When the independence of syntactic representation meets the sentence processing of Mandarin: Evidence from syntactic priming

Abstract

There is no consensus on whether syntactic representation is independent of semantic representation in Mandarin. In four experiments, we adopted the syntactic priming paradigm to investigate the independence of syntactic representation in Mandarin. Experiments 1 and 2 investigated the priming effects of double object construction (DO) and prepositional object construction (PO) with the ditransitive verb being repeated across the prime and target. Experiment 1 showed two-way priming effects of DO and PO. Experiment 2 showed that the syntactic priming effects persisted regardless of whether the semantic features (animacy of the Theme) matched across the prime and target or not. Furthermore, such effects persisted in Experiments 3 and 4 where the ditransitive verb across the prime and target was not repeated. Taken together, these findings provide evidence that syntactic/semantic independence is universal and favoured over the traditional Chinese grammar account, which claims that the syntactic representation of Mandarin is not independent of the semantic representation.

Keywords

Syntactic representation semantic representation Mandarin syntactic priming paradigm

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ambridge

Maitreyee

Tatsumi

Doherty

Zicherman

Pedro

P. M.

Bannard

Samanta

McCauley

Arnon

Bekman

Efrati

Berman

Narasimhan

Sharma

D. M.

Nair

R. B.

Fukumura

Campbell

Mendoza

M. J.

(2020). The cross linguistic acquisition of sentence structure: Computational modeling and grammaticality judgments from adult and child speakers of English, Japanese, Hindi, Hebrew and K’iche’. Cognition, 202, 104310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104310

Barr

D. J.

Levy

Scheepers

Tily

H. J.

(2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001

Bates

Maechler

(2009). Package “lme4.” (Version 0.999375-32): Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html

Bock

J. K.

(1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(86)90004-6

Bock

J. K.

Loebell

Morey

(1992). From conceptual roles to structural relations: Bridging the syntactic cleft. Psychological Review, 99, 150–171. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.150

Bock

J. K.

Loebell

(1990). Framing sentences. Cognition, 35, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(90)90035-I

Boersma

Heuven

V. V.

(2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5(9–10), 341–345.

Branigan

H. P.

Pickering

M. J.

(2017). An experimental approach to linguistic representation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e282. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X16002028

Branigan

H. P.

Pickering

M. J.

Tanaka

(2008). Contributions of animacy to grammatical function assignment and word order during production. Lingua, 118(2), 172–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.003

10.

Buckle

Lieven

Theakston

A. L.

(2017). The effects of animacy and syntax on priming: A developmental study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2246. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02246

11.

Cai

Z. G.

Dong

Y. P.

(2007). Transfer of sentence processing strategies for Chinese-English bilinguals. Modern Foreign Languages, 3, 251–261. (in Chinese)

12.

Cai

Z. G.

Pickering

M. J.

Branigan

H. P.

(2012). Mapping concepts to syntax: Evidence from structural priming in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 833–849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.03.009

13.

Carminati

M. N.

van Gompel

R. P. G.

Scheepers

Arai

(2008). Syntactic priming in comprehension: The role of argument order and animacy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 5, 1098–1110. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012795

14.

Chen

S. H.

Chen

S. C.

T. H.

(2012). Surface cues and pragmatic interpretation of given/new in Mandarin Chinese and English: A comparative study. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 490–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.12.006

15.

Chen

X. M.

Branigan

H. P.

Wang

S. P.

Huang

Pickering

M. J.

(2020). Syntactic representation is independent of semantics in Mandarin: Evidence from syntactic priming. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 2, 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1644355

16.

Chu

C. C.

(1998). A discourse grammar of Mandarin Chinese. Peter Lang.

17.

Dewart

M. H.

(1979). Role of animate and inanimate nouns in determining sentence voice. British Journal of Psychology, 70, 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1979.tb02151.x

18.

Gennari

S. P.

Mirković

MacDonald

M. C.

(2012). Animacy and competition in relative clause production: A cross-linguistic investigation. Cognitive Psychology, 65, 141–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.03.002

19.

Goldberg

A. E.

(1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. University of Chicago Press.

20.

Green

MacLeod

C. J.

(2016). SIMR: An R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4, 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12504

21.

X. W.

(2011). A generative approach to ditransitive constructions in Chinese and English. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. (in Chinese)

22.

Hoosain

(1991). Psycholinguistic implications for linguistic relativity: A case study of Chinese. Lawrence Erlbaum.

23.

M. Y.

(1994). The categories of semantic and grammar. Chinese Language Learning, 1, 2–4. (in Chinese)

24.

Huang

Pickering

M. J.

Yang

Wang

Branigan

H. P.

(2016). The independence of syntactic processing in Mandarin: Evidence from structural priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 91, 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.02.005

25.

Huang

(2020). Early, but not overwhelming: The effect of prior context on segmenting overlapping ambiguous strings when reading Chinese. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 9, 1382–1395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820926012

26.

Köhne

Pickering

M. J.

Branigan

H. P.

(2014). The relationship between sentence meaning and word order: Evidence from structural priming in German. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(2), 304–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.807855

27.

Kuznetsova

Brockhoff

P. B.

Christensen

R. H. B.

(2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 13, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13

28.

Ledoux

Traxler

M. J.

Swaab

T. Y.

(2007). Syntactic priming in comprehension: Evidence from event-related potentials. Psychological Science, 2, 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01863.x

29.

C. N.

Thompson

S. A.

(1978). An exploration of Mandarin Chinese. In Lehmann

W. P.

(Ed.), The typology of language (pp. 223–266). University of Texas Press.

30.

C. N.

Thompson

S. A.

(1989). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. University of California Press.

31.

(1996). The temporal structure of spoken sentence comprehension in Chinese. Perception and Psychophysics, 58(4), 571–586. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213091

32.

Bates

MacWhinney

(1993). Processing a language without inflections: A reaction time study of sentence interpretation in Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1010

33.

J. M.

(1997). On semantic orientation analysis. Forum on Chinese Linguistics, 1, 34–48. (in Chinese)

34.

MacDonald

M. C.

Pearlmutter

N. J.

Seidenberg

M. S.

(1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676–703. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.676

35.

Pickering

M. J.

Branigan

H. P.

(1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 633–651. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2592

36.

Pickering

M. J.

Ferreira

V. S.

(2008). Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 134(3), 427–459. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.427

37.

Pickering

M. J.

Garrod

(2021). Understanding dialogue: Language use and social interaction. Cambridge University Press.

38.

Shao

J. M.

(1998). Studies of semantics in syntactic structures. Beijing University of Language and Culture Press. (in Chinese)

39.

Sun

Givón

(1985). On the so-called SOV word order in Mandarin Chinese: A quantified text study and its implications. Language, 2, 329–351. https://doi.org/10.2307/414148

40.

Sun

Shi

Guo

Yang

Zhu

(2021). Independent syntactic representation identified in left front-temporal cortex during Chinese sentence comprehension. Brain and Language, 214, 104907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2021.104907

41.

Wang

Cai

Wang

Branigan

H. P.

Pickering

M. J.

(2020). How do phonology and orthography feed back to influence syntactic encoding in language production? Evidence from structural priming in Mandarin. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 1807–1819. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820932125

42.

Wang

(2011). Reaches on construction grammar (vol.1): Theoretical exploration. Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press. (in Chinese)

43.

Zhou

Y. X.

(2009). Dictionary of modern Chinese homonym. The Commercial Press. (in Chinese)

44.

Zhu

D. X.

(1980). A study of modern Chinese grammar. The Commercial Press. (in Chinese)