Intention is a typical mental state in the theory of mind. However, to date, there have been theoretical debates on the conceptual structure of intention. The neural and cognitive time course of intention reasoning remains unclear. The present event-related potential (ERP) study had two purposes: first, to investigate the neural correlates of intention reasoning based on a differentiated conceptual structure distinguishing desire and intention; second, to investigate the neural basis of intention reasoning for different agents. Thus, we compared the neural activity elicited by intention reasoning for self and for others when the intention matched or mismatched the desire of the agent. The results revealed that three ERP components distinguished among different types of intention reasoning. A negative-going ERP deflection with right frontal distribution between 400 and 500 ms might reflect the cognitive conflict involved in intention reasoning, a right frontal late positive component might be associated with the categorisation of agents, and a centro-parietal late slow wave might indicate the conceptual mental operations associated with decoupling mechanisms in intention processing. These findings implied the neural and cognitive time course of intention reasoning and provided neural evidence for the differentiated conception of intention.
AmodioD. M.FrithC. D. (2006). Meeting of minds: The medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(4), 268–277.
2.
ApperlyI. A.SamsonD.HumphreysG. W. (2009). Studies of adults can inform accounts of theory of mind development. Developmental Psychology, 45(1), 190–201.
3.
AstingtonJ. W. (2001). The paradox of intention: Assessing children’s meta-representational understanding. In: MalleB.MosesL.BaldwinD. (Eds.), Intentions and intentionality: Foundations of social cognition (pp. 85–103). MIT Press.
4.
BecchioC.AdenzatoM.BaraB. G. (2006). How the brain understands intention: Different neural circuits identify the componential features of motor and prior intentions. Consciousness and Cognition, 15(1), 64–74.
5.
BecchioC.CavalloA.BegliominiC.SartoriL.FeltrinG.CastielloU. (2012). Social grasping: From mirroring to mentalizing. NeuroImage, 61(1), 240–248.
6.
BehneT.CarpenterM.CallJ.TomaselloM. (2005). Unwilling versus unable: Infants’ understanding of intentional action. Developmental Psychology, 41(2), 328–337.
7.
BinderJ. R.FrostJ. A.HammekeT. A.BellgowanP. S. F.RaoS. M.CoxR. W. (1999). Conceptual processing during the conscious resting state: A functional MRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(1), 80–93.
8.
BirchS. A. J.BloomP. (2004). Understanding children’s and adults’ limitations in mental state reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(6), 255–260.
9.
BowmanL. C.LiuD.MeltzoffA. N.WellmanH. M. (2012). Neural correlates of belief- and desire-reasoning in 7- and 8-year-old children: An event-related potential study. Developmental Science, 15(5), 618–632.
10.
CarriónR. E.KeenanJ. P.SebanzN. (2010). A truth that’s told with bad intent: An ERP study of deception. Cognition, 114(1), 105–110.
11.
CarterE. J.HodginsJ. K.RakisonD. H. (2011). Exploring the neural correlates of goal-directed action and intention understanding. NeuroImage, 54(2), 1634–1642.
12.
CavannaA. E.TrimbleM. R. (2006). The precuneus: A review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain, 129(Pt. 3), 564–583.
13.
CiaramidaroA.AdenzatoM.EnriciI.ErkS.PiaL.BaraB. G.WalterH. (2007). The intentional network: How the brain reads varieties of intentions. Neuropsychologia, 45(13), 3105–3113.
14.
CiaramidaroA.BecchioC.ColleL.BaraB. G.WalterH. (2014). Do you mean me? Communicative intentions recruit the mirror and the mentalizing system. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9, 909–916.
15.
D’ArgembeauA.RubyP.ColletteF.DegueldreC.BalteauE.LuxenA.SalmonE. (2007). Distinct regions of the medial prefrontal cortex are associated with self-referential processing and perspective taking. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(6), 935–944.
16.
den OudenH. E.FrithU.FrithC.BlakemoreS. J. (2005). Thinking about intentions. NeuroImage, 28(4), 787–796.
17.
EskenaziT.RueschemeyerS. A.LangeF. P. D.KnoblichG.SebanzN. (2015). Neural correlates of observing joint actions with shared intentions. Cortex, 70, 90–100.
18.
FeinfieldK. A.LeeP. P.FlavellE. R.GreenF. L.FlavellJ. H. (1999). Young children’s understanding of intention. Cognitive Development, 14(3), 463–486.
19.
FlavellJ. H.MillerP. H.MillerS. A. (1993). Cognitive development (3rd ed.). Prentice-Hall.
20.
GagnonJ.AubinM.EmondF. C.DerguyS.BessetteM.JolicoeurP. (2016). Neural mechanisms underlying attribution of hostile intention in nonaggressive individuals: An ERP study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 110, 155–162.
21.
GallagherH. L.FrithC. D. (2003). Functional imaging of “theory of mind.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(2), 77–83.
22.
GeanguE.GibsonA.KadukK.ReidV. M. (2013). The neural correlates of passively viewed sequences of true and false beliefs. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(4), 432–437.
23.
IacoboniM.DaprettoM. (2006). The mirror neuron system and the consequences of its dysfunction. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(12), 942–951.
24.
IacoboniM.Molnar-SzakacsI.GalleseV.BuccinoG.MazziottaJ. C.RizzolattiG. (2005). Grasping the intentions of others with one’s own mirror neuron system. PLOS Biology, 3(3), 529–535.
25.
JiangQ.LiP.LiF.WangQ.CaoB.LiH. (2016). The neural basis of desire reasoning for self and others: An event-related potential study. Neuroreport, 27(2), 85–89.
26.
JiangQ.WangQ.LiP.LiH. (2016). The neural correlates underlying belief reasoning for self and for others: Evidence from ERPs. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1501–1508.
27.
JongenE. M. M.JonkmanL. M. (2011). Effects of concurrent working memory load on distractor and conflict processing in a name-face Stroop task. Psychophysiology, 48(1), 31–43.
28.
KrieghoffV.WaszakF.PrinzW.BrassM. (2011). Neural and behavioral correlates of intentional actions. Neuropsychologia, 49(5), 767–776.
29.
LiaoY.LiH.DeákG. O. (2011). Can unpredicted outcomes be intended? The role of outcome-beliefs in children’s judgments of intention. Cognitive Development, 26(2), 106–117.
30.
LiuD.MeltzoffA. N.WellmanH. M. (2009). Neural correlates of belief- and desire-reasoning. Child Development, 80(4), 1163–1171.
31.
LiuD.SabbaghM. A.GehringW. J.WellmanH. M. (2004). Decoupling beliefs from reality in the brain: An ERP study of theory of mind. Neuroreport, 15(6), 991–995.
32.
LiuD.SabbaghM. A.GehringW. J.WellmanH. M. (2009). Neural correlates of children’s theory of mind development. Child Development, 80(2), 318–326.
33.
MahyC. E.MosesL. J.PfeiferJ. H. (2014). How and where: Theory-of-mind in the brain. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(9C), 68–81.
34.
MalleB. F.KnobeJ. (1997). The folk concept of intentionality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(2), 101–121.
35.
MeinhardtJ.SodianB.ThoermerC.DöhnelK.SommerM. (2011). True- and false-belief reasoning in children and adults: An event-related potential study of theory of mind. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 1(1), 67–76.
36.
MosesL. J. (1993). Young children’s understanding of belief constraints on intention. Cognitive Development, 8, 1–25.
37.
MöttönenR.FarmerH.WatkinsK. E. (2016). Neural basis of understanding communicative actions: Changes associated with knowing the actor’s intention and the meanings of the actions. Neuropsychologia, 81, 230–237.
38.
MullM. S.EvansE. M. (2010). Did she mean to do it? Acquiring a folk theory of intentionality. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107(3), 207–228.
39.
QiuJ.LuoY.WangQ.ZhangF.ZhangQ. (2006). Brain mechanism of Stroop interference effect in Chinese characters. Brain Research, 1072(1), 186–193.
40.
RoyzmanE. B.CassidyK. W.BaronJ. (2003). “I know, you know”: Epistemic egocentrism in children and adults. Review of General Psychology, 7(1), 38–65.
41.
RuchkinD. S.JohnsonR.MahaffeyD.SuttonS. (1988). Toward a functional categorization of slow waves. Psychophysiology, 25(3), 339–353.
42.
SabbaghM. A.MoulsonM. C.HarknessK. L. (2004). Neural correlates of mental state decoding in human adults: An event-related potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(3), 415–426.
43.
SabbaghM. A.TaylorM. (2000). Neural correlates of theory-of-mind reasoning: An event-related potential study. Psychological Science, 11(1), 46–50.
44.
SamsonD.ApperlyI. A.BraithwaiteJ. J.AndrewsB. J.Bodley ScottS. E. (2010). Seeing it their way: Evidence for rapid and involuntary computation of what other people see. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, 36(5), 1255–1266.
45.
SaxeR. (2009). Theory of mind (neural basis). In: BanksW. P. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Consciousness (pp. 401–409). Academic Press.
46.
SaxeR. (2010). The right temporo-parietal junction: A specific brain region for thinking about thoughts. In: LeslieA.GermanT. (Eds.), Handbook of Theory of Mind (pp. 1–35). Taylor & Francis.
47.
SaxeR.KanwisherN. (2003). People thinking about thinking people: The role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind.”NeuroImage, 19(4), 1835–1842.
48.
SaxeR.MoranJ. M.ScholzJ.GabrieliJ. (2006). Overlapping and non-overlapping brain regions for theory of mind and self reflection in individual subjects. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1(3), 229–234.
49.
SchultC. A. (2002). Children’s understanding of the distinction between intention and desire. Child Development, 73(6), 1727–1747.
50.
SchuwerkT.DöhnelK.SodianB.KeckI. R.RupprechtR.SommerM. (2014). Functional activity and effective connectivity of the posterior medial prefrontal cortex during processing of incongruent mental states. Human Brain Mapping, 35(7), 2950–2965.
51.
SchuwerkT.SchecklmannM.LangguthB.DöhnelK.SodianB.SommerM. (2014). Inhibiting the posterior medial prefrontal cortex by rTMS decreases the discrepancy between self and other in theory of mind reasoning. Behavioural Brain Research, 274, 312–318.
52.
SommerM.DöhnelK.SodianB.MeinhardtJ.ThoermerC.HajakG. (2007). Neural correlates of true and false belief reasoning. NeuroImage, 35(3), 1378–1384.
53.
SwickD.TurkenA. U. (2002). Dissociation between conflict detection and error monitoring in the human anterior cingulate cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(25), 16354–16359.
54.
TaysW. J.DywanJ.SegalowitzS. J. (2009). General proactive interference and the n450 response. Neuroscience Letters, 462(3), 239–243.
55.
VogeleyK.BussfeldP.NewenA.HerrmannS.HappéF.FalkaiP.ZillesK. (2001). Mind reading: Neural mechanisms of theory of mind and self-perspective. NeuroImage, 14(1), 170–181.
56.
WangY.HuangL.LinC.ZhangZ.LiangF.ShenD. (2012). Spatio-temporal brain dynamics of understanding social versus private intentions: An electrical neuroimaging study. NeuroQuantology, 10(4), 733–743.
57.
WangY.HuangL.ZhangW.ZhangZ.CacioppoS. (2014). Spatio-temporal dynamics of kind versus hostile intentions in the human brain: An electrical neuroimaging study. Social Neuroscience, 10(3), 1–15.
58.
WellmanH. M. (2011). Developing a theory of mind. In: GoswamiU. (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development (2nd ed., pp. 258–284). Wiley-Blackwell.
59.
WellmanH. M.FangF.LiuD.ZhuL.LiuG. (2006). Scaling of theory-of-mind understandings in Chinese children. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1075–1081.
WellmanH. M.WoolleyJ. D. (1990). From simple desires to ordinary beliefs: The early development of everyday psychology. Cognition, 35(3), 245–275.
62.
YoungL.Dodell-FederD.SaxeR. (2010). What gets the attention of the temporo-parietal junction? An fMRI investigation of attention and theory of mind. Neuropsychologia, 48(9), 2658–2664.
63.
ZapparoliL.SeghezziS.PaulesuE. (2017). The what, the when, and the whether of intentional action in the brain: A meta-analytical review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, Article 238.
64.
ZhangT.ZhangQ.LiY.LongC.LiH. (2013). Belief and sign, true and false: The unique of false belief reasoning. Experimental Brain Research, 231(1), 27–36.
