Chinese character recognition is based on a limited set of recurrent stroke patterns. Most Chinese characters are a combination of two or more of these components. To test whether readers are sensitive to combinations of components (or multi-component units [MCUs]) within a character, we conducted two probe detection tasks where participants had to detect the presence of a component in a target character. Critically, some targets contained an MCU that can stand as a character on its own, with its own meaning and sound, while other targets contained an MCU that only exists embedded within other characters (no associated meaning and sound). Participants had more difficulty detecting component probes that were a part of an existing MCU, compared to component probes that belonged to a non-existing MCU. These findings suggest that existing MCUs are a perceptual unit in Chinese character recognition.
ChenJ.-Y.CherngR.-J. (2013). The proximate unit in Chinese handwritten character production. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 517.
4.
ChenY.-C.YehS.-L. (2015). Binding radicals in Chinese character recognition: Evidence from repetition blindness. Journal of Memory and Language, 78, 47–63.
5.
ChenY.-P.AllportA. (1995). Attention and lexical decomposition in Chinese word recognition: Conjunctions of form and position guide selective attention. Visual Cognition, 2(2–3), 235–267.
6.
ChenY.-P.AllportD. A.MarshallJ. C. (1996). What are the functional orthographic units in Chinese word recognition: The stroke or the stroke pattern?The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 49(4), 1024–1043.
7.
ChetailF. (2020). Are graphemic effects real in skilled visual word recognition?Journal of Memory and Language, 111, 104085.
8.
ChetailF.ContentA. (2014). What is the difference between OASIS and OPERA? Roughly five pixels. Psychological Science, 25(1), 243–249.
DamianM. F.QuQ. (2017). Exploring the role of logographemes in Chinese handwritten word production. Reading and Writing, 32(1), 147–173.
11.
DehaeneS.CohenL.SigmanM.VinckierF. (2005). The neural code for written words: A proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(7), 335–341.
12.
DingG.PengD.TaftM. (2004). The nature of the mental representation of radicals in Chinese: A priming study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 530–539.
13.
DrewnowskiA.HealyA. F. (1977). Detection errors on the and and: Evidence for reading units larger than the word. Memory & Cognition, 5(6), 636–647.
14.
FanK. Y. (1986, September). Graphic symbol of the Chinese character [Paper presentation]. Symposium of Chinese Character Modernization, Beijing, China.
15.
FanK. Y.GaoJ. Y.AoX. P. (1984). Pronunciation principles of the Chinese character and alphabetic writing systems. Chinese Character Reform, 3, 19–22.
16.
GraingerJ.Van HeuvenW. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In BoninP. (Ed.), The mental lexicon (pp. 1–24). Nova Science.
17.
GreenbergS. N.HealyA. F.KoriatA.KreinerH. (2004). The GO model: A reconsideration of the role of structural units in guiding and organizing text on line. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(3), 428–433.
18.
GreenbergS. N.KoriatA. (1991). The missing-letter effect for common function words depends on their linguistic function in the phrase. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(6), 1051–1061.
19.
HanZ.ZhangY.ShuH.BiY. (2007). The orthographic buffer in writing Chinese characters: Evidence from a dysgraphic patient. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24(4), 431–450.
20.
HealyA. F. (1994). Letter detection: A window to unitization and other cognitive processes in reading text. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(3), 333–344.
21.
KoriatA.GreenbergS. N.GoldshmidY. (1991). The missing-letter effect in Hebrew: Word frequency or word function?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(1), 66–80.
22.
LawS. P.LeungM. T. (2000). Structural representations of characters in Chinese writing: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Psychologia, 43, 67–83.
23.
LuoC.ProctorR. W.WengX. (2015). A Stroop effect emerges in the processing of complex Chinese characters that contain a color-related radical. Psychological Research, 79(2), 221–229.
24.
LuoC.ProctorR. W.WengX.LiX. (2014). Spatial Stroop interference occurs in the processing of radicals of ideogrammic compounds. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(3), 715–720.
25.
McBrideC. A. (2015). Is Chinese special? Four aspects of Chinese literacy acquisition that might distinguish learning Chinese from learning alphabetic orthographies. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 523–549.
26.
McClellandJ. L.RumelhartD. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88(5), 375–407.
27.
MoC.YuM.SegerC.MoL. (2015). Holistic neural coding of Chinese character forms in bilateral ventral visual system. Brain and Language, 141, 28–34.
28.
MyersJ. (2019). The grammar of Chinese characters: Productive knowledge of formal patterns in an orthographic system. Routledge.
29.
NorrisD. (2013). Models of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(10), 517–524.
30.
PeirceJ. W.GrayJ. R.SimpsonS.MacAskillM. R.HöchenbergerR.SogoH.KastmanE.LindeløvJ. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 195–203.
31.
PerfettiC. A.LiuY.TanL. H. (2005). The lexical constituency model: Some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading. Psychological Review, 112(1), 43–59.
32.
PrinzmetalW.TreimanR.RhoS. H. (1986). How to see a reading unit. Journal of Memory and Language, 25(4), 461–475.
33.
R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
34.
ReichleE. D.YuL. (2017). Models of Chinese reading: Review and analysis. Cognitive Science, 42, 1154–1165.
35.
ReyA.ZieglerJ. C.JacobsA. M. (2000). Graphemes are perceptual reading units. Cognition, 75(1), B1–B12.
36.
RStudio Team. (2019). RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, PBC. http://www.rstudio.com/
37.
Saint-AubinJ.KleinR. M. (2001). Influence of parafoveal processing on the missing-letter effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(2), 318–334. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.27.2.318
38.
SeidenbergM. S. (1987). Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy? In ColtheartM. (Ed.), Attention and performance, XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 245–263). Lawrence Erlbaum.
39.
ShuH.ChenX.AndersonR. C.WuN.XuanY. (2003). Properties of school Chinese: Implications for learning to read. Child Development, 74(1), 27–47.
40.
SunC. C.HendrixP.MaJ. Q.BaayenR. H. (2018). Chinese lexical database (CLD): A large-scale lexical database for simplified Mandarin Chinese. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 2606–2629.
41.
TaftM.ZhuX. (1997). Submorphemic processing in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(3), 761–775.
42.
TsangY.-K.WuY.NgT.-Y.ChenH.-C. (2017). Semantic activation of phonetic radicals in Chinese. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(5), 618–636.
43.
WangX.PeiM.WuY.SuY. (2017). Semantic radicals contribute more than phonetic radicals to the recognition of Chinese phonograms: Behavioral and ERP evidence in a factorial study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 2230.
44.
WhitneyC. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(2), 221–243.
45.
WongK.LiW.XuR.ZhangZ. (2010). Introduction to Chinese natural language processing. Morgan & Claypool.
46.
YehS. L.ChouW. L.HoP. (2017). Lexical processing of Chinese sub-character components: Semantic activation of phonetic radicals as revealed by the Stroop effect. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 15782.
47.
YinL.McBrideC. (2015). Chinese kindergartners learn to read characters analytically. Psychological Science, 26(4), 424–432.
48.
YuL.XiongJ.ZhangQ.DriegheD.ReichleE. D. (2019). Eye-movement evidence for the mental representation of strokes in Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(3), 544–551.
49.
ZhouX.Marslen-WilsonW. (1999). The nature of sublexical processing in reading Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(4), 819–837.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
