Effects of a neutral warning signal on spatial two-choice reactions

Abstract

Posner et al. reported that, at short fixed foreperiods, a neutral warning tone reduced reaction times (RTs) in a visual two-choice task while increasing error rates for both spatially compatible and incompatible stimulus–response mappings. Consequently, they concluded that alertness induced by the warning does not affect the efficiency of information processing but the setting of a response criterion. We conducted two experiments to determine the conditions under which the trade-off occurs. In Experiment 1, participants performed the same two-choice task as in Posner et al.’s study without RT feedback. Results showed that the warning tone speeded responses with no evidence of speed/accuracy trade-off. In Experiment 2, RT feedback was provided after each response, and a speed/accuracy trade-off was found for the 50-ms foreperiod. However, better information-processing efficiency was evident for the 200-ms foreperiod. We conclude that the foreperiod effect of a 50-ms foreperiod is a result of response criterion adjustment and that providing trial-level RT feedback is critical for replicating this pattern. However, fixed foreperiods of 200 ms or longer benefit both speed and accuracy, implying a more controlled preparation component that improves response efficiency.

Keywords

Warning signal foreperiod effect response selection stimulus–response compatibility

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bertelson

(1967). The time course of preparation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19(3), 272–279.

Bertelson

Tisseyre

(1968). The time-course of preparation with regular and irregular foreperiods. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20(3), 297–300.

Fischer

Plessow

Kiesel

(2010). Auditory warning signals affect mechanisms of response selection: Evidence from a Simon task. Experimental Psychology, 57, 89–97.

Hackley

S. A.

(2009). The speeding of voluntary reaction by a warning signal. Psychophysiology, 46(2), 225–233.

Heitz

R. P.

(2014). The speed-accuracy tradeoff: History, physiology, methodology, and behavior. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, Article 150.

Hines

(1979). Information feedback, reaction time and error rates in young and old subjects. Experimental Aging Research, 5(3), 207–215.

Jepma

Wagenmakers

E. J.

Band

G. P.

Nieuwenhuis

(2009). The effects of accessory stimuli on information processing: Evidence from electrophysiology and a diffusion model analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 847–864.

Klein

(2009). On the control of attention. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Expérimentale, 63(3), 240–252.

Lawrence

M. A.

Klein

R. M.

(2013). Isolating exogenous and endogenous modes of temporal attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(2), 560–572.

10.

Lipp

O. V.

Hardwick

S. A.

(2003). Attentional blink modulation in a reaction time task: Performance feedback, warning stimulus modality, and task difficulty. Biological Psychology, 62(2), 115–132.

11.

Locke

E. A.

(1968). Effects of knowledge of results, feedback in relation to standards, and goals on reaction-time performance. American Journal of Psychology, 81(4), 566–574.

12.

Los

S. A.

Knol

D. L.

Boers

R. M.

(2001). The foreperiod effect revisited: Conditioning as a basis for nonspecific preparation. Acta Psychologica, 106(1–2), 121–145.

13.

Los

S. A.

Kruijne

Meeter

(2014). Outlines of a multiple trace theory of temporal preparation. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 1058.

14.

Los

S. A.

Schut

M. L.

(2008). The effective time course of preparation. Cognitive Psychology, 57, 20–55.

15.

McCormick

C. R.

Redden

R. S.

Hurst

A. J.

Klein

R. M.

(2019). On the selection of endogenous and exogenous signals. Royal Society Open Science, 6(11), Article 190134.

16.

Müller-Gethmann

Ulrich

Rinkenauer

(2003). Locus of the effect of temporal preparation: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology, 40, 597–611.

17.

Niemi

Näätänen

(1981). Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychological Bulletin, 89(1), 133–162.

18.

O’Brien

Cousineau

(2014). Representing error bars in within-subject designs in typical software packages. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 10(1), 56–67.

19.

Pachella

R. G.

(1974). The interpretation of reaction time in information processing research. In Kantowitz

B. H.

(Ed.), Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition (pp. 41–82). Lawrence Erlbaum.

20.

Posner

M. I.

(1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25.

21.

Posner

M. I.

Klein

Summers

Buggie

(1973). On the selection of signals. Memory & Cognition, 1, 2–12.

22.

Ratcliff

McKoon

(2008). The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Computation, 20(4), 873–922.

23.

Ratcliff

Smith

P. L.

Brown

S. D.

McKoon

(2016). Diffusion decision model: Current issues and history. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(4), 260–281.

24.

Schneider

D. W.

(2018a). Alertness and cognitive control: Testing the early onset hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44, 756–766.

25.

Schneider

D. W.

(2018b). Alertness and cognitive control: Toward a spatial grouping hypothesis. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80, 913–928.

26.

Schneider

D. W.

(2019). Alertness and cognitive control: Is there a spatial attention constraint? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81, 119–136.

27.

Schneider

D. W.

(2020). Alertness and cognitive control: Interactions in the spatial Stroop task. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82, 2257–2270.

28.

Seibold

V. C.

(2018). Do alerting signals increase the size of the attentional focus? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80(2), 402–425.

29.

Soutschek

Müller

H. J.

Schubert

(2013). Conflict-specific effects of accessory stimuli on cognitive control in the Stroop task and the Simon task. Experimental Psychology, 60, 140–147.

30.

Steinborn

M. B.

Rolke

Bratzke

Ulrich

(2008). Sequential effects within a short foreperiod context: Evidence for the conditioning account of temporal preparation. Acta Psychologica, 129(2), 297–307.

31.

Steinborn

M. B.

Rolke

Bratzke

Ulrich

(2009). Dynamic adjustment of temporal preparation: Shifting warning signal modality attenuates the sequential foreperiod effect. Acta Psychologica, 132(1), 40–47.

32.

Steinborn

M. B.

Rolke

Bratzke

Ulrich

(2010). The effect of a cross-trial shift of auditory warning signals on the sequential foreperiod effect. Acta Psychologica, 134(1), 94–104.

33.

Ulrich

Schröter

Leuthold

Birngruber

(2015). Automatic and controlled stimulus processing in conflict tasks: Superimposed diffusion processes and delta functions. Cognitive Psychology, 78, 148–174.

34.

Vallesi

Shallice

(2007). Developmental dissociations of preparation over time: Deconstructing the variable foreperiod phenomena. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(6), 1377–1388.

35.

Weinbach

Henik

(2011). Phasic alertness can modulate executive control by enhancing global processing of visual stimuli. Cognition, 121(3), 454–458.

36.

Weinbach

Henik

(2012). The relationship between alertness and executive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(6), 1530–1540.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB