There is a lack of procedure in the UK guiding social researchers faced with ethical questions. In particular, investigators concerned with family violence and its effects on children face some of the most complex ethical dilemmas in social research and there is a need for greater transparency of ethical procedures.
This paper summarizes some key ethical principles guiding social research focused on children, and the decisions that researchers face when conducting studies in the area of child maltreatment or domestic violence. A case example of a study conducted in Dublin, Ireland is used to illustrate difficulties surrounding decisions of informed consent, confidentiality and disclosure, distress and danger, and questioning children directly about their experiences of family violence. The advice of the ethics committee and the solutions agreed by the research team are shared.
While the study was subject to a review by an independent ethics committee, in the absence of nationally-recognized or agreed guidelines, good ethical practice is largely dependent upon the moral judgments of the research team. It is hoped that by providing one such case example, others might be encouraged to report on their own ethical protocols and procedures.
AllmarkP. The ethics of research with children. Nurse Researcher2002; 10(2): 7–19.
4.
Note that the Declaration of Helsinki no longer distinguishes between these two forms of research and speaks instead about the risk and benefit potential for participants, however, the terms are still widely used.
5.
RamseyP. Consent as a canon of loyalty with special reference to children in medical investigation. In RamseyP (ed) The patient as a person. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1970: 11–12.
6.
PunchS. Research with children: the same or different from research with adults?Childhood2002; 9(3): 321–341.
7.
National Research Council. Ethical and legal issues in child maltreatment research. In Understanding child abuse and neglect. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1993: 324–342.
8.
StrausMAGellesRJSteinmetzS. Behind closed doors: Violence in the American family. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor1980.
9.
MorrowVRichardsM. The ethics of social research with children: an overview. Children in Society1996; 10(2): 90–105.
10.
Children Act 1989. London, The Stationery Office.
11.
KennedyIGrubbA. (eds) Principles of medical law. Oxford: OUP, 1998.
12.
AllmarkP: Op cit, p7.
13.
Gillick competence is a principle recognized in the medical field, where a child under the age of 16 years, with sufficient understanding and intelligence, has the right to consent to medical treatment. It cannot be overruled by parental responsibility, although it can be overruled by the court. The principle does not give the child the right to refuse treatment. The term originated in the case Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority [1985] AC 112.
14.
The Press Complaints Commission and the Market Research Society.
15.
KingNMPChurchillLR. Ethical principles guiding research on child and adolescent subjects. Journal of Interpersonal Violence2000; 15(7): 710–724.
16.
The Declaration was developed by the World Medical Association and adopted in Helsinki, Finland in 1964. It is a set of ethical principles and guidelines for the medical community relating to human experimentation, and although many counties recognize it, it is not legally binding in international law.
17.
KingNMP, Churchill LR. Op cit, p712.
18.
Ibid, p713.
19.
FontesLA. Ethics in family violence research: cross-cultural issues. Family Relations1998; 47: 53–61.
20.
The Declaration of Helsinki ‘IV’ requires that concern for the interests of the subject must always prevail over the interests of science and society.
21.
KingNMPChurchillLR. Op cit, p716.
22.
McCormickR. Proxy consent in the experimental situation. Perspectives in biology and medicine1974; 18: 2–20.
23.
The term ‘family violence’ is used here to refer to studies of child maltreatment, including abuse and neglect, as well as domestic violence between intimate partners or parents of children.
24.
TaylorJBaldwinNSpencerN. Predicting child abuse and neglect: ethical, theoretical and methodological challenges. J Clin Nurs2008; 17: 1193–1200.
25.
PeledE. Ethically sound research on children's exposure to domestic violence: a proposal. In Graham-BermannSAEdlesonJL (eds). Domestic violence in the lives of children: the future of research, intervention, and social policy. Washington DC: American Psychological Association, 2001: 111–132.
26.
MorrowVRichardsM. Op cit.
27.
BronfenbrennerU. Principles of professional ethics: Cornell studies in social growth. Am Psychol1952; 7(8): 452–455.
28.
AldersonPeg. Listening to children: children, ethics and social research. Barkingside: Barnardo's1995.
29.
StrausMA. Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: the conflict tactics scales. JMarriage Family1979; 41: 75–88.
30.
CreightonSGhateDHazelNFieldJFinchS. Putting the Conflict Tactics Scale in context in violence from parent to child. In LeeRMStankoEA (eds) Researching violence: essays on methodology and measurement. London: Routledge, 2003: 30–48.
31.
RichtersJEMartinezPE. The NIMH community violence project: I. Children as victims of and witnesses to violence. Psychiatry1993; 56: 7–21.
32.
(i) KotchJB. Ethical issues in longitudinal child maltreatment research. Journal of Interpersonal Violence2000; 15(7): 696–709.
33.
(ii) KnightEDRunyanDKDubowitzHBrandfordCKotchJLitrownikAHunterW. Methodological and ethical challenges associated with child self-report of maltreatment: solutions implemented by the LONGSCAN Consortium. Journal of Interpersonal Violence2000; 15(7): 760–775.
34.
KinardEM. Ethical issues in research with abused children. Child Abuse & Neglect1985; 9: 301–311.
35.
StrausMA. Protecting human subjects in observational research: The case of family violence. In FilsingerEELewisRA (eds) Assessing marriage. New behavioural approaches. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1981: 272–286.
36.
CreightonS. Op cit.
37.
MorrowVRichardsM. Op cit.
38.
PeledE. Op cit.
39.
(i) CarterB. Tick box for child? The ethical positioning of children as vulnerable, researchers as barbarians and reviewers as overly cautious. International Journal of Nursing, (in Press, available online 11 February 2009).
40.
(ii) ValentineGButlerRSkeltonT. The ethical and methodological complexities of doing research with ‘vulnerable’ young people. Ethics, Place and Environment2001; 4(2): 119–125.
41.
BostockL. ‘God, she's gonna report me’: The ethics of child protection in poverty research. Children & Society2002; 16: 273–283.
42.
KalichmanSC. Mandated reporting of suspected child abuse, ethics law, and policy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association1993.
43.
There is interstate variability in the US about who, in addition to health professionals, is required to report suspected abuse, although many consider it a moral obligation. A few states in the US define domestic violence as abuse, which is subject to the same reporting laws as physical or sexual abuse.
44.
The US allows a certificate of confidentiality to be requested, which exempts the research project from ‘legislative, judicial, or administrative attempts to obtain confidential project information’, which includes unreported abuse (Kotch JB. Op cit, p700).
45.
AllenB. Are researchers ethically obligated to report suspected child maltreatment? A critical analysis of opposing perspectives. Ethics & Behaviour2009; 19: 15–24.
46.
SteinbergAMPynoosRSGoenjianAKSossanabadiHSherrL. Are researchers bound by child abuse reporting laws?Child Abuse & Neglect1999; 23(8): 771–777.
47.
(i) RunyanDK. Introduction to the special issue: The ethical, legal, and methodological implications of directly asking children about abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence2000; 15(7): 675–681.
48.
(ii) PutmanFLissMLandsverkJ. Ethical issues in maltreatment research with children and adolescents. In HoagwoodKJensenPFisherC (eds). Ethical issues in mental health research with children and adolescents. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1996: 113–134.
49.
See for example Rossman BBR. Longer term effects of children's exposure to domestic violence. In Graham-BermannS (ed). Domestic violence in the lives of children. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2001: 35–65.
50.
GorinSHooperCDysonCCabralC. Ethical challenges in conducting research with hard to reach families. Child Abuse Review2008; 17: 275–287.
51.
CoyneI. Researching children: some methodological and ethical considerations. J Clin Nurs1998; 7: 409–416.
52.
GroverS. Why won't they listen to us? On giving power and voice to children participating in social research. Childhood2004; 11(1): 81–93.
53.
PeledE. Op cit.
54.
SauzierM. Disclosure of child sexual abuse: For better or for worse. Psychiatr Clin N Am1989; 12: 455–469.
55.
(i) StrausMA. Op cit.
56.
(ii) NewmanEKaloupekDGKeaneTMFolsteinSF. Ethical issues in trauma research. In KantorG GrimleyJasinskiJL (eds) Out of the darkness. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1997: 271–281.
57.
(iii) DePrinceAPFreydJJ. Costs and benefits of being asked about trauma history. JTrauma Pract2006; 3: 23–35.
58.
CashmoreJ. Ethical issues concerning consent in obtaining children's reports on their experience of violence. Child Abuse & Neglect2009; 30: 969–977.
59.
MullenderAHagueGImamUKellyLMalosEReganL. Children's perspectives on domestic violence. London: Sage Publications2002.
60.
(i) Amaya-JacksonLSocolarRRSHunterWRunyanDColindresR. Directly questioning children and adolescents about maltreatment: a review of survey measures used. J Interpers Violence2000; 15(7): 725–759.
61.
(ii) RunyanDK. Op cit.
62.
LeiterJMyersKAZingraffMT. Substantiated and unsubstantiated cases of child maltreatment: Do their consequences differ?Soc Work Res1994; 18: 67–82.
63.
CawsonPeg. Child maltreatment in the family. The experience of a national sample of young people. London: NSPCC2002.
64.
Carroll-LindJChapmanJWGregoryJMaxwellG. The key to the gatekeepers: passive consent and other ethical issues surrounding the rights of children to speak on issues that concern them. Child Abuse & Neglect2006; 30: 979–989.
65.
BlackMMPonirakisA. Computer-administered interviews with children about maltreatment: methodological, developmental and ethical issues. Journal of Interpersonal Violence2000; 15(7): 682–695.
66.
BerryVLittleMAxfordNCusickG Ruth. An evaluation of youth at Risk's Coaching for Communities programme. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice2009; 48(1): 60–75.
RESPECT is a project headed up by the Institute for Employment Studies in the UK attempting to develop a set of common European standards and benchmarks
