The “loci method” is a popular mnemonic device that involves visualising and recalling items at specific points along a familiar route. The loci method has been used for thousands of years, and by many successful memory athletes; yet there have been relatively few educational and clinical applications, possibly owing to empirical uncertainty. The current meta-analysis of 13 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) mostly based in university settings demonstrated the effectiveness of the loci method as a mnemonic device, with a medium effect size (g = 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.45, 0.85]; I2 = 45.5%). The effect size remained at similar levels in further analyses adjusting for publication bias, the impact of removing each study, setting, control conditions, outliers, and number of loci method sessions. High risk of experimental bias was indicated, however, as the vast majority of studies did not report procedures to minimise biases relating to random sequence generation and allocation concealment. Overall, this meta-analysis of predominantly university-based RCTs has provided good initial support for the loci method as a mnemonic device and this may encourage future investigations and applications, particularly in educational settings, where it has the potential to improve recall of information relevant to academic success.
BassW. S.OswaldK. M. (2014). Proactive control of proactive interference using the method of loci. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 10(2), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0156-3
2.
BeggC. B.MazumdarM. (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 50(4), 1088–1101. https://doi.org/10.2307/2533446
3.
BellezzaF. S.ReddyB. G. (1978). Mnemonic devices and natural memory. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 11(5), 277–280. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03336829
4.
CaplanJ. B.LeggeE. L.ChengB.MadanC. R. (2019). Effectiveness of the method of loci is only minimally related to factors that should influence imagined navigation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(10), 2541–2553. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819858041
5.
CarneyR. N.LevinJ. R.LevinM. E. (1994). Enhancing the psychology of memory by enhancing memory of psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 21(3), 171–174. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top2103_12
6.
CochranW. G. (1950). The comparison of percentages in matched samples. Biometrika, 37(3/4), 256–266. https://doi.org/10.2307/2332378
7.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Academic Press.
8.
CornoldiC.De BeniR. (1991). Memory for discourse: Loci mnemonics and the oral presentation effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5(6), 511–518. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350050606
9.
CrovitzH. F. (1971). The capacity of memory loci in artificial memory. Psychonomic Science, 24(4), 187–188. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03335561
10.
DalgleishT.NavradyL.BirdE.HillE.DunnB. D.GoldenA.-M. (2013). Method-of-loci as a mnemonic device to facilitate access to self-affirming personal memories for individuals with depression. Clinical Psychological Science, 1(2), 156–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702612468111
11.
De BeniR.MòA.CornoldiC. (1997). Learning from texts or lectures: Loci mnemonics can interfere with reading but not with listening. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9(4), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/713752565
12.
DreslerM.ShirerW. R.KonradB. N.MüllerN. C. J.WagnerI. C.FernándezG.. . .GreiciusM. D. (2017). Mnemonic training reshapes brain networks to support superior memory. Neuron, 93(5), 1227–1235.E6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.02.003
13.
DuvalS.TweedieR. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
14.
EggerM.Davey SmithG.SchneiderM.MinderC. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315, Article 629. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
15.
EngvigA.FjellA. M.WestlyeL. T.MobergetT.SundsethØ.LarsenV. A.WalhovdK. B. (2010). Effects of memory training on cortical thickness in the elderly. Neuroimage, 52(4), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.041
GrossA. L.BrandtJ.Bandeen-RocheK.CarlsonM. C.StuartE. A.MarsiskeM.RebokG. W. (2014). Do older adults use the method of loci? Results from the ACTIVE study. Experimental Aging Research, 40(2), 140–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073x.2014.882204
18.
GrossA. L.ParisiJ. M.SpiraA. P.KueiderA. M.KoJ. Y.SaczynskiJ. S.. . .RebokG. W. (2012). Memory training interventions for older adults: A meta-analysis. Aging and Mental Health, 16(6), 722–734. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2012.667783
19.
HigbeeK. L.ClawsonC.DelanoL.CampbellS. (1990). Using the link mnemonic to remember errands. The Psychological Record, 40(3), 429–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03399551
20.
HigginsJ. (2008). Commentary: Heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantified. International Journal of Epidemiology, 37(5), 1158–1160. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyn204
21.
HigginsJ.GreenS. (2011, March). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Version 5.1.0). https://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/
22.
HigginsJ.ThompsonS. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1539–1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186
HuY.EricssonK. A.YangD.LuC. (2009). Superior self-paced memorization of digits in spite of a normal digit span: The structure of a memorist’s skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(6), 1426–1442. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017395
25.
HudesR.RichJ. B.TroyerA. K.YusupovI.VandermorrisS. (2019). The impact of memory-strategy training interventions on participant-reported outcomes in healthy older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 34(4), 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000340
26.
KellyL. (2015). Knowledge and power in prehistoric societies. Cambridge University Press.
27.
KroneisenM.MakerudS. E. (2017). The effects of item material on encoding strategies: Survival processing compared to the method of loci. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(9), 1824–1836. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1209533
28.
LeaG. (1975). Chronometric analysis of the method of loci. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1(2), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.1.2.95
29.
LeggeE. L. G.MadanC. R.NgE. T.CaplanJ. B. (2012). Building a memory palace in minutes: Equivalent memory performance using virtual versus conventional environments with the Method of Loci. Acta Psychologica, 141(3), 380–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.09.002
30.
MaguireE. A.ValentineE. R.WildingJ. M.KapurN. (2003). Routes to remembering: The brains behind superior memory. Nature Neuroscience, 6(1), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn988
McCabeJ. A. (2015). Location, location, location! Demon-strating the mnemonic benefit of the method of loci. Teaching of Psychology, 42(2), 169–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628315573143
33.
McCabeJ. A.OshaK. L.RocheJ. A.SusserJ. A. (2013). Psychology students’ knowledge and use of mnemonics. Teaching of Psychology, 40(3), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628313487460
34.
QureshiA.RizviF.SyedA.ShahidA.ManzoorH. (2014). The method of loci as a mnemonic device to facilitate learning in endocrinology leads to improvement in student performance as measured by assessments. Advances in Physiology Education, 38(2), 140–144. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00092.2013
35.
RazA.PackardM. G.AlexanderG. M.BuhleJ. T.ZhuH.YuS.PetersonB. S. (2009). A slice of PI: An exploratory neuroimaging study of digit encoding and retrieval in a superior memorist. Neurocase, 15(5), 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/13554790902776896
36.
RebokG. W.LangbaumJ. B. S.JonesR. N.GrossA. L.ParisiJ. M.SpiraA. P.. . .BrandtJ. (2013). Memory training in the ACTIVE study: How much is needed and who benefits?Journal of Aging and Health, 25(8 Suppl.), 21S–42S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264312461937
37.
RestorffH. V. (1933). Ueber die Wirkung von Bereichsbildungen im Spurenfeld: Analyse von Vorgängen im Spurenfeld. I. Von W. Köhler und H. v. Restorff. [On the effect of field formations in the trace field: Analysis of processes in the trace field. I. By W. Kohler and H. v. Restorff.]. Psychologische Forschung, 18, 299–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02409636
38.
RileyR. D.HigginsJ. P. T.DeeksJ. J. (2011). Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 342, Article d549. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d549
39.
RossJ.LawrenceK. A. (1968). Some observations on memory artifice. Psychonomic Science, 13(2), 107–108. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03342433
40.
SennS. J. (2009). Overstating the evidence: Double counting in meta-analysis and related problems. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9(1), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-10
41.
SibbaldB.RolandM. (1998). Understanding controlled trials: Why are randomised controlled trials important?British Medical Journal, 316(7126), 201. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7126.201
42.
TwomeyC.O’ReillyG.BultmannO.MeyerB. (2020). Effectiveness of a tailored, integrative Internet intervention (deprexis) for depression: Updated meta-analysis. PLOS ONE, 15(1), Article e0228100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228100
43.
VerhaeghenP.MarcoenA.GoossensL. (1992). Improving memory performance in the aged through mnemonic training: A meta-analytic study. Psychology and Aging, 7(2), 242–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.7.2.242
44.
WeinsteinC. E.CubberlyW. E.WickerF. W.UnderwoodV. L.RoneyL. K.DutyD. C. (1981). Training versus instruction in the acquisition of cognitive learning strategies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 6(2), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(81)90045-X
45.
WolgemuthJ. R.CobbR. B.AlwellM. (2008). The effects of mnemonic interventions on academic outcomes for youth with disabilities: A systematic review. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00258.x
46.
YangH. L.ChanP. T.ChangP. C.ChiuH. L.Sheen HsiaoS. T.ChuH.ChouK. R. (2018). Memory-focused interventions for people with cognitive disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 78, 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.08.005
47.
YatesF. (1966). The art of memory. Pimlico.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
