Recent work has begun to focus on the role that individual differences in executive function and intelligence have on the production of fluent speech. However, isolating the underlying causes of different types of disfluency has been difficult given the speed and complexity of language production. In this study, we focused on the role of memory abilities and verbal intelligence, and we chose a task that relied heavily on memory for successful performance. Given the task demands, we hypothesised that a substantial proportion of disfluencies would be due to memory retrieval problems. We contrasted memory abilities with individual differences in verbal intelligence as previous work highlighted verbal intelligence as an important factor in disfluency production. A total of 78 participants memorised and repeated 40 syntactically complex sentences, which were recorded and coded for disfluencies. Model comparisons were carried out using hierarchical structural equation modelling. Results showed that repetitions were significantly related to verbal intelligence. Unfilled pauses and repairs, in contrast, were marginally (p < .09) related to memory abilities. The relationship in all cases was negative. Conclusions explore the link between different types of disfluency and particular problems arising in the course of production, and how individual differences inform theoretical debates in language production.
AckermanP. L.BeierM. E.BoyleM. O. (2005). Working memory and intelligence: The same or different constructs?Psychological Bulletin, 131, 30–60.
2.
AndersonJ. C.GerbingD. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–
423.
3.
AndersonS. W.DamasioH.JonesR. D.TranelD. (1991). Wisconsin card sorting performance as a measure of frontal lobe damage. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 13, 909–922.
4.
ArdilaA.PinedaD.RosselliM. (2000). Correlation between intelligence test scores and executive function measures. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15, 31–36.
5.
ArnoldJ. E.LosongcoA.WasowT.GinstromR. (2000). Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language, 76(1), 28–55.
6.
ArnoldJ. E.TanenhausM. K.AltmannR. J.FagnanoM. (2004). The old and thee, uh, new—Disfluency and reference resolution. Psychological Science, 15, 578–582.
7.
BaddeleyA. D.LogieR. H. (1999). Working memory: The multicomponent model. In MiyakeA.ShahP. (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 28–
61). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BarkleyR. A. (1997). Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 65–94.
9.
BarkleyR. A.MurphyK. R. (2006). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A clinical workbook (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
10.
BarrD. J. (2001). Trouble in mind: Paralinguistic indices of effort and uncertainty in communication. In CavéC.GuaïtellaI.SantiS. (Eds.), Oralité et gestualité: Interactions et comportements multimodaux dans la communication [Oral and gesture: interactions and multimodal behaviours in communication] (pp. 597–600). Paris, France: L’Harmattan.
11.
BatesT. C.StoughC. (1997). Processing speed, attention, and intelligence: Effects of spatial attention on decisions time in high and low IQ subjects. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 861–868.
12.
BelardiK. M.WilliamsD. L. (2009). Disruptions in spontaneous language in HFA: Indicators of linguistic processing challenges. Presented at the International Meeting for Autism Research, 7–9 May 2009, Chicago, IL.
13.
BergT.SchadeU. (1992). The role of inhibition in a spreading activation model of language production. Part 1: The psycholinguistic perspective. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, 405–434.
14.
BlackmerE. R.MittonJ. L. (1991). Theories of monitoring and timing of repairs in spontaneous speech. Cognition, 39, 173–194.
15.
BockJ. K.LeveltW. J. M. (1994). Language production: Grammatical encoding. In GernsbacherM. A. (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 945–984). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
16.
BockK. (1996). Language production: Methods and methodologies. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 395–
421.
17.
BortfeldH.LeonS. D.BloomJ. E.SchoberM. F.BrennanS. E. (2001). Disfluency rates in spontaneous speech: Effects of age, relationship, topic, role, and gender. Language and Speech, 44, 123–147.
18.
BrennanS. E.WilliamsM. (1995). The feeling of Another’s Knowing: Prosody and filled pauses as cues to listeners about the metacognitive states of speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 383–398.
19.
BrownW. (1910). Some experimental results in the correlation of mental abilities. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 296–322.
20.
BurgessP. W. (1997). Theory and methodology in executive function research. In RabbittP. (Ed.), Methodology of frontal and executive function (pp. 81–116). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
21.
CarrollJ. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
22.
ChristiansonK.HollingworthA.HalliwellJ.FerreiraF. (2001). Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 368–407.
23.
ClarkH. H. (1994). Managing problems in speaking. Speech Communication, 15, 243–250.
24.
ClarkH. H.Fox TreeJ. E. (2002). Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84, 73–
111.
25.
ClarkH. H.WasowT. (1998). Repeating words in spontaneous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 37, 201–242.
26.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27.
CooperP. V. (1990). Discourse production and normal aging: Performance on oral picture description tasks. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 45, 210–
214.
28.
DearyI. J. (2001). Intelligence: A very short introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
29.
DeeseJ. (1984). Pauses, prosody, and the demands of production in language. In DechertH. W.RaupachM. (Ed.), Temporal variables in speech (pp. 69–
84). The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
30.
De JongN. H.BoskerH. R. (2013). Choosing a threshold for silent pauses to measure second language fluency. In Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech (DiSS) (pp. 17–20).
31.
DellG. S. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in language production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–
321.
32.
DellG. S.BurgerL. K.SvecW. R. (1997). Language production and serial order: A functional analysis and a model. Psychological Review, 104, 123–147.
33.
DellG. S.ChangF.GriffinZ. M. (1999). Connectionist models of language production: Lexical access and grammatical encoding. Cognitive Science, 23, 517–
542.
34.
DellG. S.O’SeaghdhaP. G. (1992). Stages of lexical access in language production. Cognition, 42, 287–314.
35.
DencklaM. B. (1996). A theory and model of executive function: A neuropsychological perspective. In LyonG. R.KrasnegorN. A. (Eds.), Attention, memory, and executive function (pp. 263–278). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
36.
DuncanJ.JohnsonR.SwalesM.FreerC. (1997). Frontal lobe deficits after head injury: Unity and diversity of function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 713–
741.
37.
EngelhardtP. E.AlfridijantaO.McMullonM.CorleyM. (2017). Speaker-versus listener-oriented disfluency: A re-examination of arguments and assumptions from Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Autism Develop-mental Disorders, 47, 2885–
2898.
38.
EngelhardtP. E.CorleyM.NiggJ. T.FerreiraF. (2010). The role of inhibition in the production of disfluencies. Memory & Cognition, 38, 617–
628.
39.
EngelhardtP. E.FerreiraF.NiggJ. T. (2009). Priming sentence production in adolescents and adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 995–
1006.
40.
EngelhardtP. E.FerreiraF.NiggJ. T. (2011). Language production strategies and disfluencies in multi-clause network descriptions: A study of adult attention-deficit hyper-activity disorder. Neuropsychology, 25, 442–453.
41.
EngelhardtP. E.NiggJ. T.FerreiraF. (2013). Is the fluency of language outputs related to individual differences in intelligence and executive function?Acta Psychologica, 144, 424–
432.
42.
EngelhardtP. E.VeldS.NiggJ. T.FerreiraF. (2012). Are language production problems apparent in adults who no longer meet diagnostic criteria for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder?Cognitive Neuropsychology, 29, 275–299.
43.
FerreiraF. (1991). Effects of length and syntactic complexity on initiation times for prepared utterances. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 210–
233.
44.
FerreiraF.ChristiansonK.HollingworthA. (2001). Misinterpretations of garden-path sentences: Implications for models of reanalysis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 3–20.
45.
FerreiraF.EngelhardtP. E. (2006). Syntax and production. In TraxlerM.GernsbacherM. A. (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 61–91). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Inc.
46.
FinlaysonI. R.CorleyM. (2012). Disfluency in dialogue: An intentional signal from the speaker?Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19, 921–
928.
47.
ForsterK. I.ChambersS. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627–635.
48.
Fox TreeJ. E.ClarkH. H. (1997). Pronouncing “the” as “thee” to signal problems in speaking. Cognition, 62, 151–167.
49.
FraundorfS. H.WatsonD. G. (2013). Alice’s adventures in um-derland: Psycholinguistic sources of variation in disfluency production. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29, 1083–1096.
50.
FriedmanN. P.HaberstickB. C.WillcuttE. G.MiyakeA.YoungS. E.CorleyR. P.HewittJ. K. (2007). Greater attention problems during childhood predict poorer executive functioning in late adolescents. Psychological Science, 18, 893–
900.
51.
FriedmanN. P.MiyakeA. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control processes: A latent variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 101–135.
52.
FriedmanN. P.MiyakeA.CorleyR. P.YoungS. E.DeFriesJ. C.HewittJ. K. (2006). Not all executive functions are related to intelligence. Psychological Science, 17, 172–179.
53.
FromkinV. (1973). Slips of the tongue. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman.
54.
GanushchakL. Y.SchillerN. O. (2008). Brain error-monitoring activity is affected by semantic relatedness: An event-related brain potentials study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 927–940.
55.
GarrettM. F. (1975). The analysis of sentence production. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 9, 133–177.
56.
GarrettM. F. (1982). Production of speech: Observations from normal and pathological language use. In EllisA. (Ed.), Normality and pathology in cognitive functions (pp. 19–76). London, England: Academic Press.
57.
GoldenC. J. (1978). Stroop color and word test: A manual for clinical and experimental issues. Wood Dale, IL: Stoelting.
58.
Goldman-EislerF. (1968). Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. New York, NY: Academic Press.
59.
GonzalezR.GriffinD. (2001). Testing parameters in structural equation modeling: Every “one” matters. Psychological Methods, 6, 258–
269.
60.
GriffinZ. M. (2001). Gaze durations during speech reflect word selection and phonological encoding. Cognition, 82(1), B1–B14.
61.
HarleyT. A. (2013). The psychology of language: From data to theory. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
62.
HarleyT. A.MacAndrewS. B. G. (2001). Constraints upon word substitutions speech errors. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 395–418.
63.
HartsuikerR. J.BarkhuysenP. H. (2006). Language production and working memory: The case of subject-verb agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 181–
204.
64.
HartsuikerR. J.KolkH. H. J. (2001). Error monitoring in speech production: A computational test of the perceptual loop theory. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 113–157.
65.
HartsuikerR. J.NotebaertL. (2010). Lexical access problems lead to disfluencies in speech. Experimental Psychology, 57, 169–171.
66.
HeatonR. K.CheluneG. J.TalleyJ. L.KayG. G.CurtissG. (1993). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Manual: Revised and expanded. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
67.
HolroydC. B.ColesM. G. H. (2002). The neural basis of human error processing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine and the error-related-negativity. Psychological Review, 109, 679–709.
68.
HowellP.Au-YuengJ. (1999). The EXPLAIN theory of fluency control applied to the diagnosis of stuttering. Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science Series, 4, 75–94.
69.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
70.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to under-parameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453.
71.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cuttoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.
72.
HusseyE. K.WardN.ChristiansonK.KramerA. F. (2015). Language and memory improvements following tDCS of executive-control brain regions. PLoS ONE. Advance online publication. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141417
73.
JesterJ. J.NiggJ. T.PuttlerL. I.LongJ.FitzgeraldH. E.ZuckerR. A. (2009). Intergenerational transmission of neuropsychological executive functioning. Brain and Cognition, 70, 145–153.
74.
JouJ.HarrisR. J. (1992). The effect of divided attention on speech perception. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 301–304.
75.
KaneM. J.HambrickD. Z.WilhelmO.PayneT.TuholskiS.EngleR. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: A latent variable approach to verbal and visuo-spatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 189–217.
76.
KempenG. (1978). Sentence construction by a psychologically plausible formulator. In CampbellR.SmithP (Eds.), Recent advances in the psychology of language: Formal and experimental approaches (pp. 103–123). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
77.
KempenG.HuijbersP. (1983). The lexicalization process in sentence production and naming: Indirect election of words. Cognition, 14, 185–209.
78.
KemperS. (1992). Adults’ sentence fragments: Who, what, when, where, and why. Communication Research, 19, 444–
458.
79.
KlineP. (1991). Intelligence: The psychometric view. London, England: Routledge.
80.
KlineR. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford.
81.
KormosJ.DenesM. (2004). Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System, 32, 145–164.
82.
LakeJ. K.HumphreysK. R.CardyS. (2011). Listener vs. speaker-oriented aspects of speech: Studying the disfluencies of individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18, 135–140.
83.
LansbergeM. M.KenemansJ. L.van EngelandH. (2007). Stroop interference and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychology, 21, 251–262.
84.
Le DorzeG.BedardC. (1998). Effects of age and education on the lexico-semantic content of connected speech in adults. Journal of Communication Disorders, 31, 53–
71.
85.
LeveltW. J. (2001). Spoken word production: A theory of lexical access. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 13464–13471.
86.
LeveltW. J. M. (1981). Linearization in describing spatial networks. In PetersS.SaarinenE. (Eds.), Processes, beliefs, and questions (pp. 199–220). London, England: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
87.
LeveltW. J. M. (1982). Surface form and memory in question answering. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 78–106.
88.
LeveltW. J. M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14, 41–104.
89.
LeveltW. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
90.
LeveltW. J. M. (1999). Producing spoken language: A blueprint for the speaker. In BrownC. M.HagoortP. (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 83–122). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
91.
LeveltW. J.RoelofsA.MeyerA. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–38.
92.
LeveltW. J. M.SchriefersH.VorbergD.MeyerA. S.PechmannT.HavingaJ. (1991). The time course of lexical access in speech production: A study of picture naming. Psychological Review, 98, 122–142.
93.
LoganG. D. (1985). Executive control of thought and action. Acta Psychologica, 60, 193–210.
94.
LukeS. G.HendersonJ. M.FerreiraF. (2015). Children’s eye-movements during reading reflects the quality of lexical representations: An individual differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 1675–1683.
95.
MaclayH.OsgoodC. E. (1959). Hesitation phenomenon in spontaneous English speech. Word, 15, 19–44.
96.
MartelM.NikolasM.NiggJ. T. (2007). Executive function in adolescents with ADHD. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 46, 1437–1444.
97.
MartinN. G. (2001). Genetic covariance among measures of information processing speed, working memory, and IQ. Behavior Genetics, 31, 581–592.
98.
McCartneyK.BurchinalM. R.BubK. L. (2006). Best practices in quantitative methods for developmentalists. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 71, 1–145.
99.
MiyakeA.FriedmanN. P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 8–14.
100.
MiyakeA.FriedmanN. P.EmersonM. J.WitzkiA. H.HowerterA.WagerT. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.
101.
MiyakeA.FriedmanN. P.RettingerD. A.ShahP.HegartyM. (2001). How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 621–640.
102.
MortensenL.MeyerA. S.HumphreysG. W. (2006). Age-related changes in object naming: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 238–290.
103.
NiggJ. T. (2001). Is ADHD a disinhibtion disorder?Psychological Bulletin, 127, 571–598.
104.
NiggJ. T.CarrL. A.MartelM. M.HendersonJ. M. (2007). Concepts of inhibition and developmental psychopathology. In MacCleodC.GorfeinD. (Eds.), Inhibition in Cognition (pp. 259–277). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
105.
NooteboomS. G. (1980). Speaking and unspeaking: Detection and correction of phonological and lexical errors in spontaneous speech. In FromkinV. A. (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand (pp. 87–95). New York, NY: Academic Press.
106.
NunnallyC. J. (1978). Psychometric methods. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
107.
O’ConnellD. C.KowalS. (2005). Uh and Um revisited: Are they interjections for signaling delay?Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, 555–
576.
108.
OomenC. C. E.PostmaA. (2001). Effects of time pressure on mechanisms of speech production and self-monitoring. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 163–
184.
109.
OomenC. C. E.PostmaA. (2002). Limitations in processing resources and speech monitoring. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 163–184.
110.
PaivioA.ClarkJ. M.DigdonN.BonsT. (1989). Referential processing: Reciprocity and correlates of naming and imaging. Memory & Cognition, 17, 163–174.
111.
PenningtonB. F.OzonoffS. (1996). Executive functions and developmental psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 51–
87.
112.
PickeringM. J.BraniganH. P.McLeanJ. F. (2002). Constituent structure is formulated in one stage. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 586–605.
113.
PostmaA. (1997). On the mechanisms of speech monitoring. In HulstijnW.PetersH.Van LieshoutP. (Eds.), Speech production: Motor control, brain research, and fluency disorders (pp. 495–501). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
114.
PostmaA. (2000). Detection of errors during speech production: A review of speech monitoring models. Cognition, 77, 97–
131.
115.
PostmaA.KolkH.PovelD. J. (1990). On the relation among speech errors, disfluencies, and self-repairs. Language and Speech, 33, 19–29.
116.
RabbittP. (Ed.) (1997). Methodology of frontal and executive function. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
117.
RedfordM. A. (2013). A comparative analysis of pausing in child and adult storytelling. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 569–589.
118.
RoelofsA. (2003). Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: Modelling attentional control in the Stroop task. Psychological Review, 110, 88–
125.
119.
SamuelsonL. K.JenkinsG. W.SpencerJ. P. (2015). Grounding cognitive-level processes in behavior: The view from dynamic systems theory. Topics in Cognitive Science, 7, 191–205.
120.
SandsonJ.OblerL. K.AlbertM. L. (1987). Language changes in healthy aging and dementia. In RosenbergS. (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics (pp. 264–292). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
121.
SatorraA.BentlerP. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–
514.
122.
SchacharR.TannockR.MarriottM.LoganG. D. (1995). Deficient inhibitory control and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 23, 411–437.
123.
Schmitter-EdgecombeM.VesneskiM.JonesD. W. R. (2000). Aging and word-finding: A comparison of spontaneous and constrained naming tests. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15, 479–493.
124.
SchnadtM. J.CorleyM. (2006). The influence of lexical, conceptual and planning based factors on disfluency production. In Proceedings of the 28th Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1–6). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. Available at: https://cloudfront.escholarship.org/dist/prd/content/qt9337x2hk/qt9337x2hk.pdf
125.
SchriefersH.MeyerA. S.LeveltW. J. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(1), 86–102.
126.
SeverensE.Van LommelS.RatinckxE.HartsuikerR. J. (2005). Timed picture naming norms for 590 pictures in Dutch. Acta Psychologica, 119, 159–187.
127.
ShaferJ. L.GrahamJ. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177.
128.
ShaoZ.MeyerA. S.RoelofsA. (2013). Selective and nonselective inhibition of competitors in picture naming. Memory & Cognition, 41, 1200–
1211.
129.
ShaoZ.RoelofsA.MeyerA. S. (2012). Sources of individual differences in the speed of naming objects and actions: The contribution of executive control. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1927–
1944.
130.
ShribergE. (1996, October3-6). Disfluencies in Switchboard. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP), (Vol. Addendum, pp. 11–
14), Philadelphia, PA.
131.
ShribergL. D.PaulR.McSweenyJ. L.KlinA.CohenD. J.VolkmarF. R. (2001). Speech and prosody characteristics of adolescents and adults with high-functioning autism and Asperger syndrome. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 1097–
1115.
132.
SmithV. L.ClarkH. H. (1993). On the course of answering questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(1), 25–
38.
133.
SpearmanC. (1910). Correlation calculated from faulty data. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 271–
295.
134.
SpearmanC. (1927). The abilities of man. London, England: Macmillan.
135.
StevensJ. P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
136.
StroopJ. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.
137.
StussD. T.BensonD. F. (1986). The frontal lobes. New York, NY: Raven Press.
138.
SuhJ.EigstiI.NaiglesL.BartonM.KellyE.FeinD. (2014). Narrative performance of optimal outcome children and adolescents with a history of an autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44, 1681–1694.
139.
SwertsM.KrahmerE. (2005). Audiovisual prosody and feeling of knowing. Journal of Memory and Language, 53(1), 81–94.
140.
Tager-FlusbergH.PaulR.LordC. (2005). Language and communication in autism. In VolkmarF. R.PaulR.KlinA.CohenD. (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders, Vol. 1: Diagnosis, development, neurobiology, and behavior (3rd ed., pp. 335–364). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
141.
TannockR.SchacharR. (1996). Executive dysfunction as an underlying mechanism of behavior and language problems in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. In BeitchmanJ.CohenN.KonstantearasM. M.TannockR. (Eds.), Language, learning, and behavior disorders (pp. 128–155). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
142.
TeuberH. L. (1972). Unity and diversity of frontal lobe functions. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 32, 615–656.
143.
ThurberC.Tager-FlusbergH. (1993). Pauses in the narratives produced by autistic, mentally retarded, and normal children as an index of cognitive demand. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 23, 309–322.
144.
UnderwoodB. J. (1975). Individual differences as a crucible in theory construction. American Psychologist, 30, 128–134.
145.
VitkovitchM.TyrrellL. (1995). Sources of disagreement in object naming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 822–848.
146.
VosseT.KempenG. (2000). Syntactic structure assembly in human parsing: A computational model based on competitive inhibition and lexicalist grammar. Cognition, 75, 105–143.
147.
VuongL. C.MartinR. C. (2013). Domain-specific executive control and the revision of misinterpretations in sentence comprehension. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29, 312–325.
148.
WechslerD. (1997a). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
149.
WechslerD. (1997b). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
150.
WheeldonL. R.LeveltW. J. M. (1995). Monitoring the time course of phonological encoding. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 311–334.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
