The role of the response–outcome association in the nature of inhibitory Pavlovian-instrumental transfer in rats

Abstract

Inhibitory stimuli can reduce animals’ reward seeking in an outcome-specific manner or outcome-general manner. However, we do not understand the factors that determine which of these effects are produced. To address this, we carried out three experiments which examined whether instrumental training with one or multiple outcomes determined the nature of subsequently observed Pavlovian-instrumental transfer (PIT). Rats underwent Pavlovian training to produce inhibitors and excitors for two outcomes using a feature-negative procedure. In Experiment 1, these stimuli were tested for their effects on a single response trained with one of those outcomes in a PIT procedure. Here, stimuli trained as inhibitors and excitors were found to produce outcome-general effects on reward seeking (in addition to an outcome-specific effect for excitors). In Experiment 2, we trained two responses, one for each of the Pavlovian outcomes, and tested the effect of the stimuli on each response individually. This design also produced outcome-general inhibitory and excitatory PIT effects. Experiment 3 followed the procedure of Experiment 2, except for implementation of a shorter Pavlovian training phase and an additional choice test, where both responses were concurrently available. This procedure produced putative inhibitory effects that were also outcome-general. However, outcome-specific excitatory effects were observed, indicating that the general inhibitory results may not be attributable to the duration of Pavlovian training. Overall, this study suggests that variations in the number of response–outcome contingencies experienced by animals do not readily determine the specificity of putative inhibitors.