This study examines whether synonyms are represented similarly to translation equivalents in the bilingual mind. In particular, this study investigated whether there is masked synonym priming such that it will simulate masked translation priming in the L1-L2 direction. Given that masked translation priming studies consistently show priming in the L1-L2 direction, it was predicted that synonyms should show a masked priming effect if the prime was higher in frequency than the target. Contrary to what Bilingual Interactive Activation models would predict, there was no priming for synonyms in the high-to-low frequency (HF-LF) condition or in the low-to-high frequency (LF-HF) condition in Experiment 1. Experiment 2 only tested the HF-LF condition to ensure that previous exposure to LF words within the experiment did not affect the results. Again, no HF-LF synonym priming was observed. The effect sizes of these synonym priming effects were comparable with that of L2-L1 translation priming, all of which were weak. This is not surprising given that semantic interpretation of a given word usually occurs post-lexically and requires partial awareness. What is surprising is that there is robust evidence showing strong L1-L2 masked translation priming effect, which bilingual lexical processing models should attempt to explain, thereby uncovering the relations between L1 words and their L2 translations.
AuT. K.GlusmanM. (1990). The principle of mutual exclusivity in word learning: To honor or not to honor?Child Development, 61, 1474–1490.
2.
BaayenR. H.PiepenbrockR.Van RunH. (1995). The CELEX lexical database. Release 2 [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
3.
Basnight-BrownD. M.AltarribaJ. (2007). Differences in semantic and translation priming across languages: The role of language direction and language dominance. Memory & Cognition, 35, 953–965.
4.
BrownC.HagoortP. (1993). The processing nature of the N400: Evidence from masked priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 34–44.
5.
BuenoS.Frenck-MestreC. (2008). The activation of semantic memory: Effects of prime exposure, prime-target relationship, and task demands. Memory & Cognition, 36, 882–898.
6.
ChenB.LiangL.CuiP.DunlapS. (2014). The priming effect of translation equivalents across languages for concrete and abstract words. Acta Psychologica, 153, 147–152.
7.
CousineauD. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1, 42–45.
8.
DaviesP. D. M. (1998). Automatic semantic priming: The contribution of lexical- and semantic-level processes. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 10, 389–412.
9.
DavisC. J. (2005). N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 65–70.
10.
DeclerckM.SnellJ.GraingerJ. (2018). On the role of language membership information during word recognition in bilinguals: Evidence from flanker-language congruency effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 704–709.
11.
de GrootA. M. B. (1990). The locus of the associative-priming effect in the mental lexicon. In BalotaD. A.Flores d’ArcaisG. B. (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 101–123). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
de WitB.KinoshitaS. (2015). The masked semantic effect is task dependent: Reconsidering the automatic spreading activation process. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 1062–1075.
13.
DijkstraT.van HeuvenW. J. B. (1998). The BIA model and bilingual word recognition. In GraingerJ.JacobsA. M. (Eds.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (pp. 189–225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
DijkstraT.van HeuvenW. J. B. (2002). The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 175–197.
15.
DijkstraT.WahlA.BuytenhuijsF.van HalemN.Al-JibouriZ.De KorteM.RekkéS. (2018). Multilink: A computational model for bilingual word recognition and word translation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. Advance online publication. doi:10.1017/S1366728918000287
DimitropoulouM.DuñabeitiaJ. A.CarreirasM. (2011b). Two words, one meaning: Evidence for automatic co-activation of translation equivalents. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, Article 188.
18.
DubeyN.WitzelN.WitzelJ. (2018). Script differences and masked translation priming: Evidence from Hindi-English bilinguals. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 2421–2438.
DuyckW.WarlopN. (2009). Translation priming between the native language and a second language: New evidence from Dutch-French bilinguals. Experimental Psychology, 56, 173–179.
21.
FerréP.Sánchez-CasasR.ComesañaM.DemstreJ. (2017). Masked translation priming with cognates and noncognates: Is there an effect of words’ concreteness?Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20, 770–782.
22.
FinkbeinerM.ForsterK.NicolJ.NakamuraK. (2004). The role of polysemy in masked semantic and translation priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 1–22.
23.
ForsterK. I. (2009). The intervenor effect in masked priming: How does masked priming survive across an intervening word?Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 36–49.
24.
ForsterK. I. (2013). How many words can we read at once? More intervenor effects in masked priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 563–573.
25.
ForsterK. I.ForsterJ. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116–124.
26.
ForsterK. I.MohanK.HectorJ. (2003). The mechanics of masked priming. In KinoshitaS.LupkerS. J. (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 3–37). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
27.
FrancisW. S. (2005). Bilingual semantic and conceptual representation. In KrollJ.F.de GrootA.M.B. (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 251–267). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
28.
GollanT. H.ForsterK. I.FrostR. (1997). Translation priming with different scripts: Masked priming with cognates and noncognates in Hebrew-English bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1122–1139.
29.
GraingerJ.DijkstraT. (1992). On the representation and use of language information in bilinguals. In HarrisR. J. (Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals (pp. 207–220). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers.
30.
GraingerJ.Frenck-MestreC. (1998). Masked priming by translation equivalents in proficient bilinguals. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 601–623.
31.
HinoY.LupkerS. J.PexmanP. M. (2002). Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: Interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 686–713.
32.
HolcombP. J.GraingerJ. (2009). ERP effects of short interval masked associative and repetition priming. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22, 301–312.
33.
HolcombP. J.RederL.MisraM.GraingerJ. (2005). The effects of prime visibility on ERP measures of masked priming. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 155–172.
34.
Houston-PriceC.CaloghirisZ.RaviglioneE. (2010). Language experience shapes the development of the mutual exclusivity bias. Infancy, 15, 125–150.
35.
IbrahimA.CowellP. E.VarleyR. A. (2017). Word frequency predicts translation asymmetry. Journal of Memory and Language, 95, 49–67.
36.
JiangN. (1999). Testing processing explanations for the asymmetry in masked cross-language priming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2, 59–75.
37.
JiangN.ForsterK. I. (2001). Cross-language priming asymmetries in lexical decision and episodic recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 32–51.
38.
KolersP. A.GonzalezE. (1980). Memory for words, synonyms, and translations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 53–65.
39.
KouiderS.DupouxE. (2004). Partial awareness creates the “illusion” of subliminal semantic priming. Psychological Science, 15, 75–81.
40.
KrollJ. F.StewartE. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149–174.
LupkerS. J. (1984). Semantic priming without association: A second look. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 709–733.
43.
NakayamaM.IdaK.LupkerS. J. (2016). Cross-script L2-L1 noncognate translation priming in lexical decision depends on L2 proficiency: Evidence from Japanese-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 1001–1022.
44.
NakayamaM.LupkerS.ItaguchiY. (2018). An examination of L2-L1 noncognate translation priming in the lexical decision task: Insights from distributional and frequency-based analyses. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21, 265–277.
45.
NakayamaM.SearsC. R.HinoY.LupkerS. J. (2013). Masked translation priming with Japanese-English bilinguals: Interactions between cognate status, target frequency and L2 proficiency. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2, 949–981.
46.
PaivioA.ClarkJ. M.LambertW. E. (1988). Bilingual dual-coding theory and semantic repetition effects on recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 163–172.
47.
PearsonB. Z.FernándezS.OllerD. K. (1995). Cross-language synonyms in the lexicons of bilingual infants: One language or two?Journal of Child Language, 22, 345–368.
48.
PecherD. (2001). Perception is a two-way junction: Feedback semantics in word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 545–551.
49.
PereaM.GomezP. (2010). Does light prime dark? Masked associative priming with addition neighbors. Memory & Cognition, 38, 513–518.
50.
PereaM.GotorA. (1997). Associative and semantic priming effects occur at very short stimulus-onset asynchronies in lexical decision and naming. Cognition, 62, 223–240.
51.
PereaM.RosaE. (2002). The effects of associative and semantic priming in the lexical decision task. Psychological Research, 66, 180–194.
52.
RastleK.DavisM. H.Marslen-WilsonW. D.TylerL. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 507–537.
53.
RosenthalR. (1991). Meta-analytical procedures for social research. Newbury Park: SAGE.
54.
SabourinL.BrienC.BurkholderM. (2014). The effect of age of L2 acquisition on the organization of the bilingual lexicon: Evidence from masked priming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 542–555.
55.
Sánchez-CasasR.FerréP.DemestreJ.García-ChicoT.García-AlbeaJ. E. (2012). Masked and unmasked priming effects as a function of semantic relatedness and associative strength. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15, 891–900.
56.
SerenoJ. A. (1991). Graphemic, associative, and syntactic priming effects at a brief stimulus onset asynchrony in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 459–477.
57.
van HeuvenW. J.DijkstraT.GraingerJ. (1998). Orthographic neighborhood effects in bilingual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 458–483.
58.
WangX. (2013). Language dominance in translation priming: Evidence from balanced and unbalanced Chinese-English bilinguals. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 727–743.
59.
WangX.ForsterK. (2015). Is translation priming asymmetry due to partial awareness of the prime?Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 657–669.
60.
WenY.van HeuvenW. J. B. (2017). Non-cognate translation priming in masked priming lexical decision experiments: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 879–886.
61.
WilliamsJ. N. (1996). Is automatic priming semantic?European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 8, 113–161.
62.
WitzelN. O.ForsterK. I. (2012). How L2 words are stored: The episodic L2 hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1608–1621.
63.
ZhangJ.WuC.ZhouT.MengY. (2019). Cognate facilitation priming effect is modulated by writing systems: Evidence from Chinese-English bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 23, 553–566.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
