Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Arithmetic facts (AFs) are required when solving problems such as “3 × 4” and refer to calculations for which the correct answer is retrieved from memory. Currently, two important effects that modulate the performance in AFs have been highlighted: the problem size effect and the proactive interference effect. The aim of this study is to investigate possible age-related changes of the problem size effect and the proactive interference effect in AF solving. To this end, the performance of young and older adults was compared in a multiplication production task. Furthermore, an independent measure of proactive interference was assessed to further define the architecture underlying this effect in multiplication solving. The results indicate that both young and older adults were sensitive to the effects of interference and of the problem size. That is, both interference and problem size affected performance negatively: the time needed to solve a multiplication problem increases as the level of interference and the size of the problem increase. Regarding the effect of ageing, the problem size effect remains constant with age, indicating a preserved AF network in older adults. Interestingly, sensitivity to proactive interference in multiplication solving was less pronounced in older than in younger adults suggesting that part of the proactive interference has been overcome with age.

Keywords

Proactive interference problem size ageing arithmetic facts numerical cognition

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

P. A.

Bucur

Lemaire

Duverne

Ogrocki

P. K.

Sanders

R. E.

(2005). Influence of probable Alzheimer’s disease on multiplication verification and production abstract. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 12(1), 1–31.

Allen

P. A.

Smith

A. F.

Jerge

K. A.

Vires-Collins

(1997). Age differences in mental multiplication: Evidence for peripheral but not central decrements. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 52, 81–90.

Apperly

I. A.

Samson

Humphreys

G. W.

(2009). Studies of adults can inform accounts of theory of mind development. Developmental Psychology, 45, 190–201.

Ashcraft

M. H.

(1982). The development of mental arithmetic: A chronometric approach. Developmental Review, 2, 213–236.

Ashcraft

M. H.

(1987). Children’s knowledge of simple arithmetic: A developmental model and simulation. In Bisanz

Brainerd

C. J.

Kail

(Eds.), Formal methods in developmental psychology (pp. 302–338). New York, NY: Springer.

Ashcraft

M. H.

(1992). Cognitive arithmetic: A review of data and theory. Cognition, 44, 75–106.

Ashcraft

M. H.

Christy

K. S.

(1995). The frequency of arithmetic facts in elementary texts: Addition and multiplication in grades 1-6. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 396–421.

Ashcraft

M. H.

Guillaume

M. M.

(2009). Chapter 4: Mathematical cognition and the problem size effect. In Ross

(Series Ed.), The psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 51, pp. 121–151). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.

Boles

D. B.

Clifford

J. E.

(1989). An upper- and lowercase alphabetic similarity matrix, with derived generation similarity values. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 21, 579–586.

10.

Campbell

J. I.

(1995). Mechanisms of simple addition and multiplication: A modified network-interference theory and simulation. Mathematical Cognition, 1, 121–164.

11.

Campbell

J. I.

Graham

D. J.

(1985). Mental multiplication skill: Structure, process, and acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology/revue Canadienne De Psychologie, 39, 338–366.

12.

Campbell

J. I.

Xue

(2001). Cognitive arithmetic across cultures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 299–315.

13.

Cerella

(1991). Age effects may be global, not local: Comment on Fisk and Rogers (1991). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 215–223.

14.

Chiappe

Siegel

L. S.

Hasher

(2000). Working memory, inhibitory control, and reading disability. Memory & Cognition, 28, 8–17.

15.

De Brauwer

Verguts

Fias

. (2006). The representation of multiplication facts: Developmental changes in the problem size, five, and tie effects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94, 43–56.

16.

De Visscher

Berens

S. C.

Keidel

J. L.

Noël

M.-P.

Bird

C. M

. (2015). The interference effect in arithmetic fact solving: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 116, 92–101.

17.

De Visscher

Noël

M.-P

. (2013). A case study of arithmetic facts dyscalculia caused by a hypersensitivity-to-interference in memory. Cortex, 49, 50–70.

18.

De Visscher

Noël

M.-P

. (2014). The detrimental effect of interference in multiplication facts storing: Typical development and individual differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 2380–2400.

19.

Eidswick

(2012). A Bayesian alternative to null hypothesis significance testing. Shinken Research Bulletin, 16(1), 2–15.

20.

Geary

D. C.

(1993). Mathematical disabilities: Cognitive, neuropsychological, and genetic components. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 345–362.

21.

Geary

D. C.

Frensch

P. A.

Wiley

J. G.

(1993). Simple and complex mental subtraction: Strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 8, 242–256.

22.

Geary

D. C.

Wiley

J. G.

(1991). Cognitive addition: Strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in young and elderly adults. Psychology and Aging, 6, 474–483.

23.

Hamann

M. S.

Ashcraft

M. H.

(1986). Textbook presentations of the basic addition facts. Cognition and Instruction, 3, 173–202.

24.

Imbo

Vandierendonck

(2008). Effects of problem size, operation, and working-memory span on simple-arithmetic strategies: Differences between children and adults? Psychological Research, 72, 331–346.

25.

Jonides

Marshuetz

Smith

E. E.

Reuter-Lorenz

P. A.

Koeppe

R. A.

Hartley

(2000). Age differences in behavior and PET activation reveal differences in interference resolution in verbal working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 188–196.

26.

Jordan

N. C.

Montani

T. O.

(1997). Cognitive arithmetic and problem solving a comparison of children with specific and general mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 624–634.

27.

LeFevre

J.-A.

Bisanz

Daley

K. E.

Buffone

Greenham

S. L.

Sadesky

G. S.

(1996). Multiple routes to solution of single-digit multiplication problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 284–306.

28.

Loosli

S. V.

Rahm

Unterrainer

J. M.

Weiller

Kaller

C. P.

(2014). Developmental change in proactive interference across the life span: Evidence from two working memory tasks. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1060–1072.

29.

Love

Selker

Marsman

Jamil

Dropmann

Verhagen

A. J.

. . . Wagenmakers

E.-J.

(2015). [Computer Software]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.

30.

May

C. P.

Hasher

Kane

M. J.

(1999). The role of interference in memory span. Memory & Cognition, 27, 759–767.

31.

McCloskey

Lindemann

A. M.

(1992). Chapter 10: Mathnet: Preliminary results from a distributed model of arithmetic fact retrieval. In Campbell

J. I. D.

(Ed.), Advances in psychology (Vol. 91, pp. 365–409). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.

32.

Miller

Perlmutter

Keating

(1984). Cognitive arithmetic: Comparison of operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 46–60.

33.

Monsell

(1978). Recency, immediate recognition memory, and reaction time. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 465–501.

34.

Nasreddine

Z. S.

Phillips

N. A.

Bédirian

Charbonneau

Whitehead

Collin

Chertkow

(2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53, 695–699.

35.

Penner-Wilger

Leth-Steensen

LeFevre

J.-A.

(2002). Decomposing the problem-size effect: A comparison of response time distributions across cultures. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1160–1167.

36.

Stazyk

E. H.

Ashcraft

M. H.

Hamann

M. S.

(1982). A network approach to mental multiplication. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 320–335.

37.

Thompson-Schill

S. L.

Jonides

Marshuetz

Smith

E. E.

D’Esposito

Kan

I. P.

… Swick

(2002). Effects of frontal lobe damage on interference effects in working memory. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2, 109–120.

38.

Verguts

Fias

(2005). Interacting neighbors: A connectionist model of retrieval in single-digit multiplication. Memory & Cognition, 33(1), 1–16.

39.

Wagenmakers

E.-J.

Wetzels

Borsboom

van der Maas

H. L. J.

(2011). Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: The case of Psi: Comment on Bem (2011). Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 100, 426–432.

40.

Zbrodoff

N. J.

Logan

G. D.

(2005). What everyone finds: The problem-size effect. In Campbell

J. I. D.

(Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 331–345). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.05 MB

Impact of ageing on problem size and proactive interference in arithmetic facts solving

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material