Recent studies suggest that the continuous flow of information that constitutes daily life events is temporally compressed in episodic memory, yet the characteristics and determinants of this compression mechanism remain unclear. This study examined this question using an experimental paradigm incorporating wearable camera technology. Participants experienced a series of real-life events and were later asked to mentally replay various event sequences that were cued by pictures taken during the original events. Estimates of temporal compression (the ratio of the time needed to mentally re-experience an event to the actual event duration) showed that events were replayed, on average, about eight times faster than the original experiences. This compression mechanism seemed to operate by representing events as a succession of moments or slices of prior experience separated by temporal discontinuities. Importantly, however, rates of temporal compression were not constant and were lower for events involving goal-directed actions. The results also showed that the perceived duration of events increased with the density of recalled moments of prior experience. Taken together, these data extend our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the temporal compression and perceived duration of real-life events in episodic memory.
AlléM. C.ManningL.PotheegadooJ.CoutelleR.DanionJ.-M.BernaF. (2017). Wearable cameras are useful tools to investigate and remediate autobiographical memory impairment: A systematic PRISMA review. Neuropsychology Review, 27, 81–99.
2.
AndersonS. J.ConwayM. A. (1993). Investigating the structure of autobiographical memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1178–1196.
3.
ArnoldA.IariaG.EkstromA. D. (2016). Mental simulation of routes during navigation involves adaptive temporal compression. Cognition, 157, 14–23.
4.
BaddeleyA. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417–423.
5.
BlockR. A. (1982). Temporal judgments and contextual change. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 530–544.
6.
BlockR. A.HancockP. A.ZakayD. (2010). How cognitive load affects duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. Acta Psychologica, 134, 330–343.
7.
BlockR. A.ReedA. M. (1978). Remembered duration: Evidence for a contextual-change hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 656–665.
8.
BlockR. A.ZakayD. (1997). Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 184–197.
9.
BlockR. A.ZakayD. (2008). Timing and remembering the past, the present, and the future. In GrondinS. (Ed.), Psychology of time (pp. 367–394). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
10.
BonasiaK.BlommesteynJ.MoscovitchM. (2016). Memory and navigation: Compression of space varies with route length and turns. Hippocampus, 12, 9–12.
11.
BrownS. W. (1985). Time perception and attention: The effects of prospective versus retrospective paradigms and task demands on perceived duration. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 115–124.
12.
BrunecI. K.OzubkoJ. D.BarenseM. D.MoscovitchM. (2017). Recollection-dependent memory for event duration in large-scale spatial navigation. Learning & Memory, 24, 104–114.
13.
ChowT. E.RissmanJ. (2017). Neurocognitive mechanisms of real-world autobiographical memory retrieval: Insights from studies using wearable camera technology. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1396, 202–221.
14.
ConwayM. A. (2001). Sensory-perceptual episodic memory and its context: Autobiographical memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 365, 1375–1384.
15.
ConwayM. A. (2008). Exploring episodic memory. In DereE.EastonA.NadelL.HustonJ. P. (Eds.), Handbook of episodic memory (Vol. 18, pp. 19–29). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
16.
ConwayM. A. (2009). Episodic memories. Neuropsychologia, 47, 2305–2313.
17.
CraikF. I. M.GovoniR.Naveh-BenjaminM.AndersonN. D. (2006). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 159–180.
18.
DavidsonT. J.KloostermanF.WilsonM. A. (2009). Hippocampal replay of extended experience. Neuron, 63, 497–507.
19.
DuBrownS.DavachiL. (2013). The influence of context boundaries on memory for the sequential order of events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 693–700.
20.
Erceg-HurnD. M.MirosevichV. M. (2008). Modern robust statistical methods: An easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research. American Psychologist, 63, 591–601.
21.
EzzyatY.DavachiL. (2011). What constitutes an episode in episodic memory?Psychological Science, 22, 243–252.
22.
EzzyatY.DavachiL. (2014). Similarity breeds proximity: Pattern similarity within and across contexts is related to later mnemonic judgments of temporal proximity. Neuron, 81, 1179–1189.
23.
FaberM.GennariS. P. (2015). In search of lost time: Reconstructing the unfolding of events from memory. Cognition, 143, 193–202.
24.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
25.
FieldA. P.WilcoxR. R. (2017). Robust statistical methods: A primer for clinical psychology and experimental psychopathology researchers. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 98, 19–38.
HardB. M.RecchiaG.TverskyB. (2011). The shape of action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 586–604.
28.
HornerA. J.BisbyJ. A.WangA.BogusK.BurgessN. (2016). The role of spatial boundaries in shaping long-term event representations. Cognition, 154, 151–164.
29.
HowardL. R.JavadiA. H.YuY.MillR. D.MorrisonL. C.KnightR.… SpiersH. J. (2014). The hippocampus and entorhinal cortex encode the path and Euclidean distances to goals during navigation. Current Biology, 24, 1331–1340.
30.
JeunehommeO.FolvilleA.StawarczykD.Van der LindenM.D’ArgembeauA. (in press). Temporal compression in episodic memory for real-life events.
31.
KurbyC. A.ZacksJ. M. (2008). Segmentation in the perception and memory of events. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 72–79.
32.
MathôtS.SchreijD.TheeuwesJ. (2012). OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 314–324.
33.
OrnsteinR. E. (1969). On the experience of time. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
34.
PettijohnK. A.ThompsonN. A.TamplinA. K.KrawietzS. A.RadvanskyG. A. (2016). Event boundaries and memory improvement. Cognition, 148, 136–144.
35.
PoynterW. D. (1983). Duration judgment and the segmentation of experience. Memory & Cognition, 11, 77–82.
36.
SheldonS.AmaralR.LevineB. (2017). Individual differences in visual imagery determine how event information is remembered. Memory, 25, 360–369.
37.
SilvaA. R.PinhoL. S.MacedoL.MoulinC. J. A. (2018). A critical review of the effects of wearable cameras on memory. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 28, 117–141.
38.
SkaggsW. E.McnaughtonB. L.WilsonM. A.BarnesC. A. (1996). Theta phase precession in hippocampal neuronal populations and the compression of temporal sequences. Hippocampus, 6, 149–172.
39.
SwallowK. M.ZacksJ. M.AbramsR. A. (2009). Event boundaries in perception affect memory encoding and updating. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 236–257.
40.
TulvingE. (2002). Episodic memory: From mind to brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 1–25.
41.
VannucciM.PelagattiC.ChiorriC.MazzoniG. (2016). Visual object imagery and autobiographical memory: Object Imagers are better at remembering their personal past. Memory, 24, 455–470.
42.
WilcoxR. R. (2012). Introduction to robust estimation and hypothesis testing. Waltham, MA: Academic Press.
43.
YarmeyA. D. (2000). Retrospective duration estimations for variant and invariant events in field situations. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 45–57.
44.
ZacksJ. M.SpeerN. K.SwallowK. M.BraverT. S.ReynoldsJ. R. (2007). Event perception: A mind-brain perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 273–293.
45.
ZacksJ. M.SpeerN. K.SwallowK. M.MaleyC. J. (2010). The brain’s cutting-room floor: Segmentation of narrative cinema. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, Article 168.
