Language production entails selecting words in the face of internally, and sometimes externally, driven competition that influences the long-term accessibility of both selected words and competitors. Because both endogenous and externally presented competitors usually result in semantic interference, it is often assumed that they engage the same underlying processes. We question this assumption. Specifically, we propose that latent primes may more naturally commingle with endogenous lexical activation whereas overt primes elicit strong control processes. Two experiments examined the effects of latent (masked) and overt (picture–word) priming in combination with cyclic picture naming of small sets of taxonomically or thematically related or unrelated pictures. A subsequent continuous picture naming phase was designed to assess enduring effects of service as a prime or target. Only taxonomic relations showed substantial interference in cyclic naming. Latent priming tended to increase interference for taxonomic relations, but it produced facilitation for thematic relations. In contrast, overt priming induced interference for both types of relation, indicating exertion of cognitive control. In the continuous picture naming phases, accessibility was hindered for previously presented latent primes (Experiment 1) but enhanced for previously overt primes (Experiment 2). Surprisingly, interference in cyclic naming did not carry forward to the continuous phase. These findings suggest that masked priming may be a viable intervention in the internal dynamics of lexical selection. In contrast, they also add to the body of evidence questioning the validity of using picture–word procedures to study inherent semantic interference.
Abdel RahmanR.MelingerA. (2007). When bees hamper the production of honey: Lexical interference from associates in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(3), 604–614.
2.
Abdel RahmanR.MelingerA. (2011). The dynamic microstructure of speech production: Semantic interference built on the fly. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(1), 149–161.
3.
Abdel RahmanR.MelingerA. (2019). Semantic processing during language production: an update of the swinging lexical network. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(9), 1176–1192.
4.
AlarioF.SeguiJ.FerrandL. (2000). Semantic and associative priming in picture naming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 53(3), 741–764.
5.
AndersonJ. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Harvard University Press.
6.
AndersonM. C.BjorkR. A.BjorkE. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(5), 1063–1087.
7.
AristeiS.MelingerA.RahmanR. A. (2011). Electrophysiological chronometry of semantic context effects in language production. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(7), 1567–1586.
8.
BarrD. J.LevyR.ScheepersC.TilyH. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278.
9.
BarsalouL. W. (1991). Deriving categories to achieve goals. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 27, 1–64.
10.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.
11.
BelkeE. (2008). Effects of working memory load on lexical-semantic encoding in language production. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(2), 357–363.
12.
BelkeE.StielowA. (2013). Cumulative and non-cumulative semantic interference in object naming: Evidence from blocked and continuous manipulations of semantic context. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(11), 2135–2216.
13.
BreiningB.NozariN.RappB. (2016). Does segmental overlap help or hurt? Evidence from blocked cyclic naming in spoken and written production. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(2), 500–506.
14.
CrowtherJ. E.MartinR. C. (2014). Lexical selection in the semantically blocked cyclic naming task: The role of cognitive control and learning. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 91–20.
15.
DamianM. F.AlsL. C. (2005). Long-lasting semantic context effects in the spoken production of object names. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(6), 1372–1384.
16.
DamianM. F.SpalekK. (2014). Processing different kinds of semantic relations in picture-word interference with non-masked and masked distractors. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1183.
17.
DamianM. F.ViglioccoG.LeveltW. J. (2001). Effects of semantic context in the naming of pictures and words. Cognition, 81(3), B77–B86.
18.
de ZubicarayG. I.HansenS.McMahonK. L. (2013). Differential processing of thematic and categorical conceptual relations in spoken word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(1), 131–142.
19.
de ZubicarayG. I.JohnsonK.HowardD.McMahonK. L. (2014). A perfusion fMRI investigation of thematic and categorical context effects in the spoken production of object names. Cortex, 54, 135–149.
20.
DhoogeE.HartsuikerR. J. (2010). The distractor frequency effect in picture–word interference: Evidence for response exclusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(4), 878–891.
21.
ElmanJ. L.McRaeK. (2019). A model of event knowledge. Psychological Review, 126(2), 252–291.
22.
FinkbeinerM.CaramazzaA. (2006). Now you see it, now you don’t: On turning semantic interference into facilitation in a Stroop-like task. Cortex, 42(6), 790–796.
23.
HutsonJ.DamianM. F. (2014). Semantic gradients in picture-word interference tasks: Is the size of interference effects affected by the degree of semantic overlap?Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 872.
24.
HowardD.NickelsL.ColtheartM.Cole-VirtueJ. (2006). Cumulative semantic inhibition in picture naming: Experimental and computational studies. Cognition, 100(3), 464–482.
25.
JoordensS.BeckerS. (1997). The long and short of semantic priming effects in lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(5), 1083–1105.
26.
KaneM. J.EngleR. W. (2002). The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual-differences perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 637–671.
27.
KissG. R. (1973). An Introduction to the Microfilm Version of the Associative Thesaurus. Medical Research Council Speech and Communication Research Unit, University of Edinburgh.
28.
KleinmanD. (2013). Resolving semantic interference during word production requires central attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(6), 1860–1877.
29.
KrollJ. F.StewartE. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(2), 149–174.
30.
La HeijW.DirkxJ.KramerP. (1990). Categorical interference and associative priming in picture naming. British Journal of Psychology, 81(4), 511–525.
31.
LeveltW. J.RoelofsA.MeyerA. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1–38.
32.
LupkerS. J. (1979). The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task. Memory & Cognition, 7(6), 485–495.
33.
MahonB. Z.CostaA.PetersonR.VargasK. A.CaramazzaA. (2007). Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(3), 503–535.
McRaeK.CreeG. S.SeidenbergM. S.McNorganC. (2005). Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behavior Research Methods, 37(4), 547–559.
36.
MelingerA.Abdel RahmanR. (2013). Lexical selection is competitive: Evidence from indirectly activated semantic associates during picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(2), 348–364.
NavarreteE.Del PratoP.MahonB. Z. (2012). Factors determining semantic facilitation and interference in the cyclic naming paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 38–53.
39.
NavarreteE.Del PratoP.PeressottiF.MahonB. Z. (2014). Lexical selection is not by competition: Evidence from the blocked naming paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 76, 253–272.
40.
NelsonD. L.McEvoyC. L.SchreiberT. A. (2004). The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(3), 402–407.
41.
OppenheimG. M. (2017, September). Strong competitors facilitate target name retrieval in simple picture naming. Poster Presented at Architectures and Mechanisms of Language Processing, Lancaster, UK.
42.
OppenheimG. M.DellG. S.SchwartzM. F. (2010). The dark side of incremental learning: A model of cumulative semantic interference during lexical access in speech production. Cognition, 114(2), 227–252.
43.
OppenheimG. M.NozariN. (2021). Behavioral interference or facilitation does not distinguish between competitive and noncompetitive accounts of lexical selection in word production. In 43rd annual conference of the cognitive science society (Vol.43). https://oppenheim-lab.bangor.ac.uk/pubs/oppenheimNozari_2021_cogSci.pdf
44.
PiaiV.RoelofsA.SchriefersH. (2012). Distractor strength and selective attention in picture naming performance. Memory & Cognition, 40(4), 614–627.
45.
RoelofsA. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42(1–3), 107–142.
46.
RoelofsA. (2018). A unified computational account of cumulative semantic, semantic blocking, and semantic distractor effects in picture naming. Cognition, 172, 59–72.
47.
RohautB.AlarioF.MeadowJ.CohenL.NaccacheL. (2016). Unconscious semantic processing of polysemous words is not automatic. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 1, 1–19.
48.
RoseS. B.Abdel RahmanR. (2016). Cumulative semantic interference for associative relations in language production. Cognition, 152, 20–31.
49.
RoseS. B.AristeiS.MelingerA.Abdel RahmanR. (2019). The closer they are, the more they interfere: Semantic similarity of word distractors increases competition in language production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(4), 753–763.
50.
SailorK.BrooksP. J.BrueningP. R.Seiger-GardnerL.GutermanM. (2009). Exploring the time course of semantic interference and associative priming in the picture–word interference task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(4), 789–801.
51.
SchnurT. T.SchwartzM. F.KimbergD. Y.HirshornE.CoslettH. B.Thompson-SchillS. L. (2009). Localizing interference during naming: Convergent neuroimaging and neuropsychological evidence for the function of Broca’s area. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(1), 322–327.
52.
SchnurT. T. (2014). The persistence of cumulative semantic interference during naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 75, 27–44.
53.
SchriefersH.MeyerA. S.LeveltW. J. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(1), 86–102.
54.
SchwartzM. F.KimbergD. Y.WalkerG. M.BrecherA.FaseyitanO. K.DellG. S.MirmanD.CoslettH. B. (2011). Neuroanatomical dissociation for taxonomic and thematic knowledge in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(20), 8520–8524.
55.
StarreveldP. A.La HeijW. (1996). Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(4), 896–918.
56.
ThyeM.GellerJ.SzaflarskiJ. P.MirmanD. (2021). Intracranial EEG evidence of functional specialization for taxonomic and thematic relations. Cortex, 140, 40–50.
57.
TreeJ. J.HirshK. W. (2003). Sometimes faster, sometimes slower: Associative and competitor priming in picture naming with young and elderly participants. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 16(6), 489–514.
58.
Van den BusscheE.Van den NoortgateW.ReynvoetB. (2009). Mechanisms of masked priming: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 135(3), 452–477.
59.
ViethH. E.McMahonK. L.de ZubicarayG. I. (2014). Feature overlap slows lexical selection: Evidence from the picture–word interference paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(12), 2325–2339.
60.
WongA. W. K.ChiuH. C.WangJ.CaoJ.WongS. S.ChenH. C. (2017). An early locus of associative and categorical context effects in speech production: Evidence from an ERP study using the picture–word interference paradigm. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(10), 1305–1319.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
