy. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21(5), 641–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440802205067
35.
WangY.DiM.ZhaoJ.HuS.YaoZ.WangY. (2020). Attentional modulation of unconscious inhibitory visuomotor processes: An EEG study. Psychophysiology, 57(8), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13561
36.
WangY.LiuP.YaoZ.WangY. (2020). Why do you often stop your impulsive behavior at the last moment?Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 27(2), 498–503. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01727-6
37.
WangY.WangY.LiuP.DiM.GongY.ZhaoL.ChenQ. (2017). Response readiness modulates the development of association-based automaticity in masked priming. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 79(3), 820–832. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1275-4
38.
WangY.YaoZ.WangY. (2019). The internal temporal dynamic of unconscious inhibition related to weak stimulus–response associations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819878121
39.
WeidackerK.KvammeT. L.WhitefordS.Valle GuzmanN.VoonV. (2021). Incentives and voluntary stopping: The intentional hand task. Cognition, 206, 104504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104504
40.
WieckiT. V.SoferI.FrankM. J. (2013). HDDM: Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of the Drift-Diffusion Model in Python. Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, 7(14), 984–1007. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00014
41.
ZhangJ.RittmanT.NombelaC.FoisA.Coyle-GilchristI.BarkerR. A.. . .RoweJ. B. (2016). Different decision deficits impair response inhibition in progressive supranuclear palsy and Parkinson’s disease. Brain, 139, 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awv331
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
