Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Dual-task interference often arises when people respond to an incoming stimulus according to an arbitrary rule, such as choosing between the gas pedal and the brake when driving. Severe interference from response selection yields a brief “Psychological Refractory Period,” during which a concurrent task is put on hold. Here, we show that response selection in one task does not always hamper the processing of a secondary task. Responding to a target may paradoxically enhance the processing of secondary tasks, even when the target requires complex response selection. In three experiments, participants encoded pictures of common objects to memory while simultaneously monitoring a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) of characters or colours. Some of the RSVP stimuli were targets, requiring participants to press one of the two buttons to report their identity; others were distractors that participants ignored. Despite the increased response selection demands on target trials, pictures encoded with the RSVP targets were better remembered than those encoded with the RSVP distractors. Contrary to previous reports and predictions from dual-task interference, the attentional boost from target detection overcomes increased interference from response selection.

Keywords

Attentional boost effect dual-task processing response selection target detection

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aston-Jones

Cohen

J. D.

(2005). An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: Adaptive gain and optimal performance. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 28, 403–450. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135709

Aston-Jones

Waterhouse

(2016). Locus coeruleus: From global projection system to adaptive regulation of behavior. Brain Research, 1645, 75–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2016.03.001

Bainbridge

W. A.

(2019). Memorability: How what we see influences what we remember. In Federmeier

K. D.

Beck

D. M.

(Eds.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 70, pp. 1–27). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.plm.2019.02.001

Bechi Gabrielli

Rossi-Arnaud

Spataro

Doricchi

Costanzi

Santirocchi

Angeletti

Sani

Cestari

. (2021). The attentional boost effect in young and adult euthymic bipolar patients and healthy controls. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 11(3), 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11030185

Broitman

A. W.

Swallow

K. M.

(2020). The effects of encoding instruction and opportunity on the recollection of behaviourally relevant events. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(5), 711–725. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819893676

Chiu

Y.-C.

Egner

(2015a). Inhibition-induced forgetting results from resource competition between response inhibition and memory encoding processes. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(34), 11936–11945. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0519-15.2015

Chiu

Y.-C.

Egner

(2015b). Inhibition-induced forgetting: When more control leads to less memory. Psychological Science, 26(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614553945

Dehaene

Bossini

Giraux

(1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122(3), 371–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.371

Dienes

(2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 781. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781

10.

Duncan

(1980). The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. Psychological Review, 87(3), 272–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.272

11.

Hawkins

G. E.

Mittner

Forstmann

B. U.

Heathcote

(2019). Modeling distracted performance. Cognitive Psychology, 112, 48–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.05.002

12.

Intraub

(1984). Conceptual masking: The effects of subsequent visual events on memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(1), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.10.1.115

13.

Leclercq

Seitz

A. R.

(2012). The impact of orienting attention in fast task-irrelevant perceptual learning. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(4), 648–660. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0270-7

14.

Lien

M.-C.

Proctor

R. W.

Allen

P. A.

(2002). Ideomotor compatibility in the psychological refractory period effect: 29 years of oversimplification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(2), 396–409. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.28.2.396

15.

Lin

J. Y.

Pype

A. D.

Murray

S. O.

Boynton

G. M.

(2010). Enhanced memory for scenes presented at behaviorally relevant points in time. PLOS Biology, 8(3), Article e1000337. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000337

16.

Makovski

Swallow

K. M.

Jiang

Y. V.

(2011). Attending to unrelated targets boosts short-term memory for color arrays. Neuropsychologia, 49(6), 1498–1505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.029

17.

Meyer

D. E.

Kieras

D. E.

(1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part I. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104(1), 3–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.104.1.3

18.

Mulligan

N. W.

Spataro

(2015). Divided attention can enhance early-phase memory encoding: The attentional boost effect and study trial duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(4), 1223–1228. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000055

19.

Nishina

Seitz

A. R.

Kawato

Watanabe

(2007). Effect of spatial distance to the task stimulus on task-irrelevant perceptual learning of static Gabors. Journal of Vision, 7(13), 2. https://doi.org/10.1167/7.13.2

20.

Pashler

(1994). Divided attention can enhance early-phase memory encoding: The attentional boost effect and study trial duration. Psychological Bulletin, 116(2), 220–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220

21.

Peirce

Gray

J. R.

Simpson

MacAskill

Höchenberger

Sogo

Kastman

Lindeløv

J. K.

(2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y

22.

Potter

M. C.

(1993). Very short-term conceptual memory. Memory & Cognition, 21(2), 156–161. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202727

23.

Potter

M. C.

Staub

Rado

O’Connor

D. H.

(2002). Recognition memory for briefly presented pictures: The time course of rapid forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(5), 1163–1175. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.28.5.1163

24.

Prull

M. W.

(2019). The attentional boost effect for words in young and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 34(3), 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000337

25.

Raymond

J. E.

Shapiro

K. L.

Arnell

K. M.

(1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(3), 849–860. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.18.3.849

26.

Rossi-Arnaud

Spataro

Costanzi

Saraulli

Cestari

(2018). Divided attention enhances the recognition of emotional stimuli: Evidence from the attentional boost effect. Memory, 26(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2017.1319489

27.

Rouder

J. N.

Morey

R. D.

(2011). A Bayes factor meta-analysis of Bem’s ESP claim. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(4), 682–689. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0088-7

28.

Schonberg

Bakkour

Hover

A. M.

Mumford

J. A.

Nagar

Perez

Poldrack

R. A.

(2014). Changing value through cued approach: An automatic mechanism of behavior change. Nature Neuroscience, 17(4), 625–630. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3673

29.

Seitz

A. R.

Watanabe

(2003). Is subliminal learning really passive? Nature, 422(6927), 36–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/422036a

30.

Sisk

C. A.

Jiang

Y. V.

(2020). The yellow light: Predictability enhances background processing during behaviorally relevant events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(9), 1645–1658. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000838

31.

Sisk

C. A.

Lee

V. G.

(2022). Concurrent target detection is associated with better memory for object exemplars. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29(1), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-01983-0

32.

Spataro

Mulligan

N. W.

Rossi-Arnaud

(2013). Divided attention can enhance memory encoding: The attentional boost effect in implicit memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(4), 1223–1231. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030907

33.

Swallow

K. M.

Broitman

A. W.

Riley

Turker

H. B.

(2022). Grounding the attentional boost effect in events and the efficient brain. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 892416. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.892416

34.

Swallow

K. M.

Jiang

Y. V.

(2010). The attentional boost effect: Transient increases in attention to one task enhance performance in a second task. Cognition, 115(1), 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.12.003

35.

Swallow

K. M.

Jiang

Y. V.

(2013). Attentional load and attentional boost: A review of data and theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 274. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00274

36.

Swallow

K. M.

Jiang

Y. V.

(2014a). The attentional boost effect really is a boost: Evidence from a new baseline. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76(5), 1298–1307. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0677-4

37.

Swallow

K. M.

Jiang

Y. V.

(2014b). Perceptual load and attentional boost: A study of their interaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(3), 1034–1045. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035312

38.

Swallow

K. M.

Makovski

Jiang

Y. V.

(2012). Selection of events in time enhances activity throughout early visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 108(12), 3239–3252. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00472.2012

39.

Toh

Y. N.

Lee

V. G.

(2022). Response, rather than target detection, triggers the attentional boost effect in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 48(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000977

40.

Wolfe

J. M.

(2021). Guided search 6.0: An updated model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(4), 1060–1092. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01859-9

41.

Yebra

Galarza-Vallejo

Soto-Leon

Gonzalez-Rosa

J. J.

de Berker

A. O.

Bestmann

Oliviero

Kroes

M. C. W.

Strange

B. A.

(2019). Action boosts episodic memory encoding in humans via engagement of a noradrenergic system. Nature Communications, 10(1), Article 3534. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11358-8

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

The attentional boost effect overcomes dual-task interference in choice-response tasks

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material