Background: Previous studies have found lapses in ethical safeguards for subjects of critical-care research.
Objective: To assess recently published empiric critical-care research conducted in the United States for the reporting of research protections as they relate to informed consent and surrogate decision-making. Methods: Systematic review of a sample of empiric critical-care research studies published between 2000 and 2004.
Results: Of 51 studies reviewed, consent was reported as having been obtained in 44. Assessment of subjects' decision-making capacity was noted in 35% of studies. Assessments of subjects' capacity was less likely to be reported in studies in which researchers accepted consent from either subjects or from third parties, compared to studies with only subjects' consent (P=0.042). Five studies did not report securing Institutional Review Board approval.
Conclusion: Lapses in the reporting of critical-care research are prevalent.
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm (accessed September 15, 2005).
5.
FreemanBDIsabellaKCobbJPBoyleWAIIISchmiegREJrKolleffMHLinNSaakTThompsonECBuchmanTG. A prospective randomized study comparing percutaneous with surgical tracheostomy in critically-ill patients. Crit Care Med2001; 29(5): 926–930.
6.
WendlerDPrasadK. Core safeguards for clinical research with adults who are unable to consent. Ann Intern Med2001; 135: 514–523.
7.
ESICM Task Force on Legislation Affecting Clinical Research in the Critically Ill Patient. The European Union Directive on Clinical Research: present status of implementation in EU member states’ legislations with regard to the incompetent patient. Intensive Care Med2005; 31: 476–9.
8.
MatotIPizovRSprungCL. Evaluation of institutional review board review and informed consent in publications of human research in critical care medicine. Crit Care Med1998; 26: 1596–1602.
UmpierrezGELatifKStoeverJParkLFreireAXEkitabchiA. Efficacy of subcutaneous insulin Lispro versus continuous intravenous regular insulin for the treatment of patients with diabetic ketoacidosis. Am J Med2004; 117: 291–296.
11.
HoffmanDESchwartzJ. Proxy consent to participation of the decisionally impaired in medical research — Maryland's policy initiative. J. Health Care Law Pol1998; 1: 123–153.
12.
TD, et al. v. New York State Office of Mental Health, et al., 690 N.E. 2d 1259 (N.Y. 1997).
13.
State of California Health and Safety Code: Sections 24170–24179.5.
14.
Internation Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication. http://www.icmje.org/. (accessed May 14, 2006).
