This paper considers the roles and definitions of expert and lay members of ethics committees, focussing on those given by the National Research Ethics Service which is mandated to review all research conducted in National Health Service settings in the United Kingdom. It questions the absence of a specified position for the ‘professional ethicist’ and suggests that such individuals will often be lay members of ethics committees, their participation being a reflection of their academic interest and expertise.
The absence of a specified position for professional ethicists and the concomitant but implicit denial of ethical expertise appear to be an anomalous state of affairs if one considers that the training offered to members of ethics committees is often delivered by academic ethicists. It is suggested that this is based on a misunderstanding of the concept ‘ethical expertise’ and that properly understood the ethicist can assist the work of ethics committees by drawing on their expert knowledge.
TinkerACoomberV. University research ethics committees: their role, remit and conduct. King's College London, 2004.
2.
YoderSD. Experts in ethics? The nature of ethical expertise. The Hastings Centre Report1998; 28: 11–19.
3.
EngelhardtHT. The ordination of bioethicists as secular moral experts. Social Philosophy and Policy2002; 19: 59–82.
4.
LevittM. Public consultation in bioethics. What's the point of asking the public when they have neither scientific nor ethical expertise? Health Care Analysis2003; 11: 15–25.
5.
LillehammerH. Who needs bioethicists?Studies in History and Philosophy of Biol & Biomed Sci2004; 35: 131–144.
6.
SokolDK. Meeting the ethical needs of doctors: We need clinical ethicists in addition to other measures. BMJ2005; 330: 741–742.
7.
CowleyD. A new rejection of moral expertise. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy2005; 8: 273–279.
8.
ErikssonSHelgessonGSegerdahlP. Provide expertise or facilitate ethical reflection? A comment on the debate between Cowley and Crosthwaite. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy2006; 9: 389–392.
9.
SteinkampNLGordijnBten HaveH. Debating ethical expertise. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal2008; 18: 173–192.
10.
GordijnBDekkersWEthical expertise revisited. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy2008; 11: 125–126.
11.
VareliusJ. Is ethical expertise possible?Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy2008; 11: 127–132.
For example: SinclairS. Making doctors: an institutional apprenticeship. Berg Publishers, 1997; Atkinson, PA. Medical talk and medical work: the liturgy of the clinic. Sage Publications 1995; and Lupton D. Medicine as culture: illness, disease and the body in Western societies. 2nd edn. Sage Publications, 2003.
15.
HoggCWilliamsonC. Whose interests do lay people represent? Towards an understanding of the role of lay people as members of committees. Health Expectations2001; 4(1): 2–9.
16.
HardingS. Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is ‘strong objectivity’. In AlcoffLPotterE. Feminist Epistemologies. Routledge, 1993. pp 40–82.
17.
‘Laity’ in the Oxford English Dictionary.
18.
CaplanAL. Ethical engineers need not apply: The state of applied ethics today. Science, Technology, & Human Values1980; 6: 24–32.
19.
CaveEHolmS. New governance arrangements for research ethics committees: is facilitating research achieved at the cost of participants’ interest. Jl Med Ethics2002; 28(5): 318–21.
20.
HareRM. Essays on bioethics. New edition. Clarendon Press, 1996.
21.
The Warnock Report (1984): Report of the Committee of Enquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology. London: HMSO.
22.
AshcroftRE. Constructing empirical bioethics: Foucauldian reflections on the empirical turn in bioethics research. Health Care Analysis2003; 11(1): 3–13.
23.
BrockettMGeddesE LynneWestmorlandMSalvatoriP. Moral development or moral decline? A discussion of ethics education for the health care professions. Medical Teacher1997; 19(4): 301–309.
24.
KennedyI. The unmasking of medicine. Rev edn. Flamingo, 1983.
25.
JonsenAR. The abuse of casuistry: A history of moral reasoning. University of California Press, 1992.
26.
JonsenAR. A short history of medical ethics. New York:Oxford University Press1999.
27.
SugarmanJSulmasyD. Methods in medical ethics. Georgetown University Press, 2001.
28.
JacobyLSiminoffL. Empirical methods for bioethics: a primer. 1st edn.JAI Press, 2007.
29.
JeckerNSJonsenARPearlmanRA. Bioethics: an introduction to the history, methods, and practice. 1st edn.Jones & Bartlett Publishers, 1997.
30.
JohnstonP. Bioethics, wisdom and expertise. In: Elliott C. Slow cures and bad philosophers: essays on Wittgenstein, medicine and bioethics. Duke University Press2001. pp.159.
31.
Foucault died at the point in his work where he was beginning to directly consider questions of ethics although others have discussed his interest in matters ‘ethical’ and the possibilities for nor-mativity, both in his work and others who adopt his methodology. See: MooreMC. Ethical discourse and Foucault's conception of ethics. Human Studies1987; 10(1): 81–95: Kolodny N. The ethics of cryptonormativism: a defence of Foucault's evasions. Philosophy & Social Criticism 1996; 22(5): 63.
32.
AndreJ. Bioethics as practice. New edn.University of North Carolina Press, 2004.
