People tend to perceive a virtual body standing in front of them as their own if it is either stroked or moving synchronously with their own real body—the out-of-body experience (OBE). We combined synchrony manipulation with two other factors of theoretical interest: the kind of stimulation, visuotactile stimuli or visuomotor correlations, being synchronised and the interoceptive accuracy (IA) of participants, assessed by means of the heartbeat counting task. Results showed that explicit measures of embodiment were systematically affected by synchrony, and this synchrony effect was more pronounced for visuomotor than for visuotactile conditions. The walking drift was affected by IA: In visuotactile conditions, the synchrony effect was pronounced in individuals with low IA, presumably reflecting a stronger impact of the visual information. In visuomotor conditions, however, the synchrony effect was stronger in individuals with high IA, presumably reflecting a stronger impact of re-afferent information generated by the participants’ own movements.
AbdulkarimZ.EhrssonH. H. (2016). No causal link between changes in hand position sense and feeling of limb ownership in the rubber hand illusion. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(2), 707–720.
2.
AinleyV.BrassM.TsakirisM. (2014). Heartfelt imitation: High interoceptive accuracy is linked to greater automatic imitation. Neuropsychologia, 60(1), 21–28.
3.
AinleyV.TsakirisM.PollatosO.SchulzA.HerbertB. M. (2020). Comment on “Zamariola et al. (2018), interoceptive accuracy scores are problematic: Evidence from simple bivariate correlations”—The empirical data base, the conceptual reasoning and the analysis behind this statement are misconceived and do not support the authors’ conclusions. Biological Psychology, 152, 107870.
4.
AspellJ. E.HeydrichL.MarillierG.LavanchyT.HerbelinB.BlankeO. (2013). Turning body and self inside out: Visualized heartbeats alter bodily self-consciousness and tactile perception. Psychological Science, 24(12), 2445–2453.
5.
BadoudD.TsakirisM. (2017). From the body’s viscera to the body’s image: Is there a link between interoception and body image concerns?Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 77, 237–246.
6.
BlankeO.MetzingerT. (2009). Full-body illusions and minimal phenomenal selfhood. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(1), 7–13.
7.
BlankeO.MohrC. (2005). Out-of-body experience, heautoscopy, and autoscopic hallucination of neurological origin implications for neurocognitive mechanisms of corporeal awareness and self-consciousness. Brain Research Reviews, 50(1), 184–199.
CorneilleO.DesmedtO.ZamariolaG.LuminetO.MaurageP. (2020). A heartfelt response to Zimprich et al. (2020), and Ainley et al. (2020)’s commentaries: Acknowledging issues with the HCT would benefit interoception research. Biological Psychology, 152, 107869.
10.
CraigA. D. B. (2009). How do you feel—Now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(1), 59–70.
11.
CritchleyH. D.BotanV.WardJ. (2021). Absence of reliable physiological signature of illusory body ownership revealed by fine-grained autonomic measurement during the rubber hand illusion. PLOS ONE, 16(4), Article e0237282.
12.
CritchleyH. D.GarfinkelS. N. (2017). Interoception and emotion. Current Opinion in Psychology, 17, 7–14.
13.
CrucianelliL.KrahéC.JenkinsonP. M.FotopoulouA. (2018). Interoceptive ingredients of body ownership: Affective touch and cardiac awareness in the rubber hand illusion. Cortex, 104, 180–192.
14.
DarnaiG.SzolcsányiT.HegedüsG.KincsesP.KállaiJ.KovácsM.SimonE.NagyZ.JanszkyJ. (2017). Hearing visuo-tactile synchrony—Sound-induced proprioceptive drift in the invisible hand illusion. British Journal of Psychology, 108, 91–106.
15.
DebarbaH. G.ChagueS.CharbonnierC. (2022). On the plausibility of virtual body animation features in virtual reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 28(4), 1880–1893.
16.
DesmedtO.CorneilleO.LuminetO.MurphyJ.BirdG.MaurageP. (2020). Contribution of time estimation and knowledge to heartbeat counting task performance under original and adapted instructions. Biological Psychology, 154, 107904.
17.
DesmedtO.LuminetO.CorneilleO. (2018). The heartbeat counting task largely involves non-interoceptive processes: Evidence from both the original and an adapted counting task. Biological Psychology, 138, 185–188.
18.
DobrickiM.de la RosaS. (2013). The structure of conscious bodily self-perception during full-body illusions. PLOS ONE, 8(12), Article e83840.
19.
DummerT.Picot-AnnandA.NealT.MooreC. (2009). Movement and the rubber hand illusion. Perception, 38, 271–280.
20.
EhrssonH. H. (2007). The experimental induction of out-of-body experiences. Science, 317, 1048.
21.
EshkevariE.RiegerE.LongoM. R.HaggardP.TreasureJ. (2012). Increased plasticity of the bodily self in eating disorders. Psychological Medicine, 42(4), 819–828.
22.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160.
23.
FilippettiM. L.TsakirisM. (2017). Heartfelt embodiment: Changes in body-ownership and self-identification produce distinct changes in interoceptive accuracy. Cognition, 159, 1–10.
24.
GallagherS. (2000). Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(1), 14–21.
25.
GuterstamA.EhrssonH. H. (2012). Disowning one’s seen real body during an out-of-body illusion. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(2), 1037–1042.
26.
GuterstamA.GentileG.EhrssonH. H. (2013). The invisible hand illusion: Multisensory integration leads to the embodiment of a discrete volume of empty space. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(7), 1078–1099.
27.
HaggardP. (2017). Sense of agency in the human brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18(4), 196–207.
28.
HerbertB. M.MuthE. R.PollatosO.HerbertC. (2012). Interoception across modalities: On the relationship between cardiac awareness and the sensitivity for gastric functions. PLOS ONE, 7, Article e36646.
29.
HerbertB. M.UlbrichP.SchandryR. (2007). Interoceptive sensitivity and physical effort: Implications for the self-control of physical load in everyday life. Psychophysiology, 44(2), 194–202.
30.
HermanA. M.EspositoG.TsakirisM. (2021). Body in the face of uncertainty: The role of autonomic arousal and interoception in decision-making under risk and ambiguity. Psychophysiology, 58, Article e13840.
31.
HickmanL.SeyedsalehiA.CookJ. L.BirdG.MurphyJ. (2020). The relationship between heartbeat counting and heartbeat discrimination: A meta-analysis. Biological Psychology, 156, 107949.
32.
HodossyL.AinleyV.TsakirisM. (2021). How do we relate to our heart? Neurobehavioral differences across three types of engagement with cardiac interoception. Biological Psychology, 165, 108198.
33.
HorváthÁ.FerentziE.BogdányT.SzolcsányiT.WitthöftM.KötelesF. (2020). Proprioception but not cardiac interoception is related to the rubber hand illusion. Cortex, 132, 361–373.
34.
KalckertA.EhrssonH. H. (2014). The moving rubber hand illusion revisited: Comparing movements and visuotactile stimulation to induce illusory ownership. Consciousness and Cognition, 26, 117–132.
35.
KilteniK.GrotenR.SlaterM. (2012). The sense of embodiment in virtual reality. Presence, 21(4), 373–387.
36.
KokkinaraE.SlaterM. (2014). Measuring the effects through time of the influence of visuomotor and visuotactile synchronous stimulation on a virtual body ownership illusion. Perception, 43, 43–58.
37.
KondoR.SugimotoM.MinamizawaK.HoshiT.InamiM.KitazakiM. (2018). Illusory body ownership of an invisible body interpolated between virtual hands and feet via visual-motor synchronicity. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 7541.
38.
KörmendiJ.FerentziE.KötelesF. (2022). A heartbeat away from a valid tracking task. An empirical comparison of the mental and the motor tracking task. Biological Psychology, 171, 108328.
39.
LegrandN.NikolovaN.CorreaC.BrændholtM.StuckertA.KildahlN.VejløM.FardoF.AllenM. (2022). The heart rate discrimination task: A psychophysical method to estimate the accuracy and precision of interoceptive beliefs. Biological Psychology, 168, 108239.
40.
LenggenhagerB.TadiT.MetzingerT.BlankeO. (2007). Video ergo sum: Manipulating bodily self-consciousness. Science, 317(5841), 1096–1099.
41.
LongoM. R.HaggardP. (2009). Sense of agency primes manual motor responses. Perception, 38(1), 69–78.
42.
LongoM. R.SchüürF.KammersM. P. M.TsakirisM.HaggardP. (2008). What is embodiment? A psychometric approach. Cognition, 107(3), 978–998.
43.
MaK.HommelB. (2013). The virtual-hand illusion: Effects of impact and threat on perceived ownership and affective resonance. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 604.
44.
MaK.HommelB. (2015). The role of agency for perceived ownership in the virtual hand illusion. Consciousness and Cognition, 36, 277–288.
45.
MaK.QuJ.YangL.ZhaoW.HommelB. (2021). Explicit and implicit measures of body ownership and agency: Affected by the same manipulations and yet independent. Experimental Brain Research, 239, 2159–2170.
46.
MaselliA.SlaterM. (2013). The building blocks of the full body ownership illusion. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, Article 83.
47.
MaselliA.SlaterM. (2014). Sliding perspectives: Dissociating ownership from self-location during full body illusions in virtual reality. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, Article 693.
48.
MelloM.FusaroM.TieriG.AgliotiS. M. (2022). Wearing same- and opposite-sex virtual bodies and seeing them caressed in intimate areas. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75(3), 461–474.
49.
MurphyJ.BrewerR.HobsonH.CatmurC.BirdG. (2018). Is alexithymia characterised by impaired interoception? Further evidence, the importance of control variables, and the problems with the Heartbeat Counting Task. Biological Psychology, 136, 189–197.
50.
MurphyJ.BrewerR.PlansD.KhalsaS. S.CatmurC.BirdG. (2020). Testing the independence of self-reported interoceptive accuracy and attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 115–133.
51.
O’KaneS. H.EhrssonH. H. (2021). The contribution of stimulating multiple body parts simultaneously to the illusion of owning an entire artificial body. PLOS ONE, 16(1), Article e0233243.
52.
PaulusM. P.FeinsteinJ. S.KhalsaS. S. (2019). An active inference approach to interoceptive psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 15, 97–122.
53.
PentonT.ThierryG. L.DavisN. J. (2014). Individual differences in attributional style but not in interoceptive sensitivity, predict subjective estimates of action intention. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, Article 638.
54.
Perez-MarcosD.MartiniM.FuentesC. T.Bellido RivasA. I.HaggardP.Sanchez-VivesM. V. (2018). Selective distortion of body image by asynchronous visuotactile stimulation. Body Image, 24, 55–61.
55.
PetkovaV. I.EhrssonH. H. (2008). If I Were You: Perceptual Illusion of Body Swapping. PLOS ONE, 3(12), Article e3832.
56.
PetkovaV. I.KhoshnevisM.EhrssonH. H. (2011). The perspective matters! Multisensory integration in ego-centric reference frames determines full body ownership. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, Article 35.
57.
PollatosO.KirschW.SchandryR. (2005). On the relationship between interoceptive awareness, emotional experience, and brain processes. Cognitive Brain Research, 25(3), 948–962.
58.
QuJ.MaK.HommelB. (2021). Cognitive load dissociates explicit and implicit measures of body ownership and agency. Psychonomicbulletin & Review, 28, 1567–1578.
59.
QuigleyK. S.KanoskiS.GrillW. M.BarrettL. F.TsakirisM. (2021). Functions of interoception: From energy regulation to experience of the self. Trends in Neurosciences, 44(1), 29–38.
60.
RiemerM.KleinböhlD.HölzlR.TrojanJ. (2013). Action and perception in the rubber hand illusion. Experimental Brain Research, 229, 383–393.
61.
RingC.BrenerJ.KnappK.MaillouxJ. (2015). Effects of heartbeat feedback on beliefs about heart rate and heartbeat counting: A cautionary tale about interoceptive awareness. Biological Psychology, 104, 193–198.
62.
RohdeM.Di LucaM.ErnstM. O. (2011). The rubber hand illusion: Feeling of ownership and proprioceptive drift do not go hand in hand. PLOS ONE, 6, Article e21659.
63.
SchachterS. (1971). Emotion, obesity and crime. Academic Press.
SerinoA.AlsmithA.CostantiniM.MandriginA.Tajadura-JimenezA.LopezC. (2013). Bodily ownership and self-location: Components of bodily self-consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(4), 1239–1252.
66.
ShahP.CatmurC.BirdG. (2017). From heart to mind: Linking interoception, emotion, and theory of mind. Cortex, 93, 220–223.
67.
ShaqiriA.RoinishviliM.KaliuzhnaM.FavrodO.ChkoniaE.HerzogM. H.BlankeO.SalomonR. (2018). Rethinking body ownership in schizophrenia: Experimental and meta-analytical approaches show no evidence for deficits. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 44(3), 643–652.
68.
SlaterM.Perez-MarcosD.EhrssonH. H.Sanchez-VivesM. V. (2009). Inducing illusory ownership of a virtual body. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 3, Article 214.
69.
SuzukiK.GarfinkelS. N.CritchleyH. D.SethA. K. (2013). Multisensory integration across exteroceptive and interoceptive domains modulates self-experience in the rubber-hand illusion. Neuropsychologia, 51(13), 2909–2917.
70.
SynofzikM.VosgerauG.NewenA. (2008). I move, therefore I am: A new theoretical framework to investigate agency and ownership. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 411–424.
71.
Tajadura-JiménezA.TsakirisM. (2014). Balancing the “inner” and the “outer” self: Interoceptive sensitivity modulates self-other boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 736–744.
72.
TsakirisM. (2017). The multisensory basis of the self: From body to identity to others. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(4), 597–609.
73.
TsakirisM.LongoM. R.HaggardP. (2010). Having a body versus moving your body: Neural signatures of agency and body-ownership. Neuropsychologia, 48(9), 2740–2749.
74.
TsakirisM.PrabhuG.HaggardP. (2006). Having a body versus moving your body: How agency structures body-ownership. Consciousness and Cognition, 15(2), 423–432.
75.
TsakirisM.Tajadura-JimenezA.CostantiniM. (2011). Just a heartbeat away from one’s body: Interoceptive sensitivity predicts malleability of body -representations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278(1717), 2470–2476.
76.
Von MohrM.FinottiG.VillaniV.TsakirisM. (2021). Taking the pulse of social cognition: Cardiac afferent activity and interoceptive accuracy modulate emotional egocentricity bias. Cortex, 145, 327–340.
77.
WalshL. D.MoseleyG. L.TaylorJ. L.GandeviaS. C. (2011). Proprioceptive signals contribute to the sense of body ownership. Journal of Physiology, 589(12), 3009–3021.
78.
WhiteheadW. E.DrescherV. M.HeimanP.BlackwellB. (1977). Relation of heart rate control to heartbeat perception. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 2(4), 317–392.
79.
ZamariolaG.MaurageP.LuminetO.CorneilleO. (2018). Interoceptive accuracy scores from the heartbeat counting task are problematic: Evidence from simple bivariate correlations. Biological Psychology, 137, 12–17.
80.
ZimprichD.NusserL.PollatosO. (2020). Are interoceptive accuracy scores from the heartbeat counting task problematic? A comment on Zamariola et al. (2018). Biological Psychology, 152, 107868.
