Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Human beings can show preferentially attentional bias to different facial expressions. However, it is unclear whether the modulation of selective attention by facial expressions is based on the face itself (object-based attention) or its location (space-based attention). This study aimed to test this problem by using faces with different emotional valences in the two-rectangle paradigm across three experiments. We found that there was no significant difference in space-based effect among the positive, neutral, and negative conditions. However, the object-based effect was larger for the negative condition than for the neutral and positive ones, because of its slower reaction times for the invalid different-object trials. The results indicated that the object-based attentional selection was modulated by facial expressions, and that faces expressing negative emotions hamper the disengagement of attention from the whole object (i.e., the face), instead of the certain location. Our study can further add support to the attentional prioritisation hypothesis over attentional spreading hypothesis.

Keywords

Facial expressions object-based attention space-based attention emotional valence emotional motivation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

R. B.

Ambady

Macrae

C. N.

Kleck

R. E.

(2006). Emotional expressions forecast approach-avoidance behavior. Motivation and Emotion, 30(2), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9020-2

Baldauf

Desimone

(2014). Neural mechanisms of object-based attention. Science, 344(6182), 424–427. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1247003

Carver

C. S.

Harmon-Jones

(2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013965

Chen

Cave

K. R.

(2006). Reinstating object-based attention under positional certainty: The importance of subjective parsing. Perception & Psychophysics, 68(6), 992–1003. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193360

Chen

Cave

K. R.

(2008). Object-based attention with endogenous cuing and positional certainty. Perception & Psychophysics, 70(8), 1435–1443. https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.8.1435

Cohen

(1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

Drummond

Shomstein

(2010). Object-based attention: Shifting or uncertainty? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(7), 1743–1755. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.7.1743

Drummond

Shomstein

(2013). The timecourse of space- and object-based attentional prioritization with varying degrees of certainty. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 7, Article 88. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2013.00088

Duncan

(1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.113.4.501

10.

Egly

Driver

Rafal

R. D.

(1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.123.2.161

11.

Eisenbarth

Alpers

G. W.

(2011). Happy mouth and sad eyes: Scanning emotional facial expressions. Emotion, 11(4), 860–865. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022758

12.

Faul

Erdfelder

Buchner

Lang

A. G.

(2009). Statistical power analyses using G * power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

13.

Fenske

M. J.

Eastwood

J. D.

(2003). Modulation of focused attention by faces expressing emotion: Evidence from flanker tasks. Emotion, 3(4), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.3.4.327

14.

Fox

(2002). Processing emotional facial expressions: The role of anxiety and awareness. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2(1), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.3758/cabn.2.1.52

15.

Fox

Derakshan

Shoker

(2008). Trait anxiety modulates the electrophysiological indices of rapid spatial orienting towards angry faces. NeuroReport, 19(3), 259–263. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f53d2a

16.

Fox

Lester

Russo

Bowles

R. J.

Dutton

Pichler

(2000). Facial expressions of emotion: Are angry faces detected more efficiently? Cognition & Emotion, 14(1), 61–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999300378996

17.

Fox

Russo

Bowles

Dutton

(2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 681–700. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.130.4.681

18.

Fox

Russo

Dutton

(2002). Attentional bias for threat: Evidence for delayed disengagement from emotional faces. Cognition & Emotion, 16(3), 355–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930143000527

19.

Frischen

Eastwood

J. D.

Smilek

(2008). Visual search for faces with emotional expressions. Psychological Bulletin, 134(5), 662–676. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.5.662

20.

Gable

P. A.

Harmon-Jones

(2008). Approach-motivated positive affect reduces breadth of attention. Psychological Science, 19(5), 476–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02112.x

21.

Gable

P. A.

Harmon-Jones

(2010a). The blues broaden, but the nasty narrows: Attentional consequences of negative affects low and high in motivational intensity. Psychological Science, 21(2), 211–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609359622

22.

Gable

P. A.

Harmon-Jones

(2010b). The motivational dimensional model of affect: Implications for breadth of attention, memory, and cognitive categorisation. Cognition & Emotion, 24(2), 322–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930903378305

23.

Georgiou

Bleakley

Hayward

Russo

Dutton

Eltiti

Fox

(2005). Focusing on fear: Attentional disengagement from emotional faces. Visual Cognition, 12(1), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280444000076

24.

Gong

Huang

Y. X.

Wang

Luo

Y. J.

(2011). Revision of the Chinese facial affective picture system. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 25, 40–46. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2011.01.011

25.

Harmon-Jones

Gable

P. A.

Peterson

C. K.

(2010). The role of asymmetric frontal cortical activity in emotion-related phenomena: A review and update. Biological Psychology, 84(3), 451–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.08.010

26.

Harmon-Jones

Price

T. F.

(2013). What is approach motivation? Emotion Review, 5(3), 291–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073913477509

27.

Fan

Zhou

Chen

(2004). Cue validity and object-based attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1085–1097. https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929041502689

28.

Humphreys

G. S.

Chen

Han

(2008). Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: An event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing. Brain Research, 1245(12), 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2008.09.092

29.

Horstmann

(2003). What do facial expressions convey: Feeling states, behavioral intentions, or action requests? Emotion, 3(2), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.3.2.150

30.

Liu

Song

Wang

Zhao

(2020). The influence of object similarity on real object-based attention: The disassociation of perceptual and semantic similarity. Acta Psychologica, 205, Article 103046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103046

31.

Leder

Carbon

C. C.

(2005). When context hinders! Learn–test compatibility in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(2), 235–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980343000936

32.

Liu

Wang

(2014). Positive affect and cognitive control: Approach-motivation intensity influences the balance between cognitive flexibility and stability. Psychological Science, 25(5), 1116–1123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614525213

33.

Malcolm

G. L.

Shomstein

(2015). Object-based attention in real-world scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(2), 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000060

34.

Maurer

Grand

R. L.

Mondloch

C. J.

(2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(6), 255–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01903-4

35.

Michel

Rossion

Han

Chung

C. S.

Caldara

(2006). Holistic processing is finely tuned for faces of one’s own race. Psychological Science, 17(7), 608–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01752.x

36.

Murphy

Gray

K. L. H.

Cook

(2020). Inverted faces benefit from whole-face processing. Cognition, 194, Article 104105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104105

37.

Nah

J. C.

Neppi-Modona

Strother

Behrmann

Shomstein

(2018). Object width modulates object-based attentional selection. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80, 1375–1389. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1530-y

38.

Peterson

C. K.

Harmon-Jones

(2012). Anger and testosterone: Evidence that situationally-induced anger relates to situationally-induced testosterone. Emotion, 12(5), 899–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025300

39.

Pool

Brosch

Delplanque

Sander

(2016). Attentional bias for positive emotional stimuli: A meta-analytic investigation. Psychological Bulletin, 141(5), 79–106. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000026

40.

Posner

M. I.

Snyder

C. R. R.

Davidson

B. J.

(1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.109.2.160

41.

Pourtois

Schettino

Vuilleumier

(2013). Brain mechanisms for emotional influences on perception and attention: What is magic and what is not. Biological Psychology, 92, 492–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.02.007

42.

Puls

Rothermund

(2017). Attending to emotional expressions: No evidence for automatic capture in the dot-probe task. Cognition & Emotion, 32(3), 450–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2017.1314932

43.

Reppa

Schmidt

W. C.

Leek

E. C.

(2012). Successes and failures in producing attentional object-based cueing effects. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(1), 43–69. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-011-0211-x

44.

Richler

J. J.

Gauthier

(2014). A meta-analysis and review of holistic face processing. Psychological Bulletin, 140(5), 1281–1302. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037004

45.

Scotti

Malcolm

Peterson

Shomstein

(2016). Reality vs. simplicity: The effects of real-world objects on attentional selection. Journal of Vision, 16(12), Article 700. https://doi.org/10.1167/16.12.700

46.

Seidel

E.-M.

Habel

Kirschner

Gur

R. C.

Derntl

(2010). The impact of facial emotional expressions on behavioral tendencies in women and men. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 36(2), 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018169

47.

Shomstein

(2012). Object-based attention: Strategy versus automaticity. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews, 3(2), 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1162

48.

Shomstein

Yantis

(2002). Object-based attention: Sensory modulation or priority setting? Perception & Psychophysics, 64(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF0319455

49.

Shomstein

Yantis

(2004). Configural and contextual prioritization in object-based attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(2), 247–253. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196566

50.

Tipples

(2005). Orienting to eye gaze and face processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31(5), 843–856. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.31.5.843

51.

Van Bockstaele

Verschuere

Tibboel

De Houwer

Crombez

Koster

E. H. W

. (2014). A review of current evidence for the causal impact of attentional bias on fear and anxiety. Psychological Bulletin, 140(3), 682–721. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034834

52.

van Rooijen

Ploeger

Kret

M. E

. (2017). The dot-probe task to measure emotional attention: A suitable measure in comparative studies? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 1686–1717. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1224-1

53.

Wagenmakers

E. J.

(2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p, values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(5), 779–804. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194105

54.

Yiend

Barnicot

Williams

Fox

(2018). The influence of positive and negative affect on emotional attention. Journal of Behavior Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry, 61, 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.06.008

55.

Zhang

Japee

Safiullah

Mlynaryk

Ungerleider

L. G.

(2016). A normalization framework for emotional attention. PLOS Biology, 14(11), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002578

56.

Zhao

Song

Zhou

Kong

(2019). The impact of monetary stimuli on object-based attention. British Journal of Psychology, 111, 460–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12418

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.17 MB

The modulation of object-based attentional selection by facial expressions

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material