This study aims to examine the perception of English vowels by Greek monolingual and bidialectal speakers of English as a second language (L2) and assess the predictions of the Universal Perceptual Model (UPM). Adult Cypriot Greek (CG) bidialectal speakers and Standard Modern Greek (SMG) monolingual speakers participated in classification and discrimination tests. The two groups were matched for various linguistic, sociolinguistic, and cognitive factors. Another group of adult English speakers served as controls. Data analysis has been conducted with the use of Bayesian regression models. The results of the discrimination test were predicted by acoustic similarity only to some extent, whereas perceptual similarity predicted most contrasts, confirming the hypotheses of UPM. A crucial finding was that bidialectals outperformed monolinguals in the discrimination of L2 contrasts. The advantage observed in bidialectals could be attributed to the greater flexibility of their speech categories, stemming from exposure to more diverse linguistic input.
AlotaibiA. N. (2018). The role of native language dialect on the perception of L2 English vowels [Doctoral thesis]. Indiana University, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. (10821932)
2.
AlrwaitaN.Houston-PriceC.PliatsikasC. (2020). The effects of using two variants of one language on cognition: Evidence from bidialectalism and diglossia [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9c7df
3.
AntoniouK.GrohmannK.KambanarosM.KatsosN. (2016). The effect of childhood bilectalism and multilingualism on executive control. Cognition, 149, 18–30.
4.
ArvanitiA. (1999). Cypriot Greek. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 29(2), 173–178.
5.
ArvanitiA. (2006). Linguistic practices in Cyprus and the emergence of Cypriot Standard Greek. San Diego Linguistic Papers, 2, 1–24.
6.
BaigorriM.CampanelliL.LevyE. S. (2019). Perception of American–English vowels by early and late Spanish–English bilinguals. Language and Speech, 62(4), 681–700.
7.
BerentI.LennertzT.JunJ.MorenoM. A.SmolenskyP. (2008). Language universals in human brains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 5321–5325.
8.
BestC. T.TylerM. (2007). Non-native and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In BohnO-S.MunroM. J. (Eds.), Second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 13–34). John Benjamins.
9.
BlancheP.MerinoB. J. (1989). Self-assessment of foreign language skills: Implications for teachers and researchers. Language Learning, 39(3), 313–340.
BürknerP. C. (2017). Brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 80, 1–28.
12.
ChenH.RattanasoneX.CoxF.DemuthK. (2017). Effect of early dialectal exposure on adult perception of phonemic vowel length. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(3), 1707–1716.
13.
ChládkováK.Jonáš PodlipskýV. (2011). Native dialect matters: Perceptual assimilation of Dutch vowels by Czech listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(4), EL186–EL192.
14.
CowanT. M.OlmsteadA. J. (2023). Exploring the implications of input variability for unfamiliar accented speech perception: A focused review and new hypotheses. Languages, 8(1), 67.
15.
DurrantS.Delle LucheC.CattaniA.FlocciaC. (2015). Monodialectal and multidialectal infants’ representation of familiar words. Journal of Child Language, 42(2), 447–465.
16.
ElvinJ.WilliamsD.ShawJ. A.BestC. T.EscuderoP. (2021). The Role of acoustic similarity and non-native categorisation in predicting non-native discrimination: Brazilian Portuguese vowels by English vs. Spanish listeners. Languages, 6(1), 44.
17.
EscuderoP.MulakK. E.ElvinJ.TraynorN. M. (2018). “Mummy, keep it steady”: Phonetic variation shapes word learning at 15 and 17 months. Developmental Science, 21(5), Article e12640.
18.
EscuderoP.WilliamsD. (2012). Native dialect influences second-language vowel perception: Peruvian versus Iberian Spanish learners of Dutch. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(5), EL406–EL412.
19.
FlegeJ. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings and problems. In StrangeW. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 233–277). York Press.
20.
FlegeJ. E.BirdsongD.BialystokE.MackM.SungH.TsukadaK. (2006). Degree of foreign accent in English sentences produced by Korean children and adults. Journal of Phonetics, 34(2), 153–175.
21.
FlegeJ. E.BohnO. S. (2021). The revised speech learning model (SLM-r). In WaylandR. (Ed.), Second language speech learning: Theoretical and empirical progress (pp. 3–83). Cambridge University Press.
22.
FlocciaC.Delle LucheC.DurrantS.ButlerJ.GoslinJ. (2012). Parent or community: Where do 20-month-olds exposed to two accents acquire their representation of words?Cognition, 124(1), 95–100.
23.
GelmanA.LeeD.GuoJ. (2015). Stan: A probabilistic programming language for Bayesian inference and optimization. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 40(5), 530–543.
24.
GeorgiouG. P. (2018). Discrimination of L2 Greek vowel contrasts: Evidence from learners with Arabic L1 background. Speech Communication, 102, 68–77.
25.
GeorgiouG. P. (2019a). “Bit” and “beat” are heard as the same: Mapping the vowel perceptual patterns of Greek-English bilingual children. Language Sciences, 72, 1–12.
26.
GeorgiouG. P. (2019b). EFL teachers’ cognitions about pronunciation in Cyprus. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 40(6), 538–550.
27.
GeorgiouG. P. (2021a). Effects of phonetic training on the discrimination of second language sounds by learners with naturalistic access to the second language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50(3), 707–721.
28.
GeorgiouG. P. (2021b). Toward a new model for speech perception: The Universal Perceptual Model (UPM) of second language. Cognitive Processing, 22, 277–289.
29.
GeorgiouG. P. (2022a). The acquisition of /ɪ/–/iː/ is challenging: Perceptual and production evidence from Cypriot Greek speakers of English. Behavioral Sciences, 12(12), 469.
30.
GeorgiouG. P. (2022b). The impact of auditory perceptual training on the perception and production of English vowels by Cypriot Greek children and adults. Language Learning and Development, 18(4), 379–392.
31.
GeorgiouG. P. (2023a). Comparison of the prediction accuracy of machine learning algorithms in crosslinguistic vowel classification. Scientific Reports, 13, 15594. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42818-3
32.
GeorgiouG. P. (2023b). Speakers of different L1 dialects with acoustically proximal vowel systems present with similar nonnative speech perception abilities: Data from Greek listeners of Dutch. Speech Communication, 150, 32–40.
33.
GeorgiouG. P. (2024). Classification of English vowels in terms of Cypriot Greek categories: The role of acoustic similarity between L1 and L2 sounds. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 69, 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2024.1
34.
GeorgiouG. P.DimitriouD. (2023). Perception of Dutch vowels by Cypriot Greek listeners: To what extent can listeners’ patterns be predicted by acoustic and perceptual similarity?Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 85, 2459–2474.
35.
GeorgiouG. P.GiannakouA. (2024). Discrimination of second language vowel contrasts and the role of phonological short-term memory and nonverbal intelligence. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 53, 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-024-10038-z
36.
GeorgiouG. P.PerfilievaN.DenisenkoV.NovospasskayaN. (2020a). Perceptual realization of Greek consonants by Russian monolingual speakers. Speech Communication, 125, 7–14.
37.
GeorgiouG. P.PerfilievaN.TeniziM. (2020b). Vocabulary size leads to a better attunement to L2 phonetic differences: Clues from Russian learners of English. Language Learning and Development, 16(4), 382–398.
38.
GeorgiouG. P.ThemistocleousC. (2021). Vowel learning in diglossic settings: Evidence from Arabic-Greek Learners. International Journal of Bilingualism, 25(1), 135–150.
39.
GerritsE.SchoutenM. E. H. (2004). Categorical perception depends on the discrimination task. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(3), 363–376.
40.
GilichinskayaY. D.StrangeW. (2010). Perceptual assimilation of American English vowels by naïve Russian listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128, EL80–EL85.
41.
GuionS. G.FlegeJ. E.Akahane-YamadaR.PruittJ. C. (2000). An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: The case of Japanese adults’ perception of English consonants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107(5), 2711–2724.
42.
HanW. (2020). First language bidialectism in second language interface acquisition: Difference and disorder. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
43.
IversonP.KuhlP. K.Akahane-YamadaR.DieschE.KettermannA.SiebertC. (2003). A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes. Cognition, 87(1), B47–B57.
44.
JeffreysH. (1961). The theory of probability. Oxford University Press.
45.
JungeC.Boll-AvetisyanN.BendersT. (2019). Speech perception and discrimination: From sounds to words. In HorstJ.von Koss TorkildsenJ. (Eds.), International handbook of language acquisition (pp. 153–172). Routledge.
46.
KleckaW. R. (1980). Discriminant analysis, quantitative applications in the social sciences (Vol. 19). SAGE.
47.
KouridouT. (2009). A bidialectal methodology of teaching English as a second language. Selected Papers on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 18, 223–231.
48.
KuhlP. K. (2021). Infant speech perception: Integration of multimodal data leads to a new hypothesis–sensorimotor mechanisms underlie learning. In Minnesota symposia on child psychology: Human communication: Origins, mechanisms, and functions (Vol. 40, pp. 113–158). John Wiley.
49.
KuhlP. K.StevensE.HayashiA.DeguchiT.KiritaniS.IversonP. (2006). Infants show facilitation for native language phonetic perception between 6 and 12 months. Developmental Science, 9(2), F13–F21.
50.
LengerisA. (2009). Perceptual assimilation and L2 learning: Evidence from the perception of Southern British English vowels by native speakers of Greek and Japanese. Phonetica, 66, 169–187.
51.
LevyH.KoniecznyL.HanulíkováA. (2019). Processing of unfamiliar accents in monolingual and bilingual children: Effects of type and amount of accent experience. Journal of Child Language, 46(2), 368–392.
52.
LiuL.KagerR. W. J. (2014). Perception of tones by infants learning a non-tone language. Cognition, 133, 385–394.
53.
LiuX.EscuderoP. (2023). How bidialectalism affects non-native speech acquisition: Evidence from Shanghai and Mandarin Chinese. Applied Psycholinguistics, 44(6), 969–990.
54.
Melnik-LeroyG. A.TurnbullR.PeperkampS. (2022). On the relationship between perception and production of L2 sounds: Evidence from Anglophones’ processing of the French/u/–/y/contrast. Second Language Research, 38(3), 581–605.
55.
PapapavlouA.KouridouT. (2007). Bidialectism and metalinguistic awareness. In PapapavlouA.PavlouP. (Eds.), Sociolinguistic and pedagogical dimensions of dialects in education (pp. 216–235). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press.
56.
RavenJ.RavenJ. C.CourtJ. H. (2003). Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Harcourt Assessment.
57.
R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
RoachP. (2004). British English: Received pronunciation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 34(2), 239–245.
60.
RossJ.MelingerA. (2017). Bilingual advantage, bidialectal advantage or neither? Comparing performance across three tests of executive function in middle childhood. Developmental Science, 20(4), Article e12405.
61.
RossS. (1998). Self-assessment in second language testing: A meta-analysis and analysis of experiential factors. Language Testing, 15(1), 1–20.
62.
Saiegh-HaddadE.JoshiR. M. (2014). Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives. Springer.
63.
ScaltrittiM.PeressottiF.MiozzoM. (2017). Bilingual advantage and language switch: What’s the linkage?Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(1), 80–97.
64.
StrangeW.BohnO. S.NishiK.TrentS. A. (2005). Contextual variation in the acoustic and perceptual similarity of North German and American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 1751–1762.
TrubetzkoyN. S. (1969). Principles of phonology. University of California Press.
67.
Van LeussenJ. W.EscuderoP. (2015). Learning to perceive and recognize a second language: The L2LP model revised. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1000.
68.
VorwergC. C.SuntharamS.MorandM. A. (2019). Language control and lexical access in diglossic speech production: Evidence from variety switching in speakers of Swiss German. Journal of Memory and Language, 107, 40–53.
69.
WerkerJ. F.LalondeC. E. (1988). Cross-language speech perception: Initial capabilities and developmental change. Developmental Psychology, 24(5), 672.
70.
WerkerJ. F.TeesR. C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7(1), 49–63.
71.
WilliamsD.EscuderoP.GafosA. (2018). Spectral change and duration as cues in Australian English listeners’ front vowel categorization. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 144(3), EL215–EL221.
72.
YiakoumettiA. (2006). A bidialectal programme for the learning of SMG in Cyprus. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 295–317.
