We investigated the “proximate unit” in Korean, that is, the initial phonological unit selected in speech production by Korean speakers. Previous studies have shown mixed evidence indicating either a phoneme-sized or a syllable-sized unit. We conducted two experiments in which participants named pictures while ignoring superimposed non-words. In English, for this task, when the picture (e.g., dog) and distractor phonology (e.g., dark) initially overlap, typically the picture target is named faster. We used a range of conditions (in Korean) varying from onset overlap to syllabic overlap, and the results indicated an important role for the syllable, but not the phoneme. We suggest that the basic unit used in phonological encoding in Korean is different from Germanic languages such as English and Dutch and also from Japanese and possibly also Chinese. Models dealing with the architecture of language production can use these results when providing a framework suitable for all languages in the world, including Korean.
BaayenR. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge University Press.
2.
BatesD. M.MaechlerM.BolkerB.Walker (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.
3.
BockK. (1991). A sketchbook of production problems. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20(3), 141–160.
4.
BrandM.ReyA.PeeremanR. (2003). Where is the syllable priming effect in visual word recognition?Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 435–443.
5.
CaramazzaA. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access?Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14(1), 177–208.
6.
ChenJ. Y. (1993). A small corpus of speech errors in Mandarin Chinese and their classification. World of Chinese Language, 69, 26–41.
7.
ChenJ. Y.ChenT.-M.DellG. S. (2002). Word-form encoding in Mandarin Chinese as assessed by the implicit priming task. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 751–781.
8.
ChenJ. Y.O’SéaghdhaP. G.ChenT. M. (2016). The primacy of abstract syllables in Chinese word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(5), 825.
9.
ColtheartM.WoollamsA.KinoshitaS.PerryC. (1999). A position-sensitive Stroop effect: Further evidence for a left-to-right component in print-to-speech conversion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 456–463.
10.
DellG. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93(3), 283.
11.
DellG. S. (1995). Speaking and misspeaking. An Invitation to Cognitive Science, 1, 183–208.
12.
DienesZ. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781.
13.
FerrandL.SeguiJ.GraingerJ. (1996). Masked priming of word and picture naming: The role of syllabic units. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 708–723.
14.
ForsterK. I.DavisC. (1991). The density constraint on form- priming in the naming task: Interference effects from a masked prime. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 1–25.
15.
HanJ. I.ChoiT. H. (2016). The proximate unit in the production of Korean words. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology, 22, 383–398.
16.
HanJ. I.OhJ.KimJ.-Y. (2019). Slips of the tongue in the Seoul Korean corpus of spontaneous speech. Lingua, 220, 31–42.
17.
HanJ. I.VerdonschotR. G. (2019). Spoken-word production in Korean: A non-word masked priming and phonological Stroop task investigation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 901–912.
18.
JeffreysH. (1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press; Clarendon Press.
19.
KimJ.DavisC. (2002). Using Korean to investigate phonological priming effects without the influence of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 569–591.
20.
KinoshitaS. (2000). The left-to-right nature of the masked onset priming effect in naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(1), 133–141.
21.
KinoshitaS.MillsL. (2020). Phonological encoding in the oral but not manual Stroop task: Evidence for the role of a speech production process. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(8), 1494–1504.
22.
KinoshitaS.VerdonschotR. G. (2020). Phonological encoding is free from orthographic influence: Evidence from a picture variant of the phonological Stroop task. Psychological Research. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01315-2
23.
KoesterD.SchillerN. O. (2008). Morphological priming in overt language production: Electrophysiological evidence from Dutch. NeuroImage, 42, 1622–1630.
24.
KubozonoH. (1989). The mora and syllable structure in Japanese: Evidence from speech errors. Language and Speech, 32(3), 249–278.
25.
KuretaY.FushimiT.TatsumiI. F. (2006). The functional unit of phonological encoding: Evidence for moraic representation in native Japanese speakers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1102–1119.
LeeC. H.TaftM. (2009). Are onsets and codas important in processing letter position? A comparison of TL effects in English and Korean. Journal of Memory and Language, 60(4), 530–542.
28.
LeveltW. J.RoelofsA.MeyerA. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1–38.
29.
MokP. P. K.LeeS. I. (2008). Korean speech rhythm using rhythmic measures. Paper presented at the 18th International Congress of Linguists (CIL18). Seoul, South Korea. http://ling.cuhk.edu.hk/people/peggy/Mok&Lee_CIL18.pdf
30.
MoorsA.De HouwerJ. (2006). Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 297.
31.
MoreyR. D.RouderJ. N. (2018). BayesFactor: Computation of Bayes factors for common designs (R package version 0.9.12-4.1). https://rdrr.io/rforge/BayesFactor/
32.
O’SéaghdhaP. G. (2015). Across the great divide: Proximate units at the lexical-phonological interface. Japanese Psych-ological Research, 57(1), 4–21.
33.
O’SéaghdhaP. G.ChenJ. Y.ChenT. M. (2010). Proximate units in word production: Phonological encoding begins with syllables in Mandarin Chinese but with segments in English. Cognition, 115(2), 282–302.
34.
O’SéaghdhaP. G.FrazerA. K. (2014). The exception does not rule: Attention constrains form preparation in word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(3), 797–810.
35.
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.R-project.org/
36.
RoelofsA. (1996.). Serial order in planning the production of successive morphemes of a word. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 854–876.
37.
RoelofsA. (2015). Modeling of phonological encoding in spoken word production: From Germanic languages to Mandarin Chinese and Japanese. Japanese Psychological Research, 57, 22–37.
38.
SchillerN. O. (1998). The effect of visually masked syllable primes on the naming latencies of words and pictures. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 484–507.
39.
SchillerN. O. (1999). Masked syllable priming of English nouns. Brain and Language, 68, 300–305.
40.
SohnH. S. (1987). Underspecification in Korean phonology [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
41.
SpapéM. M.VerdonschotR. G.van SteenbergenH. (2019). The E-Primer: An introduction to creating psychological experiments in E-Prime (2nd ed., Updated for E-prime 3). Leiden University Press. http://www.e-primer.com
42.
TaylorI. (1980). The Korean writing system: An alphabet? A syllabary? A logography?. In KolersP. A.WrolstadM. E.BoumaH. (Eds.), Processing of visible language (pp. 67–82). Springer.
43.
TaylorI.TaylorM. M. (2014). Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese: Revised edition (Vol. 14). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
44.
van CasterenM.DavisM. H. (2006). Mix, a program for pseudorandomization. Behavior Research Methods, 38(4), 584–589.
45.
VerdonschotR. G.KinoshitaS. (2018). Mora or more? The phonological unit of Japanese word production in the Stroop color naming task. Memory & Cognition, 46, 410–425.
46.
VerdonschotR. G.KiyamaS.TamaokaK.KinoshitaS.La HeijW.SchillerN. O. (2011). The functional unit of Japanese word naming: Evidence from masked priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 37, 1458–1473.
47.
WitzelN.WitzelJ.ChoiY. (2013). The locus of the masked onset priming effect: Evidence from Korean. The Mental Lexicon, 8, 339–352.
48.
WonK. H. (1987). Igosi Hangul ida [This is Hangul]. Samchungdang.
49.
YunW.YoonK.ParkS.LeeJ.ChoS.KangD.. . . KimJ. (2015). The Korean corpus of spontaneous speech. Journal of the Korean Society of Speech Sciences, 7(2), 103–109.
50.
ZwitserloodP.BölteJ.DohmesP. (2000). Morphological effects on speech production: Evidence from picture naming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 563–591.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
