Estimating the effects of trait knowledge on social perception

Abstract

Research in social cognition has predominantly investigated perceptual and inferential processes separately; however, real-world social interactions usually involve integration between person inferences (e.g., generous, selfish) and the perception of physical appearance (e.g., thin, tall). Therefore, in the current work, we investigated the integration of different person-relevant signals, by estimating the extent to which bias in one social information processing system influences another. Following an initial stimulus-validation experiment (Experiment 1, N = 55), two further pre-registered experiments (Experiments 2, N = 55 and 3; N = 123) employed a priming paradigm to measure the effects of extraversion-diagnostic information on subsequent health and body-size judgements of a target body. The results were consistent across both priming experiments and supported our predictions: compared to trait-neutral control statements, extraversion-diagnostic statements increased judgements of health and decreased those of body size. As such, we show that trait-based knowledge does not only influence mappings towards similar types of person judgements, such as health judgements. Rather, even a brief re-configuration of trait-space alters mappings towards non-trait judgements, which are based on body size and shape. The results complement prior neuroimaging findings that showed functional interactions between the body-selective brain regions in the ventral visual stream and the theory of mind network when forming impressions of others. Therefore, we provide a functional signature of how distinct information processing units exchange signals and integrate information to form impressions. Overall, the current study underscores the value of behavioural work in complementing neuroscience research when investigating the role and properties of functional integration during impression formation. In addition, it stresses the potential limitations of an over-reliance on studying separate systems in isolation.

Keywords

Social cognition person perception priming trait inference body size

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adolphs

(2009). The social brain: Neural basis of social knowledge. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 693–716. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163514

Alexi

Dommisse

Cleary

Palermo

Kloth

Bell

(2019). An assessment of computer-generated stimuli for use in studies of body size estimation and bias. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2390. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02390

Ambady

Rosenthal

(1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111(2), 256–274. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.256

Anderson

N. H.

(1962). Application of an additive model to impression formation. Science, 138(3542), 817–818. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.138.3542.817

Asch

S. E.

(1946). Forming impressions of personality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41(3), 258–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055756

Aviezer

Trope

Todorov

(2012). Body cues, not facial expressions, discriminate between intense positive and negative emotions. Science, 338(6111), 1225–1229. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1224313

Bullmore

Sporns

(2009). Complex brain networks: Graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 10(3), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2575

Burton

A. M.

Bruce

Johnston

R. A.

(1990). Understanding face recognition with an interactive activation model. British Journal of Psychology, 81(3), 361–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1990.tb02367.x

Cacioppo

J. T.

Petty

R. E.

Kao

C. F.

(1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(3), 306–307. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13

10.

Churchland

P. M.

(2013). Matter and consciousness. MIT Press.

11.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587

12.

Cornelissen

K. K.

Gledhill

L. J.

Cornelissen

P. L.

Tovée

M. J.

(2016). Visual biases in judging body weight. British Journal of Health Psychology, 21(3), 555–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12185

13.

Cumming

(2013). The new statistics: Estimation for better research. www.thenewstatistics.com

14.

Daly

Sutin

A. R.

Robinson

(2019). Perceived weight discrimination mediates the prospective association between obesity and physiological dysregulation: Evidence from a Population-Based Cohort. Psychological Science, 30(7), 1030–1039. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619849440

15.

de Gelder

. (2006). Towards the neurobiology of emotional body language. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(3), 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1872

16.

de Gelder

Van den Stock

Meeren

H. K. M.

Sinke

C. B. A.

Kret

M. E.

Tamietto

. (2010). Standing up for the body. Recent progress in uncovering the networks involved in the perception of bodies and bodily expressions. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(4), 513–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.10.008

17.

DeYoung

C. G.

Quilty

L. C.

Peterson

J. B.

(2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.880

18.

Downing

P. E.

Jiang

Shuman

Kanwisher

(2001). A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science, 293(5539), 2470–2473. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1063414

19.

Downing

P. E.

Peelen

M. V.

(2011). How might occipitotemporal body-selective regions interact with other brain areas to support person perception? Cognitive Neuroscience, 2(3–4), 216–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2011.613987

20.

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

A.-G.

Buchner

(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

21.

Frith

C. D.

Frith

(1999). Interacting minds—A biological basis. Science, 286(5445), 1692–1695. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5445.1692

22.

Frith

C. D.

Frith

(2012). Mechanisms of social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 287–313. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100449

23.

Funder

D. C.

Ozer

D. J.

(2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202

24.

Greven

I. M.

Downing

P. E.

Ramsey

(2016). Linking person perception and person knowledge in the human brain. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(4), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsv148

25.

Greven

I. M.

Downing

P. E.

Ramsey

(2019). Neural networks supporting social evaluation of bodies based on body shape. Social Neuroscience, 14(3), 328–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2018.1448888

26.

Greven

I. M.

Ramsey

(2017a). Neural network integration during the perception of in-group and out-group members. Neuropsychologia, 106, 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.09.036

27.

Greven

I. M.

Ramsey

(2017b). Person perception involves functional integration between the extrastriate body area and temporal pole. Neuropsychologia, 96, 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.01.003

28.

Hendrick

Franz

C. M.

Hoving

K. L.

(1975). How do children form impressions of persons? They average. Memory & Cognition, 3(3), 325–328. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212919

29.

Hielscher

Whitford

T. J.

Scott

J. G.

Zopf

(2019). When the body is the target—Representations of one’s own body and bodily sensations in self-harm: A systematic review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 101, 85–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.03.007

30.

Hill

M. Q.

Streuber

Hahn

C. A.

Black

M. J.

O’Toole

A. J.

(2016). Creating body shapes from verbal descriptions by linking similarity spaces. Psychological Science, 27(11), 1486–1497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616663878

31.

Hills

P. J.

Elward

R. L.

Lewis

M. B.

(2010). Cross-modal face identity aftereffects and their relation to priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(4), 876–891. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018731

32.

Parde

C. J.

Hill

M. Q.

Mahmood

O’Toole

A. J.

(2018). First impressions of personality traits from body shapes. Psychological Science, 29(12), 1969–1983. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618799300

33.

JASP Team (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1) [Computer software].

34.

John

O. P.

Srivastava

(1999). The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In Pervin

L. A.

John

O. P.

(Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). Guilford Press.

35.

Kanwisher

(2010). Functional specificity in the human brain: A window into the functional architecture of the mind. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(25), 11163–11170. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1005062107

36.

Kanwisher

McDermott

Chun

M. M.

(1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17(11), 4302–4311. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-11-04302.1997

37.

Kaplan

D. M.

Hewitson

C. L.

(2020). Modelling Bayesian computation in the brain: Unification, explanation, and constraints. In Calzavarini

Viola

(Eds.), Neural mechanisms: New challenges in philosophy of neuroscience. Springer International Publishing.

38.

Kemmerer

(2011). Do body-part concepts depend on the EBA/FBA? Cognitive Neuroscience, 2(3–4), 204–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2011.604718

39.

Krakauer

J. W.

Ghazanfar

A. A.

Gomez-Marin

MacIver

M. A.

Poeppel

(2017). Neuroscience needs behavior: Correcting a reductionist bias. Neuron, 93(3), 480–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.041

40.

McBee

M. T.

Field

S. H.

(2017). Confirmatory study design, data analysis, and results that matter. In Makel

M. C.

Plucker

J. A.

(Eds.), Toward a more perfect psychology: Improving trust, accuracy, and transparency in research (pp. 59–78). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000033-004i

41.

Mitchell

J. P.

(2009). Inferences about mental states. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 364(1521), 1309–1316. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0318

42.

Mitchell

J. P.

Banaji

M. R.

Macrae

C. N.

(2005). General and specific contributions of the medial prefrontal cortex to knowledge about mental states. NeuroImage, 28(4), 757–762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.03.011

43.

Mitchell

J. P.

Cloutier

Banaji

M. R.

Macrae

C. N.

(2006). Medial prefrontal dissociations during processing of trait diagnostic and nondiagnostic person information. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1(1), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsl007

44.

Munafò

M. R.

Nosek

B. A.

Bishop

D. V. M.

Button

K. S.

Chambers

C. D.

Percie du Sert

Simonsohn

Wagenmakers

E.-J.

Ware

J. J.

Ioannidis

J. P. A.

(2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021

45.

Naumann

Vazire

Rentfrow

Gosling

(2009). Personality judgments based on physical appearance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1661–1671. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209346309

46.

Niv

(2020). The primacy of behavioral research for understanding the brain. PsyArXiv. https://psyarxiv.com/y8mxe/

47.

Oosterhof

N. N.

Todorov

(2008). The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(32), 11087–11092. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805664105

48.

Over

Cook

(2018). Where do spontaneous first impressions of faces come from? Cognition, 170, 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.10.002

49.

Park

H.-J.

Friston

(2013). Structural and functional brain networks: From connections to cognition. Science, 342(6158), Article 1238411. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1238411

50.

Peelen

M. V.

Downing

P. E.

(2007). The neural basis of visual body perception. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(8), 636–648. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2195

51.

Petty

R. E.

DeMarree

K. G.

Briñol

Horcajo

Strathman

A. J.

(2008). Need for cognition can magnify or attenuate priming effects in social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(7), 900–912. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208316692

52.

Puhl

R. M.

Heuer

C. A.

(2009). The stigma of obesity: A review and update. Obesity, 17(5), 941–964. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2008.636

53.

Quadflieg

Flannigan

Waiter

G. D.

Rossion

Wig

G. S.

Turk

D. J.

Macrae

C. N.

(2011). Stereotype-based modulation of person perception. NeuroImage, 57(2), 549–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.004

54.

R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/

55.

Ramsey

(2018). Neural integration in body perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 30(10), 1442–1451. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01299

56.

Ramsey

(2020). Advocating for the credibility revolution. Cognitive Psychology Bulletin, 5, 69–72. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/3kwnu

57.

Ramsey

Schie

H. T.

van Cross

E. S.

(2011). No two are the same: Body shape is part of identifying others. Cognitive Neuroscience, 2(3–4), 207–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2011.604721

58.

Saxe

Kanwisher

(2003). People thinking about thinking people. The role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind.” NeuroImage, 19(4), 1835–1842. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00230-1

59.

Scheel

A. M.

Tiokhin

Isager

P. M.

Lakens

(2021). Why hypothesis testers should spend less time testing hypotheses. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 744–755. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966795

60.

Schwarzlose

R. F.

Baker

C. I.

Kanwisher

(2005). Separate face and body selectivity on the fusiform gyrus. The Journal of Neuroscience, 25(47), 11055–11059. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2621-05.2005

61.

Simmons

J. P.

Nelson

L. D.

Simonsohn

(2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632

62.

Simmons

J. P.

Nelson

L. D.

Simonsohn

(2018). False-positive citations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 255–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617698146

63.

Stolier

R. M.

Hehman

Keller

M. D.

Walker

Freeman

J. B.

(2018). The conceptual structure of face impressions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(37), 9210–9215. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1807222115

64.

Sutherland

C. A.

Oldmeadow

J. A.

Santos

I. M.

Towler

Burt

D. M.

Young

A. W.

(2013). Social inferences from faces: Ambient images generate a three-dimensional model. Cognition, 127(1), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.12.001

65.

Todorov

Olivola

C. Y.

Dotsch

Mende-Siedlecki

(2015). Social attributions from faces: Determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 519–545. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143831

66.

Tong

(2019). Statistical inference enables bad science; Statistical thinking enables good science. The American Statistician, 73(Supp. 1), 246–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1518264

67.

van Overwalle

. (2009). Social cognition and the brain: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 30(3), 829–858. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20547

68.

Vazire

(2018). Implications of the credibility revolution for productivity, creativity, and progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884

69.

Wang

Y. C.

McPherson

Marsh

Gortmaker

S. L.

Brown

(2011). Health and economic burden of the projected obesity trends in the USA and the UK. Lancet, 378(9793), 815–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60814-3

70.

Watson

Latinus

Noguchi

Garrod

Crabbe

Belin

(2014). Crossmodal adaptation in right posterior superior temporal sulcus during face–voice emotional integration. The Journal of Neuroscience, 34(20), 6813–6821. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4478-13.2014

71.

Wolf

L. J.

von Hecker

Maio

G. R.

(2017). Affective and cognitive orientations in group perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(6), 828–844. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217699582

72.

Zopf

Contini

Fowler

Mondraty

Williams

M. A.

(2016). Body distortions in Anorexia Nervosa: Evidence for changed processing of multisensory bodily signals. Psychiatry Research, 245, 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.09.003

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

1.62 MB

0.00 MB