This paper seeks to clarify the process of ethical review primarily through a consideration of the lay member's role; it considers some of the conventional accounts of the role and portrays weaknesses in them. Its positive account places the ethical review service in a wide political context allowing the definition of lay member as a politically-positioned individual in the REC with the function of formally representing the public standards of morality in the medical research context.
References
1.
GreenFA. Further thoughts on the recruitment of REC lay members. Res Ethics Rev2007; 3(1): 8–12.
2.
RichardsonA. A report on the change forum for consumers consultation. COREC, March 2006.
3.
Governance arrangements for NHS research ethics committees. Department of Health, August 2001.
4.
HunterD. The roles of research ethics committees: implications for membership. Res Ethics Rev2007; 3(1): 24–26.
5.
Earl-SlaterA. Lay involvement in health and other research. Abingdon: Radcliffe Medical Press2004.
6.
RawboneR. Editorial. Res Ethics Rev2007; 3(1): 1–2.
