Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2020-12
Which cognitive functions subserve clustering and switching in category fluency? Generalisations from an extended set of semantic categories using linear mixed-effects modelling
Clustering and switching are hypothesised to reflect the automatic and controlled components in category fluency, respectively, but how they are associated with cognitive functions has not been fully elucidated, due to several uncertainties. (1) The conventional scoring method that segregates responses by semantic categories could not optimally dissociate the automatic and controlled components. (2) The temporal structure of individual responses, as characterised by mean retrieval time (MRT) and mean switching time (MST), has seldom been analysed alongside the more well-studied variables, cluster size (CS) and number of switches (NS). (3) Most studies examined only one to a few semantic categories, raising concerns of generalisability. This study built upon a distance-based automatic clustering procedure, referred to as temporal–semantic distance procedure, to thoroughly characterise the category fluency performance. Linear mixed-effects (LME) modelling was applied to re-examine the differential associations of clustering and switching with cognitive functions with a sample of 80 university students. Our results revealed that although lexical retrieval speed (LRS) is clearly the determining factor for effective clustering and switching, matrix reasoning and processing speed also have significant roles to play, possibly in the processes of identifying and validating the semantic relationships. Interestingly, total fluency score was accurately predicted by the four clustering/switching indices alone; including the cognitive variables did not significantly improve the prediction. These findings underline the importance of the clustering and switching indices in explaining the category fluency performance and the cognitive demands in category fluency.
AbwenderD. A.SwanJ. G.BowermanJ. T.ConnollyS. W. (2001). Qualitative analysis of verbal fluency output: Review and comparison of several scoring methods. Assessment, 8(3), 323–338.
2.
AzumaT. (2004). Working memory and perseveration in verbal fluency. Neuropsychology, 18(1), 69−77.
3.
BaayenR. H.DavidsonD. J.BatesD. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412.
4.
BakdashJ. Z.MarusichL. R. (2017). Repeated measures correlation. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 456.
5.
BarrD. J.LevyR.ScheepersC.TilyH. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278.
6.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.
BellevilleS.RouleauN.Van der LindenM. (2006). Use of the Hayling task to measure inhibition of prepotent responses in normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Brain and Cognition, 62(2), 113–119.
9.
BentonA. L. (1968). Differential behavioral effects in frontal lobe disease. Neuropsychologia, 6(1), 53–60.
10.
BjorklundD. F.JacobsJ. W.III. (1985). Associative and categorical processes in children’s memory: The role of automaticity in the development of organization in free recall. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39(3), 599–617.
11.
BlandJ. M.AltmanD. G. (1995a). Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: Part 1—Correlation within subjects. British Medical Journal, 310, Article 446.
12.
BlandJ. M.AltmanD. G. (1995b). Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: Part 2—Correlation between subjects. British Medical Journal, 310, Article 633.
13.
BoersmaP.WeeninkD. (2002). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5(9/10), 341–345.
14.
BorkowskiJ. G.BentonA. L.SpreenO. (1967). Word fluency and brain damage. Neuropsychologia, 5(2), 135–140.
15.
BoseA.WoodR.KiranS. (2017). Semantic fluency in aphasia: Clustering and switching in the course of 1 minute. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 52(3), 334–345.
16.
BousfieldW. A.SedgewickC. H. W. (1944). An analysis of sequences of restricted associative responses. Journal of General Psychology, 30(2), 149–165.
17.
BryanJ.LuszczM. A.CrawfordJ. R. (1997). Verbal knowledge and speed of information processing as mediators of age differences in verbal fluency performance among older adults. Psychology and Aging, 12(3), 473–478.
18.
CabezaR. (2002). Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: The HAROLD model. Psychology and Aging, 17(1), 85–100.
19.
CamarataS.WoodcockR. (2006). Sex differences in processing speed: Developmental effects in males and females. Intelligence, 34(3), 231–252.
20.
ChengJ.EdwardsL. J.Maldonado-MolinaM. M.KomroK. A.MullerK. E. (2010). Real longitudinal data analysis for real people: building a good enough mixed model. Statistics in Medicine, 29(4), 504–520.
21.
CiesielskiK. T.LesnikP. G.SavoyR. L.GrantE. P.AhlforsS. P. (2006). Developmental neural networks in children performing a Categorical N-Back Task. NeuroImage, 33(3), 980–990.
22.
ClarkD.KapurP.GeldmacherD.BrockingtonJ.HarrellL.DeRamusT.. . . MarsonD. (2014). Latent information in fluency lists predicts functional decline in persons at risk for Alzheimer disease. Cortex, 55, 202–218.
23.
DugbarteyA. T.SanchezP. N.Gail RosenbaumJ.MahurinR. K.Mark DavisJ.TownesB. D. (1999). WAIS-III matrix reasoning test performance in a mixed clinical sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 13(5), 396–404.
24.
FerrerE.O’HareE. D.BungeS. A. (2009). Fluid reasoning and the developing brain. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 3, Article 3.
25.
GaleckiA.BurzykowskiT. (2013). Linear mixed-effects models using R: A step-by-step approach. Springer Science & Business Media.
26.
GoldenC. J.FreshwaterS. M. (1978). Stroop color and word test. Stoelting.
27.
GordonJ. K.YoungM.GarciaC. (2018). Why do older adults have difficulty with semantic fluency?Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 25(6), 803–828.
28.
GruenewaldP. J.LockheadG. R. (1980). The free recall of category examples. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6(3), 225–240.
29.
HaugrudN.CrossleyM.VrbancicM. (2011). Clustering and switching strategies during verbal fluency performance differentiate Alzheimer’s disease and healthy aging. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17(6), 1153–1157.
30.
HeddenT.LautenschlagerG.ParkD. C. (2005). Contributions of processing ability and knowledge to verbal memory tasks across the adult life-span. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A: Human Experimental Psychology, 58(1), 169–190.
31.
HoffmanP. (2019). Divergent effects of healthy ageing on semantic knowledge and control: Evidence from novel comparisons with semantically impaired patients. Journal of Neuropsychology, 13, 462–484.
32.
HowardD.PattersonK. E. (1992). The pyramids and palm trees test: A test of semantic access from words and pictures. Thames Valley Test Company.
33.
HughesD. L.BryanJ. (2002). Adult age differences in strategy use during verbal fluency performance. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24(5), 642–654.
34.
KartushinaN.FrauenfelderU. H. (2014). On the effects of l2 perception and of individual differences in l1 production on l2 pronunciation. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 1246.
35.
KeizerA. W.VerschoorM.VermentR. S.HommelB. (2010). The effect of gamma enhancing neurofeedback on the control of feature bindings and intelligence measures. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 75(1), 25–32.
36.
KorenR.KofmanO.BergerA. (2005). Analysis of word clustering in verbal fluency of school-aged children. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20(8), 1087–1104.
37.
KuznetsovaA.BrockhoffP. B.ChristensenR. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26.
38.
LantingS.HaugrudN.CrossleyM. (2009). The effect of age and sex on clustering and switching during speeded verbal fluency tasks. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 15(2), 196–204.
39.
LedouxK.VannorsdallT. D.PickettE. J.BosleyL. V.GordonB.SchretlenD. J. (2014). Capturing additional information about the organization of entries in the lexicon from verbal fluency productions. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 36(2), 205–220.
40.
MatuschekH.KlieglR.VasishthS.BaayenH.BatesD. (2017). Balancing type i error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 305–315.
41.
MayrU. (2002). On the dissociation between clustering and switching in verbal fluency: Comment on Troyer, Moscovitch, Winocur, Alexander and Stuss. Neuropsych-ologia, 40(5), 562–566.
42.
NewcombeF. (1969). Missile wounds of the brain: A study of psychological deficits. Oxford University Press.
43.
OldfieldR. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113.
44.
PinheiroJ. C.BatesD. M. (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-Plus. Springer.
45.
PrescottT. J.NewtonL. D.MirN. U.WoodruffP. W.ParksR. W. (2006). A new dissimilarity measure for finding semantic structure in category fluency data with implications for understanding memory organization in schizophrenia. Neuropsychology, 20(6), 685–699.
46.
RavenJ. C.CourtJ. H. (1998). Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Oxford Psychologists Press.
47.
RhodesS. M.DonaldsonD. I. (2008). Association and not semantic relationships elicit the N400 effect: Electrophysiological evidence from an explicit language comprehension task. Psychophysiology, 45(1), 50–59.
48.
RocaM.ManesF.ChadeA.GleichgerrchtE.GershanikO.ArévaloG.. . . DuncanJ. (2012). The relationship between executive functions and fluid intelligence in Parkinson’s disease. Psychological Medicine, 42(11), 2445–2452.
49.
RosenV. M.EngleR. W. (1997). The role of working memory capacity in retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126(3), 211–227.
50.
RosenV. M.SunderlandT.LevyJ.HarwellA.McGeeL.HammondC.. . . LefkowitzC. (2005). Apolipoprotein E and category fluency: Evidence for reduced semantic access in healthy normal controls at risk for developing Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychologia, 43(4), 647–658.
51.
RosenW. G. (1980). Verbal fluency in aging and dementia. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 2(2), 135–146.
52.
RubinovM.SpornsO. (2010). Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations. NeuroImage, 52(3), 1059–1069.
53.
SachsO.WeisS.ZellaguiN.HuberW.ZvyagintsevM.MathiakK.KircherT. (2008). Automatic processing of semantic relations in fMRI: Neural activation during semantic priming of taxonomic and thematic categories. Brain Research, 1218, 194–205.
54.
SalthouseT. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103(3), 403–428.
55.
SalthouseT. A.BabcockR. L. (1991). Decomposing adult age differences in working memory. Developmental Psychology, 27(5), 763–776.
56.
SauzéonH.RaboutetC.RodriguesJ.LangevinS.SchelstraeteM.-A.FeyereisenP.. . . N’KaouaB. (2011). Verbal knowledge as a compensation determinant of adult age differences in verbal fluency tasks over time. Journal of Adult Development, 18(3), 144–154.
57.
ShaoZ.JanseE.VisserK.MeyerA. S. (2014). What do verbal fluency tasks measure? Predictors of verbal fluency performance in older adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 772.
58.
StraussE.ShermanE. M.SpreenO. (2006). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary. Oxford University Press.
59.
ThurstoneL. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. University of Chicago Press.
60.
TroyerA. K. (2000). Normative data for clustering and switching on verbal fluency tasks. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22(3), 370–378.
61.
TroyerA. K.MoscovitchM.WinocurG. (1997). Clustering and switching as two components of verbal fluency: Evidence from younger and older healthy adults. Neuropsychology, 11(1), 138–146.
62.
TurnerM. L.EngleR. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent?Journal of Memory and Language, 28(2), 127–154.
63.
UnsworthN.SpillersG. J.BrewerG. A. (2011). Variation in verbal fluency: A latent variable analysis of clustering, switching, and overall performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(3), 447–466.
64.
Van MuijdenJ.BandG. P.HommelB. (2012). Online games training aging brains: Limited transfer to cognitive control functions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, Article 221.
65.
WinterB. (2013). Linear models and linear mixed effects models in R with linguistic applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.5499.
66.
WixtedJ. T.RohrerD. (1994). Analyzing the dynamics of free recall: An integrative review of the empirical literature. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(1), 89–106.
67.
ZhaoQ.GuoQ.HongZ. (2013). Clustering and switching during a semantic verbal fluency test contribute to differential diagnosis of cognitive impairment. Neuroscience Bulletin, 29(1), 75–82.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
