AhmedO.LovibondP. F. (2018). Rule-based processes in generalisation and peak shift in human fear conditioning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 118–131. doi:10.1177/1747021818766461
2.
BaetuI.BakerA. G. (2019). Reasoning about redundant and non-redundant alternative causes of a single outcome; blocking or enhancement caused by the stronger cause. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 238–250. doi:10.1080/17470218.2017.1338302
3.
BonardiC.JenningsD. J. (2019). The effects of stimulus distribution form during trace conditioning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 285–297. doi:10.1080/17470218.2017.1367017
4.
ByromN. C.MurphyR. A. (2019). Cue competition influences biconditional discrimination. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 182–192. doi:10.1080/17470218.2017.1363256
5.
CatmurC.HeyesC. (2019). Mirroring “meaningful” actions: Sensorimotor learning modulates imitation of goal-directed actions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 322–334. doi:10.1080/17470218.2017.1344257
6.
ChamizoV. D.RodríguezC. A.EspinetA.MackintoshN. J. (2012). Generalization decrement and not overshadowing by associative competition among pairs of landmarks in a navigation task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 38, 255–265. doi:10.1037/a0029015
7.
DwyerD. M.GasallaP.LópezM. (2019). Partial reinforcement and conditioned taste aversion: No evidence for resistance to extinction. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 274–284. doi:10.1080/17470218.2017.1347191
8.
EasdaleL. C.Le PelleyM. E.BeesleyT. (2019). The onset of uncertainty facilitates the learning of new associations by increasing attention to cues. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 193–208. doi:10.1080/17470218.2017.1363257
9.
EdmundsC. E. R.WillsA. J.MiltonF. (2019). Initial training with difficult items does not facilitate category learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 151–167. doi:10.1080/17470218.2017.1370477
10.
HallG. (2003). Learned changes in the sensitivity of stimulus representations: Associative and nonassociative mechanisms. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, B, 56, 43–55. doi:10.1080/02724990244000151
11.
HallG.RodríguezG. (2019). Attention to perceive, to learn, and to respond. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72: 335–345. doi:10.1080/17470218.2017.1339719
12.
KaminL. J. (1969). Selective association and conditioning. In MackintoshN. J.HonigW. K. (Eds.), Fundamental issues in associative learning (pp. 42–64). Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada: Dalhousie University Press.
13.
KwokD. W.BoakesR. A. (2019). Situational relevance: Context as a factor in serial overshadowing of taste aversion learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 263–273. doi:10.1080/17470218.2017.1338739
14.
Le PelleyM. E.PearsonD.PorterA.YeeH.LuqueD. (2019). Oculomotor capture is influenced by expected reward value but (maybe) not predictiveness. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 168–181. doi:10.1080/17470218.2017.1313874
15.
LiveseyE. J.McLarenI. P. (2019). Revisiting peak shift on an artificial dimension: Effects of stimulus variability on generalisation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 132–150. doi:10.1177/1747021817739832
16.
LuqueD.VadilloM. A.Gutiérrez-CoboM. J.Le PelleyM. E. (2018). The blocking effect in associative learning involves learned biases in rapid attentional capture. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 522–544. doi:10.1080/17470218.2016.1262435
17.
MackintoshN. J. (1974). The psychology of animal learning. London, England: Academic Press.
18.
MackintoshN. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276–298. doi:10.1037/h0076778
19.
McLarenI. P. L.KayeH.MackintoshN. J. (1989). An associative theory of the representation of stimuli: Applications to perceptual learning and latent inhibition. In MorrisR. G. M. (Ed.), Parallel distributed processing: Implications for psychology and neurobiology (pp. 102–130). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
20.
McLarenI. P. L.MackintoshN. J. (2002). Associative learning and elemental representation: II. Generalization and discrimination. Animal Learning & Behavior, 30, 177–200. doi:10.3758/BF03192828
21.
McLarenI. P. L.McAndrewA.AngererK.McLarenR.ForrestC.BowditchW., ... VerbruggenF. (2019). Mackintosh lecture: Association and cognition: Two processes, one system. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 98–117. doi:10.1177/1747021818766287
22.
PearceJ. M. (2018). Nicholas John Seymour Mackintosh. 9 July 1935-8 February 2015. Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society, 64, 299–316. doi:10.1098/rsbm.2017.0024
23.
PearceJ. M.HallG. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 532–552. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.87.6.532
24.
PérezO. D.AitkenM. R.ZhukovskyP.SotoF. A.UrcelayG. P.DickinsonA. (2019). Human instrumental performance in ratio and interval contingencies: A challenge for associative theory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72: 311–321. doi:10.1080/17470218.2016.1265996
25.
QuigleyM. C.EatheringtonC. J.HaselgroveM. (2019). Learned changes in outcome associability. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 209–221. doi:10.1080/17470218.2017.1344258
26.
RescorlaR. A.WagnerA. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In BlackA. H.ProkasyW. F. (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64–99). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
27.
RevuskyS. (1977). Learning as a general process with an emphasis on data from feeding experiments. In MilgramN. W.KramesL.AllowayT. M. (Eds.), Food aversion learning (pp. 1–51). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
28.
SansaJ.Aznar-CasanovaJ. A.RodríguezC. A.ChamizoV. D. (2019). Generalisation decrement and not overshadowing by associative competition among pairs of landmarks in a navigation task with humans. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 251–262. doi:10.1177/1747021818766467
29.
SubramaniamS.KyonkaE. (2019). Selective attention in pigeon temporal discrimination. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 298–310. doi:10.1080/17470218.2017.1360921
30.
UengoerM.DwyerD. M.KoenigS.PearceJ. M. (2019). A test for a difference in the associability of blocked and uninformative cues in human predictive learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/17470218.2017.1345957
31.
VogelE. H.PonceF. P.WagnerA. R. (2019). The development and present status of the SOP model of associative learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72: 346–374. doi:10.1177/1747021818777074
32.
WillsS.MackintoshN. J. (1998). Peak shift on an artificial dimension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section B, 51, 1–32. doi:10.1080/027249998393393