Do we savour aesthetic experiences less when distracted by interrupted tasks, work rumination, or stress? Evidence suggests that the ability to concentrate on the aesthetic experience is crucial for initiating a processing mode of conscious aesthetic reception that results in more positive emotions. When working memory resources are otherwise occupied, people are less able to concentrate on aesthetic experiences. Aesthetic savouring, in particular—a cognitive form of emotion regulation that is used to maintain and extend aesthetic experiences—is thought to be impaired under those circumstances. We conducted three investigations to examine how conditions that are known to deplete working memory resources affect the savouring of aesthetic experiences. In Study 1, participants rated beauty and savouring felt from encounters with visual stimuli in a controlled laboratory setting after an interruption of a writing task. Aesthetic experience was hampered if participants were interrupted. In two field investigations, we demonstrated that work-related rumination (Study 2, N = 329) and stress (Study 3, N = 368) are inversely related to the savouring felt from opera, theatre, or cabaret pieces. These findings highlight the importance of concentrating on aesthetic experiences so that the perceiver can fully benefit from them. We also discuss implications for cognitive models of working memory and for health and well-being.
AnichaC. L.OdeS.MoellerS. K.RobinsonM. D. (2012). Toward a cognitive view of trait mindfulness: Distinct cognitive skills predict its observing and nonreactivity facets. Journal of Personality, 80(2), 255–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00722.x
2.
BaddeleyA. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford University Press.
3.
BaddeleyA. D.HitchG. J. (1974). Working memory. In BowerG. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). Academic Press.
4.
BaddeleyA. D.LogieR. H. (1999). The multiple-component model. In MiyakeA.ShahP. (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 28–61). Cambridge University Press.
5.
BaradellJ. G.KleinK. (1993). Relationship of life stress and body consciousness to hypervigilant decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(2), 267–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.267
6.
BradleyM. M.LangP. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9
7.
BratticoE.BogertB.JacobsenT. (2013). Toward a neural chronometry for the aesthetic experience of music. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 206. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00206
BroseA.SchmiedekF.LövdénM.LindenbergerU. (2012). Daily variability in working memory is coupled with negative affect: The role of attention and motivation. Emotion, 12, 605–617. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024436
10.
BrownK.RyanR. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822
BryantF. B. (2003). Savouring Beliefs Inventory (SBI): A scale for measuring beliefs about savouring. Journal of Mental Health, 12, 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963823031000103489
13.
BryantF. B.VeroffJ. (2007). Savouring: A new model of positive experience. Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
BuchnerA.FaulF.ErdfelderE. (1992). G Power: A priori, post-hoc, and compromise power analyses for the Macintosh [Computer program]. Bonn University.
15.
BuehnerM.KrummS.ZieglerM.PlueckenT. (2006). Cognitive abilities and their interplay: Reasoning, crystallized intelligence, working memory components, and sustained attention. Journal of Individual Differences, 27(2), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.27.2.57
CollaniG. (2004). Eine deutsche Skala zum Konstrukt Bedürfnis nach kognitiver Geschlossenheit (NFCC)/Persönliches Strukturbedürfnis (PNS) [A German scale of the construct “Need for Cognitive Closure/Personal Need for Structure”]. In Glöckner-RistA. (Ed.), ZUMA-Informationssystem. Zentrum für Umfragen [ZUMA information system: Electronic handbook of data collection methods in the social sciences] (Version 10.0), Methoden und Analysen.
20.
CowanN. (2005). Working memory capacity. Psychology Press.
21.
CowanN. (2010). The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721409359277
22.
CoxT.GriffithsA.Rial-GonzalezE. (2000). Research on work-related stress. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work.
23.
CraikF. I.LockhartR. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X
24.
CropleyM.Millward PurvisL. (2003). Job strain and rumination about work issues during leisure time: A diary study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12(3), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320344000093
25.
CupchikG. C.VartanianO.CrawleyA.MikulisD. J. (2009). Viewing artworks: Contributions of cognitive control and perceptual facilitation to aesthetic experience. Brain and Cognition, 70(1), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2009.01.003
26.
CupchikG. C.WinstonA. S. (1996). Confluence and divergence in empirical aesthetics, philosophy, and mainstream psychology. In CarteretteE. C.FriedmanM. P. (Eds.), Handbook of perception & cognition, cognitive ecology (pp. 62–85). Academic Press.
27.
CurciA.LancianoT.SoletiE.RiméB. (2013). Negative emotional experiences arouse rumination and affect working memory capacity. Emotion, 13(5), 867–880. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032492
28.
DanemanM.CarpenterP. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 19(4), 450–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6
29.
DanemanM.TardifT. (1987). Working memory and reading skill re-examined. In ColtheartM. E. (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 491–508). Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
DavidsonR.MacKinnonJ. G. (1993). Estimation and inference in econometrics. Oxford University Press.
31.
DaykinN.ByrneE.SoteriouT.O’ConnorS. (2008). The impact of art, design and environment in mental healthcare: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, 128(2), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466424007087806
32.
DesnoyersA.Arpin-CribbieC. (2015). Examining cognitive performance: Do perfectionism and rumination matter?Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 94–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.050
33.
DiazF. M. (2013). Mindfulness, attention, and flow during music listening: An empirical investigation. Psychology of Music, 41(1), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735611415144
34.
EloA.-L.LeppänenA.JahkolaA. (2003). Validity of a single-item measure of stress symptoms. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health, 29, 444–451. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.75
35.
EysenckM. W.CalvoM. G. (1992). Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory. Cognition & Emotion, 6(6), 409–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208409696
36.
FeldmanG. C.JoormannJ.JohnsonS. L. (2008). Responses to positive affect: A self-report measure of rumination and dampening. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32, 507–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-006-9083-0
37.
FredricksonB. L. (2013). Positive emotions broaden and build. In DevineP.PlantA. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 1–53). Academic Press.
38.
FrenchJ. R. P.Jr.RodgersW. L.CobbS. (1974). Adjustment as person–environment fit. In CoelhoG.HamburgD.AdamsJ. (Eds.), Coping and adaptation (pp. 316–333). Basic Books.
39.
GabrielA. S.DiefendorffJ. M.EricksonR. J. (2011). The relations of daily task accomplishment satisfaction with changes in affect: A multilevel study in nurses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 1095–1104. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023937
40.
GeisslerL. R. (1909). The measurement of attention. American Journal of Psychology, 20, 473–529. https://doi.org/10.2307/1412972
41.
GonzálezV. M.MarkG. (2004). “Constant, constant, multitasking craziness”: Managing multiple working spheres. In Dykstra-EricksonE.TscheligiM. (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 113–120). ACM.
42.
GreenP.MacLeodC. J. (2016). SIMR: An R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(4), 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12504
43.
HarrisonN. R.ClarkD. P. A. (2016). The observing facet of trait mindfulness predicts frequency of aesthetic experiences evoked by the arts. Mindfulness, 7, 971–978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0536-6
44.
HendersonC.BeckJ.PalmatierR. (2011). Review of the theoretical underpinnings of loyalty programs. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 3, 256–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.02.007
45.
HöfelL.JacobsenT. (2007). Electrophysiological indices of processing aesthetics: Spontaneous or intentional processes?International Journal of Psychophysiology, 65(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.02.007
JacobsenT. (2010a). Beauty and the brain: Culture, history and individual differences in aesthetic appreciation. Journal of Anatomy, 216(2), 184–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2009.01164.x
48.
JacobsenT. (2010b). On the psychophysiology of aesthetics: Automatic and controlled processes of aesthetic appreciation. In CziglerI.WinklerI. (Eds.), Unconscious memory representations in perception, processes and mechanisms in the brain (pp. 245–257). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/aicr.78.11jac
49.
JacobsenT. (2019). Settings, sensors, and tasks: Comment on Scherer, Trznadel, Fantini, and Coutinho (2019). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(3), 261–263. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000253
JacobsenT.BuchtaK.KöhlerM.SchrögerE. (2004). A primacy of beauty: The aesthetics of things. Psychological Reports, 94(3), 1253–1260. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.94.3c.1253-1260
52.
JacobsenT.HöfelL. (2003). Descriptive and evaluative judgment processes: Behavioral and electrophysiological indices of processing symmetry and aesthetics. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 289–299. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.3.4.289
53.
JoseP. E.LimB. T.BryantF. B. (2012). Does savouring increase happiness? A daily diary study. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7, 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2012.671345
54.
JustM. A.CarpenterP. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122
55.
Kabat-ZinnJ. (1994). Wherever you go, there you are. Hyperion.
KaneM. J.BrownL. H.McVayJ. C.SilviaP. J.Myin-GermeysI.KwapilT. R. (2007). For whom the mind wanders, and when: An experience-sampling study of working memory and executive control in daily life. Psychological Science, 18(7), 614–621. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01948.x
58.
KirchnerW. K. (1958). Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55(4), 352–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043688
59.
KivetzR.UrminskyO.ZhengY. H. (2006). The goal-gradient hypothesis resurrected: Purchase acceleration, illusionary goal progress, and customer retention. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.43.1.39
60.
KleinK.BarnesD. (1994). The relationship of life stress to problem solving: Task complexity and individual differences. Social Cognition, 12(3), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1994.12.3.187
61.
KleinK.BoalsA. (2001a). Expressive writing can increase working memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(3), 520–533. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.520
62.
KleinK.BoalsA. (2001b). The relationship of life event stress and working memory capacity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15(5), 565–579. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.727
63.
KonecniV. J. (2008). Does music induce emotion? A theoretical and methodological analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(2), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.115
64.
KrohneH. W.EgloffB.KohlmannC. W.TauschA. (1996). Investigations with a German version of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Diagnostica, 42(2), 139–156.
65.
LederH.BelkeB.OeberstA.AugustinD. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95(4), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1348/0007126042369811
66.
LederH.CarbonC. C.RipsasA. L. (2006). Entitling art: Influence of title information on understanding and appreciation of paintings. Acta Psychologica, 121, 176–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.08.005
67.
LederH.GergerG.BrieberD.SchwarzN. (2014). What makes an art expert? Emotion and evaluation in art appreciation. Cognition and Emotion, 28(6), 1137–1147. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2013.870132
68.
LewinK. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. McGraw-Hill.
69.
LewinK. (1939). Field theory and experiment in social psychology: Concepts and methods. American Journal of Sociology, 44(6), 868–896. https://doi.org/10.1086/218177
70.
MaW. J.HusainM.BaysP. M. (2014). Changing concepts of working memory. Nature Neuroscience, 17(3), 347–356.
71.
MacInnisD. J.PriceL. L. (1987). The role of imagery in information processing: Review and extensions. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), 473–491. https://doi.org/10.1086/209082
72.
MarkG.GudithD.KlockeU. (2008). The cost of interrupted work: More speed and stress. In BurnettM.CostabileM. F.CatarciT.de RuyterB.TanD.CzerwinskiM.LundA. (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 107–110). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357072
73.
MarkovićS. (2012). Components of aesthetic experience: Aesthetic fascination, aesthetic appraisal, and aesthetic emotion. i-Perception, 3(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1068/i0450aap
74.
MasicampoE. J.BaumeisterR. F. (2011). Consider it done! Plan making can eliminate the cognitive effects of unfulfilled goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(4), 667–683. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024192
75.
MaxwellS. E.DelaneyH. D.KelleyK. (2018). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective (3rd ed.). Routledge.
MenninghausW.WagnerV.HanichJ.WassiliwizkyE.JacobsenT.KoelschS. (2017). The distancing–embracing model of the enjoyment of negative emotions in art reception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, Article e347. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17000309
78.
MenninghausW.WagnerV.WassiliwizkyE.SchindlerI.HanichJ.JacobsenT.KoelschS. (2019). What are aesthetic emotions?Psychological Review, 126(2), 171–195. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000135
79.
MontoyaA. K. (2019). Moderation analysis in two-instance repeated measures designs: Probing methods and multiple moderator models. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1088-6
80.
MontoyaA. K.HayesA. F. (2017). Two-condition within-participant statistical mediation analysis: A path-analytic framework. Psychological Methods, 22(1), 6–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000086
81.
MoskowitzG. B. (2002). Preconscious effects of temporary goals on attention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(4), 397–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00001-X
82.
MullennixJ. W.PilotK. M.SteevesT. A.BurnsJ. C. (2018). The effects of cognitive load on judgments of titled visual art. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(2), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000128
83.
NguyenH. T.QuandtS. A.GrzywaczJ. G.ChenH.GalvánL.Kitner-TrioloM. H.ArcuryT. A. (2012). Stress and cognitive function in Latino farmworkers. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 55, 707–713. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22035
84.
NodineC. F.LocherP. J.KrupinskiE. A. (1993). The role of formal art training on perception and aesthetic judgment of art compositions. Leonardo, 26, 219–227. https://doi.org/10.2307/1575815
85.
NorthA. C.HargreavesD. J. (2007). Lifestyle correlates of musical preference: 1. Relationships, living arrangements, beliefs, and crime. Psychology of Music, 35(1), 58–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735607068888
86.
OvsiankinaM. (1928). Die Wiederaufnahme unterbrochener Handlungen [The resumption of disrupted activities]. Psychologische Forschung, 11(1), 302–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00410261
87.
OyamaY.ManaloE.NakataniY. (2018). The Hemingway effect: How failing to finish a task can have a positive effect on motivation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 30, 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.01.001
88.
PeakH.BoringE. G. (1926). The factor of speed in intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 9, 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0071020
89.
PetersonR. A.BrownS. P. (2005). On the use of beta coefficients in meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.175
ReberR.SchwarzN.WinkielmanP. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience?Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364–382. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804-3
92.
RhodesS.JaroslawskaA. J.DohertyJ. M.BelletierC.Naveh-BenjaminM.CowanN.CamosV.BarrouilletP.LogieR. H. (2019). Storage and processing in working memory: Assessing dual-task performance and task prioritization across the adult lifespan. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(7), 1204–1227. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000539
93.
SarassoP.Neppi-ModonaM.SaccoK.RongaI. (2020). “Stopping for knowledge”: The sense of beauty in the perception-action cycle. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 118, 723–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.09.004
94.
SchallM.GoetzT.MartinyS. E.HallN. C. (2017). It ain’t over ‘til it’s over: The effect of task completion on the savouring of success. Motivation and Emotion, 41(1), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-016-9591-5
95.
SchwörerB.KrottN. R.OettingenG. (2019). Saying goodbye and saying it well: Consequences of a (not) well-rounded ending. Motivation Science, 6(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000126
96.
ShahP.MiyakeA. (1996). The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: An individual differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 4–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.125.1.4
97.
ShermanA.GraboweckyM.SuzukiS. (2015). In the working memory of the beholder: Art appreciation is enhanced when visual complexity is compatible with working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(4), 898–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039314
98.
SpeckerE.ForsterM.BrinkmannH.BoddyJ.PelowskiM.RosenbergR.LederH. (2018). The Vienna Art Interest and Art Knowledge Questionnaire (VAIAK): A unified and validated measure of art interest and art knowledge. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 14(2), 172–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000205
99.
SundararajanL. (2010). Two flavors of aesthetic tasting: Rasa and savouring a cross-cultural study with implications for psychology of emotion. Review of General Psychology, 14(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018122
100.
SundararajanL. (2015). Savouring (Pin wei), from aesthetics to the everyday. In SundararajanL. (Ed.), Understanding emotion in Chinese culture: International and cultural psychology (pp. 157–174.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18221-6-10
101.
SyrekC. J.WeigeltO.PeiferC.AntoniC. H. (2017). Zeigarnik’s sleepless nights: How unfinished tasks at the end of the week impair employee sleep on the weekend through rumination. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(2), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000031
102.
ThomsonL. J.LockyerB.CamicP. M.ChatterjeeH. J. (2018). Effects of a museum-based social prescription intervention on quantitative measures of psychological wellbeing in older adults. Perspectives in Public Health, 138(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757913917737563
103.
ToddC.CamicP. M.LockyerB.ThomsonL. J.ChatterjeeH. J. (2017). Museum-based programs for socially isolated older adults: Understanding what works. Health & Place, 48, 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.08.005
Van BreukelenG. J. P. (1989). Concentration, speed and precision in simple mental tasks. In RoskamE. E. E.SuckR. (Eds.), Progress in mathematical psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 175–193). Elsevier.
106.
VartanianO.NavarreteG.ChatterjeeA.FichL. B.LederH.ModronoC.NadalfM.RostruphN.SkovM. (2013). Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach–avoidance decisions in architecture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(Suppl. 2), 10446–10453. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1301227110
107.
WagnerV.KleinJ.HanichJ.ShahM.MenninghausW.JacobsenT. (2016). Anger framed: A field study on emotion, pleasure, and art. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(2), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000029
108.
WagnerV.MenninghausW.HanichJ.JacobsenT. (2014). Art schema effects on affective experience: The case of disgusting images. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(2), 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036126
109.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.
110.
WebsterD. M.KruglanskiA. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049–1062. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049
111.
WeigandR.JacobsenT. (2021). Beauty and the busy mind: Occupied working memory resources impair aesthetic experiences in everyday life. PLOS ONE, 16(3), Article e0248529.
112.
WesthoffK.KluckM. L. (1984). Ansätze einer Theorie konzentrativer Leistungen [Towards a theory of concentration performance]. Diagnostica, 30, 167–183.
YeeP. L.EdmondsonB.SantoroK. E.BeggA. E.HunterC. D. (1996). Cognitive effects of life stress and learned helplessness. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 9(4), 301–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615809608249408
115.
ZeigarnikB. (1927). On the retention of completed and uncompleted activities. Psychologische Forschung, 9, 1–85.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
