This is the first of four papers to be published in Research Ethics Review in 2009 that address methodological issues of relevance to research ethics committees. These will be practical papers, intended to assist ethics committee members to determine whether a research method is both ethically justified and likely to lead to high quality research. This paper prepares the way for the series through a consideration of the relationship between research ethics and methodology.
References
1.
AngellELBrymanAAshcroftREDixon-WoodsM. An analysis of decision letters by research ethics committees: the ethics/scientific quality boundary examined. Qual Saf Health Care2008; 17: 131–136.
2.
CoughlinSSBeauchampTL. Ethics, scientific validity and the design of epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology1992; 3: 343–347.
3.
GreenJThorogoodN. Qualitative methods for health research. Sage Publications, 2004.
4.
EmanuelEJWendlerDGradyC. What makes clinical research ethical?JAMA2000; 282: 2701–2711.
5.
GradyC. Ethics of vaccine research. Nat Immunol2004; 5: 465–468.
6.
BreseeJSGlassRIIvanoffBGentschJR. Current status and future priorities for rotavirus vaccine development, evaluation and implementation in developing countries. Vaccine1999; 17: 2207–2222.
7.
MulhollandEK. Global control of rotavirus disease. In: PollardAJMcCrackenGHFinnA (eds.). Hot topics in infection and immunity in children. Adv Experim Med Biol2004; 549: 161–168.
8.
DuValG. Ethics in psychiatric research: study design issues. Can J Psychiatr2004; 49: 55–59.
9.
DjulbegovicBCantorAClarkeM. The importance of the presentation of the ethical principle of equipoise in the design of clinical trials: relative impact of the methodological quality domains on the treatment effect in randomized controlled trials. Acceptability in Research2003; 10: 301–315.
10.
VogelG. Study of HIV transmission sparks ethical debate. Science2000; 288: 22–23.
